Yes Bank Shares In Focus As Board Approves Raising Rs 16,000 Crore Via Mix Of Equity, Debt
Last Updated:
Yes Bank shares will be in focus on Wednesday as the bank's board has approved raising Rs 16,000 crore
Yes Bank Share Price: Yes Bank shares will be in focus on Wednesday as the bank's board has approved raising Rs 16,000 crore through a mix of equity and debt to support business growth.
The board approved raising funds by issuing eligible equity securities through various permissible routes, ensuring that the total amount raised would not exceed Rs 7,500 crore and would not result in an aggregate dilution of more than 10 per cent (including dilution from any convertible debt securities). This was disclosed in a regulatory filing on Tuesday.
Additionally, the board gave its nod for raising up to Rs 8,500 crore via eligible debt securities, either in Indian or foreign currency, also with the condition that it would not cause a dilution of more than 10 per cent.
The board also approved amendments to the Articles of Association of the bank, in line with the share purchase agreement dated May 9 signed by Yes Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) and State Bank of India (SBI). These amendments are subject to approvals from the Reserve Bank of India and shareholders.
The revised Articles of Association would grant SMBC or any of its permitted assignees the right to nominate two non-executive and non-independent directors to the board, in accordance with applicable laws. Similarly, SBI will be allowed to nominate one non-executive and non-independent director.
Last month, SBI and seven other lenders agreed to sell 20 per cent of their combined stake in Yes Bank to SMBC for Rs 13,483 crore — the largest cross-border investment in India's banking sector.
Upon completion of the deal, SMBC will become the single-largest shareholder of Yes Bank. Of the 20 per cent stake, SBI will dilute 13.19 per cent in favour of SMBC for Rs 8,889 crore, while the remaining 6.81 per cent will be sold by Axis Bank, Bandhan Bank, Federal Bank, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, IDFC First Bank and Kotak Mahindra Bank for about Rs 4,594 crore.
These banks originally invested in Yes Bank in March 2020 as part of the YES Bank Reconstruction Scheme. After the deal, SBI's stake in Yes Bank will reduce to just over 10 per cent.
SMBC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, the second-largest banking group in Japan with total assets of USD 2 trillion as of December 2024 and a significant global footprint.
Yes Bank Q4 Results
Yes Bank posted a strong set of numbers in its Q4FY25 results, reporting a net profit of Rs 738 crore, up 63.3% YoY, supported by reduced provisions and steady asset quality. Net interest income (NII) grew 5.7% to Rs 2,276 crore, while net interest margin (NIM) improved to 2.5%. Non-interest income rose by 10.9% to Rs 1,739 crore, and provisions dropped by 32.5% to Rs 318 crore. Advances increased 8.1% YoY to Rs 2.46 lakh crore, and deposits were up 6.8% at Rs 2.85 lakh crore. Asset quality showed improvement, with gross NPA stable at 1.6% and net NPA falling to 0.3%. The bank's board also approved a fundraising plan, underscoring confidence in its growth strategy.
Yes Bank is a private sector bank in India that was founded in 2004 by Rana Kapoor and Ashok Kapur. It is headquartered in Mumbai and offers a wide range of banking and financial services, including corporate and retail banking, asset management, and wealth management.
First Published:
June 04, 2025, 07:57 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
20 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Non-Mumbai builders tap into financial capital via redevelopment projects
Real estate developers based outside of Mumbai such as Delhi-based DLF, Bengaluru-based Prestige Estates, Puravankara, Pune-based Blackstone-backed Kolte-Patil Developers, Vascon Engineers, and Hyderabad-based Ramky Estates, are foraying into India's largest real estate market through redevelopment projects. While Mumbai has always been India's prime real estate market, policy-level incentives for redevelopments, less capital intensive nature of redevelopment business amid a lack of open land parcels, is attracting developers that are using asset-light strategies to get better realisations from high property rates. 'For developers based outside the MMR, redevelopment offers an effective route to enter the Mumbai market, given the limited availability of greenfield land. Additional attractive factors include higher FSI allowances in slum rehabilitation and society redevelopment projects, which translate to better returns on investment,' said Siddharth Vasudevan, MD, Vascon Engineers. Mumbai's redevelopment market is big enough to accomodate more players like Bengaluru-based Sobha and Ahmedabad-based Arvind Smartspaces are evaluating opportunities. According to Credai-MCHI, over 25,000 buildings across MMR are eligible for redevelopment, with the total estimated project value exceeding Rs 30,000 crore. As per Anarock, as of 2024, average property prices in MMR stood at Rs 16,600 per sq ft, while those in Bengaluru and Hyderabad stood at Rs 8,380 per sq ft and Rs 7,300 per sq ft, respectively. The prices in NCR stood at Rs 7,550 per sq ft. Vijay Agrawal, MD- investment banking, Equirus said that the average margins in real estate are around 25-30 per cent but the Mumbai market is known for higher realisation per square foot, between Rs 25,000 and Rs 1 lakh. 'In other cities, general realisation is between Rs 5,000-12,000, except in a few micro markets. Higher realisations help developers disclose higher revenue with a smaller sales area. This helps in improving their blended per sq ft realisations.' In Mumbai, a developer can book revenue of Rs 500 crore for 1 lakh sq ft of a project with a sale price of Rs 50,000 per sq ft for one project. However, in other markets, a developer will need to sell 5 lakh sq ft of area at Rs 10,000 per sq ft to achieve the same revenue, Agrawal explained. 'Listed companies can meet their topline growth targets by executing projects in this market," Sanjay Daga, CEO and MD, Anex Advisory, said. But the bright opportunity has its challenges. Redevelopment for non-Mumbai developers involves multiple stakeholders, so having a reliable team in a new market in a must. Dealing with local tenants besides higher cost of approvals, construction in smaller area of sites compared to the other cities, are other issues to name a few. 'Developers fail to underwrite the working capital requirement in Mumbai projects. A typical project in other cities is between 5 to 15 acres, while Mumbai's typical project is 0.5 to 3 acres. Construction costs in Mumbai are very steep,' said an industry expert who didn't wish to be named. To overcome these hindrances, developers are forging joint ventures with local developers who already have the land or permissions, and industry experts who hold the ability to deal with the local administration and tenants more effectively. This helps in securing faster approvals and faster project launches. DLF, for its first Mumbai project, has tied up with Trident Realty, a local real estate firm. Prestige, for its mega redevelopment project in Bandra, has joined hands with Mumbai-based Valor Estate and RC Group. Despite strong balance sheets and deep expertise, building trust among buyers will take time. 'Local developers, due to their deep-rooted presence and familiarity with these intricacies, often have an edge,' Shrinivas Rao, CEO, Vestian.
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Which country in Southeast Asia is the most popular among Indian travellers?
Known for its pristine beaches, affordable stays and vibrant nightlife, this country received the highest number of Indian tourists among Southeast Asian countries in 2024. Can you guess which one? Also read: 10 million tourists visited Asia's 'most-loved country' in Q1; more than Thailand, Indonesia India is one of Thailand's most significant tourism markets, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) said in a press release in December 2024 to celebrate the 2 million-mark of Indian tourists in Thailand. In 2023, Indian tourists generated 61.9 billion Baht in revenue for Thailand. More than 35.5 million foreign tourists visited Thailand in 2024. Of these, 2.1 million were Indians. Indian travellers arrive in Thailand around the year. November to February is typically considered the high tourist season, overlapping with winter vacation for schoolchildren in India. Thailand is a popular tourist destination with both bachelors and families. There are plenty of factors that contribute to Thailand's popularity as India's favourite tourist destination, including accessibility, affordability and distance. In its press release, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) said: 'Thailand's strong air connectivity with India has been instrumental in fostering this growth. As of June 2024, 342 weekly flights between the two nations offered 2.9 million seats annually, representing a 92.2% rebound from pre-pandemic levels. Recent additions, including Indigo's Hyderabad-Bangkok route, THAI's Kochi-Bangkok flights, and Thai AirAsia's Vishakhapatnam-Bangkok service, have further enhanced accessibility.' Friendly visa policies are another major factor contributing the footfall. Thailand has visa-free entry for Indians 'until further notice'. Popular tourist destinations in Thailand include Bangkok, Phuket, Chon Buri, Krabi, Chiang Mai and Phang-nga. Places like Phuket and Krabi are known for their stunning beaches and water activities. In Bangkok, tourists can enjoy shopping, visit famous temples like Wat Phra Kaew and Wat Arun, or drop into one of the city's famous rooftop bars. Chiang Mai, located in northern Thailand, is famous for its historic temples, night markets, and mountain landscapes. It also serves as a base for visiting elephant sanctuaries.
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
India's National Manufacturing Mission is just the catalyst this sector needs
India's National Manufacturing Mission (NMM), announced in the Union budget this year, was much awaited. While the sector has grown over the years in size, its contribution to our economy has not gained share. The need to increase manufacturing as a proportion of GDP has always been emphasized and this mission-mode approach announced by the government should make a difference. An ambitious, empowered and inclusive framework is expected to be the hallmark for this mission. It must target a share of at least 12% in global manufacturing output for India, as against the current 3%. Let me share a few thoughts on a framework that could help propel India as a manufacturer. Also Read: Time to re-imagine Indian manufacturing from the ground up The first aspect is the structure of the mission, which could determine the success or failure of the initiative. The NMM can consider a three-tier structure. At the initial level, the government could consider having inter-ministerial task-forces. These should focus on the five key areas spelt out by the finance minister in her budget speech for 2025-26: namely, the ease of doing business; a future-ready workforce; micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs); technology adoption; and quality. These five task-forces could be under the concerned ministries with various stakeholders as members. They should recommend policies, propose roadmaps and drive implementation. The NMM could be headed by a senior industry leader. This can be the second tier. Its main members could be secretaries of key government departments related to manufacturing; they can provide policy and strategic direction. In addition, CEOs from industry associations could be members, while state chief secretaries can be special invitees. This high-level private-public partnership model will be crucial for driving this mission. At the pinnacle of this structure could be a high-level committee headed by the Prime Minister. Its members could be the NMM chairperson, finance minister, commerce and industry minister, cabinet secretary and a representative of the Niti Aayog. This three-tier structure, in our view, would be inclusive and empowered to drive reforms and take the steps required to achieve our goals. Also Read: Think ahead: India's electronics manufacturing must go up the value curve The second aspect is whether the NMM should have a sectoral focus or address sector-agnostic issues. In this, the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Ficci) has suggested that its dominant focus should be on sector-agnostic areas, like regulatory reforms, cost competitiveness, the overall investment climate, skilling, quality, productivity and the like. The mission should also make strategic interventions in frontier-technology fields—such as electronics, batteries, defence, space, renewables, AI, quantum computing, etc—by boosting domestic design capability and value addition. Last year, the government announced an allocation of ₹1 trillion to encourage research and development (R&D) in sunrise domains by the private sector. We need to leverage this fund now to take a lead in the frontier technologies. The NMM's priorities are the third aspect. A sine qua non list would include macro-level policies, be it logistics, monetary, fiscal, tariffs or trade. These should be fully aligned with the mission's needs. It would also cover technology, which needs to be the key driver of manufacturing. A focus on value addition by way of design, key components and so on must also feature as a priority. So also export competitiveness, global value chain integration and import substitution in critical areas of dependency. As its fourth aspect, the mission will lay emphasis on MSMEs, which have been the main driver of manufacturing growth in several countries. Also Read: Rahul Jacob: Manufacturing is crying out for a reality check Ficci has suggested six areas of intervention: Training for MSME promoters to grow into mid-sized or large firms in the future; an impetus to family-owned businesses; the development of urban MSME zones, non-polluting MSME malls or urban industrial clusters within city limits to reduce logistical costs and enhance market access for small enterprises; support for environment, social and governance capacity among MSMEs; a catalyst for digital adoption across MSMEs to drive efficiency and growth; and light-touch regulations for three years for MSMEs in strategic areas to help them take off. For India to become a global manufacturing powerhouse, quality cannot be ignored. The mission should collaborate with industry consortiums to set Indian standards and India should take an active part in such processes at international standard-setting bodies. We need to promote and push Indian standards alongside our exports. Apart from the NMM, a high-level committee for regulatory reforms was also announced by the government. Ficci has suggested some broad terms of reference for its institutional structure, urging the adoption of a regulatory impact assessment framework to ensure transparent and consistent policy implementation across regulators. Overall, the two structures should lead to seamless communication and interaction between all stakeholders at every level—from central and state functionaries to experts and leaders of academia and industry—with everyone focused on one mission: manufacturing. The author is president, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.
