SpaceX Starship Spins Out After Successful Launch, But It Didn't Explode This Time
SpaceX's latest launch of its Starship rockets was more successful than the past couple, but it still ended its launch out of control, eventually crashing down in the Indian Ocean. It did make it into orbit, though, and the claimed issues from previously explosive launches appear to have been fixed. This was also the first time Starship has used a refurbished first-stage booster.
Starship is SpaceX's next-generation rocket and the largest one ever designed. If it ever reaches the same reliability for regular use as the long-running Falcon 9, it will have the ability to transport between 100 and 200 tonnes into low Earth orbit. Unfortunately, 2025 has seen Starship stumble, with two out of three launches ending in catastrophic explosions of the new Block 2 booster design, for various reasons.
SpaceX will be largely happy with this latest launch, then, despite the problems it faced. The first stage booster completed its burn successfully and separated without issue. While the first-stage booster turned and began its burn back toward the launchpad for an intended splashdown landing, the Starship upper stage continued on, burning for a few more minutes to achieve "nominal orbital insertion."
Unfortunately, that's when some issues cropped up. Initially, the cargo bay doors failed to open, so the dummy Starlink satellites couldn't be deployed. And then SpaceX lost control of the spacecraft.
"Leaks caused loss of main tank pressure during the coast and reentry phase," SpaceX CEO Elon Musk explained on Twitter/X. This loss of tank pressure meant that the Starship team lost the ability to control the ship's attitude, which led to the upper stage entering an uncontrolled spin.
This meant that the Starship wasn't going to be able to hold its orbit, and a decision was made to bring it down as carefully as possible. All remaining fuel was vented and at around 46 minutes into its flight, Starship went dark and broke up into pieces over the Indian Ocean, as per Ars Technica. This was at least in its intended flight path, however, so there should be no danger of damage to human life or property due to falling debris.
That wasn't the end to the launch woes, though. The first-stage booster also suffered an unknown issue, exploding soon after igniting its engines again for re-entry. That brought an explosive end to the first re-used Starship booster.
SpaceX has announced plans to continue with launches of one Starship every three to four weeks for the rest of the year, with plans to introduce a new Block 3 design before the end of 2025 with greater lift capacity, and a new Raptor engine with greater reliability.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Cries 'Corruption' as Tesla Superchargers Disappear from Key US Route
Elon Musk Cries 'Corruption' as Tesla Superchargers Disappear from Key US Route originally appeared on Autoblog. A common dealbreaker that new car buyers say steers them out of electric vehicles is the sheer state of the charging infrastructure compared to gas-powered cars. Although manufacturers like Ford, Hyundai, Genesis, and Honda offer new owners the opportunity to install a free home charging unit, this is not an entirely "one-size-fits-all" solution for all owners for various reasons. However, as public EV charging appears in more public places and heavily trafficked corridors for the general public's use, one of America's busiest highways has taken a massive chunk of its EV charging offline. According to a new report by NJ Advance Media and the New Jersey Turnpike Authority has ordered Tesla to decommission and remove 64 Superchargers at rest stops along the New Jersey Turnpike, the stretch of I-95 spanning northern and southern New Jersey. Per a May 30 statement from the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA), the state agency responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the New Jersey Turnpike and the Garden State Parkway, the move comes as the agency decided to transition to what it calls "Universal Open Access EV chargers" starting on June 6. These chargers, which are provided by Applegreen Electric (an arm of Irish company Applegreen, who operates NJTA's service areas), are said to be compatible "with all makes and models of EVs" and will be available on June 6 at various service areas across the Turnpike including the Vince Lombardi, Woodrow Wilson, Richard Stockton, James Fenimore Cooper, Joyce Kilmer, and Walt Whitman Service Areas, with additional chargers at the Molly Pitcher Service Area in July and the Clara Barton and John Fenwick Service Areas in Fall 2025. According to early user-reported data from Plugshare, these chargers are capable of up to 400 kW charging and are usually located next to Tesla Superchargers at select service areas. However, this move is not without conflict. In a lengthy post on X (formerly known as Twitter) on May 30, the official account for Tesla Charging wrote that the Turnpike Authority's order came after it rejected any requests to coexist with the Applegreen chargers on the Turnpike, adding that it had been "preparing for 3 years for this potential outcome by building 116 stalls off the New Jersey Turnpike" in certain high-traffic areas. Tesla says that it offered the NJTA "above-market commercial terms" to sweeten the deal, including offering its NJ Turnpike Superchargers with "screens and NACS with CCS1 'magic docks.'" Ultimately, Tesla called the NJTA's decision to decommission its Superchargers a step back for all EV users who use the Turnpike. 'Tesla always advocates for more infrastructure and co-location with additional third-party charging providers. This drives down costs through optionality and accelerates EV adoption by having sufficient capacity to shoulder peaks,' the automaker said on X. Despite reaching out to invest in the state, Tesla claims that the NJTA's decision to remove Tesla superchargers is a setback for EV drivers. "We expect that ~30 times more fast-charging capacity is needed to get to full EV adoption," it said on X. "NJTA's decision to remove, rather than add, critical charging infrastructure is a setback for New Jersey's EV adoption goals of 100% Zero-Emission New Car Sales by 2035. It removes Turnpike access to the most reliable (99.9% uptime), least congested (<1% waiters), and cost-effective (~30% lower $/kWh) charging." In a May 30 post responding to a quote tweet from Tesla fan and Model Y owner Sawyer Merritt, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that the NJTA's decision "sounds like corruption." I do not own an EV, but I live in New Jersey, and while I observe that EV charging is very prevalent in many convenient places adjacent to major highways, including shopping malls like the infamous American Dream mall, large retail centers where Walmarts and Targets are located, and non-service-area roadside stops like Wawas, I view the loss of Superchargers on the Turnpike as a bit of a disservice to EV owners. The New Jersey Turnpike is a major thoroughfare connecting two major Northeastern cities, New York and Philadelphia. Many drivers who travel on it pass through with a further destination in mind, and the faster out of Jersey, the better. It's not just Teslas that charge at Superchargers. So far, Ford, GM, Rivian, Volvo, Polestar, Hyundai, and Genesis are just some of the manufacturers that support it, with others like Honda and Acura soon to have that capability. Though one may view Tesla Supercharging as anything but universal, as someone who has had to wait upwards of hours in line to charge non-Tesla EVs at "universal stations," keeping the Superchargers where they were would help ease any potential congestion these Applegreen chargers will have. Trust me, there will be congestion. The service areas on the Turnpike have Shake Shacks, Dunkins, and Popeyes now. Elon Musk Cries 'Corruption' as Tesla Superchargers Disappear from Key US Route first appeared on Autoblog on Jun 3, 2025 This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jun 3, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoiners roast Elon Musk's new ‘Bitcoin-style' XChat
Bitcoiners roast Elon Musk's new 'Bitcoin-style' XChat originally appeared on TheStreet. Elon Musk wants X to become the most secure communication platform on the planet. But his latest branding choice has left the crypto world confused, and a little amused. On June 1, Musk announced XChat, a new feature for X (formerly Twitter) that includes encrypted messaging, vanishing messages, file sharing, and audio/video calling — all without needing a phone number. The architecture is reportedly built on Rust, and as Musk described it, uses 'Bitcoin-style encryption.' That phrasing triggered an instant response from Bitcoin experts. 'Brother w*f is bitcoin style encryption, bitcoin literally doesn't have any encryption in it whatsoever,' wrote Taproot Wizards contributor Udi Wertheimer, whose tweet quickly racked up over half a million views. Short answer. Not in the way you think. Despite being one of the most secure financial systems ever created, Bitcoin does not use encryption to keep data private. Instead, it relies on cryptographic hashing and digital signatures, both critical tools in cryptography, but not encryption. Hashing (like SHA-256) is used to generate unique fingerprints of data, crucial for mining and verifying transactions. Digital signatures (using ECDSA or Schnorr) ensure that only someone with the correct private key can authorize a transaction. As Wertheimer explained, encryption is when you take a message and keep it secret from everyone but the intended recipient. Bitcoin doesn't hide anything. Every transaction is open, auditable, and publicly visible on the blockchain — that's part of its entire design. 'Seriously, what is Bitcoin-style encryption?' asked cryptographer and assistant professor Ian Miers. 'Bitcoin primarily uses signatures, not encryption. This is like saying, we decided to run our rocket on water, since NASA uses hydrogen and oxygen.' Some users pointed out that Bitcoin Core implemented BIP-324, a proposal to encrypt peer-to-peer (P2P) network messages, in 2023. That means nodes talking to each other on the Bitcoin network can now encrypt their communication — but this is not the same as encrypting transactions or wallets. So while there's some encryption involved at the networking layer, it's misleading to suggest that Bitcoin's core value proposition revolves around encryption. Even Wertheimer admitted he may have jumped the gun: 'I might have to stop tweeting about bitcoin forever… turns out they do have some encryption in Bitcoin Core for the P2P protocol since 2023. Elon knows more about Bitcoin than I do. It's over, bye.' Musk was probably referring to end-to-end encryption and threw in 'Bitcoin-style' as shorthand for peer-to-peer privacy and decentralization — even if the terminology isn't accurate. As crypto OG Wei Dai speculated: ''Bitcoin-style' ~= 'peer-to-peer' ~= 'end-to-end'... So 'Bitcoin style encryption' means 'end-to-end encryption'.' Musk's XChat may very well offer a solid privacy layer for communications. But if you're calling it "Bitcoin-style encryption," be ready for pushback — because in Bitcoin, transparency is the feature, not the bug. And if you're going to cite the world's most open protocol, maybe… read the whitepaper first. TheStreet Roundtable reached out to X for clarification on what Musk meant by 'Bitcoin-style encryption.' This story will be updated if and when the company responds. Bitcoiners roast Elon Musk's new 'Bitcoin-style' XChat first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 2, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 2, 2025, where it first appeared.


Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Media Groups Probed by FTC Over Allegedly Coordinating Boycotts
The US Federal Trade Commission is investigating whether more than a dozen media and advertising groups have illegally colluded to boycott online content alleged to be hateful, false or misleading, according to people familiar with the matter and a document seen by Bloomberg News. The investigation partially relates to litigation between Elon Musk's X and the liberal watchdog group Media Matters For America, but extends far beyond that dispute to include other trade groups, including Interactive Advertising Bureau, World Federation of Advertisers and the news rating company Ad Fontes Media Inc., according to the people, who asked not to be identified because they weren't authorized to speak publicly.