
Letters to the editor: Lubbock A-J readers share opinions Trump, immigration and more
Here are some recent letters to the editor shared by Avalanche-Journal readers.
Thoughts on government healthcare, immigration
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell says illegal immigrants are why unemployment is rising. Democrats and Joe Biden caused many citizens to fail to find employment by allowing illegal immigration. They drove down wages with many businesses hiring illegal immigrants, forcing more citizens to turn to Medicaid for healthcare.
Former President Obama promised that his ObamaCare would bend the medical cost curve down, which was a lie. Progressive Insurance says, 'Only pay for what you need.' He pushed health insurance to add many additional health insurance coverages that many people didn't need. He promised, 'If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it.' The number of people who lost their health insurance was in the millions.
He violated the actuarial principle of risk pooling of like risks. That meant many younger, healthy people were subsidizing the health insurance of older men and women who were sicker. Many younger, healthy people dropped their health insurance because of the costs.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
Former President Obama failed to work with the U.S. Congress to try to shape healthcare for high needs patients in 2016. Instead to get votes, he wanted to expand Medicaid coverage like Kyle Rable (see recent opinion columns in A-J by Kyle Rable.) The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine delivered a report on how to restructure health care for high needs patients. The 20% sickest patients use approximately 80% of health care dollars. Former President Obama had no answer, as does Mr. Rable.
In 2011, Medicaid was worse for sick people than people who had no health insurance at all. In 2024, a natural experiment found that a Medicaid expansion in Texas had an overall decrease in preterm birth rates. However, more work is needed to reduce preterm birth rates among the Black population.
Should Mr. Rable wish to work with Republicans, there is much good work that can be done with health care and health insurance. Increasing Medicaid coverage is not the answer. - Richard R. Allen, Lubbock
Concerns about Trump administration actions and safety
On Jan. 20, President Donald Trump fired the FAA director. On Jan. 21, Trump froze hiring of Air Traffic Controllers. On Jan. 22, Trump disbanded the Aviation Safety Advisory Committee. On Jan. 28, Trump sent a buyout/retirement demand sent to existing employees. On Jan. 29, we had the first American mid-air collision in 16 years, with no survivors. These are the first victims of Trump's war against America and Americans. How many more Americans will die in the next four years from preventable accidents and epidemics? How many Americans will die because Trump halted medical research? How many American soldiers will die because of Trump's grossly unqualified political appointee as Secretary of Defense? The next funeral you attend may be your own. - Mark Stoll, Lubbock
'Love of Money' rules the world
The United States and a few other nations are on the verge of pure corruption. Never have we seen a time in history where the "Love of Money" rules the world, and we all know that this leads to all types of evil! President Donald Trump is a wannabe oligarch accepting bribes from oligarchs all over the world. The Supreme Court is complicit with all this lawlessness. They have given him a free get-out-of-jail card, and he is corrupt enough to play it out, while collecting all the money he can. There is a force in play for all of the lies and deception he and the Republican party have visited on this country. Reaping time is at hand. We will witness unheard of perils in the next four years, and we are praying that the Lord will intervene, execute judgment, because it is apparent that man cannot. - Rose M. Davidson, Lubbock.
How to share a letter to the editor
Want to share your voice in the A-J? We'd love for you to contribute to the thoughtful and civil conversation. Please send us a letter to the editor by emailing us at newmedia@lubbockonline.com or through mail: Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, 710 Avenue J, Lubbock, TX 79401. Please keep submissions to around 250 words or less.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
6 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A Nobel Peace Prize for Trump — but seriously, folks
None of the four nations that joined the Abraham Accords had ever been at war with Israel (other than a small expeditionary force Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The rest of his argument relies on a lot of maybes. Maybe Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries will join in; perhaps the preliminary peace deal between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda will hold up; oh, and might Trump even 'work a new miracle in Ukraine?' Advertisement Additionally, awarding such an honor as the Nobel Peace Prize to Trump ought to take into account the full measure of the man's personality and moral character. How would history judge granting such a prestigious award — for peace! – to such a person? Advertisement A true promoter of world peace is guided by more noble intentions, not purely so that he can add 'Peace Prize' to his resume. Trump doesn't even try to hide his egotistical obsession with this pursuit, recently stating, Let's hope the Nobel Committee, in its wisdom, chooses a more deserving honoree. Richard Feinberg Boston Events of Jan. 6, 2021, are a disqualifying factor John J. Miller, director of the Dow Journalism Program at Hillsdale College in Michigan, argues that Donald Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. I argue that the attempted coup on Jan. 6, 2021, at Trump's urging would disqualify him from ever getting near any prize, especially one with 'peace' attached to it. Involving himself in recent warring conflicts and claiming his ability to procure peace is a charade, typified by his showing up at the last minute to claim ownership of resolutions of peace negotiations. The Norwegian Nobel Committee's prize for peace would lose vast amounts of credibility if its members ever elevated Trump with their hallowed award. Trump's thirsty attempts to get attention and crassly continuing to ask that he receive the Nobel are an embarrassment to America and to the Nobel Peace Prize. Tobin Wirt Sandwich Peace begins at home To think that Donald Trump can bring peace to the world is ludicrous. Maybe he has brought stability (but the proof remains in how long it lasts) in Africa and the Middle East, but his waffling commitment to Ukraine and his tacit support of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's actions in Gaza disqualify him completely. His tariff pronouncements don't suggest peace, and his bullying of our neighbors and his pursuit of retribution against countries that don't toe his line, such as Brazil, are not the pursuit of peace. And peace begins at home. The imposition of the National Guard in cities is not a peaceful action. Advertisement Trump wants the Peace Prize as one more personal trophy. He hasn't earned it. Katharine Gregg Amherst The prize would be a bitter irony Since our president and his minions are spending so much effort lobbying for a Nobel Prize to acknowledge all his work toward a peace in Ukraine, one has to wonder: Is it the peace or the fame that is being pursued by this cabal of zealots? The irony of a peace prize being the legacy of Frank Kelley Braintree


Bloomberg
7 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Spurned by Trump, Modi Springs Into Action
Newsletter India Edition Trump's 50% tariff will hit India next week Welcome to India Edition, I'm Menaka Doshi. Join me each week for a ringside view of the billionaires, businesses and policy decisions behind India's rise as an emerging economic powerhouse. You can subscribe here, and share feedback with me here.


Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom Scores California Supreme Court Win In Redistricting Battle
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The California Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a challenge from Republican lawmakers aimed at blocking Governor Gavin Newsom's proposal to redistrict the state's congressional map. Republican lawmakers in California urged the state's highest court to intervene to pause Newsom's redistricting plan, arguing that Democrats bypassed a rule mandating a 30-day waiting period before voting on newly introduced legislation. But in a ruling on Wednesday, the court declined to act. "Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8," the court said in an order. Newsom has positioned the move as a counter to the Republican-led redistricting in Texas, and has called for a November special election to let voters decide on a map designed to flip up to five Republican-held seats ahead of the 2026 midterms. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaking in Los Angeles last week. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaking in Los Angeles last is a developing story. More to follow.