
Carville blasts progressives like AOC with sharp new nickname
By
Longtime Democratic strategist James Carville dumped on the so-called 'pom pom caucus' - progressives including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders - as he tried to hand his party a potent issue to get them out of the gutter. In a new podcast for Politicon, the former adviser to President Bill Clinton said Democrats needed to focus on 'what they're doing to our veterans.'
He also encouraged Democrats to rain on President Donald Trump's military parade - that marks both his birthday and the Army's - as it forced Vietnam veterans to move their annual commemoration from the memorial on the National Mall. 'Screw the Qatari jet and the Democrats' low numbers and who's the leader of the party and what's the message and all of the constipated, convoluted [expletive] you see and hear about,' Carville said. 'This is the No. 1 issue, this has every visual you can imagine, it's justice versus evil, it's being a great citizen to being a turncoat.'
Carville pointed out how the Trump administration planned to eliminate more than 80,000 jobs from the Department of Veterans Affairs, including from the [self-murder] prevention hotline. 'This is, I think, a great time - you know, we've got the pom pom caucus out there "yeah team fight team fight, we're going to get him, we're going to get him." You actually have a piece of ground that you can fight on. It's a noble piece of ground,' Carville said. 'You don't have to go to Coachilla,' Carville continued, mispronouncing the California music festival Coachella, which Sanders addressed in April. 'Or somewhere and speak to rallies. You can do it right there and it's something that people give a [expletive] give a big [expletive] about.'
Carville said that the messaging around veterans could force voters to ponder a bigger question. 'If they are going to screw and cut and trample and disrespect a veteran - what are they going to do to you?' the Democratic strategist said. He pointed out that Americans understand this issue. 'They know what a veteran is, they know what a [self-murder] is, they know what an obligation is, they know what a country is,' Carville said.
The strategist also floated that it could be a winner with the moderate and progressive sides of the party. 'I would ask my friends on the progressive side of the equation, or whatever it is, this is something we can join together in,' Carville said. 'This is a fight that we can fight together.' Carville helped lead President Bill Clinton to victory in 1992 after 12 years of Republicans in the White House by moderating the Democrats' message.
He sees a future where that move could work again, whereas Ocasio-Cortez (pictured), Sanders and other progressive members of the party has pushed for the Democrats to move leftward. 'So this is our golden opportunity,' Carville said. 'You do it in your hometown, do it in the courthouse square. Organize people. Bring them together. Use flags, use music. I'll tell you what's a good one, play When Johnny Comes Marching Home Again. The Trump administration is going to [expletive] Johnny!' Carville suggested. 'That's what's going to happen to Johnny!'
'He's going to end up eating a .38! And his last call is going to be to a non-existent veterans [self-murder] prevention hotline,' Carville continued. 'Take that! Take that!' As for the Trump parade, which will take place the evening of June 14th - Flag Day - Carville rolled his eyes at the cost, while at the same time the administration is cutting veteran benefits. 'So he wants to have a parade and you know now it's going to cost $16 million to repair streets. Oh [expletive] that,' Carville said. 'We're not into $16 million here.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
S&P Global 'positive' on Wells Fargo as regulatory burden lifts
June 6 (Reuters) - S&P Global (SPGI.N), opens new tab upgraded its outlook on Wells Fargo (WFC.N), opens new tab to "positive" from "stable", the ratings provider said on Friday, after the U.S. bank was released from a $1.95 trillion asset cap earlier this week. The U.S. Federal Reserve's unprecedented, seven-year long punitive measure was imposed on Wells in 2018 and restricted balance sheet growth so the bank could address rampant governance and compliance concerns that had been brought to light in a fake accounts scandal in 2016. The Fed's unanimous decision on Tuesday capped years of efforts by the bank to repair the damage and pay off billions of dollars in fines, sending Wells Fargo shares to a three-month high a day later. The stock has gained nearly 8.3% in a year where the benchmark S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab has remained flat. "The positive outlook on the holding company reflects our view that Wells Fargo has substantially improved its underlying governance, risk, and control profile, allowing for the removal of the Fed's asset cap," said S&P. S&P also expects Wells to expand its commercial and investment banking business, "the unit most affected by the asset cap and one that had to turn away some nonoperational deposits from customers." While the fourth-largest U.S. lender was forced to carefully manage wholesale deposits and its markets business, assets of peer JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N), opens new tab swelled by nearly $2 trillion since the start of 2018, while those of Bank of America (BAC.N), opens new tab and PNC Financial (PNC.N), opens new tab added about $1 trillion and nearly $200 billion, respectively.


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump vs Musk is the final battle before economic catastrophe
Who needs reality TV when there's the psychodrama of Trump's White House to keep us all entertained? As plot lines go, the falling out between Elon Musk and Donald Trump was perhaps about as predictable as they come, but the sheer venom, speed and combustibility of the divorce has nevertheless proved utterly captivating. Even the best of Hollywood scriptwriters would have struggled to do better. The stench of betrayal hangs heavy in the air, a veritable revenger's tragedy of a drama. Beneath it all, however, lies a rather more serious matter than the sight of two of the world's richest and most powerful men breaking up and exchanging insults. And it's one which afflicts nearly all major, high income economies. Slowly but surely – and at varying speeds – they are all going bust. Yet few of them even seem capable of recognising it, let alone doing anything to correct it. None more so than the United States, where the Congressional Budget Office last week estimated that Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' would add a further $2.4 trillion to the national debt by 2034. Let's not take sides, but Musk was absolutely right when he described the bill as 'a disgusting abomination'. It taxes far too little, and it spends far too much. It is hard to imagine a more reckless piece of make-believe. Musk had backed Trump not just out of self-interest – more government contracts, protection of the electric vehicle mandate, personal aggrandisement and so on – but because he genuinely believed he could help stop the US from bankrupting itself. This has proved a monumental conceit. The $2 trillion of savings in federal spending he initially promised has turned out to be at most $200bn, and probably substantially less once double accounting and wishful thinking is factored in. In any case, against total federal spending last year of nearly £7 trillion, it is but a drop in the ocean, and only goes to show just how difficult it is to find serious savings in government administration even when given a free hand with the headcount.


Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Elon Musk picks a losing fight with Donald Trump
NEW YORK, June 6 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Money can buy power, but Elon Musk paid for someone else to have it. After spending more than $250 million backing Donald Trump's presidential campaign, an acrimonious schism erupted between the two and swiftly vaporized $150 billion of Tesla's (TSLA.O), opens new tab market value. By picking a losing fight, the carmaker's boss is putting even more at risk for himself and his investors. A cozy alliance between the world's richest man and its most powerful one pointed to a troubling oligarchy. Musk joined Team Trump to lead a controversial effort to slash costs from the U.S. bureaucracy. Tesla sales sank internationally, protests at showrooms escalated and concerns about the CEO's focus intensified. He left his Department of Government Efficiency post last week, with an amicable White House sendoff. The tone abruptly changed on Thursday. Musk's criticism of Trump's signature budget legislation and the president's retorts about government contracts with Musk's companies spiraled into a deeply personal social-media war of words. Musk is a formidable force, with a net worth approaching $400 billion, according, opens new tab to Forbes. His rocket company SpaceX accounted for 85% of orbit-bound cargo in early 2024 by one estimate. After paying $44 billion to buy Twitter, he remade it into a friendlier forum for the president's followers. Any tinkering with the algorithms might swing the tone, as could Musk's bulging wallet if used to support anti-Trump candidates. A threat, opens new tab from Trump to cut U.S. government purse strings from Musk's businesses flaunts the real balance of power, however. About $22 billion of contracts hang in the balance at SpaceX alone, Reuters reported. Tesla's deep ties in China, where it generated a fifth of revenue last year, also may tempt the president's ire as he wages a highly combative trade war with Beijing. Reprisals from President Xi Jinping also could be painful. Musk is doing his companies no favors either. He pivoted Tesla away from mass-market dominance to pursue autonomous driving instead. National regulators have nagging questions about robotic taxi services. A more hostile regulatory environment would undermine the moonshot, leaving a shrinking car business falling behind Chinese rivals. If Musk doesn't back down, as he hinted was a possibility, the costs are bound to escalate. Having already alienated pro-renewable-energy Democrats, he may scare off pro-Trump Republicans, too. An adversarial relationship with SpaceX is probably untenable for NASA. Raising money for his artificial intelligence venture may get harder, as would securing U.S. government contracts for his tunneling company. Musk achieved success by defying perceived scientific constraints, but he is now pushing up against the limits of money. Follow Jonathan Guilford on X, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab.