logo
Stacey Abrams is the Democrats' self-made nightmare — as she hints at another election bid

Stacey Abrams is the Democrats' self-made nightmare — as she hints at another election bid

New York Post30-04-2025

Democrats created a monster in Stacey Abrams — and years after she first burst into the national political spotlight, she continues to punish them for doing so.
Abrams, the perennial Georgia gubernatorial candidate, is reportedly mulling yet another campaign for the office in 2026, when the term-limited Republican Gov. Brian Kemp must depart.
She's teased such a run for months, declaring that 'all options are on the table,' insisting she'd 'look at all the opportunities' and 'evaluate' how she could 'best serve.'
Now, as she continues to drop hints, Peach State Democrats worry that yet another Abrams attempt at the governor's mansion would consign them to yet another defeat.
'She's run twice, and that's enough to convince me she won't win' a general election, Jimmy Johnson, former chair of the Appling County Democratic Committee, told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution last week.
'Can some other Democrat win? Yes.'
'Abrams is great, but she missed the train,' said Marilyn Langford, another Democratic district official.
The Journal-Constitution itself piled on, as top political reporter Greg Bluestein editorialized that Abrams' 'unabashed liberal platform and relentless GOP attacks have taken a toll on the swing voters who help decide Georgia races.'
'Her rematch against Kemp in 2022 ended in a resounding defeat, thanks partly to split-ticket voters who backed [Sen. Raphael] Warnock but rejected her,' Bluestein noted.
Put it all together and you can't miss the painful — or, for Republicans, painfully delicious — truth: Abrams can't lose a Democratic primary, but can't win a general election.
'Every Georgia Democrat is scared to death Abrams runs again because they know they can't beat her in the primary,' said Cody Hall, an adviser to Kemp.
Brian Kemp, Governor of Georgia, speaks during a meeting of the Republican Governors Association at the National Building Museum in Washington, DC, on February 20, 2025.
AFP via Getty Images
'But she's also probably their worst candidate in the general.'
One might pity the Democrats and their media allies, were this quandary not entirely of their own making.
After all, while they may quietly be acknowledging the readily apparent truth that Abrams is political fool's gold, the product of a years-long crusade to make a mendacious mediocrity out to be something more, they're the ones who embarked upon it.
First, there was her high-profile 2018 campaign, during which a bevy of prominent Democrats — including Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton and then-Sen. Kamala Harris — all interceded on her behalf.
The Washington Post christened her 'Democrats' newest Southern hope,' and The New York Times insisted there was 'more to' Abrams 'than meets partisan eyes.'
In this May 20, 2018, photo, Georgia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams participates in a debate against Stacey Evans in Atlanta, Georgia.
AP
Then, after she fell short by a 1.4% margin, her boosters all parroted Abrams' meritless charge that the election had been stolen from her.
Just hours after the polls closed, the Times published a guest essay by a voter-suppression expert alleging that Abrams had faced 'the rising swamp of Neo-Jim Crow' in her loss.
A full year later, the Post produced a 'fact check' defending Pete Buttigieg's claim that 'racially motivated patterns of voter suppression are responsible for Stacey Abrams not being governor of Georgia right now.'
The charade went on.
There were over-the-top photo shoots (she wore a cape!).
There was a 'Star Trek' cameo (she wore a cape and played the president of Earth!).
There were glowing profiles (including one, in 2020, that that compared her to 'a runway supermodel').
There was speculation she might be Joe Biden's vice president (a fire she helped fuel).
But while there's been plenty of evidence of Abrams' supreme skill at self-promotion, what we have never seen is any demonstration of the political talent ascribed to her.
In 2022, she ran for governor again — only to be embarrassed by Kemp, who beat her by a punishing 7.5 percentage points.
And these days, Abrams is haunted not only by the ghosts of her electoral failures past, but by scandal.
In January, the Georgia Ethics Commission unanimously slapped Abrams' New Georgia Project nonprofit with a $300,000 campaign-finance fine — the largest in state history — for illegally doing election work on behalf of her 2018 campaign.
You know, the same one in which she claimed Republicans were up to no good.
Projection remains the surest sign of guilt.
Then there's the shady $2 billion-with-a-b federal grant the Biden administration gave to an environmental group that Abrams played a 'pivotal' role in securing — a grant that's now under investigation by President Trump's Environmental Protection Agency, and from which Abrams in recent days has tried desperately to distance herself.
Among elite Democrats in the know, patience with Abrams — for her losses, her excuses, her campaign-finance shenanigans and her pork-barrel grifting — may at long last be running thin.
But the bells they have pealed for her cannot be un-rung — and the extensive energy they've expended to turn Abrams into a progressive folk hero seems poised to backfire, again.
Isaac Schorr is a staff writer at Mediaite.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart
GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart

Wall Street Journal

time25 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart

WASHINGTON—Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R., S.D.) is trying to release this week a revised version of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' But as he races to pass the legislation ahead of Republicans' self-imposed July 4 deadline, he has got about as many problems as there are GOP senators, with lawmakers battling over the additional borrowing and spending cuts that will be used to finance tax relief, plus spending on the border and military.

Read: Newsom demands Trump pull National Guard from LA protests
Read: Newsom demands Trump pull National Guard from LA protests

Axios

time35 minutes ago

  • Axios

Read: Newsom demands Trump pull National Guard from LA protests

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Sunday formally that requested President Trump's administration withdraw the National Guard from Los Angeles County, where troops are responding to immigration raid protests. Why it matters: Trump in a Saturday memorandum that authorized the action in response to the LA unrest cited a rarely used provision in federal law that enables presidents to deploy national National Guard troops, but Newsom called the action "unlawful." The big picture: Newsom and other Californian Democratic leaders criticized Trump and his administration on Sunday for the action, as tensions remained heightened between authorities and protesters in a weekend that's seen tear gas deployed. Driving the news: Trump in his memo said that to the "extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." However, David Sapp, the California governor's legal affairs secretary, said in a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that local law enforcement resources were "sufficient to maintain order." What they're saying: Newsom said the action was "a serious breach of state sovereignty" that inflamed tensions "while pulling resources from where they're actually needed," as he posted copies of Sapp's letter to his social media accounts on Sunday.

California gov describes Trump's deployment of National Guard as 'the acts of a dictator'
California gov describes Trump's deployment of National Guard as 'the acts of a dictator'

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

California gov describes Trump's deployment of National Guard as 'the acts of a dictator'

California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused President Donald Trump of 'the acts of a dictator' for deploying National Guard troops to quell violent protests in Los Angeles. Newsom posted to socia media a video of Trump saying he would charge state and local officials federally if they interfere with the immigration enforcement that sparked the protests June 6, 7 and 8. Gavin accused Trump of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos' and 'militarizing cities.' 'These are the acts of a dictator, not a President,' Newsom said. The two men have long been at odds. Trump said on social media June 7 that federal authorities needed to step in because of the inaction of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom, who Trump has nicknamed. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump said in the post. The two have repeatedly clashed, most recently in late May, when Trump threatened to cut California's federal funding after a transgender high school athlete qualified for the state championship. "Large scale Federal Funding will be held back, maybe permanently," Trump said at the time, if California fails to follow an executive order he signed Feb. 5 seeking to bar transgender student athletes from playing women's sports. Newsom, a Democrat with presidential aspirations, has also sparred with Trump over tariffs, fighting fires and the management of water and environmental resources, though he has also criticized his own party. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: California governor accuses Trump of 'acts of a dictator'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store