Committee bills crowded out by national hot-topic legislation pushed by Freedom Caucus
CHEYENNE — With a high volume of individually sponsored bills filed for the Wyoming legislative session this year — several of which were filed by first-time lawmakers — veteran legislators said there was a noticeable shift from state problems to hot-button national issues.
Committee bills are discussed during the Legislature's off-season, formally known as the interim. This is a time when lawmakers meet, conduct research and hear hours of public testimony as they draft bills for the upcoming session. These bills are a result of Wyoming stakeholders coming together to find a solution to Wyoming problems.
Typically, around 20% of committee bills filed each session fail to become law, said Rep. Lloyd Larsen, R-Lander, who has served in the Legislature since 2013. The Wyoming Tribune Eagle calculated about 40% of committee bills in this legislative session failed to make it to the finish line this year.
'I would not disagree that we've, over the last two sessions, seen more committee bills not be considered in committee, or die in committee,' Larsen said.
A majority of individual-sponsored bills filed this legislative session focused on election security, restricting abortion access, protecting gun rights, targeting the transgender community, and ending diversity, equity and inclusion programs across the state.
Wyoming recently made national headlines as the first state to have a legislative chamber controlled by the Freedom Caucus, a group of hardline Republicans.
Sen. Ogden Driskill, R-Devils Tower, said politics were at play as members of the Freedom Caucus in the House seemed more concerned about passing their 'Five and Dime' plan than any legislation that would actually help Wyoming constituents.
'We chose to take individual bills from the Freedom Caucus, (people) wrote them, and no one had ever seen them,' Driskill said. 'We brought them in on the first day of the session, their Five and Dime plan, and they left committee bills that were vetted by both the House and Senate, had all kinds of public comment, (on the table).'
That, he said, has been his 'real heartburn this session.'
'We've dealt with national social issues that came out of D.C., from the Freedom Caucus handlers, rather than looking at ourselves and saying, 'How can we keep our economy going, build highways, have good jobs?'' Driskill said. 'Instead, we are worried about regulating people's lives. … This session is probably going to go down as the Freedom Caucus session. You know, what did we accomplish? Abortion. Guns. Election bills.
'What do any of those have to do with the long-term future of my kids?' Driskill said.
Committee bills
In December, the Wyoming Freedom Caucus released its Five and Dime plan, saying the goal was to push five bills through within the first 10 days of the session.
These bills included: requiring proof of Wyoming residency and U.S. citizenship in voter registration; invalidating driver's licenses issued by other states to those who came into the country illegally; banning diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in higher education; ending investment of state money in environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds, and reintroducing a vetoed property tax bill from last year's budget session.
Wyoming Freedom Caucus Chairwoman Rep. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, R-Cody, told members of the media during a pre-session news conference at the Capitol the plan 'came about from a poll that was taken statewide.'
Rep. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, R-Cody (2025)
Rep. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, R-Cody
'The ideas are based on priorities that came from the people throughout the state of Wyoming, in which the Freedom Caucus is prepared to carry out in the House,' Rodriguez-Williams said at the time.
None of these bills were committee-sponsored, and all passed easily through the House of Representatives.
Meanwhile, several committee bills, including ones that addressed affordable housing and regulated Wyoming's billion-dollar gaming industry, failed to push through the finish line.
In 2024, legislative leadership budgeted between $50,000 to $65,000 for each interim committee, according to a Legislative Service Office annual report. If a committee met six times on a $60,000 budget, each meeting cost around $10,000, according to LSO.
Historically speaking, committee bills are first on the list to be heard in committee of the whole (the first floor reading) in each chamber.
'We didn't see that this year,' Larsen said. 'There were a lot of other bills, personal bills, that were brought up and debated. On the House side, we struggled, for a variety of reasons, getting through bills.'
Rep. Lloyd Larsen, R-Lander (2025)
Rep. Lloyd Larsen, R-Lander
Larsen said he'd never seen so many personal bills filed in a session that failed to help move the state forward, and he attributed this to the majority of lawmakers in the House of Representatives who were only in their first or second term.
Affordable housing
Many bills related to the issue of affordable housing — some that had been vetted through both the Regulatory Reduction Task Force, which cannot sponsor legislation, and a committee that did sponsor the work — did not make it to the finish line this session.
A measure to expand affordable housing development qualifications for tax increment financing (TIF), a change supported by Cheyenne Mayor Patrick Collins, did not make it past a House committee.
Two other measures that were vetted in both the Regulatory Reduction Task Force and sponsored by committees, one to limit property development exaction and mitigation fees and another to allow for multi-family dwellings to have single stairwells, were barely debated this session.
Gaming bills
Gambling has exploded into a billion-dollar industry in Wyoming after the state legalized new forms of gaming in the last several years. Lawmakers decided last year it was time for legislators to step in and review existing regulations.
'The Legislature has been responding to the growth of gaming in the state now for about six years,' Larsen said. 'We've never been out in front of it.'
After roughly 18 hours of committee meetings, working group sessions and a statewide comprehensive study of the gambling industry, the Joint Appropriations Committee sponsored five bills for the general session that aimed to improve the state's gaming laws.
Among these were clean-up legislation to make current gaming laws more uniform and a bill that allowed national betting on Wyoming horse races. Former Rep. Tom Walters, R-Casper, who chaired the working group, told the WTE this bill would have generated revenue for the state.
Former Rep. Tom Walters, R-Casper
Former Rep. Tom Walters, R-Casper
'Horse racing tracks around the country are closing on a regular basis,' Walters said. 'But Wyoming's opening tracks, and our market is growing. … It makes a lot more money for the state of Wyoming, because now you have a larger wagering pool.'
However, four of these bills never made it out of the House speaker's drawer. The bill that made the best progress was House Bill 85, 'Local approval for simulcasting,' which gave city and town governments the ability to approve or deny simulcasting permits for historic horse racing machines — a power currently reserved at the county level.
Walters said his constituents always brought up the issue of pop-up gaming machines in their favorite bars at the end of every legislative session. Collins, who supported HB 85, previously told the WTE he's been frustrated with the approval process.
Mayor Patrick Collins
Mayor Patrick Collins speaks during an investment announcement event in the Cheyenne Frontier Days Event Center on Tuesday, July 2, 2024.
'We have 10 approved casinos inside the city limits, and our governing body had no input on their approval,' Collins said. 'We're the governing body closest to the people living in Cheyenne, and I think we should have had the responsibility for making that decision.'
This bill made it all the way through the House of Representatives before dying in the Senate president's drawer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
L.A. protests lead to new bill in Congress
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Rep Brandon Gill (R-TX) co-introduced the 'Lawless Cities Accountability Act' in Congress. The bill would withdraw federal funds from cities that don't stop violent unrest or don't accept help from federal law enforcement. 'We have to use the tools in our toolbox to ensure that our mayors and our governors like Gavin Newsom are following the law in this country, because if we don't have laws, we're not a country at all,' Rep. Mace told me. But will Republicans back measures like this? Of the more than 9.7 million people who live in Los Angeles County, more than 1.1 million people voted for President Trump in 2024. When I brought up the potential threat of funding to Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) earlier this week warned not to 'lump everyone in California in with the actions of a few leaders.'
CNBC
11 minutes ago
- CNBC
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
‘Immaturity': Rand Paul rips White House after being ‘uninvited' from picnic
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) had harsh words for the White House on Wednesday after he said he was 'uninvited' from its annual picnic, a snub that came amid the Kentucky Republican's vocal opposition to President Trump's tax cut and spending package. Paul — who has criticized the debt limit provision in the 'big, beautiful bill,' along with its impact on the deficit — said he had planned to attend the White House picnic on Thursday with his wife, son, daughter-in-law and six-month-old grandson, but he was informed on Wednesday that he was no longer welcome. 'I've just been told that I've been uninvited from the picnic; I think I'm the first senator in the history of the United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' Paul told reporters. 'The White House is owned by the taxpayers, we are all members of it, every Democrat will be invited, every Republican will be invited, but I will be the only one disallowed to come on the grounds of the White House.' 'I just find this incredibly petty,' he added. 'I have been, I think nothing but polite to the president. I have been a intellectual opponent, a public policy opponent, and he's chosen now to uninvite me from the picnic and to say my grandson can't come to the picnic.' Paul continued, saying 'the level of immaturity is beyond words' before tearing into Trump himself. 'I'm arguing from a true belief and worry that our country is mired in debt and getting worse, and they choose to react by uninviting my grandson to the public,' he said. 'It really makes me lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' The senator said he was not offered an explanation for the rescinded invitation, and noted that he was not sure who at the White House made the decision. The Hill reached out to the White House for comment. The White House has been hosting picnics for decades — under both Democratic and Republican presidents — inviting lawmakers from both parties to mingle on the lawn. This year's confab comes as the administration is trying to muscle its sprawling agenda bill through Congress — specifically the Senate at the moment — which has been met with some opposition. Paul, a Libertarian-minded Republican, has expressed opposition to the inclusion of a $4 trillion debt limit increase in the bill, voicing concerns about the ballooning deficit. He has said on multiple occasions that he will not support the legislation if the debt limit provision remains. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said Congress must raise the borrowing limit this summer to avoid an economic default. Senate Republicans, meanwhile, can only afford to lose three votes and still squeak the package through the chamber, making Paul's opposition a point of concern. On Wednesday, Paul suggested that the White House's rescinded invitation did not help move him closer to supporting the behemoth bill. 'When they tell you your grandson can't come to a picnic at the White House that all of Congress is allowed to come to, I don't know, it just shows such a pettiness,' he said when asked if the snub makes him less likely to back the bill. 'But they have shown over the last week they don't care about my vote at all,' he added. 'Because I've told them I can and would vote for the bill if the debt ceiling were taken off of it. So conceivably, there might be some situation in which they needed my vote. Instead they have decided to try to attack my character.' 'They're afraid of what I'm saying so they think they're going to punish me, I can't go to the picnic, as if that's somehow going to make me more conciliatory,' he added. 'So it's silly in a way, but it's also just really sad that this is what it's come to. But petty vindictiveness like this, I don't know, it makes you wonder about the quality of people you're dealing with.' Paul also offered criticism of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who earlier this week had attacked Paul over his criticism of the bill. Paul speculated the rescinded invitation could have come from a White House staffer, rather than Trump himself. 'It could be from lower level staff members, but these are people that shouldn't be working over there. But I mean, you have people that are basically going around casually talking about getting rid of habeas corpus,' he said, presumably referring to Miller's proposal earlier this year. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So I think what it tells that they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me. They're going to try to destroy me in other ways, and then do petty little things like social occasions or whatever.'
