ACLU, teachers, students sue St. Francis Area Schools over book bans
The ACLU of Minnesota and the state teachers union filed two separate lawsuits Monday against St. Francis Area Schools, alleging that the district's book bans violate the Minnesota Constitution and a 2024 law banning book bans. Students, teachers and parents are also plaintiffs in the lawsuits.
St. Francis Area Schools adopted a library policy in November that relies on ratings from a website called BookLooks, which has ties to the right-wing group Moms for Liberty. Books with a BookLooks rating of 3 or higher (out of 5) are subject to removal from St. Francis bookshelves at the request of a student, parent or community member.
So far, the district has banned, or plans to ban, books including 'The Handmaid's Tale' by Margaret Atwood, 'The Perks of Being a Wallflower' by Stephen Chbosky, 'The Bluest Eye' by Toni Morrison and 'The Kite Runner' by Khaled Hosseini, among others.
The Reformer interviewed Hosseini last week about his book being pulled from the shelves.
Of the 47 books that have been challenged, all but one challenge came from a 'community member' — i.e., not a student or parent, according to the Education Minnesota complaint. So far, 11 books have been removed from the shelves and the other 36 challenges are pending.
The litigation highlights the pitched national battle in recent years over what constitutes valuable educational content and who should be allowed to restrict it, leading to similar book bans across the country.
The lawsuits will test Minnesota's law limiting book bans, which was passed by the DFL-controlled Legislature in 2024.
The law states 'a public library cannot ban, remove or restrict access to books or other materials based solely on its viewpoint or the messages, ideas, or opinions it conveys.' The law does allow for books to be removed from shelves based on practical reasons, 'legitimate pedagogical concerns, including but not limited to the appropriateness of potentially sensitive topics for the library's intended audience,' and to comply with other state or federal laws.
The law also requires that library administrators adopt a library materials policy that outlines procedures for the selection and removal of materials. That policy must be administered by a librarian or someone trained in library collection management.
In its complaint, the ACLU pointed out that the school district's attorney advised the school board against adopting the BookLooks-based rating system because the organization does not appear to be run by a librarian — instead, it is run by 'concerned parents,' according to the website.
Both lawsuits pointed to comments made by a board member who supported the BookLooks-based policy because it aligned with the area's 'red' — conservative — beliefs.
BookLooks is shutting down, according to a message on its website, but a similar organization — ratedbooks.org out of Utah, is maintaining the BookLooks archive.
The St. Francis Area School Board will meet Monday evening. Individuals organizing against the library policy plan to read letters from authors whose books have been banned in the district, according to a press release from the teachers union.
St. Francis High School students staged a walkout in protest of the library policy on Monday afternoon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
6 days ago
Judge strikes down key parts of Florida law that led to book removal from libraries
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A federal judge has struck down key parts of a Florida law that helped parents get books they found objectionable removed from public school libraries and classrooms. It is a victory for publishers and authors who had sued after their books were removed. U.S. District Judge Carlos Mendoza in Orlando said in Wednesday's ruling that the statute's prohibition on material that described sexual conduct was overbroad. Mendoza, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, also said that the state's interpretation of the 2023 law was unconstitutional. Among the books that had been removed from central Florida schools were classics like Margaret Atwood's 'The Handmaid's Tale,' Richard Wright's 'Native Son' and Kurt Vonnegut's 'Slaughterhouse-Five.' 'Historically, librarians curate their collections based on their sound discretion not based on decrees from on high,' the judge said. 'There is also evidence that the statute has swept up more non-obscene books than just the ones referenced here." After the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature passed the law, school officials worried that any sexual content was questionable, a belief that was enforced by new state training that urged librarians to err on the side of caution. Last year, Florida led the nation with 4,500 removals of school books. Under the judge's ruling, schools should revert back to a U.S. Supreme Court precedent in which the test is whether an average person would find the work prurient as a whole; whether it depicts sexual content in an offensive way; and whether the work lacks literary, artistic, political or scientific value. The lawsuit was brought by some of the nation's largest book publishers and some of the authors whose books had been removed from central Florida school libraries, as well as the parents of schoolchildren who tried to access books that were removed. The author plaintiffs included Angie Thomas, author of 'The Hate U Give"; Jodi Picoult, author of 'My Sister's Keeper"; John Green, author of 'The Fault in Our Stars"; and Julia Alvarez, author of 'How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents.' The publisher plaintiffs included Penguin Random House, Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Macmillan Publishing and Simon and Schuster.
San Francisco Chronicle
6 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Judge strikes down key parts of Florida law that led to removal of books from school libraries
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — A federal judge has struck down key parts of a Florida law that helped parents get books they found objectionable removed from public school libraries and classrooms. It is a victory for publishers and authors who had sued after their books were removed. U.S. District Judge Carlos Mendoza in Orlando said in Wednesday's ruling that the statute's prohibition on material that described sexual conduct was overbroad. Mendoza, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, also said that the state's interpretation of the 2023 law was unconstitutional. Among the books that had been removed from central Florida schools were classics like Margaret Atwood's 'The Handmaid's Tale,' Richard Wright's 'Native Son' and Kurt Vonnegut's 'Slaughterhouse-Five.' 'Historically, librarians curate their collections based on their sound discretion not based on decrees from on high,' the judge said. 'There is also evidence that the statute has swept up more non-obscene books than just the ones referenced here." After the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature passed the law, school officials worried that any sexual content was questionable, a belief that was enforced by new state training that urged librarians to err on the side of caution. Last year, Florida led the nation with 4,500 removals of school books. Under the judge's ruling, schools should revert back to a U.S. Supreme Court precedent in which the test is whether an average person would find the work prurient as a whole; whether it depicts sexual content in an offensive way; and whether the work lacks literary, artistic, political or scientific value. The lawsuit was brought by some of the nation's largest book publishers and some of the authors whose books had been removed from central Florida school libraries, as well as the parents of schoolchildren who tried to access books that were removed. The author plaintiffs included Angie Thomas, author of 'The Hate U Give"; Jodi Picoult, author of 'My Sister's Keeper"; John Green, author of 'The Fault in Our Stars"; and Julia Alvarez, author of 'How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents.' The publisher plaintiffs included Penguin Random House, Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Macmillan Publishing and Simon and Schuster.
Newsweek
09-08-2025
- Newsweek
Sydney Sweeney's Net Worth Is Set To Radically Change
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Sydney Sweeney's net worth will likely only increase following her controversial American Eagle jeans ad, experts have told Newsweek. The Euphoria and The White Lotus actor made headlines late last month over her partnership with the clothing brand. The tagline of the campaign, "Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans"—a wordplay on genes—sparked a fierce conversation about racism and eugenics. However, some reputation management experts said the debate could boost her future earnings, with one predicting it would provide Sweeney with an "outrage cocktail of $5 million" by the end of the month alone. The 27-year-old says in the advert, released on July 23: "Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color. My jeans are blue." While some online critics accused the advertisement of "white supremacy" and "Nazi propaganda," others dismissed the accusations and said the wordplay was simply creative marketing. On August 1, American Eagle defended Sweeney and the advert in a statement posted to social media, which said: "'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story. We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone." Newsweek reached out to Sweeney's representative via email for comment on Friday. Experts tell Newsweek Sydney Sweeney's net worth will likely increase despite uproar over her American Eagle jeans ad. Experts tell Newsweek Sydney Sweeney's net worth will likely increase despite uproar over her American Eagle jeans ad. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Is Sydney Sweeney a Republican? Amid the debate, Newsweek and multiple other outlets confirmed Sweeney is a registered Republican in Monroe County, Florida. The revelation has conservatives associating Sweeney with right-leaning politics, despite her never speaking out about her political affiliation. Republican President Donald Trump told reporters: "She's a registered Republican? Oh, now I love her ad." He later said on his social media platform Truth Social that The Handmaid's Tale star "has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there." Fox News host Jesse Watters, meanwhile, playfully teased that she and Trump's youngest son, Barron Trump, should marry. "It's going to create the greatest political dynasty in American history," he said on The Five. What Is Sydney Sweeney's Net Worth? Sweeney's net worth has not been confirmed, but Celebrity Net Worth estimates it to be approximately $40 million. The Spokane, Washington, native was nominated for two Emmy Awards in 2022 and was named in Forbes' 30 Under 30 list in 2023. Her new film Americana is due to hit theaters on August 15. Increased Visibility and Cash Crisis management and PR expert Edward Segal, author of the upcoming book The Crisis Casebook: Lessons in Crisis Management from the World's Leading Brands, told Newsweek that Sweeney's "future earnings could certainly be helped because of the controversial ad." "That is because companies, brands, movies, Netflix and others might want to take advantage of the recent spike in her name recognition to help increase visibility for their own purposes," he said. Eric Schiffer, CEO of Reputation Management Consultants, went further. "American Eagle's denim blitz could jam an outrage cocktail of $5 million more in Sweeney's wallet before Labor Day. The viral jeans spot is a ruthless napalm-grade cash cannon—every click fires fresh royalty checks at her $40 million pile." "Critics rant, but controversy drives denim sales," he continued. "She's riding a volatile tornado straight to the bank." Schiffer added that the ad could boost roles coming her way as Sweeney's "blend of bombshell and backlash is near lethal catnip for producers." "Hollywood forgives denim puns; it rewards controversial cash. She proved she can take heat—directors love an actress with fierce armor," he said. Additionally, Trump's social media post "gave American Eagle a shocking stock pop," Schiffer said. "She earned that bump without tweeting a syllable." The New York Times reported on Tuesday that American Eagle's stock rose by more than 23 percent after he complimented its campaign. A window display of actor Sydney Sweeney is seen on an American Eagle storefront on August 1, 2025, in New York City. A window display of actor Sydney Sweeney is seen on an American Eagle storefront on August 1, 2025, in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images The Downsides However, Segal warned that the advert's controversy could have the opposite effect on Sweeney's career. "Companies, movies and TV shows could shy away from her because a number of people who were offended by the commercial," he said. "Consumers who were turned off by the ad may decide that they will not buy American Eagle's jeans. Or if they already have a pair, will refuse to buy them again. In their eyes, American Eagle's brand has been tarnished, and the company will forever be remembered for sponsoring 'that' ad." Karen J. Kessler, president and CEO Kessler PR Group, told Newsweek that Sweeney "has been walking a marketing tightrope." "Will a marketing campaign define her image? No, but she will need to be strategic as she navigates the 'actress as marketing tool' career," she warned. Sweeney and American Eagle's Futures Segal said the brand's "future is brighter" following the collaboration. "Breaking through the clutter in the marketplace is always a challenge for brands, and the ad certainly was able to do that in a memorable and effective way," he said . "I will not be surprised if American Eagle continues to feature Sweeney in their ads or creates a series of new ones that are based on the headlines generated by the 'great genes' commercial. Nothing succeeds like success." Sweeney has not yet spoken out about the debate, but Kessler said that's a good thing. "She is letting the social media universe chatter, while she is notably silent. Good move, Sydney." As for her future, it's looking just as bright as the brand she collaborated with, Schiffer said. The "ad proves the 'girl next door' can weaponize backlash—she's a savvy PR chameleon," he said. "Sydney Sweeney turned a 15-second denim tease into a blistering wealth accelerator. The moral of Sydney's story is outrage sells jeans, jeans fatten wallets and that Sweeney's playing a ruthless grand-master game."
