Anti-India rallies in Pakistan-administered Kashmir over disputed status
The protesters on Tuesday demanded the restoration of statehood for the India-administered side of the Himalayan region, which has been split between the two nations and claimed by both in its entirety.
Article 370 of India's Constitution granting its state of Kashmir and Jammu semiautonomous status was revoked on August 5, 2019, by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Hindu nationalist government. The status had guaranteed special rights to the Muslim-majority state, including its own constitution and autonomy to make laws on all matters except defence, communications and foreign affairs.
In the lead-up to the move, India sent thousands of additional soldiers to the disputed region, imposed a crippling curfew, shut down telecommunications and arrested political leaders. Since then, numerous journalists and activists have been arrested under 'anti-terrorism' laws, local communities have suffered from an influx of new residents and attacks are on the rise.
Tuesday's main protest in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, drew hundreds of members of civil society and political parties. In the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, where similar anti-India protests were held, Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar reaffirmed Pakistan's moral and diplomatic support for Kashmiris seeking what he called 'freedom from India's illegal occupation'.
Mazhar Saeed Shah – a leader of the All Parties Hurriyat Conference, an alliance of pro-independence Kashmiri political and religious groups – urged the international community to help ensure Kashmiris are granted the right to self-determination, as called for in United Nations resolutions decades ago.
Meanwhile in Srinagar in India-administered Kashmir, supporters of the opposition India National Congress party rallied to demand that the government restore the statehood of the disputed region.
Heightened tensions between India and Pakistan
Tuesday's rallies come nearly three months after Pakistan and India exchanged military strikes over a mass shooting in Pahalgam in India-administered Kashmir that New Delhi blamed on Islamabad – a charge Pakistan denied.
It was the worst standoff by the nuclear-armed neighbours since 1999, and more than 70 people were killed in missile, drone and artillery fire on both sides. The confrontation raised concerns about a possible military escalation before global powers defused the crisis. While the May 10 ceasefire has held, tensions are still simmering.
New Delhi last week said three Pakistani men who carried out the Pahalgam attack were killed during a gun battle on July 28 on the outskirts of Srinagar.
India's top court will hear a plea for the restoration of Kashmir's federal statehood this week, court officials said on Tuesday. The hearing, scheduled on Friday in the Supreme Court, follows an application filed by two residents.
The Supreme Court in December 2023 upheld removing the region's autonomy but called for Jammu and Kashmir to be restored to statehood and put on a par with any other Indian federal state 'at the earliest and as soon as possible'.
In November, Kashmir elected its first government since it was brought under New Delhi's direct control as voters backed opposition parties to lead its regional assembly. But the local government has limited powers, and the territory continues to be for all practical purposes governed by a New Delhi-appointed administrator.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
22 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
India says six Pakistani aircraft shot down during May conflict
India shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft during fighting in May, India's air force chief says, the first such statement from the country since the deadly conflict with its neighbour. Air force chief Amar Preet Singh made the announcement on Saturday, weeks after India's military acknowledged that an unspecified number of its own jets were also shot down by Pakistan during their heaviest fighting in decades. It involved fighter planes and cruise missiles and killed dozens of people. The conflict was triggered after armed men killed 26 tourists in India-administered Kashmir's Pahalgam town on April 22. Speaking at a military lecture in the southern city of Bengaluru on Saturday, Singh said India's S-400 air defence systems took down most of the Pakistani aircraft. 'We have at least five fighters confirmed killed and one large aircraft,' he said, adding that the large aircraft, which could have been a surveillance plane, was shot down at a distance of 300km (186 miles). 'This is actually the largest ever recorded surface-to-air kill that we can talk about. Our air defence systems have done a wonderful job,' he was quoted as saying by several Indian media outlets. Air Chief Marshal Staff Singh did not mention the type of fighter jets that were downed but said air strikes also hit an additional surveillance plane and 'a few F-16' fighters that were parked in hangars at two airbases in southeastern Pakistan. Half of the F-16 hangar at the Shahbaz Jacobabad airbase in Sindh province was destroyed, he said. Islamabad, whose air force primarily operates Chinese-made jets and US F-16s, has previously denied that India downed any Pakistani aircraft during the May 7-10 fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbours. There was no immediate reaction to Singh's statements from Pakistan. During their conflict, Pakistan said it downed six Indian military jets, including at least three Rafale fighters – a claim one Indian military official described as 'absolutely incorrect'. Both India and Pakistan claim Kashmir in full but administer only parts of the Muslim-majority Himalayan territory, which has been a continuing source of tension between them. Armed groups in the India-administered portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi's rule since 1989. India accuses Pakistan of backing some armed groups, but Islamabad says it provides only diplomatic support to the Kashmiris' struggle for self-determination. Since India and Pakistan declared a ceasefire in May, intermittent fighting has continued in the area between Indian troops and fighters. On Saturday, Indian officials said two Indian soldiers and a suspected fighter were reported killed late on Friday in the India-administered Kashmir district of Kulgam. According to Indian military officials, two soldiers were also injured.
Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Attack on people's memory': Kashmir's book ban sparks new censorship fears
Srinagar, India-administered Kashmir – Hafsa Kanjwal's book on Kashmir has just been banned, but it's the irony of the moment that strikes her the most. This week, authorities in India-administered Kashmir proscribed 25 books authored by acclaimed scholars, writers and journalists. The banned books include Kanjwal's Colonizing Kashmir: State‑Building under Indian Occupation. But even as the ban was followed by police raids on several bookstores in the region's biggest city, Srinagar, during which they seized books on the blacklist, Indian officials are holding a book festival in the city on the banks of Dal Lake. 'Nothing is surprising about this ban, which comes at a moment when the level of censorship and surveillance in Kashmir since 2019 has reached absurd heights,' Kanjwal told Al Jazeera, referring to India's crackdown on the region since it revoked Kashmir's semiautonomous status six years ago. 'It is, of course, even more absurd that this ban comes at a time when the Indian army is simultaneously promoting book reading and literature through a state-sponsored Chinar Book Festival.' Yet even with Kashmir's long history of facing censorship, the book bans represent to many critics a particularly sweeping attempt by New Delhi to assert control over academia in the disputed region. 'Misguiding youth' The 25 books banned by the government offer a detailed overview of the events surrounding the Partition of India and the reasons why Kashmir became such an intransigent territorial dispute to begin with. They include writings like Azadi by Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy, Human Rights Violations in Kashmir by Piotr Balcerowicz and Agnieszka Kuszewska, Kashmiris' Fight for Freedom by Mohd Yusaf Saraf, Kashmir Politics and Plebiscite by Abdul Gockhami Jabbar and Do You Remember Kunan Poshpora? by Essar Batool. These are books that directly speak to rights abuses and massacres in Kashmir and promises broken by the Indian state. Then there are books like Kanjwal's, journalist Anuradha Bhasin's A Dismantled State: The Untold Story of Kashmir After Article 370 and legal scholar AG Noorani's The Kashmir Dispute 1947-2012, which dissect the region's political journey over the decades. The government has blamed these books for allegedly 'misguiding youth' in Kashmir and instigating their 'participation in violence and terrorism'. The government's order states: 'This literature would deeply impact the psyche of youth by promoting a culture of grievance, victimhood, and terrorist heroism.' The dispute in Kashmir dates back to 1947 when the departing British cleaved the Indian subcontinent into the two dominions of India and Pakistan. Muslim-majority Kashmir's Hindu king sought to be independent of both, but after Pakistan-backed fighters entered a part of the region, he agreed to join India on the condition that Kashmir enjoy a special status within the new union with some autonomy guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. But the Kashmiri people were never asked what they wanted, and India repeatedly rebuffed demands for a United Nations-sponsored plebiscite. Discontent against Indian rule simmered on and off and exploded into an armed uprising against India in 1989 in response to allegations of election fixing. Kanjwal's Colonizing Kashmir sheds light on the complicated ways in which the Indian government under its first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, consolidated its control over Kashmir. Some of Nehru's decisions that have come under criticism include the unceremonious dismissal of the region's leader Sheikh Abdullah, who advocated for self-rule for Kashmir, and the decision to replace him with his lieutenant, Bakshi Ghulam Muhammad, whose 10 years in office were marked by the strengthening of New Delhi's rule of Indian-administered Kashmir. Kanjwal's book won this year's Bernard Cohn Book Prize, which 'recognizes outstanding and innovative scholarship for a first single-authored English-language monograph on South Asia'. Kanjwal said the ban gives a sense of how 'insecure' the government is. 'Intensification of political clampdown' India has a long history of censorship and information control in Kashmir. In 2010, after major protests broke out following the killing of 17-year-old student Tufail Mattoo by security forces, the provincial government banned SMS services and restored them only three years later. At the height of another civil uprising in 2016, the government stopped Kashmir Reader, an independent publication in Srinagar, from going to press, citing its purported 'tendency to incite violence'. Aside from prohibitions on newspapers and modes of communication, Indian authorities have routinely detained journalists under stringent preventive detention laws in Kashmir. That pattern has picked up since 2019. 'First they came for journalists, and realising they were successful in silencing them, they have turned their attention to academia,' said veteran editor Anuradha Bhasin, whose book on India's revocation of Kashmir's special status in 2019 is among those banned. Bhasin described the accusations that her book promotes violence as strange. 'Nowhere does my book glorify terrorism, but it does criticise the state. There's a distinction between the two that authorities in Kashmir want to blur. That's a very dangerous trend.' Bhasin told Al Jazeera that such bans will have far-reaching implications for future works being produced on Kashmir. 'Publishers will think twice before printing anything critical on Kashmir,' she said. 'When my book went to print, the legal team vetted it thrice.' 'A feeling of despair' The book bans have drawn criticism from various quarters in Kashmir with students and researchers calling it an attempt to impose collective amnesia. Sabir Rashid, a 27-year-old independent scholar from Kashmir, said he was very disappointed. 'If we take these books out of Kashmir's literary canon, we are left with nothing,' he said. Rashid is working on a book on Kashmir's modern history concerning the period surrounding the Partition of India. 'If these works are no longer available to me, my research is naturally going to be lopsided.' On Thursday, videos showed uniformed policemen entering bookstores in Srinagar and asking their proprietors if they possessed any of the books in the banned list. At least one book vendor in Srinagar told Al Jazeera he had a single copy of Bhasin's Dismantled State, which he sold just before the raids. 'Except that one, I did not have any of these books,' he shrugged. More acclaimed works on the blacklist Historian Sumantra Bose is aghast at the suggestion by Indian authorities that his book Kashmir at the Crossroads has fuelled violence in the region. He has worked on the Kashmir dispute since 1993 and said he has focused on devising pathways for finding a lasting peace for the region. Bose is also amused at a family legacy represented by the ban. In 1935, the colonial authorities in British India banned The Indian Struggle, 1920-1934, a compendium of political analysis authored by Subhas Chandra Bose, his great-uncle and a leader of India's freedom struggle. 'Ninety years later, I have been accorded the singular honour of following in the legendary freedom fighter's footsteps,' he said. As police step up raids on bookshops in Srinagar and seize valuable, more critical works, the literary community in Kashmir has a feeling of despondency. 'This is an attack on the people's memory,' Rashid said. 'These books served as sentinels. They were supposed to remind us of our history. But now, the erasure of memory in Kashmir is nearly complete.'
Al Jazeera
18 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
India may pause plans to buy US arms after Trump's tariffs: Report
India is pausing plans to procure new weapons and aircraft from the United States in apparent retaliation for President Donald Trump's tariff hike on its exports this week, according to news agency Reuters, citing three Indian officials. Two of the officials familiar with the matter told Reuters that India had been planning to send Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to Washington in the coming weeks for an announcement on some of the purchases, but that the trip had been cancelled, the news agency reported. Following publication of the story on Friday, India's government issued a statement it attributed to a Ministry of Defence source describing news reports of a pause in the talks as 'false and fabricated'. The statement also said procurement was progressing as per 'extant procedures'. Relations between the two countries nosedived this week after Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods on Wednesday as punishment for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil, which he said meant the country was funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine. That raised the total duty on Indian exports to 50 percent – among the highest of any US trading partner. Trump has a history of reversing course on tariffs and India has said it remains actively engaged in discussions with Washington. One of the officials who spoke to Reuters said the defence purchases could go ahead once India had clarity on tariffs and the direction of bilateral ties, but 'just not as soon as they were expected to'. Written instructions had not been given to pause the purchases, another official said, indicating that India had the option to quickly reverse course, though there was 'no forward movement at least for now'. New Delhi, which has forged a close partnership with the US in recent years, has said it is being unfairly targeted and that Washington and its European allies continue to trade with Moscow when it is in their interest. Reuters reported that discussions on India's purchases of Stryker combat vehicles, made by General Dynamics Land Systems, and Javelin antitank missiles, developed by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, had been paused due to the tariffs. Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had in February announced plans to pursue procurement and joint production of those items. Singh had also been planning to announce the purchase of six Boeing P8I reconnaissance aircraft and support systems for the Indian Navy during his now-cancelled trip, two of the people said. Talks over procuring the aircraft in a proposed $3.6bn deal were at an advanced stage, according to the officials. Boeing, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics referred queries to the Indian and US governments. Raytheon did not return a Reuters request for comment. Strained relations India's deepening security relationship with the US, which is fuelled by their shared strategic rivalry with China, was heralded by many US analysts as one of the key areas of foreign-policy progress in the first Trump administration. New Delhi is the world's second-largest arms importer, and Russia has traditionally been its top supplier. India has in recent years, however, shifted to importing from Western powers like France, Israel and the US, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute think tank. The shift in suppliers was driven partly by constraints on Russia's ability to export arms, which it is utilising heavily in its invasion of Ukraine. Some Russian weapons have also performed poorly in the battlefield, according to Western analysts. The broader US-India defence partnership, which includes intelligence sharing and joint military exercises, continues without hiccups, one of the Indian officials said. India also remains open to scaling back on oil imports from Russia and is open to making deals elsewhere, including the US, if it can get similar prices, according to two other Indian sources speaking to Reuters. Trump's threats and rising anti-US sentiment in India have 'made it politically difficult for Modi to make the shift from Russia to the US', one of the people said. Nonetheless, discounts on the landing cost of Russian oil have shrunk to the lowest since 2022. While the rupture in US-India ties was abrupt, there have been strains in the relationship. New Delhi has repeatedly rebutted Trump's claim that the US brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after four days of fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbours in May. Trump also hosted Pakistan's army chief at the White House in the weeks following the conflict. In recent months, Moscow has been actively pitching India on buying new defence technologies like its S-500 surface-to-air missile system, according to one of the Indian officials, as well as a Russian source familiar with the talks. India currently does not see a need for new arms purchases from Moscow, two Indian officials said. But India is unlikely to wean itself off Russian weapons entirely as the decades-long partnership between the two powers means Indian military systems will continue to require Moscow's support, one of the officials said. The Russian embassy in New Delhi did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
