
This isn't just about preserving buildings; it's about restoring hope
Read More:
The import of this moment will also come to resonate in communities across the land. This was a landmark treaty – the first of its kind - signifying a new chapter in Scotland's relationship with its own people and their stewardship of their public buildings and the land bequeathed to them by several generations of their own families.
The Campsie High Kirk ranks among the most majestic and important ruins in this part of West Central Scotland. It sits atop the raised cemetery in the middle of the town where most of Lennoxtown's departed souls now rest. Beyond it lie the Campsie Hills which form the gateway to the Trossachs. You'd be blessed indeed to secure your eternal rest beneath these pastures.
And besides: David Hamilton is one of the UJK's most important – but under-appreciated architects whose genius helped shape Glasgow's Georgian majesty.
Last year, The Herald revealed that a local community group, Friends of Campsie High Kirk, had successfully applied to acquire the ruin from the Crown, represented by King's and Lord Treasurer's Remembrancer (KILTR). On Wednesday, John Logue, Crown Agent and Chief Executive of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, formally transferred ownership of the A-listed High Kirk to the community. A ceremonial key to mark the event was presented to the local provost, Gillian Renwick, representing the community of Lennoxtown.
Simply to have reached this stage is a small miracle in itself. The Friends group had come together barely two years ago, a handful of local people united by their affection of the old High Kirk and a growing alarm about its impending fate. They had chosen their moment well, though. It had come just as the Crown was developing its ambitious Ownerless Property Transfer Scheme, whereby many other hallowed community buildings may be handed back to the people whose forbears had built them and used them.
The Friends of the High Kirk believe that this place can be first restored and then used as a community arts and events hub which would spark authentic regeneration in a small town that's been left reeling by the departure of several old industries. Even as their plans emerged from the drawing board, the decrepitude of its once thriving Main Street has continued with the departure of the local Post Office. That followed the closure of several pubs, the local family butcher and a number of family-run shops. In a town which occupies the bottom reaches of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, the restoration of the High Kirk and its future use as a Community arts and civic space is vital.
Campsie High Kirk (Image: Gordon Terris)
Sympathy and sentiment alone though, wouldn't have been sufficient to enable the transfer of the Kirk. The community needed to meet a high bar set around levels of future viability and purpose to the community. The potential to do all of this: the repairs (especially to the roof) the clearing of trees and stabilising the old stones, while retaining the integrity of David Hamilton's architecture was crucial.
Usually, it takes a lot of time and effort to disturb the serpentine nexus of pathways that lead to funding and support for community projects. Unless you have the cash and influence to be received in Holyrood or to persuade cash-strapped Councils that your project is beneficial to the people, then you're facing an uphill battle. Craig Brooks, Chair of Friends of Campsie High Kirk, has used every lever at his disposal to cause the necessary ripples.
Thus far, they've been backed by East Dunbartonshire Council, a host of local community groups and support agencies and now, crucially, the King's man in Scotland. As the architects charged with restoring this place outlined their five-phase plan on Wednesday it became clear that several serious challenges lie ahead. Around £3m is required to effect the repairs and re-setting necessary for a space to be created for community events. Replacing the roof with a glass canopy and restoring the old clock tower to its former grandeur will take a few million more. In the absence of any rich benefactor, the next five years will see a massive fund-raising effort that must, at least, involve the entire community.
'It'll be worth it, though,' says Mr Brooks. 'Few other towns in Scotland have an architectural jewel like this sitting in the middle of their high street. And fewer still have the backdrop of the Campsie Hills or the imprint that makes this place one of Scotland's most historically important sites stretching back to the activity of the Romans and centuries before them.'
One of the main challenges which could make a crucial difference is to secure VAT relief from the UK's labyrinthine tax regime. Capital works are taxed at 20%, even when those works – such as this one – are demonstrably beneficial to the public and administered by a charity solely comprised of volunteers. Charity exemptions are denied for projects with sustainable income models.
'In effect,' says Craig Brooks, 'the system demands that the Friends of Campsie High Kirk prove they are financially self-sustaining and then penalises them for doing so.' He cites an article in this month's edition of Scottish Field by Peter Burman, the former Director of Conservation and Property Services for the National Trust for Scotland.
In it, Mr Burman shows how VAT treatment of historic buildings is a false economy and how taxation is actively destabilising charitable regeneration work. 'How do you feel about fundraising for an additional 20% just to pay a tax bill,' he asks.
As usual, it's disadvantaged communities which face discrimination in this tax-trap. 'Many of the buildings affected lie in deprived or 'regenerative-priority areas'. It means that the very communities who are being encouraged to lead renewal are penalised at the point of delivery.'
For now though, the local people are celebrating their crucial first victory in the battle to restore their beloved old kirk to its former glory. Michelle Haswell, Secretary of the Friends of Campsie High Kirk was raised in Lennoxtown and still lives in the shadow of the old church.
'The High Kirk is part of our identity and to lose it would have been like losing a loved one. It's intrinsic to who we are and still lives in our childhood memories. It's such a majestic building and a great deal of community pride is invested in it.
'I recall watching a documentary about the Singer factory in Clydebank and the sense of loss felt by the community when the old Singer clock tower was dismantled in 1963. They felt that a piece of them had disappeared too. We feel the same about our beloved High Kirk. For the first time though, we feel that we can save it and you can already see that the wider Campsie community is becoming more invested in the campaign.'
Of all the speeches which marked the ceremonial transfer, perhaps the words of John Logue, the Crown Agent were the most poignant as he effectively signalled the King's assent for this old Kirk to be given back to the people.
'So let me say, without reservation, how delighted I am that this once abandoned kirk can now thrive in the hands of those who cherish it most,' said Mr Logue. 'What you've done here isn't just about preserving bricks and mortar; it's about restoring hope; creating opportunity and reclaiming a shared space for generations to come.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
I can't read anyone's body language and I feel flirt-illiterate. How do I meet new people?
I'm approaching 30 and I've been single since I was 19. What's more, I haven't dated anyone. This isn't a question of labels – I have objectively not seen anyone for 10 years. I'm a straight man and I have felt quite a bit of shame about not dating and not seeing anyone, and I have lied about my circumstances to family and friends. 'Oh, yeah, I've been on dates,' and 'Oh, yeah, I have a sex life,' are some of the lies I have repeated. I have more or less gotten over the reasons why I might have isolated myself emotionally from other people. I no longer tell myself that I am unlikable/unlovable, and am open to the idea that other people could be attracted to me. But, I can't fathom how to meet anyone. I can't read anyone's body language, and feel flirt-illiterate. How does a 30-year-old man meet people they might like and be honest about their dating illiteracy and inexperience without compounding the problem? Eleanor says: There's plenty of advice on how to get 'a date' or 'a girlfriend', as though they're a uniform species. Like catching 'a trout'. Some such advice is fine (be punctual, don't expect mind reading), but I'd be wary of treating dating as a uniform activity – one big sport where everyone but you knows the rules. Dating's different for everyone. Just like the friendships between high school girlfriends have different norms and origins from the friendships between golf buddies, your dating life will look particular to you. Figuring it out isn't about figuring out how to 'date' per se. It's about figuring out how to be yourself enough that the people who are looking for you can find you. With that in mind, here are some generalisations that should be treated as exactly that. 'People' are everywhere, but you're not just trying to meet people, you're trying to meet your people. Go where they're likely to be – joint activities, hobbies, shared friend groups. Expanding your romantic life often involves just expanding your social life: making sure you're out, known, in the habit of chatting to people you don't know. It might help to think of flirting as an extension of social bonding rather than a strategy unique to dating. It's just creating chemistry. Do you make people feel like the most interesting thing in the room? Do you hold eye contact a smidge longer in a way that suggests they're fascinating? Does it seem as though there's some mischief that you're in on together? When figuring out whether people are flirting with you, it's the same thing in reverse. If someone is trying to build some chemistry, they will find reasons to share things with you. A lot of philosophers worry that our closest relationships often start in a bit of deception: we act like our best selves in early romance. In fact, I think this is for good reason. You don't want to make your neurosis or baggage the other person's responsibility at first. In your case, you've felt unlovable in the past and you worry about your inexperience. But I don't think it's dishonest not to disclose this. The risk of sharing these things is they could become symbols for both of you – a date can't just be a date, a rejection can't just be a rejection. It becomes a symbol of your worth or romantic viability. That's a lot to put out there in the early stages of getting to know someone – for them and for you. It's important to have your own ways of dealing with the fears and vulnerabilities dating can bring up. Since you have learned ways to manage your negative self-talk, it sounds as though you're well on the way. Let yourself be seen for you, not for your fears and woes. And when in doubt, you can just ask. You mentioned finding it hard to read body language, feeling 'flirt illiterate'. Partly this is by design. A lot of flirting deliberately retains its plausible deniability. That being said, if your challenges reading social cues are general, not dating-specific, it may be worth coming up with direct and friendly ways to clarify: 'I'm not always sure if I've read the vibe right, but would you like to get a drink or dinner together?' Some people will feel liberated if you give them permission to say exactly what they mean. I know this stuff feels like an impossible world to break into, but believe me that dating is just an extension of the social interactions you're used to. It's not about learning a new language or world; it's about being yourself, on purpose, in ways that let your people find you.


The Guardian
21 hours ago
- The Guardian
I can't read anyone's body language and I feel flirt-illiterate. How do I meet new people?
I'm approaching 30 and I've been single since I was 19. What's more, I haven't dated anyone. This isn't a question of labels – I have objectively not seen anyone for 10 years. I'm a straight man and I have felt quite a bit of shame about not dating and not seeing anyone, and I have lied about my circumstances to family and friends. 'Oh, yeah, I've been on dates,' and 'Oh, yeah, I have a sex life,' are some of the lies I have repeated. I have more or less gotten over the reasons why I might have isolated myself emotionally from other people. I no longer tell myself that I am unlikable/unlovable, and am open to the idea that other people could be attracted to me. But, I can't fathom how to meet anyone. I can't read anyone's body language, and feel flirt-illiterate. How does a 30-year-old man meet people they might like and be honest about their dating illiteracy and inexperience without compounding the problem? Eleanor says: There's plenty of advice on how to get 'a date' or 'a girlfriend', as though they're a uniform species. Like catching 'a trout'. Some such advice is fine (be punctual, don't expect mind reading), but I'd be wary of treating dating as a uniform activity – one big sport where everyone but you knows the rules. Dating's different for everyone. Just like the friendships between high school girlfriends have different norms and origins from the friendships between golf buddies, your dating life will look particular to you. Figuring it out isn't about figuring out how to 'date' per se. It's about figuring out how to be yourself enough that the people who are looking for you can find you. With that in mind, here are some generalisations that should be treated as exactly that. 'People' are everywhere, but you're not just trying to meet people, you're trying to meet your people. Go where they're likely to be – joint activities, hobbies, shared friend groups. Expanding your romantic life often involves just expanding your social life: making sure you're out, known, in the habit of chatting to people you don't know. It might help to think of flirting as an extension of social bonding rather than a strategy unique to dating. It's just creating chemistry. Do you make people feel like the most interesting thing in the room? Do you hold eye contact a smidge longer in a way that suggests they're fascinating? Does it seem as though there's some mischief that you're in on together? When figuring out whether people are flirting with you, it's the same thing in reverse. If someone is trying to build some chemistry, they will find reasons to share things with you. A lot of philosophers worry that our closest relationships often start in a bit of deception: we act like our best selves in early romance. In fact, I think this is for good reason. You don't want to make your neurosis or baggage the other person's responsibility at first. In your case, you've felt unlovable in the past and you worry about your inexperience. But I don't think it's dishonest not to disclose this. The risk of sharing these things is they could become symbols for both of you – a date can't just be a date, a rejection can't just be a rejection. It becomes a symbol of your worth or romantic viability. That's a lot to put out there in the early stages of getting to know someone – for them and for you. It's important to have your own ways of dealing with the fears and vulnerabilities dating can bring up. Since you have learned ways to manage your negative self-talk, it sounds as though you're well on the way. Let yourself be seen for you, not for your fears and woes. And when in doubt, you can just ask. You mentioned finding it hard to read body language, feeling 'flirt illiterate'. Partly this is by design. A lot of flirting deliberately retains its plausible deniability. That being said, if your challenges reading social cues are general, not dating-specific, it may be worth coming up with direct and friendly ways to clarify: 'I'm not always sure if I've read the vibe right, but would you like to get a drink or dinner together?' Some people will feel liberated if you give them permission to say exactly what they mean. I know this stuff feels like an impossible world to break into, but believe me that dating is just an extension of the social interactions you're used to. It's not about learning a new language or world; it's about being yourself, on purpose, in ways that let your people find you.


The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Teenage girls making TikToks: Philippa James's best photograph
This started as a project with my daughter and her friends, who are all part of the smartphone generation. They were 14 years old at the time and I wanted to learn more about the relationship they had with their mobile phones. In 2022, a study by Ofcom showed that nine out of 10 children owned one by the time they reached the age of 11, and that 91% of them used video platforms, messaging apps and social media by the age of 12. I spoke to my daughter and her friends about how they use their phones and the negative reputation that surrounds teenagers and their screens. They told me the positives as well as the negatives, such as how social media can raise confidence as well as knock it down. I asked if I could photograph them. There was very little direction from me and – rather than photographing them in a controlled portraiture style, as I would usually have done – I simply observed them doing their thing. The energy was high: they moved so fast, dancing to short music reels, filming each other, laughing, scrolling, chatting, taking selfies, and back to making TikTok dances again. It was so hectic, I struggled to keep up. This image, called TikTok, came out of that session. I found this composition and asked Lucy to quickly look up at me. I had about two seconds before the moment was broken and they moved on to the next thing. As a portrait photographer, you get a feeling about certain shots, and I knew this was the one. Back in the edit, I reflected on how the girls use their phones as a form of visual communication, or as the theorist Nathan Jurgenson calls it, 'social photography'. This means the result of the photograph is social, rather than an object as it would be in traditional photography. Social photography is less about making a document or archive, and more about taking a picture or video and sharing it, basically having a visual conversation. The more time I spent with the girls, the more I learned about the darker side of their phones – the sexism and misogyny online. I shared the project as a work-in-progress exhibition in Oxford, and I worked closely with other focus groups of teenage girls who shared their experiences of online sexism and sexual harassment. I was shocked at some of the things I learned. The final project includes photographs of their handwritten testimonials. To further my research, I was reading activists Laura Bates and Soma Sara's work – and the original title of the project was No Big Deal, informed by Sara, who says sexual harassment happens so often it becomes seen as 'no big deal'. But as the project progressed, I changed it to Once a Slag, which refers to a TikTok soundbite my daughter played to me. The acceptance and ownership of the lyrics made me feel protective and frustrated as a mother and feminist. It's not a comfortable title, but the shock factor is important to get attention and raise awareness. This photograph has many layers, but it's also striking. It is beautiful and alluring and I think it has captured a wonderful moment. It's a celebration of the joy of girlhood, and of a group of girls in their own world. And just like social photography, these teenage years are ephemeral. In this image they are having so much fun together – it's so important to capture this confidence in a safe place. This image has also made me very conscious of the triangle of three gazes: Lucy gazing at the viewer, performing for the camera but also confronting the viewer with that look, that attitude. Then my gaze as the mother and the photographer – which changes the more research I do on the subject. Then the gaze of the viewer, who might be transported back in time to their own teenage years. I find the tension between these really challenging with this subject matter. The girls in the image are now 17. A lot has come out since it was made. People such as Andrew Tate have become widely known – even though the kids knew all about him years before us adults did – and more recently the Netflix series Adolescence prompted wide debate. This week a mum got in touch with me and said: 'I need to talk to you about short skirts.' Where I sit as a mum, and where I sit as a woman, are often totally at odds. As a mum, instinctively, you want to be protective. But if you zoom out of it, why should a woman not wear what she wants? Unfortunately, young women today are at risk, just by having a phone. That's the world we don't know as parents today. Born: Bath, 1978Trained BA in art and moving image at Maidstone, Kent (2000); MA in photography at Falmouth (2023)Influences 'Rineke Dijkstra, Miranda July, Lynne Ramsay, Tracey Emin, Abigail Heyman, Cindy Sherman, Samantha Morton, Catherine McCormack, the film Short Cuts by Robert Altman, and Lisa Taddeo's book Three Women.'High point 'Being selected last year for the Taylor Wessing portrait prize and exhibiting at the National Portrait Gallery. Receiving funding from Arts Council England to develop my practice – it's given me the confidence to develop my visual language. And winning LensCulture's Emerging Talent award.'Low point 'In 2020 I was publicly criticised for including a trans women in my very first personal project, 100 Women of Oxford, and protesters threatened to sabotage the exhibition. I learned a lot from that experience about responsibility, representation, and the emotional weight of photographing real people.'Top tip 'Keep making work, reflect on what you made, then make more work. Photography can look easy, but it's hard – and consistency really matters.'