logo
Committee bills crowded out by national hot-topic legislation pushed by Freedom Caucus

Committee bills crowded out by national hot-topic legislation pushed by Freedom Caucus

Yahoo06-03-2025
CHEYENNE — With a high volume of individually sponsored bills filed for the Wyoming legislative session this year — several of which were filed by first-time lawmakers — veteran legislators said there was a noticeable shift from state problems to hot-button national issues.
Committee bills are discussed during the Legislature's off-season, formally known as the interim. This is a time when lawmakers meet, conduct research and hear hours of public testimony as they draft bills for the upcoming session. These bills are a result of Wyoming stakeholders coming together to find a solution to Wyoming problems.
Typically, around 20% of committee bills filed each session fail to become law, said Rep. Lloyd Larsen, R-Lander, who has served in the Legislature since 2013. The Wyoming Tribune Eagle calculated about 40% of committee bills in this legislative session failed to make it to the finish line this year.
'I would not disagree that we've, over the last two sessions, seen more committee bills not be considered in committee, or die in committee,' Larsen said.
A majority of individual-sponsored bills filed this legislative session focused on election security, restricting abortion access, protecting gun rights, targeting the transgender community, and ending diversity, equity and inclusion programs across the state.
Wyoming recently made national headlines as the first state to have a legislative chamber controlled by the Freedom Caucus, a group of hardline Republicans.
Sen. Ogden Driskill, R-Devils Tower, said politics were at play as members of the Freedom Caucus in the House seemed more concerned about passing their 'Five and Dime' plan than any legislation that would actually help Wyoming constituents.
'We chose to take individual bills from the Freedom Caucus, (people) wrote them, and no one had ever seen them,' Driskill said. 'We brought them in on the first day of the session, their Five and Dime plan, and they left committee bills that were vetted by both the House and Senate, had all kinds of public comment, (on the table).'
That, he said, has been his 'real heartburn this session.'
'We've dealt with national social issues that came out of D.C., from the Freedom Caucus handlers, rather than looking at ourselves and saying, 'How can we keep our economy going, build highways, have good jobs?'' Driskill said. 'Instead, we are worried about regulating people's lives. … This session is probably going to go down as the Freedom Caucus session. You know, what did we accomplish? Abortion. Guns. Election bills.
'What do any of those have to do with the long-term future of my kids?' Driskill said.
Committee bills
In December, the Wyoming Freedom Caucus released its Five and Dime plan, saying the goal was to push five bills through within the first 10 days of the session.
These bills included: requiring proof of Wyoming residency and U.S. citizenship in voter registration; invalidating driver's licenses issued by other states to those who came into the country illegally; banning diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in higher education; ending investment of state money in environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds, and reintroducing a vetoed property tax bill from last year's budget session.
Wyoming Freedom Caucus Chairwoman Rep. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, R-Cody, told members of the media during a pre-session news conference at the Capitol the plan 'came about from a poll that was taken statewide.'
Rep. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, R-Cody (2025)
Rep. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, R-Cody
'The ideas are based on priorities that came from the people throughout the state of Wyoming, in which the Freedom Caucus is prepared to carry out in the House,' Rodriguez-Williams said at the time.
None of these bills were committee-sponsored, and all passed easily through the House of Representatives.
Meanwhile, several committee bills, including ones that addressed affordable housing and regulated Wyoming's billion-dollar gaming industry, failed to push through the finish line.
In 2024, legislative leadership budgeted between $50,000 to $65,000 for each interim committee, according to a Legislative Service Office annual report. If a committee met six times on a $60,000 budget, each meeting cost around $10,000, according to LSO.
Historically speaking, committee bills are first on the list to be heard in committee of the whole (the first floor reading) in each chamber.
'We didn't see that this year,' Larsen said. 'There were a lot of other bills, personal bills, that were brought up and debated. On the House side, we struggled, for a variety of reasons, getting through bills.'
Rep. Lloyd Larsen, R-Lander (2025)
Rep. Lloyd Larsen, R-Lander
Larsen said he'd never seen so many personal bills filed in a session that failed to help move the state forward, and he attributed this to the majority of lawmakers in the House of Representatives who were only in their first or second term.
Affordable housing
Many bills related to the issue of affordable housing — some that had been vetted through both the Regulatory Reduction Task Force, which cannot sponsor legislation, and a committee that did sponsor the work — did not make it to the finish line this session.
A measure to expand affordable housing development qualifications for tax increment financing (TIF), a change supported by Cheyenne Mayor Patrick Collins, did not make it past a House committee.
Two other measures that were vetted in both the Regulatory Reduction Task Force and sponsored by committees, one to limit property development exaction and mitigation fees and another to allow for multi-family dwellings to have single stairwells, were barely debated this session.
Gaming bills
Gambling has exploded into a billion-dollar industry in Wyoming after the state legalized new forms of gaming in the last several years. Lawmakers decided last year it was time for legislators to step in and review existing regulations.
'The Legislature has been responding to the growth of gaming in the state now for about six years,' Larsen said. 'We've never been out in front of it.'
After roughly 18 hours of committee meetings, working group sessions and a statewide comprehensive study of the gambling industry, the Joint Appropriations Committee sponsored five bills for the general session that aimed to improve the state's gaming laws.
Among these were clean-up legislation to make current gaming laws more uniform and a bill that allowed national betting on Wyoming horse races. Former Rep. Tom Walters, R-Casper, who chaired the working group, told the WTE this bill would have generated revenue for the state.
Former Rep. Tom Walters, R-Casper
Former Rep. Tom Walters, R-Casper
'Horse racing tracks around the country are closing on a regular basis,' Walters said. 'But Wyoming's opening tracks, and our market is growing. … It makes a lot more money for the state of Wyoming, because now you have a larger wagering pool.'
However, four of these bills never made it out of the House speaker's drawer. The bill that made the best progress was House Bill 85, 'Local approval for simulcasting,' which gave city and town governments the ability to approve or deny simulcasting permits for historic horse racing machines — a power currently reserved at the county level.
Walters said his constituents always brought up the issue of pop-up gaming machines in their favorite bars at the end of every legislative session. Collins, who supported HB 85, previously told the WTE he's been frustrated with the approval process.
Mayor Patrick Collins
Mayor Patrick Collins speaks during an investment announcement event in the Cheyenne Frontier Days Event Center on Tuesday, July 2, 2024.
'We have 10 approved casinos inside the city limits, and our governing body had no input on their approval,' Collins said. 'We're the governing body closest to the people living in Cheyenne, and I think we should have had the responsibility for making that decision.'
This bill made it all the way through the House of Representatives before dying in the Senate president's drawer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palo Pinto County Elections Administrator tells commissioners local GOP wants separate primary
Palo Pinto County Elections Administrator tells commissioners local GOP wants separate primary

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Palo Pinto County Elections Administrator tells commissioners local GOP wants separate primary

PALO PINTO — Elections Administrator Laura Watkins alerted county commissioners on Monday that a local party is exploring holding its 2026 primary separately. Her announcement, during a workshop for next year's budget, prompted Palo Pinto County Judge Shane Long to urge members of both parties to be in touch with their political party leadership. "I think whether Republican or Democrat, you need to be willing to go to your own party meetings to find out what this separate primaries is going to cost," Long said. "The number of polling places is going to be ridiculous. We would be set back 30 years and have to have separate polling places." Watkins later confirmed it was the county Republicans investigating the change, which in addition to cost increases would eliminate the popular countywide voting in which residents vote at any county poll. The county pays up front for party primaries, and the parties reimburse the county for election day and early voting expenses — but the county buys the electronic voting machines. Watson said the state GOP had reimbursed the county for the 2024 election last February. Palo Pinto Republican Chairwoman Barbara Upham did not answer several calls Monday after the county meeting, where the elections administrator revealed more of the GOP call. "They want to hand-count ballots," Watkins said. "It's been well over 30 years since we hand-counted ballots in this county." The wait for hand-counted election results also would return to the pre-electronic voting era, when next-day results were common in Texas. "I pray it goes away," she said. "But this is the reality. So if you can't get your totals for five or six days, just be ready." Losing the joint-party option, she told the court, would create the need for more polling sites and voting machines. "Just the voting machines themselves are close to $5,000 apiece," Watson said. "So, you're looking at a big undertaking that we have not had in years." She said Hart InterCivic, which makes the machines the county uses, does not have the inventory to loan equipment to the county but was willing to sell machines. "So who's really pushing this?" Precinct 4 Commissioner Jeff Fryer asked Watson. "Somebody spoke to the party last week, and there's somebody from Tarrant County that has, you know..." she said, not finishing her sentence. The change also would lead to many voters showing up at the wrong site, she said. "We're going to be turning people away and telling them to go someplace else," Watson said, adding those people will blame the county. "It doesn't matter if I say all day, talk to your Republican Party chair." Monday's budget work session brought good news for some county employees, as Sheriff J.R. Patterson successfully pitched a $1.02 hourly raise for his dispatchers beyond the 5% countywide pay increase. Patterson has six in his communications department plus a supervisor. He said their assignment is unique in being tied to their chair. "They sit there 12 hours and have to catch somebody walking by to get a bathroom break," the sheriff said, adding each is licensed and has 500 hours of training. County Auditor Melissa Mahan said the $1.02 raise would bring that pay category from $75,000 to $77,000. The communications office already was budgeted for its first major renovation in decades, and Patterson said he would "whittle down" that expense if it helped secure the pay raise. "I can forego something in order to get the girls taken care of," he said. "I've just got to be frugal with it." Solve the daily Crossword

Sherrod Brown raises $3.6M in 24 hours since launching Senate bid
Sherrod Brown raises $3.6M in 24 hours since launching Senate bid

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Sherrod Brown raises $3.6M in 24 hours since launching Senate bid

Former Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) raised more than $3.6 million in the first 24 hours after he launched his comeback campaign for Senate Monday. Brown's campaign said in a release on Tuesday that the donations came from all 88 of Ohio's counties and 95 percent of them were less than $100, averaging $53 per donation. The release states that $3 million went to Brown's campaign itself, while the other $600,000 went to affiliated joint fundraising committees that can support his campaign. 'Ohioans are fired up to send Sherrod Brown to fight for them in the Senate,' said Brown campaign manager Patrick Eisenhauer in a statement. 'Sherrod has lived his life by three principles: standing up for workers, treating everyone with dignity and respect, and working as hard as possible for the people of Ohio. He's running to be a voice for Ohioans and fight back against politicians doing the bidding of corporations and billionaires.' Brown's entrance into the Senate race against Sen. Jon Husted (R) is a win for Democrats who are hoping to make the contest competitive as they face a tough map toward trying to win back control of the Senate next year. Ohio has increasingly voted for President Trump through each of his three presidential campaigns, but Brown was the last Democrat elected statewide and has consistently outperformed the top of the ticket. He only lost reelection last year by about 3.5 points to Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio). Husted was appointed to fill the Senate seat vacated by Vice President Vance and is running in a special election to serve the remainder of the term. Whoever wins the election would have to run again in 2028 if they wish to serve a full term. Brown has sought to develop a reputation for himself as a champion of the working class and Ohioans. Still, he will face an uphill battle in a state that has increasingly elected Republicans statewide in recent years.

Texas Dem Rep. Nicole Collier slept in state House, calls herself ‘political prisoner' for turning down escort after redistricting stunt
Texas Dem Rep. Nicole Collier slept in state House, calls herself ‘political prisoner' for turning down escort after redistricting stunt

New York Post

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Texas Dem Rep. Nicole Collier slept in state House, calls herself ‘political prisoner' for turning down escort after redistricting stunt

She's having a Capitol sleepover. Texas state Rep. Nicole Collier (D) slept in the House chamber Monday into Tuesday after refusing to accept a state trooper escort, calling herself a 'political prisoner.' Republicans required their Democratic peers to have an escort to ensure they returned to the chamber on Wednesday following their two-week venture outside the state to thwart a GOP redistricting effort. 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts,' Collier, who is from Fort Worth, said in a statement, per NBC News. She accused Republicans of implementing a 'surveillance protocol' and posted an image of her kicking back on her swivelchair in the chamber with a sleeping mask and blanket to catch some Zs. Texas state Rep. Nicole Collier (D) is in her seventh term of service in the Texas state House. AP Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott (R) had called a special session this month to pass flood relief aid and redraw the state's congressional district lines to give them a five-seat pickup opportunity. In response, 57 Democrats fled the state, starting on Aug. 3, to scuttle the special session. Under Texas law, 100 of the legislature's 150 members are required to be present to allow for a quorum. On Monday, Texas Democrats returned to the state to allow a second special session to take place. They claimed that the decision to end their self-imposed exile was made because they succeeded in quashing the first special session, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) maneuvered to potentially neutralize Texas' line-drawing venture. Texas Democrats have been leading protests in the state against GOP redistricting efforts. AP Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) filed a lawsuit against the runaways. Now that the runaway Dems have returned, Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) required them to sign documentation pledging to be present for the Wednesday session. 'Members who have not been present until today for whom arrest warrants were issued will be granted written permission to leave only after agreeing to be released into the custody of a designated DPS officer appointment,' Burrows said. All of the Dems agreed, except Collier. 'I will not agree to be in [Texas Department of Public Safety] DPS custody. I am not a criminal. I am exercising my right to resist and oppose the decisions of our government. So, this is my form of protest,' Collier said. She is in her seventh term in the Texas House chamber and previously led the Texas Legislative Black Caucus. Democrats have vowed to challenge the Texas GOP's redistricting effort in court. States typically redraw their congressional districts after the census each decade, though mid-decade redistricting is not entirely unprecedented.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store