Efforts to pass worker's bill of rights, $20 minimum wage in Tacoma advance
The two groups started the process of getting the initiative on the ballot in February, when they submitted a proposal to increase protections for workers in Tacoma with new policies like a $20 minimum wage. In submitting the roughly 10,000 signatures at city hall on June 24, UFCW 367 and the Tacoma DSA are one step closer in the city's initiative process.
After submitting the draft of their initiative in February, the organizers had about six months to collect valid signatures from at least 10 percent of people who voted in the last mayoral election. They told The News Tribune in March that they planned to have at least 8,000 by early July. It's now up to the county auditor to verify the signatures, and the city clerk to validate the petition.
As long as that happens, it would be up to the city council to enact or reject the initiative, according to the city. If the council enacts the petition, their approval would be the final say, eliminating the need to put the initiative to the voters. If council rejects the initiative, then it would be on the ballot.
According to the city, if the council rejects the initiative or fails to take action within 30 days, the initiative would end up on the ballot for the next municipal or general election that's at least 90 days from when the signatures are validated — which organizers estimate could take 30 days. That means there's a possibility it could end up on the November ballot, or it could be part of a special election that happens sooner.
If a majority of voters approve the initiative, it'll go into effect 10 days after the election results are certified.
'It's been much easier than we thought to get people to sign on to this,' union president Michael Hines told The News Tribune.
The organizers put forward two versions of the initiative in February, which are largely similar but Version 2 has stronger penalties for violations of the bill of rights and stronger language outlining worker protections for fair scheduling and hours. Colton Rose, an organizer with the union, told The News Tribune that after hearing from residents through the process of getting signatures, the union decided to pursue Version 1 — the one with more lenient penalties.
The Worker's Bill of Rights would require every employer in Tacoma with more than 500 employees to pay their staff at least $20 an hour, and any employer with between 16 and 500 employees must pay their staff at least $18 an hour. That rate drops to $17 an hour for employers with 15 or fewer employees.
Minimum wage in the state of Washington is currently $16.66 per hour, which also currently applies to Tacoma. Cities like Seattle and Bellingham have different rates, at $20.76 per hour and $18.66 per hour, respectively.
It also, among other things, would require employers to create a safety plan to protect workers and consumers in case of violence or a natural disaster, and would require them to give employees an estimate of their work schedules at least 14 days in advance.
As city and county officials work to validate the signatures, a process that could take 30 days, Rose said organizers are still in the process of collecting more signatures in case they fall short of the number of signatures required.
Hines said organizers are optimistic that the initiative will receive the support it needs from voters.
'I remember the days when you could be a single mom and a checker and pay your rent or buy a house, and that's pretty hard to do now based on what these companies are doing with the schedules,' Hines said. 'I think there's a lot of empathy from the community.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
6 minutes ago
- CBS News
Nursing mother in ICE custody in Minnesota to be released from detention, judge rules
A nursing mother who has spent more than three weeks in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody will soon be reunited with her children following a federal judge's ruling on Tuesday. Antonia Aguilar Maldonado, 26, was arrested by federal agents on July 17. She came to the United States from El Salvador as a teenager and has no criminal history. She is now seeking asylum and lives in Lake Elmo, Minnesota. Her attorneys filed a writ of habeas corpus challenging her detention because an immigration judge authorized her release on bond on July 31. Soon after the U.S. Department of Homeland Security then filed an automatic stay to keep her in custody at the Kandiyohi County Jail despite that order. They sought injunctive relief to block that from taking effect and require her release while her case moves forward. Hannah Brown, one of her attorneys, told the court Tuesday that her client is experiencing emotional and mental distress while separated from her two U.S. citizen children, including her youngest whom she is breastfeeding. She also said she faces physical harm because she cannot pump on a set schedule or in sanitary conditions. U.S. District Judge Susan Richard Nelson delivered a ruling from the bench in St. Paul after each side made their arguments, ultimately granting the request for a temporary restraining order which will force her release. She rejected the government's argument that Aguilar Maldonado's detention was allowable by law and said ICE violated its own policies for pregnant and nursing mothers. Nelson said ICE contends that a January executive order from President Donald Trump revoked that rule, but "nowhere in that policy is there a mention of nursing mothers." "In the court's view, the irreparable harm to separating a nursing mother and her child is self-evident," she said. She added that her case is a civil matter yet Aguilar Maldonado is being held in conditions "indiscriminable" to criminal detention and that agents made a "mistake" when they arrested her. A written ruling will follow later this week. Aguilar Maldonado's attorneys said she will be released as soon as she posts bond, likely early Wednesday morning. The court room was packed with friends, congregants at Aguilar Maldonado's local church and other community members who observed the hearing. They erupted into applause once it was over, celebrating her release. Her church helped raise money to pay her bond. "A lot of people can relate to Ms. Aguilar Maldonado's situation and to her story. And there are folks here who know her and folks here who don't know her," Brown said. "And I think it was really beautiful to see so many people, so many Minnesotans, showing their support for a young mother who does not need to be detained." Aguilar Maldonado came to the U.S. in 2017 as a minor, granting her special protections, and had a removal order in 2019 for failing to attend a hearing. But an immigration judge reopened her case last year after finding she wasn't given notice of that court appearance, Gloria Contreras Edin, another one of her attorneys told WCCO in an interview. Since then, she has been doing "everything right," she added, and filed for asylum and obtained work authorization. Her arrest on July 17 came as a surprise. When asked about Aguilar Maldonado's case, a spokesperson for ICE provided the following statement to WCCO: "By statute, we have no information on this person." "[Her son] is allergic to other forms of milk, and so unfortunately, this baby has been without his mother's milk now for 26 days, and she wants to get to him right away and start nursing," Contreras Edin told reporters Tuesday. Contreras Edin and Brown said she will remain free as her writ of habeas corpus petition proceeds. The government is also appealing the immigration judge's earlier ruling late last month. The judge said she does not have a removal order at this time. Telma Vides, a friend of Aguilar Maldonado, spoke with her friend soon after the hearing and said she was excited and crying nonstop when she learned that should be released. "It's just amazing what God can do to get her out," Vides said. "It just kept going up and down and up—it's been a roller coaster all these three weeks."


Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
When Will ‘South Park' Season 27 Return With Episode 3?
It's still unclear if South Park Season 27, Episode 3 will be on Comedy Central and Paramount+ this week. Trey Parker and Matt Stone's new season featuring Cartman, Kyle, Stan and Kenny kicked off on July 23 with a controversial South Park-style skewering of President Donald Trump, then went on hiatus the following week. On Aug. 6, the show returned with its comedic crosshairs aimed once again at Trump, as well as Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. Thanks to the Parker and Stone's blockbuster deal with Paramount Global worth $1.5 billion to produce 50 new episodes of the series over the next five years, South Park's new episodes are generally set to air on Wednesdays at 10 p.m. ET/PT on Comedy Central on cable and stream exclusively on Paramount+ the next day. As of Tuesday, however, the South Park X account is still being silent about when Season 27, Episode 3 is coming out. Various press outlets have different answers about when the episode will air. Newsweek reported that Episode 3 won't air on Comedy Central until Wednesday, Aug. 20, while Esquire said it would air on Wednesday, Aug. 13. IMDb went with a completely different date, noting that Episode 3 will be airing on Friday, Aug. 15. Prior to the show going on hiatus for a week after the airing of Episode 1 on July 23, fans were treated to promo on X that indicated the show was returning on Aug. 6. On Aug. 5 the South Park account teased Episode 2, titled Got a Nut, along with photos of Noem and Mr. Mackay at an ICE raid and Cartman on his laptop in his bedroom. At some point — hopefully on Tuesday night or Wednesday during the day — Comedy Central and Paramount+ will confirm when Season 27, Episode 3 will air. Given that there's been no teasers for the new episode released yet, it seems likely that South Park is taking yet another one-week hiatus and return on Aug. 20 on Comedy Central and Aug. 21 on Paramount+. One thing is certain: Paramount+ has not been forthcoming with its release schedule for South Park Season 27, as an email to the show's PR team about its release schedule after the premiere episode went unanswered. 'South Park' Posted The End Credits Scene For 'Got A Nut' On Monday Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem was the prime target of the mockery on the Aug. 6 episode, as Parker and Stone continuously poked fun at Noem by showing her face melting and shooting puppies — a reference to an admission in her book in 2024 about shooting her 'extremely dangerous' family dog. The most recent post on the South Park's X account happened on Monday, when the end credits sequence that wasn't ready for Comedy Central viewers — but made the cut on Paramount+ — was posted. The scene continues the episode's running gag about Noem shooting puppies. In the episode, the South Park version of Noem guided raids by masked agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Among the new agents recruited by ICE was South Park Elementary School councilor Mr. Mackay. The face-melting jokes particularly rankled Noem, who called the show's portrayal of her 'lazy' and 'petty.' On the other hand, Vice President JD Vance took his mockery in stride, responding to a South Park post on X by saying, 'Well, I've finally made it.' In the episode, Vance was part of a Fantasy Island scenario where President Donald Trump, wearing a white suit a la Mr. Rourke (Ricardo Montalban), greeted visitors at his Mar-A-Lago resort in Florida. Vance played Trump's diminutive assistant, reminiscent of Rourke's diminutive assistant, Tattoo (Hervé Villechaize). Look for reports on South Park Season 27, Episode 3 when the information is formally released by Comedy Central and Paramount+.


Fox News
8 minutes ago
- Fox News
National Guard troops seen in DC amid Trump crackdown on crime in capital
The Trump administration has cited the city's crime rate for the surge in law enforcement.