Russia, Ukraine holding talks in Turkiye after launching major attacks
Delegations from Russia and Ukraine met in Turkiye on Monday (June 2, 2025) for the second round of direct peace talks in just over two weeks, although expectations were low for any significant progress on ending the three-year war after a string of stunning attacks over the weekend.
The Ukrainian delegation was led by Defence Minister Rustem Umerov, officials said. Vladimir Medinsky, an aide to Russian leader Vladimir Putin, headed the Kremlin team, Russian state media reported.
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan chaired the talks at the city's Ciragan Palace and gave an opening speech to mark their start.
Recent comments by senior officials in both countries indicate they remain far apart on the key conditions for stopping the war.
Ukraine said Sunday (June 1, 2025) it launched a spectacular surprise attack on four Russian airbases thousands of kilometres apart, destroying more than 40 warplanes. The raid was unprecedented in its scope and geographic reach, targeting bases in Russia's Arctic, Siberia and Far East more than 7,000km from Ukraine.
The head of the Ukrainian security service, Vasyl Maliuk, who led the planning of the operation, said its success was 'a major slap in the face for Russia's military power.' He said the drones struck simultaneously in three time zones and the complex logistics took over a year and a half to prepare.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called it a 'brilliant operation.'
Meanwhile, Russia on Sunday (June 1, 2025) fired the biggest number of drones — 472 — at Ukraine since its full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine's air force said, in an apparent effort to overwhelm air defences. That was part of a recently escalating campaign of strikes in civilian areas of Ukraine.
U.S.-led efforts to push the two sides into accepting a ceasefire have so far failed. Ukraine accepted that step, but the Kremlin effectively rejected it.
The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank, said Sunday (June 1, 2025) that 'Russia is attempting to delay negotiations and prolong the war in order to make additional battlefield gains.'
The relentless fighting has frustrated U.S. President Donald Trump's goal of bringing about a quick end to the war. A week ago, he expressed impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin as Moscow pounded Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities with drones and missiles for a third straight night. Trump said on social media that Putin 'has gone absolutely CRAZY!'
Senior officials in both countries have indicated the two sides remain far apart on the key conditions for stopping the war.
The first round of talks, held on May 16, also in Istanbul, ended after less than two hours. While both sides agreed on a large prisoner swap, there was no breakthrough.
Ukraine was triumphant after targeting distant Russian air bases. The official Russian response was muted, with the attack getting little coverage on the state-controlled television. Russia-1 TV channel on Sunday evening spent for a little over a minute on it with a brief Ministry of Defence's statement read out before images shifted to Russian drone strikes on Ukrainian positions.
Mr Zelenskyy said the setbacks for the Kremlin would help force it to the negotiating table, even as its pursues a summer offensive on the battlefield.
'Russia must feel what its losses mean. That is what will push it toward diplomacy,' he said at a summit Monday (June 1, 2025) in Vilnius, Lithuania with leaders from the Nordic nations and countries on NATO's eastern flank.
Ukraine has occasionally struck air bases hosting Russia's nuclear capable strategic bombers since early in the war, prompting the Russian air force to redeploy most of them to the regions farther from the front line.
Because Sunday's (May 31, 2025) drones were launched from trucks close to the bases targeted in five Russian regions, military defences had virtually no time to prepare for them.
Many Russian military bloggers chided the military for its failure to build protective shields for the bombers despite previous attacks but the large size of the planes makes that a challenging task.
The attacks were 'a big blow to Russian strategic airpower' and exposed significant vulnerabilities in Moscow's military capabilities, according to Phillips O'Brien, a professor of strategic studies at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland.
'This is hard to underestimate,' Mr O'Brien wrote in an analysis.
Mr Zelenskyy said that 'if the Istanbul meeting brings nothing, that clearly means strong new sanctions are urgently, urgently needed' against Russia.
International concerns about the war's consequences, as well as trade tensions, drove Asian share prices lower Monday (June 2, 2025) while oil prices surged.
Fierce fighting has continued along the roughly 1,000-kilometer front line, and both sides have hit each other's territory with deep strikes.
Russian forces shelled Ukraine's southern Kherson region, killing three people and injuring 19 others, including two children, regional officials said Monday (June 2, 2025).
Also, a missile strike and shelling around the southern city of Zaporizhzhia, killing five people and injured nine others, officials said.
Russian air defences downed 162 Ukrainian drones over eight Russian regions overnight, as well as over the annexed Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, Russia's Defence Ministry said Monday (June 2, 2025).
Ukrainian air defences damaged 52 out of 80 drones launched by Russia overnight, the Ukrainian air force said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump breaks silence on Putin after biggest Ukraine attack with 'he is hit...'
U.S. President Donald Trump broke his silence following the largest Ukrainian attack on Russian forces to date, declaring, 'Putin got hit hard, I don't think he is playing games.' Trump's remarks come after Ukraine's unprecedented drone and missile strikes devastated multiple Russian airbases. Speaking to reporters, Trump suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin has suffered a major setback and warned that the Russian leader is likely to respond seriously rather than escalate with mere posturing. Watch for more
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tripura ADC inks MoUs with UK institutions
Agartala: The Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (ADC) has signed three MoUs with prominent UK-based institutions in London recently, said ADC's ruling party TIPRA Motha founder Pradyot Kishore Debbarman on Thursday, reports Biswendu Bhattacharjee. The MoUs were focused on skill development, cultural promotion and academic exchange, marking a milestone in Tripura's global outreach efforts.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court Ruling On Gun Companies: Supreme Court Blocks Mexico's Gun Lawsuit Against US Companies, ET LegalWorld
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday spared two American gun companies from a lawsuit by Mexico's government accusing them of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels and fueling gun violence in the southern neighbor of the United States. The justices in a 9-0 ruling authored by liberal Justice Elena Kagan overturned a lower court's ruling that had allowed the lawsuit to proceed against firearms maker Smith & Wesson and distributor Interstate Arms. The lower court had found that Mexico plausibly alleged that the companies aided and abetted unlawful sales routing guns to Mexican drug cartels, harming its government. Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis. Download ETLegalWorld App Get Realtime updates Save your favourite articles Scan to download App The justices embraced the argument made by the companies for dismissal of Mexico's suit under a 2005 U.S. law called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that broadly shields gun companies from liability for crimes committed with their products. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had decided in 2024 that the alleged conduct by the companies fell outside these Supreme Court decided that while it has little doubt that U.S. companies are aware of some unlawful sales to Mexican gun traffickers, Mexico's lawsuit failed to allege that the companies had aided and abetted such illegal firearms sales by deliberately helping to bring about the transactions."Mexico's plausible allegations are of 'indifference' rather than assistance," Kagan wrote. "They are of the manufacturers merely allowing some unidentified 'bad actors' to make illegal use of their wares." The case came to the Supreme Court at a complicated time for U.S.-Mexican relations as President Donald Trump pursues on-again, off-again tariffs on Mexican goods. Trump has also accused Mexico of doing too little to stop the flow of synthetic drugs such as fentanyl and migrant arrivals at the lawsuit, filed in Boston in 2021, accused the two companies of violating various U.S. and Mexican laws. Mexico claims that the companies have deliberately maintained a distribution system that included firearms dealers who knowingly sell weapons to third-party, or "straw," purchasers who then traffic guns to cartels in suit also accused the companies of unlawfully designing and marketing their guns as military-grade weapons to drive up demand among the cartels, including by associating their products with the American military and law enforcement. The gun companies said they make and sell lawful avoid its lawsuit being dismissed under the 2005 law, Mexico was required to plausibly allege that the companies aided and abetted illegal gun sales and that such conduct was the "proximate cause" - a legal principle involving who is responsible for causing an injury - of the harms claimed by Mexico. The Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case on March 4, declined to resolve the proximate cause question after finding that Mexico's suit failed to adequately allege aiding and Arrocha Olabuenaga, the legal adviser for Mexico's Foreign Ministry, vowed that Mexico will continue pursuing its legal fight."While we are disappointed with the decision from this Supreme Court, we are convinced of the strength of our arguments and the evidence that upholds them, and we are encouraged by the support at home and abroad for Mexico's actions," he in the lawsuit had sought monetary damages of an unspecified amount and a court order requiring Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms to take steps to "abate and remedy the public nuisance they have created in Mexico."The Second Amendment Foundation, a gun rights group that backed the U.S. gun companies in the case, welcomed Thursday's ruling."The lawsuit, dreamt up by multiple gun control groups, had one goal - bankrupt the American firearms market by allowing civil liability to apply for the criminal misuse of its products," the group said in a social media post. "Thankfully the Supreme Court stepped in and squashed it."Gun violence fueled by trafficked U.S.-made firearms has contributed to a decline in business investment and economic activity in Mexico and forced its government to incur unusually high costs on services including healthcare, law enforcement and the military, according to the a country with strict firearms laws, has said most of its gun homicides are committed with weapons trafficked from the United States and valued at more than $250 million Perez Ricart, an international affairs researcher at Mexico's Center for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE), criticized the ruling."Once again, the industry is shielded. It doesn't matter how many bullets cross the border or how many people are killed on the Mexican side. Bullets are not the only things that kill; so does the legal impunity guaranteed by Washington," Ricart said in a social media post.
