Osaka Ojo Gang wins World of Street Woman Fighter Season 3 over AG Squad; fans cry nepotism as TWICE Momo's sister takes the crown
Fans rally behind AG Squad
The moment Osaka Ojo Gang was announced as the winner, social media users were left stunned, as many felt that AG Squad, who had consistently delivered technically flawless and emotionally gripping performances, had clearly earned the top spot.
One fan tweeted, 'Ag squad really carried the whole season just to end up like Jam Republic…' Y'all not tired of snubbing the real winners?"
ag squad really carried the whole season just to end up like jam republic… y'all not tired of snubbing the real winners 😭
"Honestly, I didn't need the AG squad to win 1st place because their superior performances and sheer work ethic during the show speak for themselves. They're a winner in my eyes, and that's all that matters," another wrote.
honestly I didn't need ag squad to win 1st place because their superior performances and sheer work ethic during the show speak for themselves, they're a winner in my eyes and that's all that matters! 🫶🫶 #WSWF #WSWF3
Some fans even speculated that the decision leaned into Mnet's push for global appeal and that Osaka Ojo Gang's international popularity might've tipped the scales. The sentiment wasn't universal, but it was loud and persistent.
Why are fans crying nepotism?
Adding to the controversy, some netizens are now crying nepotism, pointing to the fact that TWICE member Momo's older sister, Hana Hirai, is part of the Osaka Ojo Gang. The connection drew even more attention when several TWICE members, including Momo, Jihyo, Jeongyeon, Nayeon, and Sana, showed up at the WSWF finale in support of the crew. While their presence lit up the crowd and added star power to the event, some fans are questioning whether the group's K-pop ties may have influenced the outcome. '
"Wdym a crew who wins almost all missions got lost to a crew who never wins even one? Oh, I hate nepotism. If it's SWF 2, I get it since Bebe wins on some missions too, but this? Meh," said one user.
wdym a crew who wins almost all missions got lost to a crew who never win even one 🙂↔️ oh i hate nepotism. if swf 2 i get it since bebe wins on some missions too, but this? meh
TWICE members and Daehwi spotted on the finale of WSWF. #WSWF pic.twitter.com/EWGJyu6M24
AG Squad vs. Osaka Ojo Gang: two very different journeys
AG Squad had one of the strongest track records this season. They came out on top in several missions, including the demanding Mega Crew challenge, and consistently impressed judges with clean execution and detailed choreography. Their elimination battle earlier in the show showcased just how fierce and prepared they were, making it all the more shocking when they didn't walk away with the title.
Osaka Ojo Gang, on the other hand, gained momentum later in the season. Their Dance Film Mission performance—which racked up over 2.5 million views and 330,000 likes—helped cement their status as crowd pullers. Led by Kyoka and Ibuki, their finale routine leaned more into stage presence and emotional impact than technical perfection. That choice clearly worked for the judges, who emphasised storytelling and transformation in their final evaluations.
To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Japanese vlogger compares Bengaluru airport to '5-star hotel': 'Fake or natural green?'
A Japanese content creator has gone viral after posting a video of his visit to Kempegowda International Airport in Bengaluru, describing it as 'one of the most beautiful airports in the world.' The video was shared by a reel creator named Kaito, as per his Instagram bio. In the clip, he can be seen walking through the terminal, clearly impressed by its architecture, greenery, and overall atmosphere. 'This is Bengaluru International Airport. This architecture, I have never seen any airport like this before,' he says in the video. 'Guys, this is inside of Bengaluru International Airport. I don't know the official name of this airport. But there are so many trees hanging from the ceiling.' Kaito compared the airport's interiors to those of a luxury hotel. 'It looks like a 5-star hotel or something. And it smells really really good inside. It smells like... like Aesop, if you know, the cosmetic brand.' He also pointed out some of the unique features, saying, 'Actually, it's not a tree, it's like a bell. A huge bell covered with trees hanging from the ceiling. And there is also a fountain there. That's insane. There's like an indoor waterfall here.' While admiring the design, Kaito compared Bengaluru's airport to some of the world's best, including Singapore's Changi Airport and Doha's Hamad International Airport. 'There is like a garden in Changi Airport, Singapore, and Hamad International Airport, Doha, Qatar, but this is like another level, because the whole airport is covered with green. Is this fake or natural green?' he asked. He added, 'There is a garden at some airports, but this is not garden, like whole airport is like garden. Oh my gosh, is this real or not? Oh I think it's real. All plants here are real, but there is no like insect or something.' Pressed for time, Kaito wrapped up the video saying, 'This is a shopping area, but I don't have much time today. My boarding is already started, so I have to hurry. I don't have much time to enjoy like eating or shopping.' The reel, captioned 'One of the most beautiful airport in the world', has received widespread praise online. One user commented, 'Yes, it's one of India's best airports. We're proud!' Another said, 'This feels like a garden you can fly from!' A third added, 'South India's pride, truly stunning.' Someone else wrote, 'Our airports are changing the way the world sees India.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru airport's immersive design leave Japanese vlogger awestruck: 'I have never seen any airport like this before!'
A Garden You Can Fly From A Moment for India In a world where most airports feel like concrete stopovers between cities, Bengaluru's Kempegowda International Airport is rewriting expectations—and winning hearts. A recent Instagram video by Japanese content creator Kaito has gone viral for all the right reasons: his stunned reaction to KIA's architecture, interiors, and lush green design left global viewers curious, and Indian audiences it 'one of the most beautiful airports in the world ,' Kaito's short video shows him walking through the airport with wide-eyed amazement. 'This architecture, I have never seen any airport like this before,' he says in the video posted to his Instagram account, @kaito_travelers.What struck Kaito most wasn't the usual flashy duty-free zones or runway views, but the striking use of greenery and immersive design. 'There are so many trees hanging from the ceiling,' he says, pointing to massive bell-shaped installations wrapped in plants. 'It looks like a five-star hotel or something. And it smells really, really good inside—like Aesop ,' he adds, referring to the luxury skincare brand known for its aromatic he pans his camera across the terminal, he notes, 'There is like an indoor waterfall here. I've never seen any airport with so much green inside.'He then draws comparisons to renowned global hubs like Singapore's Changi and Doha's Hamad International, noting that while those airports have gardens, Bengaluru's terminal is different. 'This is not a garden. Like, the whole airport is like a garden,' he says, clearly impressed. He even questions aloud whether the plants are real—only to confirm they are—adding, 'But there is no insect or something!'Kaito's video, titled 'One of the most beautiful airports in the world,' has drawn praise from both domestic and international viewers. One user commented, 'South India's pride, truly stunning.' Another added, 'Our airports are changing the way the world sees India.' One follower wrote, 'This feels like a garden you can fly from!'The design that left Kaito in awe is part of a larger vision for KIA. The new Terminal 2, also called the 'Terminal in a Garden,' was unveiled in 2022 with an emphasis on sustainability and biophilic architecture . Using hanging gardens, local art installations, and natural materials, the space was crafted to reflect Bengaluru's reputation as India's 'Garden City.'Unfortunately, Kaito couldn't explore the full stretch of the terminal. 'My boarding is already started, so I have to hurry. I didn't have much time to enjoy eating or shopping,' he says toward the end of his video. Yet, even in a short visit, Bengaluru left its mark.
Scroll.in
3 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Kazuo Ishiguro won the Nobel Prize for making us cry. But, ‘Never Let Me Go' should make us angry
Kazuo Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go was published 20 years ago. Since then, the Japanese-born English writer has been awarded the Nobel Prize in 2017 and knighted for services to literature in 2018. Never Let Me Go has been translated into over 50 languages. It has been adapted into a film, two stage plays, and a ten-part Japanese television series. A critical and commercial success, the novel has been reissued in an anniversary edition with a fresh introduction from the author. A spate of reappraisals has accompanied this anniversary: 'An impossibly sad novel […] it made me cry several times […] sadness spilled off every page.' 'No matter how many times I read it,' one critic wrote, ' Never Let Me Go breaks my heart all over again.' These brief excerpts are clear: the novel pulls us into a morass of sadness that never lets us go. 'I've usually been praised for producing stuff that makes people cry,' Ishiguro has said. 'They gave me a Nobel prize for it.' Strange and familiar I want to reconsider the emotional charge of Never Let Me Go. The deluge of tears attested to by critics hinges on the relationship Ishiguro meticulously crafts between narrator and reader. This is initiated in the novel's first lines. Ishiguro places us in an alternative 1990s England. His opening gambit will be familiar to novel readers: 'My name is Kathy H. I'm thirty-one years old, and I've been a carer now for over eleven years. That sounds long enough, I know, but actually they want me to go on for another eight months […] My donors have always tended to do much better than expected.' Within a few pages, the narration slips into Kathy's recollections of her idyllic 1970s youth at a boarding school called Hailsham. We are immersed in a childhood world of friendship and exclusion, jealousy and love. This is a recognisable world. Ishiguro's first-person narration affords the reader vicarious access to Kathy's interior tangle of emotion, desire and reflection, such that we can recognise something of ourselves in her. Yet something is amiss in her narration. Flat and rather affectless, it is a decidedly less curious, less passionate and more tempered mode of narration than we might expect. The threadbare texture frays the narrative world. What are we to make of the opaque references to 'carer', 'they' and 'donors'? This uncanny tension between the strange and the familiar simmers until a third of the way through the novel, when a 'guardian' at Hailsham reveals the students' futures: 'Your lives are set out for you. You'll become adults, then before you're old, before you're even middle-aged, you'll start to donate your vital organs. That's what each of you was created to do.' Good liberals Kathy is a clone, condemned to death so her organs can be harvested for 'normals'. That this heartless system ' reduces the most hardened critics to tears ' comes as no surprise. After all, Ishiguro has evoked the familiar genre of the 19th-century boarding-school bildungsroman to encourage us to believe that this is a form of subjectivity we can share. This bildung – the German word for 'formation' – is not an integration into society but rather a dismemberment by society. That this does not provoke anger, in readers and characters alike, does come as a surprise. For if the proclamation of the students' fates is not distressing enough, Ishiguro forces us to confront the clones' response or, rather, the lack thereof. There are no incandescent flashes of fury or even mild expressions of dismay. Instead, the clones are 'pretty relieved' when the speech stops. Knowledge of their impending death passes them like a ship in the night, inciting 'surprisingly little discussion'. In this disconcerting silence, the relation between reader and clone is mediated through another genre: science fiction. The bildungsroman and science fiction, identification and misidentification, intimacy and estrangement – these are the tools of Ishiguro's trade. He manipulates them, and us, with precision. There is intimacy as we recognise that the students' everyday lives – reading novels, creating art, playing sport – are much like our own. There is estrangement as we realise that the clones are willingly cooperating in their own deaths. They will 'donate' and 'complete' in the narrative's chilling terms. In other words, we cry because the clones are just like us, but our anger towards the machinery of donation is blunted because the clones are not yet us, in that their complicity eerily lacks our instinct for self-preservation. Confident that we will take ourselves as the measuring stick, Ishiguro compels us to adopt a position of superiority characterised by a paternalistic ethos of sympathy and care. In this way, he persuades us to read as good liberals. We acknowledge the humanity of the clones and embrace the diversity of our common condition. At the same time, we are complacent in the knowledge that we are almost the same, but not quite. We are insulated by a disavowed difference. An abstract formal equality, evacuated of concrete historical content, is precisely what is expressed when the same critics who praise the novel's melancholic tone claim that Ishiguro shows us ' what it is to be human ' or that he enlivens this otherwise ' meaningless cliche '. Beyond liberal sentiments Is Ishiguro doing anything more than offering a banal endorsement of common humanity? It seems to me that he is, and in doing so, he is summoning our liberal sentiments only to turn them against us. The mechanism he uses is as old as the novel form itself: the romance plot. Romance leads to the happily-ever-after of marriage: a perfect union in which each person completes the other. Not long after we learn that Kathy and her friends are clones destined to die, we become privy to a rumour: students who can prove they are 'properly in love' are eligible for a 'deferral' of their donations. To fast-forward through the novel's tangled romance plot to the denouement, Kathy and Tommy – a fellow clone – track down Hailsham's former administrator to plead their case. Not only is their request for deferral rejected, but the possibility of deferral is dispelled as a pernicious rumour. The allure of romance has been a lure, a cold steel trap in the guise of a warm embrace. Ishiguro dangles the promise of romance only to expose its sinister echoes in the donation system. The 'completion' of romance is macabrely inverted. Completion through matrimonial union with an ideal other is transformed into the 'donation' of organs, which completes an unknown 'normal', whose life can continue as a result of the clone's death. Ishiguro positions us so that we are unwittingly aligned with the 'normal' population, whose 'overwhelming concern was that their own children, their spouses, their parents, their friends, did not die from cancer, motor neuron disease, heart disease'. What we want the clones to do (resist their fates) and the means of doing so (romance) are revealed as responsible for the donation system. If we want Kathy and Tommy to live because they love each other – and we do because Ishiguro has compelled us to care for them – then we are endorsing the logic that designates them as disposable in the first place. The anger Ishiguro has deliberately blunted returns, redoubled. Our care is transformed into complicity. We, rather than the clones, are the targets of Ishiguro's ire. Translating this into political terms, Ishiguro is giving aesthetic form to neoliberalism's eclipse of liberalism. It is no coincidence that Never Let Me Go takes place in England between the 1970s and 1990s, the exact period of neoliberalism's emergence and consolidation. But this is no simple transition. Never Let Me Go implies that liberalism is the ghost in the neoliberal machine. The novel is a representation of a vicious neoliberal class system, where those who can afford replacement parts can substantiate the fantasy of liberal individualism, while those who can't serve as replacement parts. In this sense, Ishiguro can be read as posing a series of incisive questions, not simply offering the platitude that we are all human. What are the costs of love? Why is there a trade-off between caring for those close to us and caring for those who are distant? How do our claims of shared humanity pave the way for domination? Why do we assume that our way of life is superior because it is predicated on liberal principles? How do we break from a callous system in which we too are complicit? Twenty years on, these questions are as relevant as ever. To begin answering them, perhaps we have to wipe the tears from our eyes and turn to anger. Matthew Taft is Course Coordinator in English and Theatre Studies, The University of Melbourne. This article first appeared on The Conversation.
