
Rapid warfare tech helps U.S. Army build on lessons learned in Ukraine's war with Russia
Under the cover of trees nearby, another soldier was on a laptop monitoring the activity of that drone and several others, tracking an enemy vehicle several miles away.
Developed and tested using information from the real - life battlefield in Ukraine, the drone was one of several pieces of technology including light vehicles and updated communication devices that were being tested for the first time by the U.S. Army in Europe.
'These drones are definitely smarter than they've ever been,' 1st Lt. Jake Baumert told NBC News earlier this month as his new unmanned systems platoon experimented with the new equipment to figure out how best to use it in traditional infantry fighting.
'They have missions and they are semiautonomous, not fully autonomous, but you plan it, and you can direct it if you want to,' added the 28-year-old from Dallas.
Deploying multiple drones including short-range quadcopters similar to those available in stores to the public, his platoon observed the opposing force's tactical vehicles. They also sent up larger unmanned aerial vehicles that flew semiautonomously.
As well as being able to start and land them with a click of a button on their laptop, operators could also hand control of the drones to other units hidden in dense forest several miles away, while the information they gathered could be shared instantly with colleagues or commanders.
'I think the biggest advantage is the technology that's in the drone and its ability to give you data,' Baumert said.
Elsewhere, soldiers tested vehicles that seat more soldiers than traditional Humvees. Smaller and often more agile in steep terrain, they are easier to camouflage and are equipped with hybrid engines, making them quieter and less likely to be spotted by drones with thermal cameras.
Lessons learned during Ukraine's three-year war with Russia and Israel's fight with Hamas in Gaza had 'really identified that we've got to get faster at staying competitive,' Sgt. Maj. of the Army Michael Weimer said in an interview late last month.
Experience garnered during Iran's missile and drone attacks on Israel, as well as those by its Houthi proxy army in Yemen was also being taken into account, he added.
'The character of war is changing at a speed we've never seen before,' he said. 'We've got to get faster at staying competitive with the technology that's changing.'
Information from the battlefield was coming via several avenues in Ukraine, he said.
'Traditionally, we wouldn't give such new technology to soldiers this early. Traditionally, we would grab a few soldiers, and we would allow them to use the gear, experiment with it, get some feedback from them, then go back, do some more research and development,' added Weimer. 'What we're doing here, because so much of this is commercial off the shelf, is we're expediting our ability to learn.'
The lessons U.S. and NATO troops are learning from Ukraine and implementing in their training are game changers, according to Ed Arnold, a European security expert at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based think tank.
'Using drones to spot targets is one of the most important things we have learned from Ukraine. As an example, using artillery strikes. There's nowhere to hide on the battlefield,' he said in an interview earlier this month.
He added that the maritime capabilities were 'probably more significant than the land capabilities,' because Ukraine's military had been able to use marine drones to destroy Russian ships and infrastructure. This had allowed Ukraine to keep vital shipping lanes open so it could continue exporting critical products like grain.
The U.S. military had also learned a lot from the way Ukraine has defended parts of the Black Sea, he said.
Back on the training ground in Hohenfels, Col. Josh Glonek, the commander of the 3rd Brigade, 10th Mountain Division, said incorporating the new technology had dramatically reduced the time it took to make a firing decision after spotting an enemy.
This had gone from double digits to under two minutes, said the 43-year-old from Gordon, Wisconsin.
'The lessons that are coming out of Ukraine are ones that we are very rapidly adapting to and incorporating into our own training,' he said. 'So it's provided, I would say, a sense of urgency, not only for us, but for our NATO allies as well, to very rapidly modernize.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
06-08-2025
- Daily Mail
How extremely personal ChatGPT conversations were ending up on Google
A researcher was able to uncover over 100,000 sensitive ChatGPT conversations that were searchable on Google thanks to a 'short-lived experiment' by OpenAI. Henk Van Ess was one of the first to figure out that anyone could search for these chats using key certain key words. He discovered people had been discussing everything from non-disclosure agreements, confidential contracts, relationship problems, insider trading schemes and how to cheat on papers. This unforeseen problem arose because of the share feature, which if clicked by the user would create a predictably formatted link using words from the chat. This allowed people to search for the conversations by typing in 'site: and then putting key words at the end of the query. Van Ess said one chat he discovered detailed cyberattacks targeting named targets within Hamas, the terrorist group controlling Gaza that Israel has been at war with since October 2023. Another involved a domestic violence victim talking about possible escape plans while revealing their financial shortcomings. The share feature was an attempt by ChatGPT to make it easier for people to show others their chats, though most users likely didn't realize just how visible their musings would be. In a statement to 404Media, OpenAI did not dispute that there were more than 100,000 chats that had been searchable on Google. 'We just removed a feature from [ChatGPT] that allowed users to make their conversations discoverable by search engines, such as Google. This was a short-lived experiment to help people discover useful conversations,' said Dane Stuckey, OpenAI chief information security officer. 'This feature required users to opt-in, first by picking a chat to share, then by clicking a checkbox for it to be shared with search engines,' Stuckey added. Now, when a user shares their conversation, ChatGPT creates a randomized link that uses no key words. 'Ultimately we think this feature introduced too many opportunities for folks to accidentally share things they didn't intend to, so we're removing the option,' Stuckey said. 'We're also working to remove indexed content from the relevant search engines. This change is rolling out to all users through tomorrow morning. Security and privacy are paramount for us, and we'll keep working to maximally reflect that in our products and features,' he added. However, much of the damage has already been done, since many of the conversations were already archived by Van Ess and others. For example, a chat that's still viewable involves a plan to create a new bitcoin called Obelisk. Ironically, Van Ess used another AI model, Claude, to come up with key words to use to dredge up the most juicy chats. To find people discussing criminal conspiracies, Claude suggested searching 'without getting caught', 'avoid detection', 'without permission' or 'get away with.' But the words that exposed the most intimate confessions were 'my salary', 'my SSN', 'diagnosed with', or 'my therapist.'


NBC News
24-07-2025
- NBC News
VERB A.I. pays some users $50 a month to access data
VERB A.I., a new app launched by polling company Generation Lab, is offering to pay young people $50 a month for their data. NBC News' Gadi Schwartz has more on how the new app works.


NBC News
23-07-2025
- NBC News
This congressman wants to ban companies from using your search history to set personalized prices
WASHINGTON — From raising the price of diapers for new parents who recently searched for them online to stores excluding regular customers from discounts because they are likely to buy the product anyway, companies are using personal data to set different price points for different people. The practice, known as 'surveillance pricing," has caught the attention of Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, who wants to ban it at the federal level. Personal data collection has become commonplace in the internet age, with major corporations farming information to tailor marketing and sales pitches specifically to individual consumers. But companies are now using location data, browsing history and demographic background to individualize prices. Casar believes this practice, which is often done using artificial intelligence, could stack the deck against consumers, leading to higher, uneven prices. The lawmaker, who leads the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told NBC News he wants to ensure that prices are set 'based on supply and demand and based on how much it costs to make and sell a thing, not based on spying on you and using your private data.' The Stop AI Price Gouging and Wage Fixing Act of 2025, which Casar will introduce Wednesday, would prohibit the use of surveillance-based price and wage setting at the federal level. The bill comes on the heels of a study by the Federal Trade Commission and as some states seek to ban surveillance pricing as well. Casar said there needs to be more transparency around the use of consumers' data and artificial intelligence. His bill would also prevent the use of AI to set wages based on personal data, like an individual's financial history, rather than performance. 'AI is a developing part of our lives, part of our world, but we need to make sure that it's used for good and not being exploited,' he said. 'We're already starting to see that, and if we don't intervene now and ban these sorts of price gouging and wage suppression right now, then I think it's just going to spread all over the economy.' Casar's legislation comes after the FTC released the initial findings of its study of surveillance pricing in January. That report, released just before then-President Joe Biden left office, found that a 'person's precise location or browser history can be frequently used to target individual consumers with different prices for the same goods and services.' The FTC's findings are based on information it requested from eight companies that use consumer data when pricing products: Mastercard, Revionics, Bloomreach, JPMorgan Chase, Task Software, PROS, Accenture and McKinsey & Co. Lina Khan, who chaired the FTC under Biden, oversaw the study. It is unclear what the future of the FTC's role will be on this issue under the Trump administration, as the agency's call for public input on surveillance pricing was stopped when new leadership came in. 'One of the most pernicious aspects of surveillance pricing is that people may have absolutely no idea that they're being targeted by it,' Kahn said in an interview with NBC News. 'It's a total black box.' Kahn said the technology is rapidly evolving making it easier for companies to forecast how much a consumer is able or willing to pay without them knowing. Kahn described surveillance pricing as the 'holy grail' for companies looking to maximize profits in e-commerce. 'We have quickly slipped into an environment where companies now increasingly have the ability to do this based on just the enormous troves of personal data that are being collected about us, they have the incentive to do it," Khan said, adding that 'unless law enforcers and lawmakers are very clear about these practices being prohibited, companies will think it's totally fair game.' Casar noted that Delta Air Lines is one company that is integrating AI into its pricing. On an investor call this month, Delta president Glen Hauenstein said the airline's goal is to have a fifth of all its fares set by an artificial intelligence program, up from 3% currently. But the company disputed in a statement that prices would be set based on personal information. 'There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing, or plans to use that targets customers with individualized offers based on personal information or otherwise,' the company said. 'Delta always complies with regulations around pricing and disclosures.' While Casar's legislation is the first at the national level, several state legislatures have attempted to take on the issue. For example, the New York State legislature passed and the governor signed legislation to require companies to disclose to consumers when a price is set by an algorithm using their data. The National Retail Federation, earlier this month, asked a federal court to block the New York law, arguing that it would 'unfairly malign a system that helps merchants give customers lower prices and personalized offers.' The California Assembly, meanwhile, passed a bill in May to stop businesses from using personal data when charging different prices for the same product. That legislation next heads to the California Senate. At the federal level, the House of Representatives is leaving for its August recess this week, so no action can be taken on Casar's bill until September at the earliest. The congressman said he hopes to 'build a broad coalition of members of Congress against this, because I think this is the kind of issue that energizes people all across the country.' Casar sees a surveillance price ban as an issue that could attract bipartisan support. 'I think that's the kind of thing that pisses off Democratic and Republican and independent voters alike,' he said. 'You don't have to be a progressive Democrat to say these gigantic corporations in the tech world should not be spying on us and then using what they learn to put it into AI and make our life more expensive.'