What's behind the global surge of new Covid variant NB.1.8.1 – and should you get vaccinated?
In the UK, the Health Security Agency confirmed 13 cases of the variant in England in early June, while hospital admissions due to Covid have risen by almost 10 per cent.
However, the true extent of the variant's spread remains uncertain, largely due to a significant reduction in Covid-19 testing compared to the peak of the global pandemic five years ago.
What do we know about the variant NB.1.8.1?
NB.1.8.1 stemmed from the Omicron variant and was first detected in January this year.
It has quickly spread across China and Hong Kong, and has now been recorded in several states across the United States and Australia.
By late April, NB.1.8.1 comprised about 10.7 per cent of submitted sequences globally, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). This rose from just 2.5 per cent a month before.
The WHO declared the NB.1.8.1 strain a 'variant under monitoring' on 23 May, which means scientists believe it could potentially affect the behaviour of the virus.
Why has there been a surge in new cases?
Lara Herrero, a virologist from Griffith University in Australia, suspects that NB.1.8.1 spreads more easily than other variants.
'Using lab-based models, researchers found NB.1.8.1 had the strongest binding affinity to the human ACE2 receptor of several variants tested, suggesting it may infect cells more efficiently than earlier strains,' Dr Herrero wrote last month in The Conversation.
Dr Chun Tang, GP at UK private healthcare centre Pall Mall Medical, said: 'NB.1.8.1 isn't too different from the Omicron variant, but it does have some tweaks to its spike protein, which might make it spread a bit more easily or slip past some of our existing immunity.
'That said, early signs suggest it doesn't seem to cause more serious illness, but of course, we're still learning more about it.'
'Its spread has been identified in around 22 countries,' said Dr Naveed Asif, GP at The London General Practice.
'The WHO assesses the additional risk to the global public as currently low, and existing Covid-19 vaccines are considered effective in preventing severe disease.'
However, the 'Nimbus' variant, as it has been dubbed, does appear to be more transmissible than previous strains, with notable increases reported in India, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand, notes Dr Asif.
What are the symptoms?
Common symptoms of Nimbus include a severe sore throat, fatigue, mild cough, fever, muscle aches and congestion.
It has also been reported that some patients have experienced gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and diarrhoea.
Healthcare experts have stressed, however, that there is no evidence that the new strain is more deadly or serious than previous variants, and that current Covid vaccines are expected to remain effective and protect anyone infected from severe illness.
Should you get vaccinated?
In the UK, the NHS advises that Covid vaccinations are currently unavailable to the public until the early winter roll out, and only to those who need extra protection from the virus.
The NHS will get in touch to offer you the Covid vaccine if you are eligible.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Warning after woman left with agonising blisters from picking blackberries which could have KILLED her
BRITS have been warned after a woman was left with 'agonising' blisters having gone blackberry picking which could have killed her. Nature lover Sue Harries suffered extreme pain after a toxic plant left her covered in a horrifying rash. 2 2 The 53-year-old was collecting the berries near her home in Wales when her arm brushed nearby hogweed and was touched by its toxins. Sue didn't spot anything wrong straight away but was later covered in blisters and in "agony" as the wounds developed. A rash came up around two hours after touching the toxic plant and later spread all up her arm and onto her back. Sue said that two weeks after the hogweed horror she is still reeling from the affects of the plant - and was told that if she had eaten blackberries touched by the plant her airways could have closed. She said: "Even now, my arm is burning, literally burning. I didn't feel anything at the time, I must have just brushed past it. "I went to my doctor a week later because I've been in and I honestly mean it, I've been in agony with it. "I just want people to know about it because I never knew it was toxic and I wouldn't want anyone else to go through this." Sue has now been told to keep her arm out of the sun for at least four months and ensure she wears factor 50 sun cream or keep her affected limb covered for at least the next five years. Sue, of Mayals, Swansea, brushed against the hogweed - which is officially known as Heracleum sphondylium - and has toxic sap, stems, leaves and fruit which can leave lasting damage. In June last year, Jenson Price was left with agonising blisters when he brushed past giant hogweed. Boy, 9, left with horrific burns and blisters after brushing past 'Putin' toxic plant while playing football in the park The nine-year-old had come into contact with the plant while running to fetch the football during the kickabout with his friends in Ryhope Park, Sunderland. The toxic sap from the plant increases the sensitivity of the skin to sunlight, often leading to burns - and sometimes blindness. While in June 2022, Ella, a 22-month-old toddler, was rushed to hospital having touched giant hogweed. Ella was taken to two hospitals, North Tees and James Cook, but doctors and medics were unable to determine what had caused such injuries. The tot required intensive treatment, doctors had to burst her blisters, carve away her dead skin, and finally bandaged her hands. A similar incident occurred the same year when Chavana Neuweg's six-year-old daughter suffered poisoning from a hemlock plant growing in their garden. The young child suffered a severe rash and trouble breathing, resulting in a trip to the hospital. Dog owners have also been warned about the dangers the plant poses to our furry friends. Hogweed can tower up to 16ft tall, according to the RHS, with long green stems with purple blotches, huge branches of small white flowers and green leaves. Mike Duddy, of the Mersey Basin Rivers Trust, previously said: "Giant hogweed was without a shadow of a doubt, the most dangerous plant in Britain". It is native to the Caucasus but was introduced to Britain as an ornamental plant in 1817, and its spread has now gotten out of control. Everything you need to know about giant hogweeds Giant Hogweed may look impressive but any contact with the sap of this plant can cause serious injury, particularly to your skin. What does Giant Hogweed look like? When fully grown, giant hogweed is aptly named. The plant can grow up to 25ft tall, with long green stems, purple blotches, and huge branches of small white flowers and large green leaves. The plant's flower heads bloom in June and July and can reach up to 2ft across. Giant hogweed can be mistaken for other plants such as cow parsley, cow parsnip, Queen Anne's Lace or elderberry as the flowers look similar. Their size when fully grown is very helpful for identifying the harmful crop. Why does Giant Hogweed cause rashes, burns and blisters? Giant hogweed stems have fine needle-like hairs that can cause extreme irritation. While the sap in giant hogweed contains a chemical called furanocoumarins. When this toxin comes into contact with the skin, it binds with DNA in skin cells, causing them to die. The sap reacts with the melanin in your skin and removes protection that patch has from UV light, causing photosensitivity (where the affected area becomes highly sensitive to sunlight), resulting in nasty burns, lesions and blisters. Those burns can last for several months and, even once they've gone, skin can remain scarred and sensitive to sunlight for years to come. If the hairs of the giant hogweed plant or its sap come into contact with your eyes, they can even cause temporary or even permanent blindness in severe cases. How do I treat burns from Giant Hogweeds? The NHS website advises that if you come into contact with giant hogweed and you get a burn, you should wash the affected area with soap and water and then cover it, keeping it out of natural or artificial light. If blisters appear, do not burst them! If the blisters are extensive, seek medical attention. Should you get sap in your eye, flush the eye with a large amount of water and seek medical attention. If you begin to feel unwell after contact with giant hogweed, speak to your doctor. Ensure you thoroughly and quickly wash the clothes you were wearing when you came into contact with the plant. And if you're concerned that a child has come into contact with, or ingested giant hogweed, seek medical attention immediately
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK electricity firms leak oil underground in ‘huge problem for environment'
Electricity companies are leaking millions of litres of oil underground throughout the UK, the Guardian can reveal. In the past 15 years, 3m litres (660,000 gallons) of oil has been spilt under southern England from cables owned by the electricity distribution company UK Power Networks. But leaks are occurring UK-wide; the largest single leak reported in recent years was in Edinburgh, when 24,000 litres was spilt from a ScottishPower Energy Networks (SPEN) cable. The oil is inside ageing electricity cables which were mainly installed in the 1950s to 1970s. It acts as an insulating fluid and helps to keep the cables cool, but as the cables age they leak increasingly. One scientist who has researched the cables said the leaks presented a huge problem for the environment, while Greenpeace has described the findings as extremely concerning. The Energy Networks Association (ENA), which represents the electricity distribution companies, said heavy oil had not been used in new cables for 40 years and many cables had been replaced. UK Power Networks said it had made investments to reduce leakage and was committed to replacing the cables entirely in the long term. Dr Susmit Basu researched the underground cables between 2015 and 2018, when he worked at a science and technology company which conducted research and development for a UK Power Networks project focusing on reducing oil leaks from them. He said the leaks presented a 'huge problem for the environment' and were slowly contributing to major biodiversity loss over long periods of time. Basu visited one site in Norfolk where a cable was leaking oil continuously and had saturated the soil. The oil had seeped into the bodies of trees via the roots, then damaged leaves and caused them to become yellowish in colour and develop spots. The oil-soaked soil had to be removed and replaced with fresh soil. But no one knew 'how much of the fluid the rainwater took with it – that was anyone's guess', Basu said. Usually an underground oil leak caused no immediate danger, Basu said; it was rarely the case that 'this night there was a leak and tomorrow it was a disaster zone'. But with time the oil travelled through the soil into the nearest water bodies including rivers, lakes or the sea, killing useful fungi, bacteria, fish and other aquatic life. Maintenance workers often topped up cables when a drop in oil levels caused them to stop working effectively, Basu said. 'Where's those few thousands of litres going?' He said the leaked oil 'will not simply disappear' and would stay in the environment for thousands or millions of years. Basu said companies were rolling out solutions to the leaks, but doing so was costly and could be complicated. He also suggested there was little public pressure to act: 'The leaking is invisible to the public eye … nobody cares [about the leaks], nobody knows, nobody can see. Those materials should not be in the soil … we need electricity but we also need the environment and our surrounding atmosphere to be clean.' Companies and regulators do not publish information about precisely where leaks have occurred or oil-filled cables are located, though freedom of information requests from environmental regulators reveal leaks have happened underneath cities, residential areas, riverbeds and arable fields. Lily-Rose Ellis, a campaigner at Greenpeace UK, said: 'This is really concerning and is yet more evidence of the urgent need to update our crumbling energy infrastructure. 'These cables are at best outdated, but some are virtually antiques and are urgently in need of replacement. The UK electricity grid was designed and built for the energy system of the last century.' UK Power Networks is responsible for more electricity cable leaks than any other company, freedom of information requests to the energy regulator Ofgem have confirmed. Electricity North West, Northern Powergrid, Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks (SSEN), SPEN and National Grid Electricity Distribution (formerly Western Power Distribution) all also own fluid-filled cables. The largest single spill recorded in recent years was underneath Edinburgh. A single SPEN cable leaked 24,000 litres of oil between late 2023 and its being sealed in early 2024. An additional ScottishPower cable leaked a further 6,000 litres in Edinburgh in 2023. The Scottish Environment Protection Agency refused freedom of information requests for details on the Edinburgh leaks on the grounds that an investigation was taking place. SPEN stated at the time: 'Neither leak has resulted in oil contamination of watercourses, and no enforcement actions or undertakings resulted from the two incidents notified to the regulator.' A spokesperson for ENA said the electricity distribution companies had not used heavy oil in newly-laid fluid-filled cables for about 40 years and now used biodegradable substances, solid insulation and sealed cabling. It said 500km (310 miles) of older cables had been replaced in the past 10 years, and oil-filled cables made up less than 1% of the grid around London and the south-east. UK Power Networks said it had made significant investments to reduce oil leakage since 2011, replacing 126km of oil-filled cables, and was committed to replacing them entirely. It said it worked with the Environment Agency for reporting and mitigation and adhered to relevant operating codes. It said: 'During repairs, the company recovers as much cable fluid as possible.' This included fluid pumped into containers and oil absorbed in contaminated soil, which is removed in sealed skips and disposed of by specialists. Ofgem said it had made it clear to companies that they should do everything possible to mitigate environmental impacts, including preventing leaks by ensuring their assets were well maintained and reliable. Research for this article was supported by the Dark Green programme, an initiative of the Centre for Investigative Journalism and
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Major change to driving tests that impacts ALL learners to be rolled out in months – what it means for you
A MAJOR change to driving tests will impact all learners across the UK and is set to be rolled out in just months. Learner drivers sitting their driving theory test will soon need to brush up on their CPR skills in an effort to save thousands of lives every year. 1 Driving theory tests will include added questions on CPR and defibrillators from early next year, the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) has said. Theory test questions will be expanded to include "enhanced" CPR content. While questions on external defibrillators, or AEDs, will be added for the first time. Theory test candidates will therefore need to brush up on their CPR techniques including proper placement and compression rates as well as how to use an AED. The changes are a bid to ensure drivers know how how to use a defibrillator and how to respond in emergencies. It is hoped that new learners will be equipped with life-saving skills through the enhanced questions with 2.4 million theory tests taken each year. For example, one new theory test question relates to the correct depth to push down during CPR. Mark Winn, DVSA Chief Driving Examiner, said: "Part of being a safe and responsible driver is knowing what to do in an emergency – how to step in and make a real, life-saving difference. "Learning CPR and how to use an AED is a very simple skill and adding this into the official learning resource is a great way for DVSA to support the drive to raise awareness." According to the DVSA, drivers are often first on the scene when someone suffers a cardiac arrest. Watch Tesla test self-driving cars on London streets as it passes famous landmarks More than 40,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occur every year in the UK but fewer than 1 in 10 people survive. But if CPR is administered and an AED used within 3 to 5 minutes of collapse, survival rates can reach as high as 70 per cent. Otherwise, every minute that passes reduces those chances by up to 10 per cent. Life-saving CPR skills may be required in a range of scenarios on the road. Trauma or shock resulting from a collision could cause a cardiac arrest or a driver could have a cardiac arrest behind the wheel causing a road traffic incident. Motorists may also be required in roadside emergencies if someone has collapsed on the roadside. For example, runners may experience a sudden cardiac arrest and elderly people or those with heart conditions could also collapse in public spaces. And incidents could also occur at service areas including motorway services, petrol stations and car parks Intervention can be crucial to saving lives before professional help arrives on the scene. The theory test changes are a result of collaboration between the DVSA and organisations such as Save a Life programmes in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland in addition to Resuscitation Council UK. Learner drivers must first take a theory test and hazard perception test before they can book their practical driving test. To pass the theory test, learners must achieve 43 out of 50 correct answers. The DVSA also announced in May that three major practical driving test changes were to be trialled across the UK to speed up exams for thousands of learners.
