logo
Auckland's new cemetery dead and buried

Auckland's new cemetery dead and buried

Newsroom23-07-2025
Auckland Council has withdrawn its bid to forcibly acquire land in west Auckland for its much-needed new cemetery to replace Waikumete – stymied by iwi consultation failures and possible fast-track housing.
The council told Land Information NZ and the Environment Court this week it is abandoning its attempt under the Public Works Act to compulsorily purchase land at 1080 State Highway 16 at Reweti, northwest Auckland, for the urgently needed cemetery.
A report to Thursday's policy and planning committee says the council expects some public criticism because of the costs it has sunk so far in trying to secure the site, the first choice of 45 on an initial list formed years ago. From a shortlist of five, the council has been trying to buy the land for almost three years.
The report, by Taryn Crewe, the council's general manager of parks and community facilities, says there remains an 'extreme shortage' of burial space in the west of Auckland. Waikumete, at Glen Eden, is the country's largest cemetery but has paused sales of adult burial slots for two years.
The Reweti and owner Halberd Holdings had first refused to sell, then objected to the mandatory deal under that act, sending the matter to the Environment Court. At the court, local mana whenua groups objected, complaining the council had failed in its duties to consult on the cemetery plan. Federated Farmers also objected.
The last straw for the council seems to have been Halberd moving to apply under the Fast-track Approvals Act for a green light to build houses on the land, with backing from the mana whenua groups.
The council report says once that was known the council offered to withdraw the application if Halberd declined to seek costs from ratepayers, an offer which was accepted.
Officers accept the consultation with mana whenua groups was deficient and say that was not realised until too late, after the Public Works Act compulsory acquisition demand was made.
This increased the risk of not securing Resource Management Act approval to enable a cemetery on the land – which had been picked after considering essential cemetery pre-conditions such as soil types, flood plains, gradient, groundwater levels and the proximity of streams and rivers.
'Council staff met with mana whenua over the past few months to try to resolve their objections, but were not successful,' the note to councillors says.
'Taking all relevant factors into account, particularly the good faith relationships with our mana whenua partners, the decision was made not to proceed.'
The fact the new land use under a likely Fast-Track Approvals Act application would involve a 'large number' of residential dwellings also weighed on the decision to abandon.
As well, delays caused by court action and RMA objections could impact the urgent need for more burial spots in coming years.
'Council staff remain committed to continuing good faith engagement with mana whenua partners and progressing the urgent need to acquire land for cemetery purposes in northwest Auckland.'
The report does not say if the other four properties shortlisted back in 2022/23 would still be available and pursued.
RNZ reported in March that Waikumete Cemetery had paused the sale of adult burial plots until 2027 – when an additional 800 burial plots are set to be created.
It quoted Crewe saying if the Reweti replacement fell over, there were other options. 'If something happens along the way where we weren't able to purchase that particular piece of land, work has been done to identify other areas,' Crewe said.
'But they're not the type of property we want compared to this one, we'd had to go back to the drawing board again and start that process again with other landowners.'
He said legal issues had slowed the acquisition of new burial land.
'From the 2022 decision with the committee we hoped we could have progressed things with a willing seller and willing buyer way quicker, but that's just the nature of the process.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anne Salmond: The ‘war' on NZ values
Anne Salmond: The ‘war' on NZ values

Newsroom

time2 days ago

  • Newsroom

Anne Salmond: The ‘war' on NZ values

For some time now, various environmental non-governmental organisations have been talking about a 'war on nature' in New Zealand. Many initiatives highlight the gravity of what's at stake – the 'Fast Track' Act, the Regulatory Standards bill; proposed amendments to the Overseas Investment Act, the National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry, and National Directions under the Resource Management Act affecting forests, fresh water and soils; the radical rewriting of the Resource Management Act, the removal of regulatory powers from local councils and talk about the abolition of regional councils; and the defunding of environmental groups and initiatives. The way these measures work is often deliberately opaque. Most New Zealanders do not realise that under the Regulatory Standards Bill, for instance, the oft-touted appeal to freedom for 'persons' under this bill is as much (or even more) about freedom for corporations as it is for individuals, since under the law, corporations are treated as legal 'persons.' Under the tangled weave of amendments to the Overseas Investment Act, international corporations are given relatively unfettered access to exploit natural resources in New Zealand, whether in mining, forestry or building infrastructure, even in our most prized and/or vulnerable landscapes and seascapes. These amendments work together with the 'Fast-track Approvals' Act, the Regulatory Standards Bill, proposed amendments to national directions under the Resource Management Act, the radical rewriting of the Resource Management Act and many other measures to reduce restraints on harmful extractive activities. At the same time, many international corporations use the infrastructure paid for by taxpayers and ratepayers, pay little or no tax, expatriate their profits, exit when their activities cease to be profitable and too often leave behind costly and lasting damage (e.g. oil exploration, mining and industrial forestry) for ratepayers and taxpayers to pay for. How is that supposed to generate long-term prosperity for New Zealand, and New Zealanders? These and other new legislative and regulatory measures give local corporations similar, relatively unfettered rights, even if they inflict lasting damage on local communities and the environments they live in. How does that square with the PM's launch last month of a new '100% Pure New Zealand' tourism campaign? An insistence on economic calculation is a two-edged sword. If Fonterra, for instance, insists on charging international prices for butter and other produce to other New Zealanders, then by the same logic, other New Zealanders should have the right to charge Fonterra for the damage they cause to rivers, lakes and aquifers; the harm to citizens' health, safety and enjoyment; and their contributions to New Zealand's carbon and biodiversity global debts. That's not happening, though. So wealth flows out of the country, or into the pockets of relatively limited number of local shareholders, directors and chief executives, while waterways, landscapes and the climate are wrecked, and other citizens experience a reduced quality of life and an increased cost of living. In order to achieve these one-way flows of wealth, there's been a barrage of measures that diminish accountability to the electorate. Not surprisingly, some are now also talking about a 'war on democracy' in New Zealand. This is epitomised by the way the proportional principle that underpins MMP has been undermined during coalition negotiations, with large numbers of measures with little or no electoral support signed off without public scrutiny, followed by a blitzkrieg of legislation aimed at exhausting parliamentary and public opposition. This 'war on democracy' includes the overuse of urgency in Parliament to enact measures with as little debate as possible; the undue influence of lobby groups and party funders; the debasement of select committee processes; the silencing of public servants and attempts to harness them to ideological agendas instead of the public interest; the use of Parliamentary Service-employed political staff to attack individual critics; attacks on universities and the rule of law; the undermining of local government while centralising executive power; and to cap it all, unheralded and unwanted changes to electoral processes that are likely to disenfranchise large numbers of voters. Many MPs seem to have forgotten who pays their salaries, and the job they've been hired to do in Parliament – i.e, to serve the interests of all New Zealanders, faithfully and well. That applies to all MPs, whether in government or opposition. At times, the fight against a barrage of harmful legislation is left to voluntary organisations and individual citizens with limited resources, when that is the primary responsibility of opposition MPs. Democracy in New Zealand is staggering under these assaults. This begs the question, does this add up to a 'war on New Zealand' and New Zealanders? Whose interests are being served by the current legislative agenda? Unheralded amendments to the Pay Equity Act, passed under urgency and aimed at constraining the incomes of low paid (mostly) female workers; a host of measures that reduce incomes, increase precarity and worsen working conditions for many; the loss of access to affordable housing, reliable and affordable childcare and healthcare, and the ability to put food on the table; increases in unemployment, homelessness and child poverty; the failure to give citizens the assurance that if they are disabled, ill, out of work or hit by disaster through no fault of their own, they will be supported, and that they can afford a reasonable retirement – all raise questions about how New Zealand is being governed at present. No wonder so many New Zealanders are leaving the country to look for a brighter future. There can be no worse indictment against any government. These are heartland issues, I think, that cut across the political spectrum. A love of our country, its heritage and landscapes, a belief in democracy and a fair deal for all, and a desire for a good future for our children and grandchildren is not the preserve of any one political party in New Zealand. A widespread sense of frustration and helplessness is not helped by the fragmentation of the debate, with those who want a healthy environment, a vibrant local democracy, a more equitable society and a Parliament that's dedicated to the public interest heading in slightly different directions. The loss of journalistic depth and independence in public media, and the use of algorithms and bots in social media to alienate and divide people make matters worse. A 'war on reality,' truth and evidence uses misinformation, slurs and 'double speak' to confuse attempts at resistance that are already uncoordinated and siloed. Yet at the same time, huge, spontaneous surges of opposition to the Treaty Principles Bill and the Regulatory Standards Bill, both provoking unprecedented numbers of submissions, suggest that many New Zealanders are eager to reclaim democracy in this country. Very few are willing to see fringe political parties, lobby groups and think tanks decide their future. There are some brilliant younger leaders waiting in the wings, and some are already in Parliament. If some of them reached across the aisles and agreed to tackle these challenges together, that might make a difference. One thing's for sure – party politics is not working well for New Zealand at present. Outside Parliament, there are also impressive younger leaders. What's needed is a banner under which Kiwis can come together to restore the accountability of the executive to Parliament, and to the people of this country. Perhaps a non-partisan Civic Assembly would be useful, with leaders and attendees from the wider community coming together to address key challenges to democracy in New Zealand, and devise strategies to tackle them. These challenges might include democracy and Parliament; democracy and the media; democracy and Te Tiriti; democracy and the environment; and democracy and inequality, for instance. Or a series of such meetings, in different locations? Any other ideas? In any case, something must happen, and soon. Democracy in this country is at a turning point. New Zealanders who value their democratic freedoms need to come together across different spheres of influence to talk, think and plan; step away from the abyss; and act to make a positive difference.

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon dismisses Greens' Tauranga rail petition, says roads first
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon dismisses Greens' Tauranga rail petition, says roads first

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon dismisses Greens' Tauranga rail petition, says roads first

'What we really need to do is kick on and get serious about a high-quality roading infrastructure between Tauranga, Hamilton, and ultimately into Auckland,' he said. 'That golden triangle is critical to New Zealand's economy.' Luxon cited the State Highway 29 Ōmanawa Bridge Replacement project as a key development already under way. 'We're kicking that off before Christmas, which is excellent.' It was among $6 billion in government-funded infrastructure projects that Luxon, with Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop, recently announced were scheduled to begin in 2025. He also pointed to the exponential growth in the kiwifruit sector, which he said now generated $4 billion annually – up from $2.8b. 'Eighty per cent of that comes from this region, and it's moved via our roads. That's why we've got to get our roading infrastructure first and foremost sorted and done.' Luxon said building strong transport links was the single biggest change that could be made to unlock both economic and social benefits. Key ongoing regional priorities include the State Highway 29 upgrade through Tauriko West, the Takitimu North Link Stage 1 from Tauranga to Te Puna, and Stage 2 to Ōmokoroa. Luxon has previously described Tauranga's traffic as a 'zoo', underscoring the need for faster project delivery. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Photo / Brydie Thompson 'We've got to follow through. It's about freight, and it's about people getting home to their families,' he said. 'When we build good roading infrastructure, we boost productivity and get social benefits. We've got to focus on getting that roading network really sorted for New Zealand.' Luxon also addressed the housing shortfall in the region, saying several developments are currently progressing through the government's fast-track process. 'We've got new roads to build that will unlock housing capacity.' A 2023 capacity assessment warned of a shortfall of about 4000 dwellings in Tauranga by 2030 under high-growth scenarios. 'We've got to get the Resource Management Act sorted – there's no doubt about it,' Luxon said. 'When it takes 19 months to build a three-bedroom house, and building costs are 50% higher than in Australia, something's wrong. It's taking us too long to get resource consenting.' He noted that homes in New Zealand can be inspected up to 14 times, adding cost and delay. 'That's why we're pushing through planning law reforms and fast-track legislation. We want one-stop-shop approvals for nationally or regionally significant projects –be it housing, roading, or renewable energy.' Luxon expected the revamped planning framework to be in place by the end of the year. With significant population growth in Tauranga and the wider Bay of Plenty region, he also reaffirmed the need to maintain local healthcare investment. Christopher Luxon said the Government was working on a plan to prioritise and maintain healthcare investment. 'Simeon Brown, the new Health Minister's put together an infrastructure plan, so we have a really clear list of how we prioritise the health building from here on through.' Luxon said across New Zealand, the average age of health buildings is about 47 years. 'We'll continue to work through our health infrastructure plan.' The 10-year plan included seismic strengthening and expanding the Emergency Department as 'stage one' activities for Tauranga Hospital. On crime, Luxon pointed to what he described as an encouraging decline in serious offending since his Government reintroduced tougher measures, including the Three Strikes law (reinstated in June 2025) and a ban on gang insignia (effective November 2024). 'Gangs make up just 0.25% of the population, but they're responsible for 25% of violent crime. And now violent crime is down.' Luxon said the gang insignia ban has helped police uncover illegal firearms and drugs, key drivers of violence. He also cited a 60% drop in ram raids nationwide and a 40% increase in frontline police presence. 'All of that has led to our crime stats starting to come down, which has been really encouraging. 'We've got more work to do, but I think most New Zealanders would credit this Government for restoring law and order.'

Rolleston rezone removes hurdle for Mitre 10 store
Rolleston rezone removes hurdle for Mitre 10 store

Otago Daily Times

time3 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Rolleston rezone removes hurdle for Mitre 10 store

The path is clearing for Mitre 10 to set up shop next to the new Pak'nSave supermarket in Rolleston. The Selwyn District Council adopted the recommendations of an independent hearing commissioner to approve Foodstuff's request to rezone land to allow an extension of retail development next to its new supermarket on the corner of Levi and Lincoln-Rolleston roads. Councillors approved the commissioners' recommendations on Wednesday, with the decision to be notified and open to appeal. Council's development and growth executive director Robert Love said the councillors' decision on Wednesday does not grant consent for a trade retail supplier to build on the site, but 'will enable an easier pathway for future applications for consent to build'. 'Once the decision is notified, there is a 30-day appeal period. If no appeals are received, the council will notify that the change is in effect, and the plan will be changed five days after that.' In his 68-page decision report, the commissioner concluded the plan change request aligned with the purpose of the Resource Management Act (RMA) and relevant planning documents, that concerns raised in the submissions were adequately addressed, and a robust planning framework was in place to manage future effects. If there are no appeals, the further development process of the site will be free to start once the changes are official in the district plan. Foodstuffs applied to rezone the area from medium-density residential to large-format retail, with plans for a Mitre10 Mega to be built on the site, once it goes through a separate consent process. Foodstuffs South Island stated that it 'accepts and is supportive of the Commissioner's recommendations'. 'Like Pak'nSave, Mitre 10 is an iconic kiwi-owned business, and the two stores are complementary of one another. 'We're looking forward to seeing the South Island's biggest supermarket, Pak'nSaveRolleston, operating alongside Mitre10 as part of the continued growth of New Zealand's fastest growing district. 'There are further planning steps that Foodstuffs South Island needs to undertake, including a subdivision consent, so we'll have a clearer idea on timing following that.' Mitre10 spokesman Murray Smith, one of the three brothers that own the Mitre 10 branches in Christchurch, said they are excited about the prospect of developing a store in Rolleston, which he said would provide over 60 jobs. 'It is very early in the process, and many of the details are yet to be finalised, so at this stage it is not possible to commit to an opening date for the store, other than to say Mitre 10 is keen to become a valuable part of the Selwyn local community as soon as possible.' At the council meeting on Wednesday, councillor Grant Miller said his recollection in developing the district plan was the council's 'desire to see large format retail, big box retail, to be on the i-Zone (industrial area) side of the railway line'. 'Up until now, most of the players have played by those rules. 'Players that have played by the rules might be disadvantaged by this decision, on Mitre10 coat-tailing on another supermarket development.' Miller was frustrated that there's a lot of 'great work done in planning and then it seems to get smashed down'. Senior policy planner Jocelyn Lewes said any individual can apply to change the plan. She said the proposal's appropriateness was assessed by the independent commissioner, who considered the economic impacts on the nearby town centre, and the site's suitability relative to existing zoned areas. 'For whatever reason, development of a large format nature has not yet occurred in what we currently have zoned as large format retail.' Foodstuffs gained resource consent to build the new 8,108sqm store in Rolleston in 2022. Foodstuffs then lodged a private plan change request with the council in March 2024 to rezone the around 7 hectares of land from a medium density residential zone to a large format retail zone. The almost $50 million Pak'nSave supermarket is set to open ahead of schedule on October 14 and will be the largest supermarket in the South Island, spanning 8100sqm and creating around 250 local jobs. By Jonathan Leask, Local Democracy Reporter ■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store