&w=3840&q=100)
White House puts Pak's military elite back on top with Trump-Munir meet
Munir and Pakistan's civilian leaders praised Trump for helping secure an India-Pakistan ceasefire and even nominated him for the Nobel Peace Prize, thanking him repeatedly for his role
Bloomberg
Pakistan's military, which exercises effective control over the nuclear-armed country, has an enviable tendency to land on its feet even after a crisis. The country may be facing an economic predicament, and recently endured a confrontation with India in which the weaknesses in its defenses were laid bare, but the 'establishment,' as the euphemism goes, has emerged stronger for it.
That is thanks, in large part, to President Donald Trump.
It was not so long ago that Pakistan's army chief, Asim Munir, was known only for his backward-looking approach to international relations and to Pakistani identity. But last week he was granted a lunch date with Trump, which, according to the army, was engaging enough for the president to spontaneously extend it from one hour to two. It's hard to overstate how unusual this is: No US president has ever hosted a Pakistani army chief on such equal terms.
Both Munir and Pakistan's civilian politicians have been very free with praise for Trump. They have repeatedly thanked him for bringing about a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, and even announced that they had nominated the president for the Nobel Peace Prize. Trump fancies himself as a peacemaker, and has made it quite clear that he thinks he deserves a Nobel — and is no doubt grateful to the only other country that seems to agree.
New Delhi, which is outraged by the suggestion that Trump had anything to do with the pause in hostilities between India and Pakistan, is watching this new-found closeness with more than a little puzzlement. Trump appears to be rediscovering what so many presidents before him have — that any involvement just gets you deeper in and it's hard to find real partners for peace. He will also learn, therefore, that the Pakistani military can't be relied on.
In the interim, India seems to be keeping its distance from the US. Quite unusually, Prime Minister Narendra Modi let everyone know that he had refused an invitation to visit Trump last week. That was probably a wise decision, given that Munir was in town at the same time. He wouldn't want to be ambushed into a photograph with Munir, especially one that had Trump standing nearby.
Every time the US gets embroiled in the Middle East, the Pakistani establishment swiftly regains a privileged position in Washington. If Trump is truly committed to controlling Iran's ambitions, then relations with the Islamic Republic's eastern neighbor takes on a new importance.
But things won't be quite that simple for the generals this time. Given the continued popularity of the jailed anti-American firebrand and former prime minister Imran Khan, Munir has a political tightrope to walk. Less than a day after Islamabad announced it had nominated Trump for a Nobel, it had to condemn its preferred peacemaker for bombing Iran's nuclear installations. Nor can Munir at any point alienate Beijing, on which the military depends for arms, subsidies, and moral support.
But the danger for Pakistan runs deeper than that. In the past few years, as the country dealt with an economic crisis and the ravages of climate change, there was also real hope that its elite would finally recognize the importance of reform. As one columnist argued in 2022, 'the desire to benefit from geopolitical rents has become innate' in Pakistan's establishment. But with China beginning to measure out its largesse, a Washington uninterested in Pakistan and Gulf monarchies wooing India instead, the days of depending on foreign generosity seemed to be over.
The current civilian administration, led by Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, is dependent on the military's support to stay in power, and is visibly straining to reform the country's dysfunctional economy. The military will back him — as long as they don't see an alternative.
But now the establishment might rethink their plans. Munir's domestic position has been shored up by the clashes with India. And if his charm offensive on Trump works, could Western cash begin to flow into the army's coffers again? That enchanting prospect might be too tempting for them to back the sort of reform, including reductions in the defense budget, that Pakistan desperately needs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
23 minutes ago
- The Wire
Piloo Mody, a Parliamentarian Who Left a Mark With His Wit and Humour
This article is part of a series by The Wire titled ' The Early Parliamentarians ', exploring the lives and work of post-independence MPs who have largely been forgotten. The series looks at the institutions they helped create, the enduring ideas they left behind and the contributions they made to nation building. Piloo Mody was an architect, politician, one of the founding members of the Swatantra Party and a veteran parliamentarian. He was elected to the 4th and 5th Lok Sabhas and served in the Rajya Sabha from 1978 until his death in 1983. As a parliamentarian he left his imprint, complete with humour. Born into an affluent Parsi family on November 14, 1926, Mody was one of the sons of Sir Homi Mody. He had two brothers, Kali Mody, a pioneer of credit card operations in India and Russi Mody, a former chairman of TISCO Limited. Piloo studied at the Doon School, Dehradun. After that, he studied architecture at Sir J.J. College of Architecture, Bombay (now Mumbai), and completed his Bachelor of Architecture. To pursue his master's degree in architecture, Mody attended the University of California, Berkeley, US. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who went on to become prime minister of Pakistan in the 1970s, was his college roommate as well as a close friend. After completing his studies, he married Lavina (Vina) Colgan, a Swiss-born-American and his classmate at Berkeley, on January 3, 1953. After his stint at Berkeley he returned to India. He worked for two years on the Chandigarh Capital Project with Le Corbusier. Another significant building that Mody designed in collaboration with Durga Bajpai is the Oberoi Hotel in New Delhi. He also designed the Chennai headquarters of Engineering Construction Corporation, a former subsidiary of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. It won the Federation Internationale de la Precontrainte prize for excellence in pre-stressed concrete from India. The couple set up an architecture firm, Mody and Colgan, in 1953 at Stadium House, Churchgate. Their first project was a residential apartment at Marine Lines for senior officials of TISCO. They also designed the front casing of one model of the Voltas Air conditioner. Mody's other projects include residential project Olympus, three TELCO offices, the headquarters of Bharat Bijlee, Mukand Iron and Steel, Sandoz, Voltas and Diners Club and Business Service centres. In political life, Mody was an advocate of liberalism and freedom. He was associated with the Swatantra Party as its founding member and was executive vice-president of the party. As parliamentarian In the 1967 general election, Mody was elected to the 4th Lok Sabha, representing the Godhra constituency in Gujarat. In 1971 he was re-elected and served in the 5th Lok Sabha until March 1977 but lost with a narrow margin in 1977. Mody merged his Swatantra Party with Charan Singh's Bhartiya Kranti Dal in 1974, which eventually merged with Janata Party in 1977. After an absence of a year from parliament, on April 10, 1978 Mody joined the Rajya Sabha and served there until his death in 1983. Besides his professional pursuits, Mody was known for his constant use of wit and humour in his parliamentary speeches. Due to his conservative and pro-US views, Mody was often accused by the members of the ruling Congress party of being a 'Washington parrot'. To counter that, once he came to the House wearing a placard reading, 'I am a CIA agent.' The chairman ordered him to remove it. He did so, remarking, 'I am no longer a CIA agent.' Once, during a debate, J.C. Jain, a member of the ruling party, started needling Mody. He lost his temper and shouted at Jain, 'Stop barking.' Jain was up, yelling and pleading with the chair, 'Sir, he is calling me a dog. It is an unparliamentary language.' Chairman Hidayatullah agreed and ordered, 'This will not go on record.' Not to be outdone, Mody corrected himself by saying, 'All right then, stop braying.' Jain did not know what the word implied, and it stayed on record. Once, a minister, during a heated argument, said, 'I am not supposed to respond to every barking dog.' Then Mody rose to speak and said, 'Speaker, Sir, on the treasury benches, we have great people sitting, pillars of the government, pillars of democracy. And, we are dogs, and everyone knows how a dog treats a pillar.' The House burst out in laughter. Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty When Giani Zail Singh, as Home Minister, was piloting a bill in the Rajya Sabha, Mody participated in the debate. While replying to the debate, Gianiji, referring to Mody's comments on the Bill, stated in Hindi, ' Piloo Mody to bade seasonal member hain.' The whole House started laughing. Another minister, sitting next to Gianiji, whispered to him to say that the word is 'seasoned'. Thereupon Gianiji again said, ' Mujhe to angrezi thodi aati hai. Inko to inki biwi ne angrezi padhai hai.' Mody thumped his desk and raised a point of order. The whole House was looking at Mody. The Deputy Chairman asked, 'What is your point of order?' Mody stated, 'Gianiji is grossly misinformed. My wife did not teach me English. I taught her English.' The whole House burst into laughter again. Mody's wife was Swiss. Similarly, once, there was a debate in Parliament about the import of railway tracks and wagons for quick replacement. Indradeep Sinha, an opposition member, believed these should be manufactured locally instead of importing because it caused delays. Mody interrupted to say that the delay was caused not by importing it but by manufacturing it. Sinha replied to Mody, 'You are not the sole importing agent. There are so many others.' The Chairman corrected Sinha, 'No, he is not an importing agent. He is an exporting agent.' Mody added, 'I export ideas in a barren market.' When Shyam Lal Yadav was elected as the Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha, members of various political parties in the House started extending their congratulations to him. Mody congratulated and warned the newly appointed Deputy Chairman, 'I beg to move a vote of congratulations to my friend, Shri Shyam Lal Yadav. I have no doubt in my mind that my good friend will continue to be as partisan as he was in the past. I want to assure my friend, neighbour, and colleague that I wish him very happy times in the Chair with the least amount of acrimony and warn him that if he does not behave when he returns to this Chair, I will sit on him.' The Deputy Chairman, when not presiding, sits next to the Leader of the Opposition. Mody's sense of humour was not only in his speeches but in his writings too. He was known to address Indira Gandhi as IG in his letters and sign off as PM (Piloo Mody). He often told Indira Gandhi, 'I am the permanent PM; you are temporary.' In 1975, at the time of the Emergency in India, Mody was arrested on the orders of the Indira Gandhi government, using the controversial powers granted by the MISA and was in Delhi's Tihar Jail and Rohtak Jail for 16 long months. Apart from being a humorous parliamentarian and brilliant architect, Mody was a renowned author, having two books to his credit. His first book, Zulfi, My Friend (1973), was penned on the life and times of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Mody's second book was Democracy Means BREAD AND FREEDOM (1979), which he wrote during his 16 months in jail. The book was an attempt to trace the genesis of democracy and search for the origins of the attitudes and institutions that sustain it. Mody also served as editor of an English weekly, March of the Nation, published from Bombay, and wrote numerous articles for the national and international newspapers and magazines. A few days before he died in his sleep, Piloo Mody, the irrepressibly buoyant MP who for over a decade brought to Indian politics a special flavour of wit, wacky humour and wisdom, told India Today that "The world revolves around an idea. Every problem has its solution, given a clean heart, good intention and determination." He also explained his plans to start a new political party. But he passed away on January 29, 1983. He was 57. Qurban Ali is a trilingual journalist who has covered some of modern India's major political, social and economic developments. He has a keen interest in India's freedom struggle and is now documenting the history of the socialist movement in the country.
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Against the narrowing definition of womanhood
It takes courage to write — especially stories that challenge the status quo. It takes even more courage to stand on a global platform and speak your truth. When Dutch author Yael van der Wouden stepped up to accept the Women's Prize for Fiction on a balmy June night in London, she demonstrated bravery in spades. 'Please be gentle and kind,' she murmured, bracing for her audience's reaction, before coming out as intersex. That she had to make the plea at all is the real indictment. 'I was a girl until I turned 13,' she told the 800 people gathered. 'And then, as I hit puberty, all that was supposed to happen did not quite happen. And if it did happen, it happened too much. And all at once, my girlhood became an uncertain fact… hormonally, I am intersex.' She need not have worried about how her revelation would be received. The cheer that followed was louder than the one that greeted her name. In that moment, van der Wouden, who had just been awarded a prize that celebrates 'women's voices,' redefined what the term could mean. 'In the few precious moments here on stage, I am receiving truly the greatest honour of my life as a woman, presenting to you as a woman and accepting this women's prize,' she said. 'And that is because of every single trans person who's fought for healthcare, who changed the system, the law, societal standards themselves. I stand on their shoulders.' The timing of her words and the stage she chose to say them from lend her words particular weight. Just two months ago, the UK Supreme Court ruled that the definition of 'woman' refers strictly to biological sex. The case, brought by campaign group For Women Scotland, argued that sex-based protections must apply only to those 'born female.' The ruling, though framed by the court as not being a victory for one side over another, has major implications for how sex and gender are treated across public life, and for who gets counted as a woman under the law. It is not just the UK. In the US, the rollback of transgender rights is gaining speed under a second Trump administration. This week, the US Supreme Court ruled that states can constitutionally restrict gender-transition care for minors, the latest blow in a coordinated, nationwide effort to curtail trans rights in education, healthcare, sport, and public life. More than two dozen Republican-led states have already passed laws restricting care or limiting trans people's participation in public life. Trump has aligned federal policy with a rigid 'biological sex' framework, barred trans people from serving in the military, and ordered that passports reflect sex assigned at birth. Though there have been some legal victories against these moves, the political momentum has shifted in the West. In a world where womanhood is increasingly being policed by legal and cultural gatekeepers, van der Wouden's declaration is powerful and political. 'Won't thrill you too much with the specifics,' she said, 'but the long and the short of it is that hormonally I am intersex. This little fact defined my life throughout my teens until I advocated for the healthcare that I needed, the surgery and the hormones that I needed, which not all intersex people need. Not all intersex people feel at odds with their gender presentation.' The statement is telling. She reminded the audience that intersex persons are not a theoretical category. They exist with real needs and identities. More importantly, not everyone has homogeneous needs, wants, and identities. The point is not conformity, but autonomy. Her prize-winning debut novel, The Safekeep, is about many things: Female relationships and rivalries, repression, queer love, the Second World War, the lingering legacy of war, memory and forgetfulness, and the meaning of home. However, for Wouden it is a story of collective compliance and redemption: 'The conversation [my novel] has entered into felt all the more important to me in the face of violence in Gaza, in the West Bank, and… the violence my own queer and trans community faces worldwide,' she said. However, there is a silver lining, much like her protagonist, Isabel, it is never too late to see the collective error of our ways and make amends.
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Donald Trump officials to give first classified briefing to Congress on Iran strikes
Senators are set to meet with top national security officials Thursday (June 26, 2025) as many question President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites — and whether those strikes were ultimately successful. The classified briefing, which was originally scheduled for Tuesday (June 24, 2025) and was delayed, also comes as the Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval if Mr. Trump decides to strike Iran again. Democrats, and some Republicans, have said that the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress and they want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorised the attacks. Iran-Israel conflict LIVE updates 'Senators deserve full transparency, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening,' said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who said on Tuesday (June 24, 2025) that it was 'outrageous' that the Senate and House briefings were postponed. A similar briefing for House members was pushed to Friday (June 27, 2025). CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth are expected to brief the senators on Thursday (June 26, 2025). Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was scheduled to be at the Tuesday briefing, but will not be attending, according to a person familiar with the schedule. The briefing could be contentious as questions have swirled around Mr. Trump's decision to strike Iran and whether the attacks were successful. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found this week that Iran's nuclear programme had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Mr. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. The people were not authorised to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. On Wednesday (June 25, 2025), Ms. Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated'. Ms. Gabbard posted on social media that 'new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.' She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would 'likely take years to do.' Mr. Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear programme has been 'severely damaged' and cited new intelligence 'from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years'. Most Republicans have staunchly defended Mr. Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson even went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. 'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Mr. Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans — including some of Trump's staunchest supporters — are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for US involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. 'I think the speaker needs to review the Constitution,' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. 'And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.' Mr. Paul would not say if he is voting for the resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would require congressional approval for specific military action in Iran. The resolution is likely to fail as 60 votes would be needed to pass it and Republicans have a 53-47 majority. But Kaine says it's important to put the Senate on the record. 'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Mr. Kaine said. While he did not seek approval, sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell. The letter said that the strike was taken 'to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran's nuclear programme'.
