Wife's Past Marital Status Irrelevant To Interim Maintenance Claim: Allahabad High Court
Last Updated:
The observation came in a case where a woman challenged a family court decision denying her interim maintenance on the ground that she had concealed details of her earlier marriage
The Allahabad High Court recently observed that the veracity of a woman's past marital status need not be examined while deciding her application for maintenance during litigation under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
The observation came in a case where a woman challenged a family court's decision denying her interim maintenance on the ground that she had concealed details of her earlier marriage. The family court had found that her previous marriage had ended only in April 2024, whereas she had remarried in February 2021, allegedly in violation of Section 5(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act which bars bigamy.
However, a division bench comprising Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice Avnish Saxena held that such factual determinations regarding her previous husband were unnecessary for adjudicating the interim maintenance plea.
The high court emphasised that the sole consideration under Section 24 is whether the applicant lacks sufficient income to support herself and bear litigation costs.
'For purpose of adjudicating the appeal, it is not necessary for us to find on other facts regarding allegation of appellant that there was separation from her first husband… This is because section 24 provides for a spouse to have maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings," the bench noted.
The husband, who worked in the police, argued that the marriage was void due to concealment and relied on 2025 Supreme Court ruling in Sukhdev Singh Vs. Sukhbir Kaur to argue that conduct matters in deciding maintenance. His counsel also claimed that the woman had falsely stated she was employed in the Income Tax department.
The high court, however, found that there was no evidence on record to prove the woman was earning or had financial means. On the contrary, it noted that she had moved to live with the respondent in Kanpur after the marriage, and was now residing at her original address in Jhansi.
The high court observed that allegations of deceit, even if ultimately proven, do not override the financial necessity that Section 24 seeks to address.
Setting aside the family court's order, the bench directed the husband to pay a consolidated sum of Rs 15,000 per month to the appellant from the date of her application, April 15, 2025. Arrears were also ordered to be cleared by June 14, 2025, and monthly payments will continue by the 7th of each subsequent month.
The court also urged the family court to expedite the main matrimonial case without delay, while cautioning the wife against seeking adjournments.
First Published:
June 09, 2025, 15:26 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
41 minutes ago
- India.com
Why Sonam Surrendered At A Dhaba; What Her Post-Murder Plan Was; Why Her Lover Never Reached Shillong: 8 Explosive Revelations
Indore (Madhya Pradesh), Shillong (Meghalaya): What was supposed to be a picture-perfect honeymoon in the hills of Meghalaya turned into a premeditated murder plot so cold-blooded, it has left the country stunned. Eleven days after tying the knot, 29-year-old transport businessman Raja Raghuwanshi was found dead in a forest gorge near Shillong. His newlywed wife, Sonam Raghuwanshi, is now in custody as the prime suspect who allegedly orchestrated his killing with clinical precision. As layers of this twisted tale unravel, here are eight questions that piece together what really happened – from the conspiracy to the cover-up and the bizarre surrender that has raised even more eyebrows. 1. Why did Sonam want her husband killed? Behind the carefully staged wedding and social media smiles was a messy love triangle. Sonam, a 24-year-old HR executive from Indore in Madhya Pradesh, was allegedly in a long-standing relationship with Raj Kushwaha, a former employee of her father's company. Despite the arranged marriage to Raja, Sonam reportedly told Raj she would 'remove' Raja from the picture so they could be together. Even before the wedding, Raja had sensed something was wrong. According to his mother, he had doubts after Sonam avoided meeting him and even considered calling the wedding off. But the marriage went ahead on May 11, 2025. Eleven days later, Raja was dead. 2. How did Sonam plan the murder? Shortly after the wedding, Sonam returned to her parental home and connected with Raj, who allegedly introduced her to three of his friends – Akash Rajput, Vishal Chauhan and Anand Kurmi. Together, they hatched a plan. Sonam bought two new SIM cards, one of which was passed on to Vishal. She handed over Rs 50,000 against cash allegedly to fund the operation. On May 20, Raj and the three men reached the railway station, but Raj himself never boarded the train. Instead, he gave the SIM card to Vishal and allegedly sent the trio to execute the plan. By May 23, Sonam and Raja had reached Shillong for their honeymoon. Under the pretext of a photo shoot, Sonam allegedly led Raja into the forested Korsha Hills. There, the hired men allegedly ambushed him. Vishal is said to have made the first strike. The group then allegedly dumped Raja's body into a ravine and walked away as if nothing had happened. 3. What clues led the police to Sonam and her co-conspirators? It was the small details that cracked the case: The 'fasting' lie: Sonam allegedly told her mother-in-law that she was fasting on May 23, but the guesthouse owner saw her enjoying a full meal alone. No honeymoon photos: Despite being on a romantic trip, not one picture of the couple appeared online. Only one post surfaced that day – a cryptic caption: 'Together for seven lifetimes.' The blood soaked jacket: A red-and-blue jacket worn by Sonam in CCTV footage was later recovered from the forest, stained with blood. Murder weapon: A hatchet-like blade, unusual for local use, was allegedly found near the crime scene. The police suspected outsider involvement. The guide's tip-off: A local guide reportedly confirmed seeing Sonam and Raja with three other men speaking Hindi – a clue that led the police to the suspects. 4. Why didn't Raj go to Shillong himself? There are two possibilities, say investigators. Either Raj wanted to keep his hands clean and avoid suspicion. He even attended Raja's funeral in Indore. Or he had a last-minute change of heart. His sister told the media that Raj cried uncontrollably after the cremation that suggests guilt. 5. How did Sonam travel all the way to Ghazipur after the murder? After the crime, Sonam allegedly returned to Indore via Siliguri. She reportedly stayed with Raj at his rented flat. A few days later, a hired driver dropped her in Varanasi. From there, she took a bus to Ghazipur, where she called her brother – eventually leading to her arrest on June 9. 6. Why did she surrender at a roadside eatery in Ghazipur? This move has baffled investigators and the public alike. Ghazipur happens to be where Raj Kushwaha's family originally hailed from before moving to Indore. Was Sonam seeking refuge or simply staging a 'dramatic surrender'? Locals claim she appeared calm and composed at the eatery, and one woman on the bus later told Raja's family that Sonam had pretended to be a helpless widow. 7. What was the couple's plan after the murder? Sonam allegedly wanted to spin the story as a robbery-gone-wrong. In Ghazipur, she told people that her husband was killed by robbers in Shillong, and she barely escaped with her life. In the police custody, she now claims she was kidnapped and drugged. The police believe Sonam and Raj hoped her 'widow' status would open the door for their eventual marriage, and even her strict father would then approve. 8. What happens next? The Ghazipur court has granted the Meghalaya Police a 72-hour transit remand for Sonam and the three suspected hired killers. While the exact charges and the main accused designation are still under wraps, the police are gathering watertight evidence before presenting them in the Shillong court. Meanwhile, Raja's family is not buying the widow act. 'She walked off that bus like she was going shopping,' his brother said. The family may also demand a deeper probe, possibly an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Sonam's family, on the other hand, insists she is innocent. They might move court for an independent inquiry.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Over 17k challans pending against Hyd police vehicles; fine amount Rs 1.3cr
1 2 Hyderabad: At a time when citizens are turning traffic vigilantes, law keepers are found breaching regulations. As per a RTI filed by city-based traffic educator Lokendra Singh, a fleet of vehicles registered under the Director General of Police Telangana have accumulated 17,391 challans — some pending since 2017. Incidentally, though the total challan amount stands at around Rs 68 lakh, the department might have to cough up a penalty of Rs 1.36 crore. This, as Section 210B of the MV Act, 2019, states that if an authority empowered to enforce the Motor Vehicles Act commits an offence, they are liable to a penalty twice the amount corresponding to that offence. These challans, issued to police vehicles with registration series TS 09 PA XXXX and TS 09 PC XXXX, are in use by senior police officials including some of additional SP, additional DCP rank. Most of the violations are related to over-speeding. When TOI checked for details on the portal, it found that a majority of these police vehicles (Innova) had 10 to 15 challans each. Surprisingly, some vehicles had unpaid challans pending since 2018. For instance, one police vehicle TS 09 PA XX88 had 11 challans starting from Oct 2018 to April 2023. The total outstanding amount: Rs 11,385 "The majority of traffic fines against police vehicles are automatically generated by speed detection cameras that monitor vehicles exceeding speed limits. We will forward these fines to the respective officers and ask them to provide evidence justifying their speed violations," said Rahul Hegde BK, deputy commissioner of police (traffic), Hyderabad commissionerate and public information officer, traffic branch. He added: "The fines will be withdrawn if we find that the vehicles were responding to emergency situations, conducting patrol duties, or were involved in VIP escorts." Lokendra Singh, a volunteer with Hyderabad City Security Council said such traffic violations set a bad example for the public. "When they see police personnel flouting regulations, it diminishes their trust in the system and leads them to question the necessity of following rules. I have also noticed that many police vehicle drivers often do not use seat belts while driving," said Singh. BOX: City police issues Over 50 lakh challans Hyderabad city police issued as many as 56.3 lakh challans in 2024, with most violations involving riding without helmets and driving on the wrong side. The authorities collected Rs 46.6 lakh against these challans — 82% of the total amount.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Salt Lake woman loses 8.8L in digi-arrest fraud
1 2 Kolkata: A 63-year-old woman from Salt Lake fell victim to digital-arrest fraud in which she received WhatsApp video extortion calls in the name of Mumbai Police and the ED, losing Rs 8.8 lakh. She then continued to suffer from identity theft and psychological manipulation, where the scammers contacted her relatives on WhatsApp video calls, recorded their faces and forwarded them on WhatsApp groups. "The victim's contacts received unexpected video calls through WhatsApp. The scammers recorded their faces during these calls and subsequently circulated the images in various WhatsApp groups, creating panic among her social circle," said a senior officer quoting the complaint. According to the FIR, the perpetrators first contacted the victim on May 28, posing as CBI and ED officials from Mumbai. They claimed that an arrest warrant was issued against her for alleged money-laundering activities. "I received repeated calls and a WhatsApp video call from someone posing as a crime branch officer from Mumbai. During the call, he asked if my Aadhaar card was lost and whether copies were submitted in Mumbai. A person in a police uniform with an official-looking background appeared and demanded I isolate myself, citing sensitive charges. I was coerced to remain on the call and misled into believing that there were multiple criminal cases filed against me, including a shoot-at-sight order on my family, causing me extreme distress and fear," said the victim. Banerjee was coerced into transferring money thrice — Rs 2.2 lakh to a private bank in Varanasi, Rs 3.5 lakh to an account in Bangalore, and Rs 3.1 lakh to an account in Pune. The situation escalated on June 3 when the criminals hacked the victim's WhatsApp account and began targeting her contacts. "This is a new modus operandi where scammers combine financial fraud with social engineering and identity theft," explained an officer. The fraud came to light when a family friend visited the victim and found her still on call with the fraudsters. The criminals immediately disconnected upon hearing his voice.
