Stressed, scared, overwhelmed: the election issues weighing on young Australian voters
The 25-year-old is describing a feeling shared by his friends in their mid-20s.
'I know that I need to prepare for the future but also it doesn't feel like there is much of a point … when we don't know what the impact of climate change is going to be in five years' time, let alone 10; we don't know if the wealth gap is going to keep getting deeper, if I am ever going to be anything more than very stressed working class.
'Why wouldn't I just spend my time doing things I love with people I love?'
Axel is one of more than 900 young Australians who responded to a Guardian callout asking voters aged between 18 and 39 how they are feeling in the lead-up to the federal election. (You can read a selection of their responses here.)
Uncertainty about the future is a common theme among callout responses. A number of economic and social stressors stand out: the cost of living, housing and healthcare, as well as concern about social cohesion and the rise of the far right, and dissatisfaction with government action on the climate crisis and foreign affairs are all weighing on young people's minds.
The cost of living and housing (including the cost of rent and mortgage repayments) are the top stressors. Both are mentioned more than 520 times each. One respondent describes renting as a 'lottery'.
Many indicate they live paycheck to paycheck. Groceries, fuel, utilities, insurance and transport are among the daily expenses that have become a burden.
For Axel, a PhD graduate tutoring at the University of New South Wales, renting three hours away from his workplace with family in the Blue Mountains is the only way his income is livable.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
More than half his income goes to rent. After paying bills, he has spent close to 80% of his income. What is left is not enough to build up savings that would help him 'feel safe in daily life'.
'I think about money every time I tap on to the Opal system, and every time I get a script filled out, and every time I have a doctor's appointment,' he says.
'It's a weird stage of life to still be living at home.'
The only way Coby, 33, and her husband could buy a home in Darwin was for her parents to live with them. She is a frontline worker in the domestic and family violence sector. The couple earn a good wage, she says, but childcare costs take a 'good chunk' of that, even after subsidies.
'Then just trying to feed the family is insane,' Coby says. The couple used to spend $150 on food for three in a fortnight. Now that grocery bill is closer to $350.
'We've stopped eating meat just so we can afford to feed ourselves.'
Buying a house isn't an option for Lila Pierce, 33, who is eight months pregnant.
She and her partner are working professionals living in the prime minister's Sydney electorate of Grayndler, where their weekly rent costs 40% of their combined wages. They are dreading another increase expected in August, when their lease is due to end. The 'obscene' cost of groceries, transport, utilities and healthcare are also stressors – as is her $65,000 Hecs debt.
The prospect of expenses forcing her to move away from her community is difficult to consider. And, as parenthood looms, Pierce is concerned she won't be able to afford childcare, education and healthcare costs.
While her parents are homeowners – an asset she and her sibling will presumably inherit – it's a 'depressing' thought to 'wait on your parent's carcasses to have housing stability', she says.
Many respondents say they struggle coming to terms with not being able to afford 'typical' life milestones, such as travel, a wedding, children and a home. Some doubt they will be able to retire.
The idea of being able to rent alone while building up savings – as his parents' generation were able to do, Axel says – is 'unimaginable for people my age'.
Alec, 33, agrees. Social mobility seemed more accessible to his parents' generation. 'My parents were financially and career-wise more successful than their parents,' he says, indicating that he is pessimistic about that pattern continuing for him.
Without financial support from his parents, Alec says he would probably be homeless. He lost his job working in mental health last year due to Victorian government funding cuts; at the same time his rent increased by almost $200 a month.
'I feel like I'm not going to be ever able to own a house, I'll be renting all my life, it'll be hard to retire,' he says.
Alec's bipolar disorder requires regular appointments with a psychiatrist and psychologist for management – but accessing those on jobseeker 'is kind of near impossible', he says. 'You have to give up a lot of your healthcare just to try and scrape by.'
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Healthcare is mentioned almost 200 times by respondents, saying they can't afford private health cover and that out-of-pocket costs for GPs, dentists, specialists, NDIS and mental health services are increasing. Regionally based respondents highlight declining healthcare, with one saying: 'Country hospitals are understaffed and under-resourced.'
Axel is grateful for the social progress made since his parents' generation. But perceiving a rise in rightwing politics spreading globally, that progress 'suddenly feels really, really tenuous', he says. He cites threats to abortion care in Queensland and South Australia, and Queensland banning gender-affirming care for under-18-year-olds, as local examples.
Concern about a rise of the far right or fascist governments is mentioned by more than 200 respondents, with reference to political developments in the United States and Europe. Many point to Donald Trump's re-election and fear 'regression' into conservative values and the privatisation of public services.
For Coby, thinking about the rise of the far right 'absolutely terrifies the hell' out of her.
'I have this three-year-old little boy that I'm trying to [raise], and I'm terrified about this world that he is growing up in,' she says.
Concerns about social cohesion are raised by more than 240 respondents – particularly a perceived rise in hatred, division and polarised politics. Racism, misogyny, anti-LGBTQI rhetoric, Indigenous rights, disability inclusion, mistreatment of asylum seekers, mis- and disinformation, algorithm echo chambers, culture wars, Muslim and Jewish community safety, hate crimes and increasing class division are all frequently raised.
Some days Coby feels immense guilt for having a child. 'The world is not a very nice place,' she says. 'If I had seen what future I was bringing him into, would I have made the same decision? I'm not sure.'
For Alec, it is difficult to avoid succumbing to grief or anxiety when it comes to the state of the climate.
This is the third-most mentioned concern, coming up more than 430 times. A feeling of existential dread is common among these responses. Increasingly severe weather events, global warming and rising emissions, as well as pollution, deforestation, native forest logging and threatened species are common concerns.
'It seems there are more and more frequent, high-level natural disasters and ... [we are] seeing inaction from both major parties, we keep hearing about new gas projects,' Alec says. 'I know Labor have the goal of net zero but I am struggling to see how we could achieve that.'
More than 150 respondents raise foreign affairs as a major stressor, including global instability, geopolitical unrest and fear of a third world war. Palestine and Ukraine are both frequently mentioned, with a significant portion of responses raising concerns about human rights violations and accusing Israel of war crimes and genocide in Gaza, coupled with dissatisfaction about the Australian government's and mainstream media's treatment of the issue.
Another common theme is concern surrounding Australia's alliance with the US, including criticism of Aukus and the global implications of Trump's 'erratic' leadership.
The optimism Alec felt at 'getting rid of the Morrison government' last election has been lost to a sense that Labor has 'forgotten about working people, especially the younger generations'.
Axel thinks Labor and Coalition politicians are 'doing personality theatre rather than advocating for everyday Australians'.
He plans on preferencing the Greens and Labor party over the Coalition. 'My hope is that more minor parties will get seats in this upcoming election,' he says.
'It's the smaller parties that are generally working on a grassroots basis, and it's the grassroots basis that means they're getting real insight into what's impacting people today.'
Coby can't pinpoint one issue as the most important to her. Women's issues, homelessness and climate change occupy her mind but are '15 things down the list when I can't afford to feed my family'.
She plans on voting either independent or for a Green this election, 'but that didn't really teach anyone any lessons four years ago'.
'I just feel so overwhelmed,' she says. 'I'm supposed to be voting in an election … and I feel like I'm putting out a massive house fire with a little thimble of water.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Why a dramatic new proposal could spell the END of cash in Australia in just three years
Australia should phase out cash in three years in a bid to stamp out tax evasion, one of the country's leading economics professors has argued. Professor Richard Holden from the University of New South Wales said the black economy was costing the government $10billion a year in GST revenue - and depriving workers of income tax relief. Prof Holden, who studied at Harvard and was also an assistant professor at MIT, made the call as a key Reserve Bank official this week voiced concerns about whether Australia's only cash delivery company, Armaguard, could stay afloat. 'I acknowledge it would need to be a transition and some people are very attached to cash, but I really think it will go the way of cheques,' Prof Holden told Daily Mail. 'We could transition fully away from cash, I think it could be done in about three years or so - you'd probably start by eliminating the $100 bill and the $50 bill in a year and you work your way through. 'We have very, very high income taxes and if we're leaving several billion dollars a year on the table, by letting tax cheats use cash to evade the taxes the rest of us pay, I just don't have a lot of sympathy for those people.' Despite a decline in the use of banknotes, Treasurer Jim Chalmers is proposing a cash mandate that would come into effect in January 2026, requiring all businesses to offer the option of paying in banknotes. 'They're just playing politics,' Prof Holden said. 'I'm sure that's been focus grouped to death and that Jim thinks it's a political winner - that's fine, he's a politician, I'm an economist.' With banks closing down branches and taking away ATMs, Prof Holden said Australia Post outlets could have digital kiosks where staff helped the likes of the elderly pay their utility bills. 'As far as I'm aware, every town has an Australia Post outlet of some form or another,' he said. He also refuted the privacy argument about governments accessing our bank details, arguing this was based more on avoiding the Australian Taxation Office than standing up for civil liberties. 'The government can't just go and get your bank records without the appropriate legal right to do so,' he said. 'What are we trying to hide? What's the legitimate purpose of using cash to hide it from the ATO if it's not tax avoidance.' Cash delivery issues Michelle McPhee, a Reserve Bank assistant governor in charge of business services, said cash was difficult to transport around Australia, and feared for the future of Australia's near monopoly cash delivery company Armaguard. 'We saw cash use take a step level down during Covid and that created significant difficulties for those who distribute cash around the economy,' she told the Economic Society of Australia. 'One of the great challenges, as you point out in Australia, is our geography is so disparate and we have cash users in the regions so it creates a lot of difficulty to try and structure a cash distribution model that's effective if you have low volumes and you also have great distances to cover.' The nation's key cash deliverer company Armaguard Australia is struggling financially, despite having a near monopoly of banknote transportation The nation's key cash deliverer company Armaguard Australia is struggling financially, despite having a near monopoly of banknote transportation. The Big Four banks, supermarket giants Coles and Woolworths and retail group Wesfarmers last month helped stump up $25.5million for Armaguard that would last until December. 'Armaguard did find themselves in some difficulty - they merged with Prosegur and that organisation covers about 90 per cent of cash movements in this country,' Ms McPhee said. 'When you have one player who dominates to the extent that they do, it's a key risk for the infrastructure that provides cash.' The Council of Financial Regulators - which includes the Reserve Bank, Treasury and the Australian Prudential Regulator Authority - has recommended a Minister for Cash be appointed. 'It's very important that we do not make the cost of moving cash around so exorbitant that merchants can't sensibly access it and then we see those costs passed on to consumers,' Ms McPhee said. The regulators also suggested the government may have to intervene in the cash distribution business, with Reserve Bank data from 2022 revealing just 16 per cent of in-person transactions are done in cash. 'The decline in the use of cash for payments in Australia has challenged the economics of the cash distribution sector, upon which access to cash relies,' it said. 'Challenges in the cash distribution sector include the long-term decline in the use of cash for payments, and a high degree of concentration and limited competition in parts of the market.' Cash withdrawals at record highs But new Reserve Bank figures show a record $104.4billion worth of banknotes are in circulation with $245million worth of cash issued last week. In June, cash withdrawals in Australia were worth $9.2billion. Cash Welcome founder Jason Bryce said this data refuted a suggestion from the Australian Banking Association that consumers were turning away from cash. 'There has never been more cash on issue, showing strong demand and consumer support for cash,' he said. 'The Australian Bankers Association says consumers don't want or need physical banknotes and coins but these numbers tell a different story.' The ABA has consistently issued media releases suggesting cash use is in decline, arguing annual banknote withdrawals had fallen from $120billion in 2018 to $80billion in 2024. But a closer look at RBA data showed the total value of cash withdrawals during 2024-25 was worth $108billion. The Reserve Bank has said only a small proportion of in-person transactions are done in cash but a cash use attitudes report also found just 29 per cent in 2022 carried no cash at all in their wallet. Mr Bryce said that suggested 'that 70 per cent of Aussies carry cash every day'. But Prof Holden said cash was still useless during a blackout or a natural disaster. 'There's a mass power outage: shops aren't going to be open, supermarkets, convenience stores, nobody opens their shop when the power's out,' he said.
Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
A WEALTH tax, inheritance fees and the end to the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount: Extraordinary push to change Australia - here's who would get hit
A left-leaning think tank has called for the Albanese government to consider levelling a two per cent 'wealth tax' on Australians earning more than $5million. In a submission to the government's three day economic roundtable, the Australia Institute recommended three 'simple' tax reforms to bolster the nation's finances. A wealth tax alone - which would exclude superannuation and the family home - would raise more than $41billion per year, the Institute said. The other suggested two reforms, aimed at tackling intergenerational inequality, were to revive the inheritance tax of the 1960s and scrap the 50 per cent capital gains tax (CGT) discount. Australians receive a 50 per cent CGT discount when they dispose of an asset - for instance, if they sell property - if they have owned it for at least 12 months and are a resident for tax purposes. Researchers believe that these measures would raise an extra $10 billion and $19 billion respectively, meaning the Institute's three proposals would rake in a grand total of $70billion. The Institute claims the money would help pay for 'well-funded schools and hospitals; decent, affordable housing for all; a world-class NDIS; a fair welfare system and dozens of other things'. Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, said that these were not 'radical ideas' and countries like the UK, US and Japan all had inheritance taxes. 'Australia is a low-tax country that does not do a good job of taxing wealth,' Mr Grudnoff said. 'It is one of the few developed economies in the world which has neither a wealth tax nor an inheritance tax.' 'Correcting this would raise huge amounts of extra revenue for essential services and ease growing inequality in Australia. 'Even if you were to exempt the family home and superannuation, a 2 per cent wealth tax on people worth $5 million would raise $41 billion per year. 'If you limited it to just the 200 richest households in the country, it would still raise $12.5 billion per year.' He added: 'It's time to scrap the capital gains tax discount, for many reasons. 'Not only would it put downward pressure on house prices and reduce inequality, it would raise an extra $19 billion a year.' But AMP Chief Economist Shane Oliver said the plan would 'hurt the economy'. '"Tax the rich" sounds fine in theory, but all of those reforms will further increase the tax on high-income earners,' he told 'Our tax system is already skewed, it's already highly progressive.' Mr Oliver pointed to the fact that the top 10 per cent of income earners in Australia already pay almost 50 per cent income tax. He said these tax reforms, while they would raise a lot of money initially, would be destructive in the long term. 'You might help the budget initially but you'll damage the economy long-term because there'll be less work incentive,' Mr Oliver added. 'Wealth tax I think is incredibly dangerous … You want Australians to feel confident to go out and start businesses and build up their wealth – that's how we get ahead.' A pair of university economists last week suggested that Australians pay capital gains tax on the family home in order to tackle the housing crisis. Peter Siminski from the University of Technology, Sydney, and Roger Wilkins from the University of Melbourne, say the longstanding capital gains tax exemption on the family home favours the rich and costs the government much-needed revenue.
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
How Man Utd plan to fund £2billion new stadium with ‘sinister' tactic from the US
MANCHESTER UNITED are reportedly planning to fund their new £2billion stadium with a 'sinister' tactic from the US. The Red Devils announced plans for a mega 100,000-seater arena in March after deciding to replace Old Trafford. 3 3 The new stadium will be the biggest in the country. And a local regeneration project is expected to create thousands of jobs and new homes. United believe once the £2bn stadium and surrounding areas are complete, it will generate £7bn annually into the economy. United's plans are expected to cost upwards of £4.2bn in total. But according to the Guardian, United are planning on taking a leaf from the US in terms of funding. In order to build their stadium, United must move a rail freight hub which currently sits on land needed for the project. And it's claimed they want the UK government to pay the estimated costs, which could reach £300million – but has previously been estimated at as much as £1bn. In the past, West Ham's London Stadium and Manchester City's Etihad Stadium were built with public money. However, their homes were initially created for one-off sporting events, with the London Stadium serving the London Olympics in 2012, and the Etihad built for the Commonwealth Games in 2002. Politicians including Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham had previously declared that no public funds would be used to build United's new stadium. 3 TRANSFER NEWS LIVE - KEEP UP WITH ALL THE LATEST FROM A BUSY SUMMER WINDOW But as this cost would only be for clearing land needed for the arena, it would not fall under the technical billing of the 100,000-seater ground itself. This follows a 'sinister' trend across the pond in the US, where public funds are often handed to sport teams for new stadiums. In 2016, the Las Vegas Raiders were handed £555m when they were still a California-based franchise. Three years ago, the Buffalo Bills received £629m of public funding, while the Washington Commanders are currently in the process of landing £740m - which works out at $1bn. The money is handed out with the promise of returning major numbers to the economy. But Pat Garofalo, of the American Economic Liberties Project, told The Guardian: 'That's the story they tell to get the public money, but it's the big lie. 'We (in the US) export a lot of problematic things, and I really hope that we don't export that big lie.'
