The 2028 podcast primary is underway as Democrats try to reshape their image
The Democrats' 2028 podcast primary is well underway.
From Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, Andy Beshear of Kentucky and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan to former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, potential presidential contenders are following the lead of President Donald Trump, who frequently went on podcasts appealing to younger men during his 2024 campaign.
Liberal strategists acknowledge Trump showed that Democratic candidates need to master the podcast space, which is typically looser and more freewheeling than a press conference or a traditional media interview.
'The way that politicians communicate and need to be seen by their audience is changing,' said Liz Minnella, who fundraised for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris and this year launched Connect Forward, a group to support liberal influencers. 'I hate to give him credit, but he found a way to connect with people, talk to them like human beings in non-political speak.'
Newsom, long derided by conservatives as a San Francisco liberal, has welcomed conservatives onto his podcast and agreed with them on issues such as trans participation in women's sports. Beshear, a lower-profile Democrat in a red state, hosted his teenagers to teach him how to use the youth slang 'skibidi.'
The likely 2028 contenders have produced many hours of content already. Here's a look at key moments and what we've learned about the field so far.
Andy Beshear's 'be you, boo'
Launching 'The Andy Beshear Podcast' earlier this year, the Kentucky governor now has hosted a donor, a former ambassador, businessmen he calls friends and U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who ran for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.
He even brought on his two children to explain slang words high schoolers are using, asking them to explain to him how to use terms like 'skibidi' to say something looks good, or 'doing it for the plot' to say you'll be taking a risk on something despite a potentially bad outcome.
From his first episode, the 47-year-old politician outlines some rules and says the first is 'be authentic, you be you, boo.'
The governor did not respond to a request for comment on his strategy, but has mostly taken a position of dissecting and broadcasting opposition to Trump's policies, such as potential cuts to Medicaid and the use of the Signal messaging app by the president's national security team to discuss sensitive military operations.
In one of Beshear's most recent episodes earlier this month, his producer asks the governor a frequent listener's question: Will you run for president?
'If it were three years ago, this was something that we would have never thought about,' Beshear said, sitting beside his wife, Britainy. 'But I'm committed to not leaving a broken country to my kids or anyone else's. Now, what that looks like going forward, I don't know. My job right now is to try to lift up as many leaders as possible all across the country that are hopefully focused on the right things with the right message to re-earn the faith of the American people.'
Gretchen Whitmer talks about the hug
Whitmer recently appeared on 'Pod Save America' for a shorter interview than other contenders have done on podcasts. Whitmer had received some backlash for sharing a hug with the president last month as he arrived in her home state, less than a month after she shielded her face from cameras during an Oval Office appearance alongside Trump.
Whitmer and Trump announced a new fighter jet mission at a National Guard base outside Detroit that is seen as a major economic driver for the area.
'This is a BFD,' she said on the podcast, referencing if not outright saying a profane phrase that starts with 'big' and ends with 'deal.'
'It doesn't mean I've abandoned any of my values. It doesn't mean that I'm not going to stand my ground and fight where we have to, but this is one of those moments where as a public servant you're reminded your job is to put service above self and that's what it was all about.'
Gavin Newsom gives mic to MAGA figures
In February, California's governor launched 'This is Gavin Newsom' as what he called a mechanism for talking 'directly with people I disagree with, people I look up to, and you — the listeners.'
Thus far, he's had a wide array of guests, including former Trump strategist Steve Bannon and conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, as well as Klobuchar and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Harris' 2024 running mate.
The conversations have mostly been chummy. Newsom — who has in recent weeks broken with California's legislature and faced liberal criticism for his positioning on trans issues, immigration and homelessness — has fielded backlash for giving a platform to some of his party's biggest critics.
Newsom has also drawn criticism for opposing the participation of trans athletes in women's sports.
'I think it's an issue of fairness, I completely agree with you on that,' Newsom told Kirk in his debut episode. 'It is an issue of fairness — it's deeply unfair.'
The diverse guest list could be part of Newsom's attempt to self-brand as a centrist ahead of a possible 2028 run, hearing out conservative critics while trying to assume his party's mantle.
In March, the governor told HBO's Bill Maher that Democrats had developed a 'toxic' brand and criticized some in the party who are unwilling to 'have a conversation' with their opponents.
Buttigieg says Democrats need to reach 'people who don't think like us'
Buttigieg's appearance on Andrew Schulz's 'Flagrant' podcast came months after the comedian sat down with Trump.
During his three-hour sit-down with Schulz, Buttigieg sported a beard as he talked candidly about his personal life, describing his experiences serving in the military before he came out publicly as gay and raising his biracial children, even laughing along as Schulz and other hosts cracked jokes related to homosexuality or asked pointed questions about his personal life.
But mostly, Buttigieg — who spoke in Iowa earlier this month — discussed his time in politics and accused Trump of failing to deliver on economic promises from the 2024 campaign.
'We have to be encountering people who don't think like us and don't view the world the way we do, both in order to actually, legitimately, become smarter and better and make better choices and have better positions, and just in order to persuade,' Buttigieg said.
___
Associated Press Polling Editor Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux in Washington contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Responds To Elon Musk's Comments About A 'New Political Party'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump weighed in Friday on billionaire Elon Musk's threat to form a new political party to challenge Democrats and Republicans. The Context Trump and Musk had a high-profile alliance during the 2024 campaign and during the first few months of Trump's second term, with Musk spending millions of dollars to help Trump get elected in November and Trump later tapping him to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship has devolved in the last several days, as Musk excoriated the Trump-backed "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" as "outrageous" and "pork-filled," adding that it's a "disgusting abomination." Trump hit back at his onetime close ally, saying Musk has gone "crazy," accusing him of having "Trump derangement syndrome" and threatening the cancel government contracts with Musk's companies. What To Know The SpaceX CEO on Thursday floated the idea of forming a "new political party in America that "actually represents the 80% in the middle." Fox News reported on Friday that Trump responded to Musk's comments in a phone call with Fox News host Bret Baier, saying he's not worried about the threat. "Trump is not interested in talking to Elon," Fox News host and Trump's former press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said on the network while summarizing the phone call. "Trump is not worried about threats of a third party ... President Trump also pointed to his favorable polls and his strong support among Capitol Hill Republicans." Fox is reporting that Bret Baier just spoke with Trump and Trump said he is not interested in speaking with Elon Musk. Trump also said: Elon Musk has totally lost it — Acyn (@Acyn) June 6, 2025 The White House confirmed Friday that Trump has no plans to contact Musk. Trump also plans to sell the Tesla he bought earlier this year, which was once showcased on the White House lawn as a symbol of the president's alignment with Musk. This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available.


Forbes
30 minutes ago
- Forbes
Musk And Trump Go To War: Trump Considers Selling His Tesla--As Public Feud Quiets Friday
President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's months-long friendship devolved in spectacular fashion Thursday as the world's richest man and the world's most powerful man engaged in a nasty, public back-and-forth on their respective social media platforms—just months after the two formed a friendship so close Musk sometimes slept at the White House. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the ... More White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. (Photo by ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images) 11:20 A.M., Thursday (June 5)Musk, in his first direct attack on Trump amid a days-long rant against Trump's signature policy bill, reposted a 2013 tweet from Trump that said he was in disbelief and 'embarrassed' Republicans were extending the debt ceiling, captioning the repost 'wise words,' after Trump said Wednesday the debt limit should be 'entirely scrapped' as a provision of the bill, which would raise the debt ceiling ahead of its expected expiration date in August. 12 making his first comments on Musk's criticism of his bill during an Oval Office press conference, insinuated the Tesla CEO opposes his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' because he is 'upset' the electric vehicle tax credit was removed, adding he's not sure he'll remain friends with Musk and alleging Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill.' Trump also suggested Musk is suffering from what he refers to as 'Trump derangement syndrome,' which Trump claims happens when people leave the administration and turn on the president. 12:25 said he didn't turn on the bill after the EV tax credit was removed: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk tweeted. 12:46 said 'without me,' Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would control the House, and Republicans would have a more narrow majority in the Senate, after Musk donated more than $250 million toward Trump's campaign, accusing Trump in a subsequent tweet of 'such ingratitude.' 2:37 P.M. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote, adding, 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' 2:37 P.M. Trump said Musk was 'wearing thin' at the White House and he 'asked him to leave,' then he 'just went CRAZY!' when the EV tax credit was removed from the bill. 2:48 said it's 'such an obvious lie' and 'so sad' Trump asked him to leave and that he was upset over the EV tax credit. 3:10 P.M. Musk alleged on X, without evidence, the reason the White House has yet to fully release the 'Epstein files' detailing the FBI's investigation into the late, disgraced former financier Jeffrey Epstein is because Trump is implicated in them. 4:09 said he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft used by NASA to transport astronauts to the International Space Station. 4:11 P.M. Musk endorsed one user's suggestion that Trump be impeached, writing 'Yes' in response to an X user who wrote 'President vs. Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. . . Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.' 4:26 P.M. Musk said Trump's tariffs will trigger a recession in the second half of the year, after remaining mostly reserved in his previous criticism of the tariffs. 11:16 downplayed his public falling out with Musk to Politico, telling the outlet 'oh it's okay,' as White House officials were reportedly working to de-escalate the situation and set up a call between Musk and Trump. 12:30 appeared to backtrack on his earlier threat to decommission the SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after a follower urged him not to do so, prompting the billionaire to respond 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' 1 A.M., Friday (June 6)Musk signaled he is willing to de-escalate his fight with Trump after hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman—who is both a Trump supporter and a Musk ally—tweeted that both of them 'should make peace for the benefit of our great are much stronger together than apart.' Musk replied: 'You're not wrong.' 4 billionaire later reposted a follower who said 'Republicans will likely lose the House in 2026.' 4 signals of a truce, Musk continued to attack the president's allies, such as Steve Bannon, and Trump's signature spending bill. 7 price of Tesla's shares, which plummeted 14% on Thursday amid the clash, is up around 4.4% in premarket trading on Friday morning, after Musk signaled he is open to a truce with Trump. 8:17 told ABC News in a Friday morning interview he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk right now, alleging Musk has 'lost his mind.' 12:06 is 'thinking about' selling the Tesla Model S he bought in March, when he showcased the purchase to the media on the White House driveway in a public show of support for Musk, a senior White House official told Forbes, though The New York Times, also citing an unnamed White House source, reported the car is already for sale. Otherwise, the Musk-Trump feud appeared to simmer in public as of Friday afternoon, with some speculation they could mend fences in a matter of days. Musk said repeatedly last year he supports eliminating the EV tax credit—diluting Trump's argument he only opposes the bill because it gets rid of the incentive. 'I think we should get rid of all credits,' Musk said in December when asked by a reporter on Capitol Hill if he supports getting rid of the electric vehicle tax credit, Politico reported. The House-passed version of the bill would phase out the $7,500 tax credit for some EV buyers by 2026. $2.4 trillion. That's how much the bill would add to the federal debt over the next decade, according to an estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released Wednesday that estimates it would cost $4.2 trillion, mostly from tax cuts, and save $1.8 trillion. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' Trump said while sitting next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office on Thursday. Musk—who left his White House role last week—has fired off dozens of tweets this week attacking Trump's policy bill over the amount it's expected to add to the federal debt. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote Tuesday on X in his initial post bashing the legislation, calling it a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled . . . disgusting abomination.' Musk attacked Trump directly over the bill for the first time since he began his days-long rant moments before Trump sat down with Merz by reposting the president's 2013 tweet about the debt ceiling. In other tweets this week targeting the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' Musk threatened Republicans who voted for it, warning that 'in November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' and calling for lawmakers to 'KILL The BILL.' Until Trump's comments Thursday, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.—who shepherded the bill through the House—was the top Republican defending the legislation against Musk's criticism. Johnson said Wednesday Trump is 'not delighted that Elon did a 180.' The bill, passed by the House in a party-line vote last month after last-minute revisions to appease Republican holdouts, is being negotiated by the Senate. Republican leaders have set a July 4 deadline to put the bill on Trump's desk for signage, but GOP resistance in the upper chamber—and some expressions of regret from a few House Republicans who said they were unaware of certain provisions—threaten to delay its passage. The legislation would fulfill Trump's key campaign promises, including an extension of his 2017 tax cuts, no taxes on tips and overtime and additional border security, paid for, in part, by cuts to Medicaid. Tesla shares dropped 14% as Musk clashed with Trump, closing at $284.70 and completely erasing a month's worth of gains it made in May. The fall marked the 11th-worst single trading day for the electric vehicle maker since it went public in 2010, according to FactSet. Musk, who owns about 12% of Tesla excluding options, saw his estimated net worth tumble by $27 billion to $388 billion (he still remains the world's wealthiest person by far). Trump Media & Technology Group's stock closed down 8% at $20.12, bringing shares to their lowest point since April 16. Multiple cryptocurrencies also slumped amid the spat, with ethereum falling 7%, Solana dropping 6% and the Musk-backed dogecoin sliding 9%. Bitcoin prices did not fall as sharply as its competitors' prices, but still sunk by 3% by Thursday evening. Tensions between Musk and Trump were palpable during the joint press conference they held May 30 to mark Musk's last day leading the Department of Government Efficiency. While the two praised each other, their once-lighthearted rapport appeared stiff and uneasy. Musk in particular appeared to be in an odd mood, prompting social media users to claim he was 'tweaking out,' suggesting he may have been under the influence of drugs, as the press conference was held hours after a New York Times report alleging Musk engaged in heavy drug use while he campaigned for Trump last year. Musk also sported a black eye during the press conference, which the Tesla CEO claimed he got from his five-year-old son. 'KILL The BILL': Musk Deepens Rant Against Trump's Signature Policy Legislation (Forbes) Musk Calls For Ending Electric Vehicle Tax Credit—Which Could Help Tesla (Forbes) Musk Cuts Off Reporter Asking About Drug Use Allegations—Including Ketamine, Ecstasy And Adderall (Forbes)


The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth could be ‘on the hook' for hundreds of millions on Qatari jet, says Raskin
The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee has warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that he could be 'on the hook' for hundreds of millions of dollars for having accepted a luxury jet from the Qatari government. In a letter sent Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) argued that Hegseth's formal acceptance of the Boeing 747 jetliner last month – a move made so that the Air Force can upgrade its security measures so it may eventually be used as Air Force One – violates the Constitution emoluments clause. The rule bars federal officials from accepting financial benefits from foreign governments without congressional approval. 'I write now to urge and advise you to promptly mitigate these violations—and your own personal legal exposure—by either returning the plane to the Qatari government or promptly seeking Congress's consent to accept it,' Raskin wrote. The Pentagon announced on May 21 that it had officially accepted the 13-year-old luxury jet previously used by the Qatari royal family, a supposed 'free,' gift that could be used to supplement the aging Air Force One fleet, according to President Trump. The transfer has been criticized by U.S. lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, who say it raises ethical and corruption questions in addition to costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit the plane into a secure and working Air Force One. Others have focused on the national security risks of such a gift, saying the aircraft would have to be swept for listening devices. Some have worried that in Trump's push to use the plane before he leaves office, the Air Force will rush security upgrades and cut corners on protection systems. A former professor of constitutional law and former ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Raskin has focused his criticisms on the ethical issues around accepting the Qatari plane, repeatedly arguing that it requires congressional approval. 'The Constitution is perfectly clear: no present 'of any kind whatever' from a foreign state without Congressional permission,' Raskin wrote on X last month after news of the gift broke. Congress has the authority to block federal officials from receiving gifts from foreign governments, as granted in the Constitution, but the government arm has not held any formal vote to accept the plane or not. Democrats largely have been unsuccessful in stopping Trump from accepting the Qatari jet. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) last month attempted to pass a bill that would bar the use of a foreign jet as Air Force One, but that effort failed. Raskin, along with other Democrat lawmakers, have introduced resolutions to condemn the gift but Republicans have blocked them from being considered on the floor. Making matters more complicated, Democrats, given their status as the minority party, can't convene any oversight hearings that would force government officials to testify on the issue, and their colleagues across the aisle have not called any such hearings themselves. In his letter, Raskin says Hegseth is in violation of the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act, which could prompt the Attorney General to bring civil action and penalties against him. Under that law, government officials can accept certain gifts up to $480 in value, and they cannot 'request or otherwise encourage the tender of a gift or decoration' from another country. In violating the act, Hegseth can face a penalty 'not to exceed the retail value of the gift improperly solicited or received plus $5,000.' 'In other words, you may be on the hook for $400 million (plus $5,000) even for a jumbo jet that you accepted on behalf of the President but do not get to personally enjoy,' Raskin writes, referring to the cost of a new Boeing 747-8 jet. 'If you truly believe that there is nothing untoward about the President asking for and receiving a $400 million 'flying palace' from a foreign power, then you should let Congress and the President's Republican colleagues vote to approve the transaction,' he adds. 'If you're unwilling to do that, you must return the plane to Qatar.'