Dharmasthala secret burials: SIT accompanies whistleblower for inspection near temple town
The team conducted a spot mahazar (inspection) of the location where the whistleblower had dug up a skull, which he had handed over to investigating authorities while filing a complaint earlier this month. This was apart from marking other spots around Snana Ghatta (bathing ghat), located on the banks of River Netravati, where the bodies were allegedly buried by him, according to sources.
The mahazar took place amid heavy police presence as personnel from Dharmasthala and Belthangady police stations, and the Karnataka State Reserve Police were deployed around the spot. The process took place after SIT officials questioned the whistleblower for two consecutive days – Saturday and Sunday – regarding the allegations made by him. During the mahazar process, the complainant's face was concealed with a mask to protect his identity.
Earlier this month, the whistleblower – a former sanitation worker employed at Dharmasthala – filed a police complaint saying he was forced to bury several bodies and was threatened against approaching the police. The complainant had said that he was suffering from 'guilty consciousness' and that many of the bodies he had buried were of women with signs of sexual assault.
The Dharmasthala police filed a First Information Report (FIR) on July 4 based on the complaint filed by the whistleblower. On July 19, succumbing to pressure from various organisations and activists, the Karnataka government formed an SIT to probe the sensational allegations levelled by the whistleblower.
Last week, the SIT set up an office at the Belthangady police station. Officials from SIT had also visited the Dharmasthala police station to collect relevant documents pertaining to the case.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Law student's rape: Calcutta University drops Kolkata college as LLB exam centre over police presence
Calcutta University has decided not to hold its LLB fourth, sixth, and eighth semester examinations at the law college in Kolkata where a former contractual staffer allegedly raped a student on June 25, an official said on Sunday. The examinations will be held from August 11 to August 26 at the university's other centres. 'The shadow of the horrific incident is still in the minds of all, and there are barricades in front of the campus since the investigation is going on. The police are present on the campus, guarding the student union room and the guard room where the alleged crime took place. So the college will not be an exam centre,' said the university official, adding that the second semester examinations could also not be held at the college because of heavy police deployment in the wake of the alleged rape. In the Calcutta High Court, counsel representing the college had requested the bench of Justices Soumen Sen and Samira Das De to provide a temporary police post on the campus until the college could hire new security staff. According to sources, a member of the college's governing body had requested the university not to consider the college as an examination centre until the police deployment was withdrawn. Monojit Mishra, 31, a former contractual staffer at the college, and security guard Pinaki Banerjee, 55, and second-year students Zaib Ahmed, 19, and Pramit Mukherjee, 20, are the accused in the case. Mishra was also a functionary of the ruling Trinamool Congress's student wing. On Friday, the university removed two of its nominees from the college governing body. Interim Vice-Chancellor Santa Datta De said in a statement that Sibranjan Chatterjee and Yashwanti Sremanee had been removed for 'the irregular appointment of Monojit Mishra and not opposing the appointment and other irregular activities of the governing body'. Also on Friday, the police sought police custody of all four men accused in the case for further investigation, but the Alipore court sent them back to judicial custody till August 5. Police sources said there had been some discrepancies in the statements of the accused and their gait analysis (comparison of a person's walking pattern to that captured in CCTV footage) report. The police's detective department has taken over the rape case from the Special Investigation Team (SIT). The SIT, which initially had five members and was later expanded to add four more, will now assist the department in the inquiry.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Video Shows Aide Of YSRCP Leader Counting Cash Amid Andhra Liquor Scam Probe
Last Updated: The Andhra Pradesh Police's Special Investigation Team (SIT), currently investigating the alleged liquor scam, seized a significant amount of cash from a farmhouse near Hyderabad. Amid the ongoing investigation into the alleged Rs 3,500 crore Andhra Pradesh liquor scam seized, the special investigation team (SIT) has recovered a video that reportedly shows a key accused counting bundles of cash. The man in the clip, which is now making the rounds on the internet, shows a man, identified as Venkatesh Naidu, a close aide of YSRCP leader and former MLA Chevireddy Bhaskar Reddy, counting the cash. It is believed that the video could open new avenues in the investigation, potentially shedding light on the flow of illicit funds and the roles of key individuals involved. Earlier on Wednesday, Kasireddy Raja Sekhar Reddy, the prime accused in the alleged Rs 3,200-crore liquor scam during the erstwhile YSRCP government, filed an affidavit in court, denying any connection to the Rs 11 crore in cash seized near Hyderabad earlier in the day. The Andhra Pradesh Police's Special Investigation Team (SIT), currently investigating the alleged liquor scam, seized a significant amount of cash from a farmhouse near Hyderabad. The operation was carried out following the confession of Varun Purushotham, listed as the 40th accused (A-40) in the case. Meanwhile, Reddy (43), who has been in judicial custody at Vijayawada sub-jail since April 22, claimed in an affidavit that the prosecution is 'hell-bent" on preventing him from obtaining bail. 'The prosecution has turned into persecution, inventing cock and bull stories to link me with an absurd money trail. The claim that the seized cash belongs to me is a complete falsehood," the affidavit stated. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Eyewitness Files Complaint Over Illegal Burial Practices As Police Records Destruction Sparks Mass Burial Investigation
Fresh controversy has erupted in Karnataka's Belthangady district following startling revelations about the systematic destruction of police death records and new eyewitness testimony of illegal burial practices. An RTI activist has now filed a formal complaint with the Special Investigation Team, claiming to have personally witnessed the improper burial of a young girl's body, describing the incident as treating her remains "like one would bury a dog." The development comes after Right to Information documents revealed that Belthangady police deliberately deleted all entries from their Unnatural Death Register covering the period from 2000 to 2015. This timeframe coincides directly with allegations of mass burials in the temple town of Dharmasthala, located within the same administrative jurisdiction. RTI activist Jayanth, who has been investigating police conduct for years, submitted his complaint to the SIT on August 2nd. He claims to have witnessed the illegal burial firsthand and has named all officials who were present during the incident. According to Jayanth, proper legal procedures were completely ignored when the young girl's body was discovered and buried. The activist explained that his decision to come forward was motivated by the appointment of what he considers honest officers to the investigation. He stated that the disturbing scene had haunted him for years, and he had previously promised to reveal the truth once trustworthy investigators took charge of the case. In his earlier RTI requests to Belthangady Police Station, Jayanth had sought records of missing persons complaints along with accompanying photographs. The police response was deeply concerning - they claimed that all such documentation, including postmortem reports, wall posters, notices, and photographs used to identify unidentified bodies, had been destroyed under routine administrative procedures. The activist has raised critical questions about the destruction of such vital records in the digital age. He argues that in today's technological environment, it is inconceivable that such important data would be destroyed without first being digitized and backed up. This raises serious concerns about who might be influencing such decisions and what they might be trying to conceal. The implications of this record destruction are particularly troubling when considering future identification efforts. If skeletal remains are discovered, authorities would be unable to match them against any existing records since the relevant documentation has been eliminated. This systematic erasure of evidence suggests a deliberate attempt to obstruct potential investigations. The Belthangady Police's admission of destroying crucial records has intensified scrutiny of their handling of unidentified death cases. The destroyed documents covered the exact period during which a whistleblower has alleged that mass burials occurred in Dharmasthala. According to these allegations, between 1998 and 2014, the whistleblower was forced to bury and cremate bodies of women and minors, many of whom allegedly showed signs of sexual assault. The police's justification for destroying these records as part of "routine administrative orders" has been met with skepticism and outrage. Critics argue that such sensitive documentation should be preserved indefinitely, particularly given the serious nature of unidentified death cases and the potential for future investigations. The SIT is expected to register a formal FIR based on Jayanth's complaint and may soon initiate exhumation proceedings to investigate the alleged illegal burials. This development marks a significant escalation in what has become one of Karnataka's most controversial cases involving alleged systematic cover-ups and destruction of evidence. The case has broader implications for police accountability and record-keeping practices across the state. It raises fundamental questions about how law enforcement agencies handle sensitive cases involving unidentified deaths and what safeguards exist to prevent the destruction of crucial evidence. As the investigation proceeds, public attention remains focused on whether authorities will be able to uncover the truth despite the systematic destruction of records. The case highlights the critical importance of RTI activism in exposing potential misconduct and the need for transparent, accountable policing practices in handling sensitive criminal matters.
