Willies Mchunu defends MPLs' decision to oppose the Division of Revenue Bill
Image: supplied
Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) will not discipline the 'rebelling' six members of KwaZulu-Natal Legislature who voted against the Division of Revenue Bill because they did the 'right thing'
This was confirmed by the party's provincial leader Willies Mchunu on Saturday. He said there was no plan to act against the six MPLs for their action which the party does not deem wrong. He stated that when you look at the national leadership position on the Bill which rejected it, the six members do not seem to be in the wrong.
Mchunu further stated that there was no communication between the provincial leadership and the caucus before voting therefore the party will not act against anyone, adding that he has directed the caucus to discuss the matter and find each other.
'We will not act against anyone in this matter and we have directed our caucus to sort it out themselves in the legislature. I think there was a misunderstanding,' said Mchunu.
In an unprecedented move last week, six party MPLs broke ranks with the caucus and voted against the bill while 31 other members supported during the chamber sitting, prompting calls for action against the 'rebelling' MPLs, however, the members defended their decision. The member who spoke on condition of anonymity on Thursday denied going against the party's position, saying it was him and other five members who kept the long-standing position and voted against the Bill.
He stated that firstly, the new chief whip Bonginkosi Mngadi never called a caucus meeting before voting and there was no new instruction for members to vote in a particular way. He said in the absence of an instruction, the six of them followed a long-standing position that the MKP will never support anything that comes from the Government of Provincial Unity (GPU) since the party believes the elections were rigged.
Furthermore, the member said to prove that they were not wrong, the party has not charged them after explaining their side to the provincial leadership under convener Willies Mchunu.
The member further said that in their engagement with Mchunu it "became clear that it was an oversight from those who supported the Bill".
However, the party chief whip Bonginkosi Mngadi disputed the member's version that there was no meeting or mandate to support the Bill. He stated that he called a caucus meeting where he informed the members of the position and even articulated the position when he spoke for the party before voting for the Bill.
'I am chief whip of the party in the legislature and spoke in the chamber that the party will support the Bill since it was talking about transparency and accountability so I was speaking on behalf of the party,' said Mngadi.
He said he would not want to discuss the matter further since it was reported to the provincial leadership.
There was also confusion when the same Bill was voted in parliament on Wednesday where the MKP chief whip Colleen Makhubekele voted yes for the bill only to change her vote later, arguing that she thought the vote was about the Ad hoc committee on allegations of Police Minister Senzo Mchunu's interference in police operations which we were reported by KwaZulu-Natal provincial Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi.
[email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Understanding the Fair Pay Bill: A step towards salary equity in South Africa
While the Fair Pay Bill has been described as a step towards ending unequal pay, experts also highlight that it might pose some challenges for AI and technology companies, including start-ups and scale-ups that rely on flexible compensation structures. Image: Freepik The Fair Pay Bill, recently tabled in Parliament, has been described as setting the groundwork for creating a more equitable starting point for salary negotiations and career advancement by eliminating the consideration of past remuneration in hiring decisions, experts say. The Bill was tabled in Parliament as an amendment to the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA). It aims to transform recruitment and remuneration practices to promote fairness, transparency, and equal opportunity in the workplace. However, there are concerns that a critical limitation remains in that the fair pay protections are still embedded within the Employment Equity Act's unfair discrimination framework, which means that, unlike jurisdictions with standalone equal pay legislation, employees must still prove unfair discrimination to successfully claim equal pay violations, rather than having direct equal pay rights. Dr Louis Koen, senior lecturer and Moot Court coordinator at the University of Johannesburg's Faculty of Law, said historically underpaid individuals, many of whom are black women or youths entering the labour market, will no longer be constrained by prior low earnings when applying for new positions. 'The requirement for employers to disclose the remuneration or remuneration range when advertising a position or recruiting candidates would increase transparency and reduce opportunities for subjective or biased wage-setting. It could empower job applicants to negotiate from an informed position and also create greater parity among employees performing similar work. 'The Bill, if passed, will provide employees with a better understanding of what other employees performing the same role can expect to pay. This may ease the burden of proving discrimination in pay,' Koen said. Compliance with the Fair Pay Bill is likely to be demanding, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, which may not have formal job grading or remuneration systems in place, he said. 'These businesses will need to develop internal frameworks to determine and document remuneration ranges, train HR personnel to navigate the new restrictions on pay discussions, and adjust recruitment practices accordingly. One potential unintended consequence is that, to avoid scrutiny or legal risk, some employers may default to offering standardised mid-range pay within bands, thereby limiting flexibility in responding to market signals or recognising merit,' Koen said. He highlighted that several types of disputes may arise from the implementation of the Bill, where employees or applicants may allege that an employer failed to disclose an appropriate remuneration range or that the disclosed range was misleading. Others may claim that their past pay was improperly solicited or factored into a hiring decision, in contravention of Section 6B of the Bill. Professor Marius van Staden, associate professor at the Wits School of Law, said the Bill will significantly affect multinational tech and AI companies operating in South Africa through two key mechanisms. 'Firstly, the new Section 6A requires employers to disclose remuneration ranges when advertising positions and during recruitment, promotion, or transfer processes. This means companies with global pay scales will need to transparently communicate their South African compensation bands, potentially revealing disparities between local and international compensation levels. 'Second, Section 6B prohibits employers from enquiring into candidates' past remuneration information during recruitment. This prevents the common practice of using previous salaries to determine offers, which could be particularly challenging for companies accustomed to benchmarking against international compensation histories when relocating talent,' Van Staden said. He added that companies in the AI and technology sectors face unique challenges given the rapid evolution of roles and skillsets. 'The Bill's amendment to the definition of 'employment policy or practice' now explicitly includes 'determining the remuneration or remuneration range for a position' during job classification and grading. 'To ensure compliance with 'equal pay for equal work' or 'work of equal value' principles, companies should establish systematic job evaluation frameworks that focus on objective criteria such as required skills, qualifications, experience levels, and job responsibilities rather than subjective assessments. The Bill references the International Labour Organisation Convention No. 100 concerning Equal Remuneration, which emphasises work of equal value rather than just identical work,' Van Staden said. He stated that for emerging AI roles, companies should develop clear competency frameworks and regularly review job classifications as roles evolve, ensuring that remuneration ranges reflect genuine differences in skill requirements and responsibilities rather than historical biases or arbitrary distinctions. Several unintended consequences could impact the sector's growth and innovation. The mandatory disclosure of remuneration ranges may reduce companies' salary negotiation flexibility and could lead to wage inflation as employees benchmark against disclosed ranges. This might particularly affect start-ups and scale-ups that rely on flexible compensation structures, Van Staden said. He added that the prohibition on enquiring into past remuneration could make it more difficult for companies to assess appropriate compensation levels for candidates with unique or highly specialised AI skillsets, potentially leading to either over-compensation or difficulty attracting top talent. 'Most significantly, the continued embedding of fair pay rights within the discrimination framework may create legal uncertainty and compliance costs that disproportionately burden smaller tech companies without extensive HR and legal resources. There's also a risk that companies may become overly conservative in their hiring and promotion practices to avoid potential discrimination claims, which could slow innovation and talent development,' he said. How can digital law experts and legal advisors assist in ensuring compliance? Van Staden said digital law experts can assist with developing compliant recruitment processes that avoid prohibited enquiries into past remuneration whilst maintaining competitive hiring practices. This includes crafting job advertisements that include appropriate remuneration range disclosures and training hiring managers on permissible discussion topics. 'Legal experts can also help design remuneration transparency policies that comply with the new Section 6A requirements whilst protecting legitimate business interests. Additionally, they can develop internal audit mechanisms to identify potential equal pay violations before they become discrimination claims. 'Importantly, legal advisors can help companies understand that the fair pay provisions remain part of the unfair discrimination framework, meaning robust documentation of objective job evaluation and remuneration-setting processes will be essential for defending against discrimination claims,' Van Staden said. He added that while the transparency requirements align with trends in jurisdictions like California, New York, and the EU, South Africa's approach of maintaining fair pay within the discrimination framework (EEA) is increasingly outdated. Van Staden noted that South Africa's requirement to prove unfair discrimination for equal pay claims creates a higher burden of proof than in many developed jurisdictions, where equal pay violations can be established through statistical analysis without requiring proof of discriminatory intent. 'The Bill's prohibition on salary history enquiries does align with progressive practices, suggesting South Africa is adopting some best practices while maintaining a more conservative overall framework,' he said. Roger Solomons, spokesperson for Build One South Africa (BOSA), stated that mandatory disclosure will prevent lowballing, as employers will be required to provide a realistic and justifiable pay range, benchmark salaries to industry norms, and comply with non-discrimination provisions in the EEA. If a company consistently posts abnormally low ranges, it opens itself to reputational risk, public scrutiny, and intervention by the Department of Employment and Labour. More importantly, job seekers will be empowered to walk away from exploitative offers, which they cannot do when pay is hidden, Solomons said.
IOL News
21 hours ago
- IOL News
MKP rejects the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association as 'a neo-colonialism tool'
MKP's KwaZulu-Natal MPL Ishana Barciela has described the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) as an extension of Britain's neocolonialism. Image: KZN Legislature website The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) in the KwaZulu-Natal legislature has rejected the election of MPLs to the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA), which it described as the extension of Britain's neo-colonialism. DA MPL Dr Imran Keeka and ANC's Mncedisi Maphisa were elected CPA additional members, while the IFP's Blessed Gwala became its KwaZulu-Natal branch treasurer. Provincial Speaker Nontembeko Boyce and her deputy, Mmabatho Tembe, were automatically appointed the CPA's branch president and deputy president, respectively, as per their parliamentary positions. They were elected on Tuesday during an event, which was attended by CPA Secretary General Stephen Twigg, a former State for Schools Minister in the United Kingdom, at the provincial legislature in Pietermaritzburg. CPA is made up of the British legislature and its former colonies around the world. 'The CPA, led by King Charles III, whose title rests on stolen labour, expropriated land, and the blood of the colonised, remains a propaganda instrument of empire, cloaked in the rhetoric of 'parliamentary cooperation',' MKP MPL Ishana Barciela said in a statement. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The Commonwealth is made up of 56 former colonies in Africa, Asia, the Americas, Europe, and the Pacific. The provincial parliament joined the CPA on June 1, 1994, and became a branch on January 1, 1996. Barciela said that since it was established in 1911, the CPA had done nothing to dismantle colonial legacies. 'But it has reinforced Westminster-centric models of governance that are fundamentally incompatible with African revolutionary traditions and indigenous self-determination,' she said. MKP said the CPA is an ideological weapon used to benchmark democracy according to British standards while suppressing African systems and revolutionary visions. 'We are not aligned with the CPA, and we reject its legitimacy, fulfilling the role of a neo-colonial extension of the British Crown's global influence,' said Barciela. She accused the CPA of being tight-lipped on the genocide in Gaza. 'The CPA's deafening silence in the face of apartheid and genocide exposes its racist double standard and moral bankruptcy. 'This silence is complicity, and it should disturb every honest parliamentarian in Africa,' she said. She said the MKP was unapologetically anti-colonial and anti-imperialist, a stance that was aligned with BRICS and the South-South Cooperation (SSC). 'Let it be known that the MKP bears no affection for King Charles and has no respect for the CPA. 'We are building a new Africa: one that is free, sovereign, socialist and united, and neocolonial institutions have no place in this future,' said Barciela. Gwala, who has been participating in the CPA since he became an MPL in 1994, lashed out at the MKP, saying that even its leader, Jacob Zuma, was participating in the association's programmes. 'Unfortunately, to the MKP, whatever is done by someone who is not a member of the MKP is wrong. 'Jacob Zuma did attend these programmes,' he said. He said the MKP was associating everything '(that is)wrong with white people because they stole the land'. He said the CPA does not instill colonialism in the minds of its participants, and 'it is a figment of their imagination as the MKP to believe that it is so because it is not so". 'We need to deal with the issues in a manner that will bring social cohesion, which forms part of the CPA, which trains the parliamentarians,' said Gwala. Gwala said some of the CPA programmes had been implemented in the provincial legislature. '(These include) Programmes of parliamentary democracy, such as gender based issues and quotas to be given to women and youth,' said Gwala. Relaunching the CPA's KwaZulu-Natal branch, Boyce described the CPA as a network of like-minded parliamentarians from over 180 branches across the nine Commonwealth regions who believed in dialogue and diversity-fueled innovation. 'At its heart, the CPA seeks to strengthen democratic institutions and promote human rights and the rule of law. 'It reminds us that parliamentary work is not just about lawmaking, it's about listening, accountability, and ensuring that the voices of ordinary people find expression in the decisions we take,' said Boyce. She said that through its previous participation, the provincial legislature contributed meaningfully to conversations on parliamentary oversight, the role of subnational legislatures, and women's representation.
TimesLIVE
2 days ago
- TimesLIVE
Taxpayers have spent almost R170m on police VIP protection since 2020
The police have spent more than R169m on VIP protection services for members of the legislature, judiciary and ad hoc VIPs in the past five financial years. This was revealed by suspended police minister Senzo Mchunu in response to a written parliamentary question by Rise Mzansi MP Makashule Gana. Mchunu said there were three categories of people who have received VIP protection, other than members of the executive and diplomats. Category one covers members of the legislature including speakers and deputy speakers of the national and provincial legislatures, and chairs and deputy chairs of the National Council of Provinces. Mchunu said the department spent about R71m a year for 22 VIPs, excluding basic compensation of SAPS close protection officers and travel expenditure. Category two are identified members of the judiciary: chief justice, deputy chief justice, judge presidents, judge president of the Supreme Court of Appeal, deputy judge president of the Supreme Court of Appeal and judge president of the labour court. Fourteen VIPs cost the department about R45m a year, excluding basic compensation of the SAPS close protection officers and travel expenditure. Category three are ad hoc VIPs, who are individuals of strategic importance to the country and are protected based on a positive threat against their physical security as confirmed by the intelligence community. The department spent about R53m on 82 VIPs over the past five years excluding basic compensation of SAPS close protection officers and travel expenditure. 'Identified provincial premiers, members of the executive council and judiciary have been protected in terms of the mandate that is extended to the SAPS, in terms of cabinet memorandum 1A of 2004 dated 10 November 2004 (minutes dated 17 November 2004), as well as the SAPS protection and security services divisional directive 'protection services rendered by the SAPS to identified local and foreign dignitaries', dated 8 December 2023,' Mchunu said. 'The ad hoc protection of VIPs is provided on a threat and risk basis.' Gana argued that the figure for each ad hoc VIP is too high. 'The response on the rationale for protecting ad hoc VIPs is not clear and convincing,' Gana said. 'I will be asking a follow-up question on the ad hoc VIPs.'
