Utah lawmaker defends bill allocating extra funds for English-language learners despite pushback
"I have gotten a lot of pushback on this bill, a lot. And there are people who feel like we should not be doing anything," she said Thursday at a hearing on the measure, HB42, before the Senate Education Committee.
The Republican from Herriman, however, remains adamant that the measure is needed. Doing nothing "is not going to fix the problems in the classroom," she said. She feels "very strongly" that the measure is needed to "make sure we are getting the resources to the front lines, to our students and teachers."
The measure received a favorable recommendation from the Education Committee in a unanimous voice vote on Thursday and now goes to the full Utah Senate for consideration. It received unanimous support from the Utah House in a 71-0 vote last week. The measure would allocate $500,000 a year in extra funds to aid public school districts in Utah experiencing the sharpest jumps in numbers of English-language learners, typically immigrant students.
The strong legislative backing notwithstanding, the notion of bolstering money to help a pool of kids likely to include students here illegally rubs some the wrong way. Amid increased calls by many to crack down on illegal immigration, most notably from President Donald Trump, conservative Utah influencer Eric Moutsos, for one, takes umbrage with the idea.
"Yes, we all know the massive problem of illegal aliens in Utah, but is $500,000 of taxpayer money going to deter people from coming to Utah, or is this a clarion type call incentive for more illegals aliens to come with their children?" he said in a post on his X account last week.
Pierucci countered the foes, though, noting that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that schools must offer instruction to all students regardless of their migratory status. She also emphasized the measure as a means of aiding teachers contending with the influx of English-language learners, who typically need extra or specialized attention.
"Also, teachers are not ICE," Pierucci said, referencing Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal agency tasked with pursuing immigrants here illegally. "They are not the border police. Their job is to teach children. We've given that impossible task to them right now and I'm trying to make it easier for them."
As of 2024, Utah schools had experienced an 81% jump in the number of children with the most rudimentary levels of English compared to the average for the prior three years, according to Pierucci. The presence of such students can hamper instruction for the broader pool of kids, she said, citing the example of one teacher she spoke with.
The teacher "would present the subjects she was teaching on and then one of the students who spoke Spanish and English would translate for six other students," she said. "That was the only option they had."
Districts experiencing jumps of at least 75% in the numbers of English-language learners with the most basic level of English over the prior three-year average would be able to tap into the $500,000. They'd also have to experience jumps of at least 30 students in the category. The funding could be used as recipient districts see fit.
Liliana Bolaños, a policy analyst with Voices for Utah Children, a nonprofit child advocacy group, expressed support for the bill, but said extra funding should also be available for districts that already have high numbers of English-language learners. After Thursday's hearing, Pierucci said districts typically get an extra funding allowance from the state for the numbers of English-language learners in their schools. Funds from HB42 would be aimed at supplementing schools that experience large unexpected spikes in such students at the start of each school year, before the state makes the extra funding allocation.
HB42 received favorable comments, by and large, from Senate Education Committee members.
HB42 isn't "just about translating for our students. It's about providing them with an education that teaches them how to navigate an English-speaking world," said Sen. Kathleen Riebe, D-Cottonwood Heights.
Sen. John Johnson, R-North Ogden, sees HB42 as a way of bolstering support for Utah teachers contending with increasing numbers of English-language learners.
"I don't especially care where these kids came from. This is about supporting teachers and it's supporting our schools," he said. "Someone else can worry about why these kids are here or anything else. But this really is about supporting our teachers who are struggling with this."
According to Utah Board of Education figures, Granite School District experienced a 76% jump in English-language learners in 2024 compared to the prior three-year average, from 2,298 to 4,041. Jordan School District experienced a 108% jump, from 723 to 1,502. The numbers represent students with the most basic English skills as determined from standardized testing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
There is a solution to America's gerrymandering problem
The redistricting war going on across the country began with the president asking — or, as some see it, directing — Texas to redraw its congressional map to give the GOP as many as five additional House seats in the 2026 midterm elections. Given that the party that holds the White House typically loses House seats in the midterms, and with a thin GOP majority after the 2024 election, the president is looking for any advantage to hold the House. This action has elicited outrage among Democrats, pushing the most populous state, California, to redraw its map. Several other states, including Ohio, Florida and Indiana, are also investigating the possibility of redrawing their maps, in an all-out gerrymander fest to squeeze every last seat out of Congress. Yet the maps drawn after the 2020 census were already well gerrymandered. Of the 435 total seats, just 36 were deemed competitive in 2022, defined as winners determined by a margin of victory below 5 percent. In 2024, the number of competitive seats jumped to 43. Though the problem appears to be the gerrymandering of congressional maps, the real problem is how representation is determined. The popular vote in each congressional district determines its winner, but the way the population of each state is dissected into discrete districts partitions the popular vote across each state. Since each district seat is represented by a winner-take-all vote, the design of each state's congressional map effectively determines how its voters are represented in Congress. Take, for example, Massachusetts. Its nine congressional seats are all represented by Democrats. In the 2024 election, five of the seats were uncontested. Among the four contested races, the closest margin of victory was 13 percent. Yet in the presidential race, 36 percent of the votes cast were for Donald Trump, the same percentage that voted for the Republican candidates in the four contested seats. This begs the question: Should these 36 percent of voters have some GOP representation? A similar situation occurred in Oklahoma, with all five of its congressional seats held by Republications, even though 32 percent of the votes cast were for Kamala Harris. Given that computational redistricting can draw House maps that are either maximally gerrymandered, provide sensible voter representation, or anything in between, there is no need for maps to be drawn by redistricting commissions, whether they are independent or made up of partisan legislators. The necessary mapping criteria specified by state laws can now be incorporated into mapping algorithms. Examples of such criteria include compactness of districts or preserving communities of interest. The only role for redistricting commissions is to specify the desired bias of the map. Gerrymandered maps demonstrate that we no longer have representation of the people but of the parties, making Congress a de facto House of Mis-Representatives. At the core, the problem is how members of the House are elected, and indirectly, the Electoral College. As long as voter preferences are packed into discrete ongressional district seats, the current gerrymandering wars will continue to discount and ignore voters. In fact, Trump told a group in 2024 during his campaign that they would not need to vote again if he were elected. Despite not knowing precisely what he had in mind, he may indeed be correct, given that representation of voters is mostly predetermined. Is there a solution? Continue to hold elections with congressional districts. However, the number of seats won by each party should be allocated by each party's state popular vote. Then the top vote getters, either in absolute number or in percentage of votes won, across all the districts from each party are assigned seats, up to the number of seats won by the party. This means that all the representatives in each state would be at-large, representing all the people of the state. A formula for rounding would be needed to determine which party gets the partial seat fraction, much like how congressional apportionment is used after each census to determine the number of House seats in each state. With such a system, in Massachusetts, Republicans would have won two congressional seats and Democrats would have won seven. In Oklahoma, Republicans would have won four seats and Democrats would have won one. Such a process would neutralize the impact of gerrymandering, since each state's haul of seats would be determined by the state popular vote, giving every eligible voter the added incentive to cast their vote. The net effect of such a system would likely not yield a difference in the overall number of House seats held by each party. It would, however, redistribute party representation across all 50 states. Most importantly, it would neutralize the benefits of gerrymandering to the parties, since each state's popular vote would determine representation. —Such a new system would require a change in the Constitution something that is highly unlikely in this vitriolic political environment. Yet without such a change, gerrymandering will continue to erode the influence of voters and elevate the power of parties. Texas's actions to redraw their congressional map midterm has unleashed a war on democracy. More accurately, it has taken gerrymander politics to unprecedented levels. The final outcome will be less voter representation and more partisan party politics. What the Texas 'seat steal' effort demonstrates is that, in the eyes of parties, voters are no longer relevant. Every voter in the 2026 midterm elections who is disgusted with such disrespect should write in an unnamed candidate, 'Other' — if such a name won a seat, it will send a strong message that gerrymandering is no longer acceptable, that the current toxic mapping system is shattered beyond repair, and a new model for earning representation is needed. Sheldon H. Jacobson, Ph.D., is a computer science professor in the Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. As a data scientist, he uses his expertise in risk-based analytics to address problems in public policy. He is the founder of the .

Politico
7 minutes ago
- Politico
Adam Schiff forms legal defense fund
Trump specifically alleges that Schiff illicitly claimed his primary residence was Maryland for financial benefit, and his administration has tapped Ed Martin — now pardon attorney and director of DOJ's Weaponization Working Group — to oversee the matter. Just a few months ago, Schiff vowed he would place a hold on Martin's nomination to be U.S. Attorney in D.C., an effort to slow his confirmation prospects. Martin ultimately failed to gain enough support among the Senate GOP to secure his confirmation after Republican Sen. Thom Tillis said he would oppose Martin over his past defense of Jan. 6 rioters and his comments about the attack. Trump ultimately selected him for another post at the Department of Justice. Schiff's attorney, Preet Bharara — who has had his own confrontations with Trump as the top federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York — has argued that Martin's involvement into the Schiff probe represents 'the very definition of weaponization of the justice process.' FBI Director Kash Patel, who was once a House Intelligence Committee staffer working to undermine the investigation into election interference, has also released materials that suggests the California Democrat supported leaking information during his time on the House Intelligence Committee to damage the president's reputation. A spokesperson for Schiff has called the allegation 'absolutely and categorically false' and 'the latest in a series of defamatory attacks from the President and his allies.'

Epoch Times
8 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
DOJ to Start Handing Over Epstein Files to Congress, House Oversight Committee Leader Says
A top House Republican said Monday that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has agreed to hand over documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. 'There are many records in DOJ's custody, and it will take the Department time to produce all the records and ensure that the identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted,' Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the head of the House Oversight Committee, said in a Monday night statement. 'I appreciate the Trump Administration's commitment to transparency and efforts to provide the American people with information about this matter.'