Farmers say NI pollution proposals 'out of touch'
Farmers have said plans to reduce water pollution as a result of agricultural activity are "out of touch" with the reality of agriculture.
Northern Ireland's long-overdue Nutrients Action Programme (NAP) for 2026-29 has been published for consultation.
Many of the proposals are linked to the Lough Neagh Action Plan.
Making low emission slurry spreading equipment (LESSE) mandatory and placing restrictions on the use of phosphorus fertiliser are among recommended revisions.
President of the Ulster Farmers' Union, William Irvine, said it was "deeply concerning" the proposals from the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Daera) "lean heavily" towards enforcement and regulation rather than education, incentives or collaboration with farmers.
"Farmers are not shying away from their responsibilities," he said.
"For the last 20 years, since NAP was first introduced, we have been implementing practices to improve water quality.
"We fully recognise the need to protect and improve water quality, but it must be done in a way that's balanced, fair and grounded in the day-to-day realities of farming in NI.
"The proposals within NAP reflect a clear disconnect with local agriculture and fail to deliver what's truly needed."
Daera said it was "widely recognised that the intensification of agricultural production has had negative impacts on the environment".
Daera Minister Andrew Muir said action was needed to improve water quality and meet legal obligations.
"This is why it is essential to review NAP and consider additional measures to reduce the overall phosphorus surplus in our agricultural system," he said.
"The main additional measures include further restrictions on use of chemical phosphorus fertiliser and a farm phosphorus balance limit for more intensive farms."
He added that while 62% of the nutrient load in waterways could be traced back to to agriculture, other sources such as wastewater treatment and septic tank seepages also play a role.
His department also wants to "enhance" the enforcement powers available to it, to apply fixed or variable monetary penalties for breaches of the NAP.
Speaking on BBC's The View, Muir said he recognised that the measures proposed in the NAP are "challenging" and the consultation is "very complex".
"Ultimately we do need to change so we can improve our waterways and I don't want to consign Lough Neagh to the scenes we've seen in recent years," Muir said.
He added that since NI Water was established in 2007 they have had a "permission to pollute".
He added that he was "fed up" with the lack of investment in wastewater infrastructure, and that the Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins "needs to get her head out of the sand and needs to turn the situation around".
"What I am being left with as the minister for agriculture, environment and rural affairs is the job of cleaning up the sewage that NI Water are pumping into our waterways."
On Friday, the minister announced that the consultation would be extended to 12 weeks and will now close on 24 July.
"I recognise that the proposals in the revised NAP have a level of complexity because of the detailed science and evidence underpinning them," he said.
"Therefore, having listened to the concerns from farmers and industry about the need for more time to consider the consultation proposals, I am extending the consultation period by four weeks."
Muir said the extension is an "important opportunity" for people to respond or offer alternative proposals, and stressed that no final decisions have yet been made.
Intensive farms – mostly dairy and some beef farms - can be granted a derogation for using slurry on their land, allowing them to apply up to 250kg nitrogen per hectare per year from grazing livestock manures, rather than 170kg.
The number of farms that currently have a derogation is 427.
The lower limit for nitrogen would be reduced to 150kg/N/ha/year, putting another 3,100 farms in the category.
In total, the consultation document said, these farms account for 17% of all farms, yet produce some 50% of total manure nitrogen.
They will also represent a significant proportion of surplus phosphorus because of their greater reliance on feed inputs.
These farms would also be subject to a Phosphorus Balance Limit of 10kg/ha/year in 2027, reducing to 8kg in 2029.
Other schemes seeking ways of better using slurry and the nutrients it contains include the sustainable use of livestock slurry and using slurry to generate biogas.
Sewage bacteria above legal limits at NI swimming spots
More than 2,000 fish killed in river pollution
Stormont potentially breached water laws - minister
Funds not available for major water infrastructure plans
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
12 hours ago
- E&E News
Trump cuts to conservation panned at House hearing
Advocacy groups urged lawmakers Thursday to reject the Trump administration's proposal to slash funding for conservation assistance the Agriculture Department provides farmers. At a House Agriculture subcommittee hearing, groups said eliminating discretionary funding for conservation technical assistance — as the administration proposed for fiscal 2026 — could shut farmers out of practices that the Republican-led panel aims to promote. 'It all starts with technical assistance,' said Christopher McLeland, managing director of agriculture programs for Ducks Unlimited, as the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research and Biotechnology took testimony on conservation programs. Advertisement The proposed budget would eliminate more than $700 million in discretionary funding Congress has provided for conservation technical assistance in recent years. Some mandatory funding would be available, including through budget carryovers, the administration said.
News24
16 hours ago
- News24
Zimbabwe farmers see progress to ‘catapult us forward as a nation' after chaotic land policy years
Farmers in Zimbabwe are making progress following years of chaotic land reform policy. White and black farmers are building partnerships. Some farm owners whose land was confiscated received the first compensation payments. In a field of paprika plants in the heart of Zimbabwe, fourth-generation farmer Daniel Burger and relative newcomer Miriam Mupambawashe discuss the quality of the crop. Burger, 36, and Mupambawashe, 59, are neighbours and partners in efforts to revive the country's once-flourishing agriculture sector cut down by a ruinous land reform drive in the 2000s. The reform distributed land from the white minority, which still owned most of the best farmland 20 years after independence in 1980, to the black majority. Around 4 000 white-owned farms were confiscated, some with deadly violence. Mupambawashe was among thousands who received land. Though she initially knew little about farming, her small subsistence plot now thrives. READ | Zimbabwe to cull elephants and distribute meat to people Other farms failed or were abandoned, with some new tenants unschooled in agriculture and others - including politicians who were handed land - uninterested. There were food shortages and Zimbabwe soon required international aid. 'There was a bit of a tough period through the 2000s and, unfortunately, I think it sort of refuelled racial tensions to an extent,' Burger told AFP. But being so passionate about farming was the motivator for me to move forward. Daniel Burger Mupambawashe moved to the area from the southern city of Bulawayo, around 200km away. 'When we first came here in 2001, it was a forest and there was nothing built,' she said. 'Some of the white farmers were angry but we managed to talk to each other in good faith and move forward.' 'They never let us down and said: 'You grabbed the farm, let's see if you can do it.' But instead they brought their own tractors and equipment to come and help, which we felt was a nice gesture.' It was hard in the beginning, especially after irrigation equipment was stolen, and the early failures were 'embarrassing', Mupambawashe said. But today her plot does so well that she only needs to buy in sugar and cooking oil. Hakan Nural/Anadolu via Getty Images Burger leases land from her and lends tractors and expertise. His family's land was among the few hundreds that were not seized in the 2000s. Nonetheless, 'For a long time we became wound up in compensation,' said Burger, vice-president of the Commercial Farmers Union of Zimbabwe (CFU) that represents mostly white farmers. 'But it wasn't our purpose. Our purpose was driving agriculture and current agricultural affairs forward,' he said. This year, some farm owners whose land was confiscated received the first compensation payments after decades of waiting. The process has been complex and divisive. The government committed to compensation as part of an effort to settle arrears and reform the economy in order to be able to regain access to international credit lines cut two decades ago. It announced in 2020 the creation of a fund that would pay out $3.5 billion for infrastructure on farms but not the land, which it says was taken by force by colonial settlers. Unable to raise cash, the government in 2023 changed the offer to 1% in cash and the remainder in US dollar denominated treasury bonds. In April, the first payments were made to 378 of 780 farmers approved for this scheme. Deon Theron, who represents the Compensation Steering Committee group of former white farmers, says the introduction of the bonds has annulled the original deal and negotiations need to start over. The bonds are 'unsecured' and there is 'limited recourse in the event of non-performance by government,' he told AFP. 'The general feeling amongst the farmers is firstly frustration that after 20-odd years we still have not received anything,' Theron said. But the Property and Farm Compensation Association said its members would take what is on offer. The bonds are under international guarantee, said leader Harry Orphanides, adding that 'digging in' and seeking more from the government would be futile. Mupambawashe and Burger are encouraged by another major government announcement - the granting of land ownership rights to beneficiaries of the 2000s land reform. The tenure announced late in 2024 replaces 99-year leases and means the new owners can deal with the property as they wish, including putting it up for sale. 'It makes us feel settled,' Mupambawashe said. 'No one could come and tell us to move off the land or take it away from us.' 'It is just going to catapult us forward as a nation and an economy,' Burger said. 'We used to be the breadbasket of Africa and we lost it somewhat. But I just look at where we are now.'
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nigel Farage is clearly unfit to govern Britain
For a party which, rightly in my opinion, calls out the failures of multiculturalism, Reform UK should have had a view on the burqa. Whether that garb represents a rejection of British culture and the repression of women, or whether it is simply a matter of personal choice, Reform should have had a settled position on it. It did not. Sarah Pochin, one of its MPs, is seemingly against it and Zia Yusuf, its now erstwhile chairman, is not. The party's failure to have a line on a subject, raised no less by Pochin at PMQs, is symptomatic of a greater problem within Reform. It has no settled political philosophy. This is evident from manifold self-contradictory statements made by Farage himself. He is on the record saying he is not concerned about the rate of demographic change in the country, though he is worried about the cultural damage being done to our country. They are two sides of the same coin. On that same point, he would be prepared to consider a return of Shamima Begum to the country. He is against illegal migration but has no intention of deporting all illegal migrants. He claims to stand up for the United Kingdom but readily accepts that Northern Ireland will inevitably be united with Ireland. He recognises the urgent need to cut government spending and reverse the culture of dependency, but would remove the cap on benefits for more than two children. His lack of a coherent philosophy is also evident in the people he has recruited into the party. Nick Candy, his treasurer, is a Blairite. He offered to put forward Charlie Mullins, an avowed Remainer, as a candidate. Even Pochin, a former Tory, had previously welcomed Syrian and Afghan asylum seekers. He has recruited councillors and members from all parts of the political spectrum – from Labour and Tory to the Liberal Democrats. There is no heart and soul in Reform. It is merely a campaigning vehicle for Farage to capitalise on the discontent with Labour and the Tories. It is a protest party. The events of the last few days also reveal, yet again, Reform lacks discipline. How is it that an MP would ask a question in Parliament which would so offend the chairman? And why did the chairman then feel able to publicly denounce her as 'dumb'? Farage is Reform and Reform is Farage. He likes it that way. He has seemingly failed to establish a proper party structure and constitution. I campaigned hard last year for the party's democratisation. I did so in part so that it would have in-built checks and balances. With due processes established, there would have been no way for an MP to go off-piste in Parliament or for the chairman to then make a fool of himself. If Reform intends to be the antidote to the nation's woes, Farage needs to honestly reflect on recent events. He must realise the party needs a coherent political philosophy and policies which flow from this. He must establish foundations for the party which allow it to function and grow as a proper organisation. Reform is doing extremely well in the polls. If sustained, this could propel it into office. The party therefore has an obligation to take itself seriously and do the heavy lifting required to form a successful government. The sort for which we all so yearn. Farage is a brilliant and cunning campaigner. But he proves, time and again, that he is not fit to create a government or lead it. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
