Texas House passes bill to move ahead with law school for El Paso
EL PASO, Texas (KTSM) — The Texas House of Representatives passed a bill on Thursday, May 15, to authorize moving ahead with and establishing a public law school in El Paso County, according to a news release from state Rep. Vince Perez, D-El Paso.
House Bill 3475, sponsored by Perez, authorizes Texas university systems — including UT, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, University of Houston and Texas State — to formally propose establishing a public law school in El Paso County, according to Perez's office.
El Paso remains one of the largest metropolitan areas in the nation without a local accredited law school, requiring students to travel long distances or forgo pursuing a legal education, Perez's office said.
'HB 3475 addresses this significant educational gap and responds to strong regional demand identified through a recent state-funded feasibility study,' Perez's office said.
University of Texas at El Paso President Heather Wilson presented key findings from that study during the House Higher Education Committee hearing, highlighting 'robust local support' and the long-term benefits of providing accessible legal education in the region, Perez's office said in its news release.
'Today's vote is a significant step toward expanding educational and professional opportunities for El Paso and West Texas students,' Perez said. 'Creating a law school in El Paso will empower local talent, meet the growing statewide need for bilingual legal professionals, and stimulate economic growth in our region.'
'This isn't just about adding another school — it's about securing Texas's long-term prosperity. El Paso is our front door to the world, and we must invest in the legal minds who will lead in cross-border trade, immigration, and international business,' Perez added.
The bill will now be sent to the Senate and if passed, will go to Gov. Greg Abbott's desk to be signed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Speaker Perez says 'embarrassing' UF presidential search could have been avoided
The Plaza of the Americas on University of Florida's Gainesville campus (Photo by Jay Waagmeester/Florida Phoenix) The University of Florida presidential search failing in its last minutes could have been avoided if the House had its way this session, Speaker Daniel Perez said Thursday. 'Neither the University of Florida nor the Board of Governors, nor (Santa) Ono would have been in this position,' had HB 1321 been in effect before the presidential search, Perez said during a media availability. Representatives voted 104-8 on that bill this session, which would have repealed the public records exemption on applicants for presidencies at state colleges and universities. The Senate companion bill, SB 1726, cleared all its committees of reference, but the full Senate never considered it. Back to the drawing board: UF presidential finalist nixed for conflicting DEI stances The State University System Board of Governors rejected University of Michigan President Santa Ono during the final phase of the presidential search process this week. The 6-10 vote against Ono followed hours of questions about his conflicting stances on diversity, equity, and inclusion. He was unanimously approved by UF trustees the week before. 'All of the deficiencies that Ono had prior to the presidential search coming to a conclusion, and eventually going before the BOG would have been discovered,' Perez said. 'It was not discovered because no one knew that Ono was the one that was going to be nominated, unanimously approved, and sent to the BOG.' The House sponsor of the bill, Rep. Michelle Salzman, said the measure was about 'transparency, term limiting bureaucrats, and good governance.' Gov. Ron DeSantis said the bill, which included a provision prohibiting his office's involvement in searches, would 'kneecap our ability to hold higher ed accountable.' The law that put secrets in the dark once had the support of Perez. State law, since the signing of SB 520 in 2022, requires university presidential searches to be conducted outside the public eye, none of the applicants known to the public unless part of the 'shortlist' of finalists unveiled in the final phases, and the finalist(s) must be approved by the chair of the Board of Governors. That bill passed the House 86-26, with Perez voting in favor. 'What many fought back on was that the BOG chair had to have the veto power. Well, he had the veto power. He never used it. And then here we are with a presidential candidate for a major university, flagship university for the state of Florida, in a very embarrassing moment for the entire state of Florida, something that should have been avoided, could have been avoided,' Perez said. UF has twice, consecutively, named a sole finalist despite the 'shortlist' language in law. Perez said the school will have a problem trying to find a president now that the 'process is flawed.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Opponents of the House proposal have said keeping searches confidential initially prevents a candidate's current employer from discovering their employee is applying for a new job. That, in turn, encourages more candidates to apply. Senate President Ben Albritton doesn't see the issue as clearly as Perez. Albritton replied to Perez's comments in his own media availability held about an hour after Perez's. 'I'm not sure it would have' avoided Ono's rejection, Albritton said. 'One way to look at it would be that way. Another way to look at it would say that the system worked.' Albritton added: 'I applaud the Speaker and the House for taking it head on. It's a complicated situation. Let's keep talking about it.' The Legislature is not poised to address policy issues unrelated to the budget in the final days of its extended session. 'Are there some circumstances where it would be better to have multiple [finalists]? Maybe. Are there some circumstances you're better off to have one? Maybe,' Albritton said. 'I'm not going to give you something definitive at this point.' Perez said he hopes changes can come before any more searches fail. 'The House tried for this to never happen. Yet we were the only ones that believed in that policy. I still believe in that policy,' Perez said. 'Hopefully, now that we have seen this example come to fruition and become a reality, unfortunately, we can now once again have that consideration and that conversation of the policy that the House passed.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
House won't override DeSantis' ‘free kill' repeal veto
A trio of flashing billboards less than two miles from the Florida Capitol is slamming Gov. Ron DeSantis for vetoing the "free kill" bill on medical malpractice. (Photo credit: Christine Sexton/Florida Phoenix) House Speaker Daniel Perez said Thursday the chamber will try again next year to pass a repeal of the 'free kill' statute following Gov. Ron DeSantis' veto of the proposal. DeSantis on May 29 vetoed the Legislature's attempt to remove the bar on parents of adult children and the adult children of single parents from suing hospitals and physicians for non-economic damages for the deaths of loved ones. The governor said repealing 'free kill' would increase health care costs for Floridians and make it harder to keep physicians in the state. 'Of course, the governor has in his right the power to veto this bill, and he chose to do so,' Perez told reporters. 'I disagree with the veto, and we will be bringing that bill back next year for a continued conversation.' Lawmakers passed HB 6017 with bipartisan support. Repealing the ban on suits to recover non-economic damages is one of the perennial arguments in Tallahassee, as business interests and medical groups oppose the move. Perez said he remains opposed to placing caps on the pain-and-suffering damages, which is something that DeSantis said could make him support the repeal in the future, along with caps on attorneys' fees. The family members barred from suing for pain-and-suffering damages can recover economic damages, such as lost wages, medical bills, and funeral costs. 'I don't think that we should determine how much a person's life is worth when someone negligently ended it,' Perez said. The Senate also rejected a bid to cap the damages at $1 million on April 30. Florida, for now, remains the only state banning the recovery of pain-and-suffering damages for parents of adult children and adult children of single parents. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
ICE arrests outside El Paso immigration court spark due process concerns
EL PASO, Texas (KTSM) — Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have reportedly been arresting migrants immediately after their immigration court hearings at the Richard C. White Federal Building in Downtown El Paso, sparking concerns from local advocacy groups. A recent incident involved the detention of a family shortly after they allegedly appeared in court for an immigration hearing earlier this week. Video of the incident was captured and provided by advocates. The family was not handcuffed during the arrest, but the incident has been cited as part of a broader pattern of enforcement actions occurring across the country. Advocates argue that such arrests undermine due process and may discourage people from attending their court hearings. 'People are being arrested and prosecuted without due process. This is a violation of our Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights,' said advocate Briana Delgado. Local activist groups have begun distributing informational flyers outside the federal courthouse to educate migrants about their rights. 'Not to make any decisions in court without a lawyer present. You know, a lot of these people don't have lawyers because the nonprofit is backed up, so they can't take any more people. On top of that, a lot of people don't have the money to afford a lawyer,' said advocate Juan Flores. Previously, ICE designated courthouses as 'sensitive locations,' limiting enforcement actions at these sites. However, this guidance has been rescinded under the current administration, leading to increased enforcement activities at court facilities. Supporters of the enforcement measures argue that they are necessary for upholding immigration laws. 'We've had hundreds of thousands, millions of people who are here after their court date has said they're not allowed to stay here. They never reported. They never self-deported. So now we have a huge problem in this country, and it needs to be straightened out,' said Michael Aboud, Republican Party chairman. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defended the enforcement actions, a statement to KTSM reads in part: 'Secretary Noem is reversing Biden's catch and release policy that allowed millions of unvetted illegal aliens to be let loose on American streets. This Administration is once again implementing the rule of law. Most aliens who illegally entered the United States within the past two years are subject to expedited removals. Biden ignored this legal fact and chose to release millions of illegal aliens, including violent criminals, into the country with a notice to appear before an immigration judge. ICE is now following the law and placing these illegal aliens in expedited removal, as they always should have been. If they have a valid, credible fear claim, they will continue in immigration proceedings, but if no valid claim is found, aliens will be subject to a swift deportation.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
