Project, kajal, deedar: Chhangur Baba's codewords for conversion revealed
The revelations are part of a larger investigation into a well-funded conversion syndicate. Chhangur Baba is already under the scanner of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for alleged money laundering and accumulation of illegal wealth estimated at over Rs 100 crore. The ED believes he used foreign donations, much of it routed through illegal hawala channels via Nepal, to fund mass conversions, particularly targeting underprivileged Hindu communities.Authorities allege Chhangur Baba operated from the Chand Auliya Dargah and had opened over 100 bank accounts across India and Nepal. Nearly Rs 500 crore in foreign funding was received over three years, with Rs 300 crore allegedly funneled in illegally through border districts like Kathmandu and Banke, and Rs 200 crore verified through official routes. These funds are suspected to have come from Muslim-majority countries, including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the UAE.The ATS arrested Chhangur Baba and his close aide Neetu alias Nasreen on July 5 from a hotel in Lucknow. Both remain in custody. Investigators found 40 bank accounts holding Rs 106 crore linked to Chhangur and are examining digital devices to trace his financial and communication network.The state government has begun cracking down on properties linked to the accused. A Rs 5 crore, 40-room mansion illegally built by Chhangur Baba in Balrampur was razed using bulldozers, while other assets in Bahraich and surrounding districts are also under scrutiny.Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has labelled Chhangur Baba's activities as anti-national.The ATS, ED and central agencies like the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) are now collaborating to map the full extent of his operation, both in India and abroad.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Maha approaches SC against acquittal of 12 in Mumbai blasts
A day after the Bombay High Court acquitted all 12 men convicted of planning and executing the July 11, 2006 serial bomb blasts on Mumbai's suburban rail network, including five on death row, the Maharashtra government on Tuesday rushed to the Supreme Court seeking a stay on the verdict and an urgent hearing of its appeal. Maha approaches SC against acquittal of 12 in Mumbai blasts Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the state government, mentioned the matter before Chief Justice of India Bhushan R Gavai, requesting that the petition be heard without delay. The CJI agreed to list the case for a hearing on July 24, even as he remarked: 'But we have been reading that some of them have already been released from jail.' Responding to the observation, Mehta acknowledged the development but added: 'The state still wants the appeal to be heard expeditiously.' The special leave petition challenging the High Court judgment was filed earlier in the day. The state's legal challenge argues that the High Court erred in reversing the trial court's judgment and seeks a stay on the acquittal to prevent further release of the accused. The acquittals triggered political outrage, with Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis on Monday calling the verdict 'shocking' and vowing to challenge it in the Supreme Court. The appeal comes in the wake of Monday's decision by the Bombay High Court, which overturned the 2015 convictions handed down by a special court under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). The High Court held that the prosecution 'utterly failed to establish the offence beyond reasonable doubt,' describing the investigation as riddled with procedural lapses, unreliable evidence and grave violations of the accused's constitutional rights. The 2006 blasts were among the deadliest terror attacks in India's history, killing 188 people and injuring 829. Seven powerful improvised explosive devices, planted in pressure cookers, ripped through first-class compartments of Mumbai's crowded local trains within six minutes during evening rush hour. The carnage left behind mangled steel and shattered lives, and prompted a massive terror investigation led by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS). Within four months, 13 men were arrested by the ATS, which claimed that the attacks were orchestrated by former members of the banned Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and aided by the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). The ATS further alleged that 12 Pakistani nationals had infiltrated India to provide explosives and training to the accused—claims that ultimately failed to stand judicial scrutiny. In 2015, the MCOCA court convicted 12 of the 13 accused, awarding the death penalty to five and life imprisonment to the others. One man, Abdul Wahid Shaikh, a schoolteacher who refused to confess, was acquitted by the trial court. One of the 13 accused died during the lengthy appeals process before the Bombay High Court. On Monday, the Bombay High Court bench of Justices Anil S Kilor and Shyam Chandak delivered a 400-page verdict that raised fundamental questions about the fairness of the investigation and trial. It described the prosecution's case as a 'deceptive closure' that undermined public trust while allowing the true culprits to remain at large. The high court pointed out that the prosecution's reliance on confessional statements, which formed the bedrock of the ATS's case, was deeply flawed. Most of these statements, recorded between October 4 and 25, 2006, bore tell-tale signs of being 'cut-copy-paste' reproductions and raised suspicions of being extracted under coercion. Several accused retracted their confessions during trial, alleging torture in custody -- a claim the court found credible in light of procedural violations. The high court also noted that the accused were not informed of their right to consult their lawyers before confessing, despite being represented by advocates on record. This, the court ruled, was a violation of their fundamental rights. Furthermore, it cast serious doubt on the credibility of eyewitnesses, including two taxi drivers and a few train passengers, who claimed to have seen the accused planting the bombs. Their testimonies, recorded more than 100 days after the incident and four years later during identification parades, were found to be unreliable. The test identification parades themselves were conducted by officials not authorised under law. Material evidence, such as recovered RDX, circuit boards, pressure cookers, soldering guns and maps, was also deemed inadmissible. The court found that the chain of custody was broken and that the items were not properly sealed before being sent for forensic testing, casting doubt on their origin and connection to the accused. Additionally, the high court raised questions about the applicability of MCOCA in the case and noted serious procedural lapses in invoking its provisions. Ends
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
16-year-old Dalit boy sexually assaulted by 7 minors after he lost Rs 50 bet in Uttar Pradesh
MEERUT: A 16-year-old Dalit boy was allegedly sexually assaulted by as many as seven youths (all minors) after he lost a Rs 50 bet during a cricket match and could not pay. The culprits recorded a video of the incident and circulated it among peers, who also sexually assaulted him several times by threatening to upload the clip on social media. Though the initial assault took place nearly a month ago at a village in Saharanpur district of Uttar Pradesh, the complaint was lodged only on Monday after the traumatised boy could not bear it any longer and narrated his ordeal to his family. The boy's father said his son was so traumatised that he did not step out of the house for days. "The boy was sexually assaulted several times by the group members, all minors, on the pretext of his obscene video," said circle officer Vaibhav Pandey. "Following a complaint, an FIR under sections 3 (2)(5) of the SC/ST Act, and 3A and 4 of the Pocso Act has been registered against seven youths, and three of them have been detained. Medical examination of the victim was done and his statements were recorded. Investigation is on. The dispute over the cricket match bet is also being investigated," said Pandey.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Chanda Kochhar-Videocon Scam: Inside The Rs 3,250 Cr Loan And Rs 64 Cr Bribery
Last Updated: Appellate Tribunal has found Chanda Kochhar guilty of accepting a Rs 64 cr bribe for sanctioning a Rs 300 cr loan to Videocon; Here's what happened Chanda Kochhar-Videocon Case: The ICICI Bank–Videocon loan fraud case took a decisive turn in July 2025 after the PMLA Appellate Tribunal held Chanda Kochhar, former MD and CEO of ICICI Bank, guilty of accepting a Rs 64 crore bribe in exchange for approving a Rs 300 crore loan to the Videocon Group. The ruling upheld charges filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), calling it a 'clear case of quid pro quo." The case traces back to allegations by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) that ICICI Bank, under Kochhar's leadership, sanctioned loans totalling Rs 3,250 crore to Videocon Group firms promoted by Venugopal Dhoot. These sanctions allegedly violated the Banking Regulation Act, RBI norms, and ICICI's own internal credit policies. Among the disbursals, a pivotal transaction took place in September 2009 when ICICI Bank sanctioned Rs 300 crore to Videocon International Electronics Ltd (VIEL), a group subsidiary. Just one day later, Rs 64 crore was transferred from Supreme Energy Pvt Ltd (a Videocon-linked firm) to NuPower Renewables Pvt Ltd, a company effectively controlled by Chanda Kochhar's husband, Deepak Kochhar. The case spotlighted deeper issues of conflict of interest and corporate governance lapses, as Chanda Kochhar failed to disclose her husband's links to Videocon during her participation in loan sanctioning decisions. Early Red Flags & Chanda Kochhar's Exit Red flags were raised as early as 2016 by whistleblowers and media reports, which pointed to potential conflicts of interest in the ICICI-Videocon dealings. Following mounting scrutiny, the CBI launched a preliminary probe in March 2018. Kochhar resigned from her post in October 2018, citing personal reasons, but her exit coincided with growing internal and regulatory investigations. These probes sought to determine if she had breached ICICI Bank's code of conduct by concealing personal financial links that could influence lending decisions. FIR, ED Probe, and Asset Attachments The case intensified in January 2019 when the CBI filed a formal FIR against Chanda Kochhar, Deepak Kochhar, and Venugopal Dhoot, alleging criminal conspiracy, cheating, and misuse of official position under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Enforcement Directorate followed suit with a money laundering probe and provisionally attached Rs 78 crore worth of assets belonging to the Kochhars. However, in November 2020, the PMLA Adjudicating Authority ordered the release of these assets, stating the ED had not established a direct link between the funds and criminal activity at that point. In December 2022, the CBI arrested Chanda Kochhar, Deepak Kochhar, and Venugopal Dhoot, claiming to have conclusive evidence linking them to the illicit transactions. A month later, the Bombay High Court granted interim bail to the Kochhars, slamming the arrests as 'arbitrary" and lacking procedural rigour. The court criticised the CBI for making routine arrests 'without application of mind." The case regained national attention in September 2024 when the Supreme Court issued notices to Chanda and Deepak Kochhar in response to a CBI plea. The CBI challenged the interim bail, arguing that the Kochhars' release could hinder ongoing investigations. The ED, too, reiterated its stance before the Appellate Tribunal, emphasising the structured nature of the fund transfers and Kochhar's conflict of interest. July 2025 Tribunal Verdict: Bribery and Ethics Violation Confirmed On July 3, 2025, the PMLA Appellate Tribunal overturned the 2020 ruling and ruled in favour of the ED. The tribunal concluded that Chanda Kochhar was guilty of accepting a Rs 64 crore bribe in return for approving the Rs 300 crore loan to Videocon. It rejected claims that the payment to NuPower was a legitimate business transaction and called it a bribe, routed through Supreme Energy and NuPower, which was controlled by Deepak Kochhar. The tribunal emphasised that Chanda Kochhar, as a member of ICICI's credit committee, had a fiduciary duty to disclose any conflict of interest—something she failed to do. Citing evidence recorded under Section 50 of the PMLA Act, the tribunal also ruled that the earlier adjudicating authority had overlooked material facts and erred in releasing the attached assets. tags : chanda kochhar case view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 23, 2025, 08:30 IST News business » banking-finance Chanda Kochhar-Videocon Scam: Inside The Rs 3,250 Cr Loan And Rs 64 Cr Bribery Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
