Lights dimmed: Entertainment industry postpones live events following Kashmir terrorist attacks
The recent terrorist attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam has cast a sombre shadow over the entertainment world, prompting widespread cancellations and postponements of high-profile live events both in India and abroad.
The deadly terror attack in Pahalgam district killed 26 people, mostly tourists, around 2 pm on April 22.
One of the most anticipated events, The Bollywood Big One shows—scheduled for early May in Manchester and London—has been postponed. The tour was set to feature top Bollywood stars including Salman Khan, Madhuri Dixit, Varun Dhawan, Sara Ali Khan and Tiger Shroff.
'In light of the recent events in Kashmir, and with profound sadness, we have taken the difficult decision to postpone The Bollywood Big One shows. While we understand how much our fans were looking forward to these performances, we feel it is only right to pause during this time of grief,' Khan said in an Instagram post.
In India, singer Shreya Ghoshal's concert in Surat was also called off, with organisers confirming that full refunds will be automatically processed for all ticket holders. Other major acts, including Arijit Singh and AP Dhillon, have also shelved performances, while comedian Kevin Hart cancelled his upcoming India tour.
Siddhartha Chaturvedi, founder and CEO, Event Crafter, agreed there is a temporary impact on events as the overall mood has changed.
'Anybody would think twice before going ahead with an event at this point. Of course there would be losses and the promoters would bear the brunt, because the venue, vendors and technical equipment may already have been paid for. However, it is likely that people would help adjust these things in upcoming events given the circumstances,' added Chaturvedi, who is also former general secretary of EEMA (Event and Entertainment Management Association).
Companies such as BookMyShow and District by Zomato, that allow ticketing for live events, declined to comment on the story.
To be sure, post-pandemic recovery continues for India's live-events business that is curating everything from music festivals to multiple-city comedy tours for young audiences craving outdoor experiences.
While the initial enthusiasm for such events was attributed to revenge consumption, as people emerged after being confined to their homes by Covid-19, footfalls have mostly sustained, industry experts said, with smaller cities joining the list of patrons for such events.
With exposure to global artistes, music, and comedy, audiences in India have become receptive to diverse intellectual properties (IPs). Gen Z remains a prime target for brands, but more millennials are engaging with live events, possibly due to increased disposable income. While music is still the lowest-hanging fruit by way of mediums to engage audiences at a larger scale, the event landscape has expanded to include diverse experiences around alternative pop culture and F&B festivals.
According to the year-end report by BookMyShow, the platform offered 30,687 live events across 319 cities in 2024, an 18% increase compared to the previous year. Tier-two cities including Kanpur, Shillong, and Gandhinagar reported an almost eight-fold increase in live events, signalling the democratisation of entertainment access across the country. Music tourism surged, becoming one of the defining trends of the year. Over 4,77,393 fans travelled outside their cities to attend live music events.
First Published: 29 Apr 2025, 01:43 PM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
JK Rowling's magic brought them together; now her views have left them divided: Where do Harry Potter stars stand amid the controversy?
When the Chosen One Chooses a Side — PopCrave (@PopCrave) Emma Watson: A Feminist Witch for All Emma Watson's Instagram post. (Images: Agencies, Instagram) Rupert Grint: The Diplomatic Gryffindor The Silence Breakers: Felton, Fiennes, and Bonham Carter — Variety (@Variety) Jason Isaacs and Evanna Lynch: The Middle Path A World Torn Between Wand and Word In the universe of Harry Potter , lines between good and evil were once clearly drawn. But outside the pages, the reality has become far murkier. At the heart of this divide stands the author of the spellbinding world herself—J.K. Rowling. Once revered as the literary magician behind a generation's childhood, Rowling has since drawn intense criticism for her public stance on transgender issues . And while her pen gave life to Hogwarts, her real-life opinions have stirred the kind of debate no spell could controversy has left the Harry Potter fandom—and its beloved stars—divided. As Rowling's stance grows firmer, so do the varied responses of the actors she once helped catapult into global fame. Their statements reveal a complex dance of gratitude, discomfort, conviction, and conflict. Because while movies may bring books to life, the actors and authors behind them don't always see the world through the same lens. Daniel Radcliffe , forever known as "The Boy Who Lived," has not held back. In 2020, he penned a heartfelt op-ed distancing himself from Rowling's views and affirming, "Transgender women are women." He called out the pain her comments caused, emphasizing the need to listen to medical experts and the lived realities of trans people. In later interview with The Atlantic, he doubled down on his sadness over the divide: "Nothing in my life would have probably happened the way it did without that person... But that doesn't mean you owe the things you truly believe to someone else for your entire life."Emma Watson, never one to stay silent, used her platform to amplify trans voices. Her 2020 statement stood in direct contrast to Rowling's, expressing love and respect for the trans community. Later, at the BAFTAs, she quipped, 'I'm here for all the witches,' a line many took as a clear dig at Rowling. Watson's activism continues to blur the boundary between performer and advocate, as she chooses solidarity over also expressing firm support for trans rights, Rupert Grint has tried to strike a more personal chord. In interviews, he referred to Rowling as an "auntie"—someone he disagrees with, but still holds a complex relationship with. In an interview with The Times, he said, "I liken JK Rowling to an auntie. I don't necessarily agree with everything my auntie says, but she's still my auntie. It's a tricky one."His stance reflects the internal conflict many feel: can you love the art while questioning the artist?Tom Felton, who played the antagonistic Draco Malfoy, was more muted in his response, saying he's not deeply affected by the controversy and choosing to focus on the unifying power of Potter. But Ralph Fiennes, who portrayed Lord Voldemort, came to Rowling's defense with characteristic intensity. According to New York Times, he called the abuse Rowling faced 'disgusting' and insisted that her perspective was not extreme but Bonham Carter, the formidable Bellatrix Lestrange, echoed similar sentiments. As per a report from The Times, she condemned the backlash as 'a load of b***ocks,' suggesting Rowling was a victim of overzealous cancel culture and hinting that envy might be fueling the vitriol. 'She's allowed her opinion,' Bonham Carter said, urging respect for trauma-informed Isaacs (Lucius Malfoy) offered a cautious but thoughtful take—acknowledging differences in views but emphasizing Rowling's extensive charitable work. While talking with Telegraph, he refused to 'stab her in the front or the back' without a personal conversation. Evanna Lynch (Luna Lovegood), who once stood against Rowling, has since revisited her opinion. She now urges compassion on all sides, admitting she was 'naive' in earlier responses and praising Rowling's support for detransitioners—a controversial but honest Harry Melling, who played the unlikable cousin Dudley Dursley, offered a clear and succinct opinion while talking to the Independent: "Transgender women are women and transgender men are men." A simple statement, delivered without fanfare, but loaded with Harry Potter franchise , once a global beacon of fantasy, is now entangled in a very real-world dilemma—can the creation be separated from the creator? Can childhood heroes still stand tall if they clash with the values of their literary parent?What is unmistakably clear is that movies are not books, and actors are not authors. Each individual carries their own worldview, their own politics, their own truth. And just as Rowling once taught the world to question what lies beneath a surface, this controversy now compels fans and stars alike to reckon with the complex, often uncomfortable intersection of art, identity, and belief.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
JK Rowling's magic brought them together; now her views have left them divided: Where do Harry Potter stars stand amid the controversy?
When the Chosen One Chooses a Side — PopCrave (@PopCrave) Emma Watson: A Feminist Witch for All Emma Watson's Instagram post. (Images: Agencies, Instagram) Rupert Grint: The Diplomatic Gryffindor The Silence Breakers: Felton, Fiennes, and Bonham Carter — Variety (@Variety) Jason Isaacs and Evanna Lynch: The Middle Path A World Torn Between Wand and Word In the universe of Harry Potter , lines between good and evil were once clearly drawn. But outside the pages, the reality has become far murkier. At the heart of this divide stands the author of the spellbinding world herself—J.K. Rowling. Once revered as the literary magician behind a generation's childhood, Rowling has since drawn intense criticism for her public stance on transgender issues . And while her pen gave life to Hogwarts, her real-life opinions have stirred the kind of debate no spell could controversy has left the Harry Potter fandom—and its beloved stars—divided. As Rowling's stance grows firmer, so do the varied responses of the actors she once helped catapult into global fame. Their statements reveal a complex dance of gratitude, discomfort, conviction, and conflict. Because while movies may bring books to life, the actors and authors behind them don't always see the world through the same lens. Daniel Radcliffe , forever known as "The Boy Who Lived," has not held back. In 2020, he penned a heartfelt op-ed distancing himself from Rowling's views and affirming, "Transgender women are women." He called out the pain her comments caused, emphasizing the need to listen to medical experts and the lived realities of trans people. In later interview with The Atlantic, he doubled down on his sadness over the divide: "Nothing in my life would have probably happened the way it did without that person... But that doesn't mean you owe the things you truly believe to someone else for your entire life."Emma Watson, never one to stay silent, used her platform to amplify trans voices. Her 2020 statement stood in direct contrast to Rowling's, expressing love and respect for the trans community. Later, at the BAFTAs, she quipped, 'I'm here for all the witches,' a line many took as a clear dig at Rowling. Watson's activism continues to blur the boundary between performer and advocate, as she chooses solidarity over also expressing firm support for trans rights, Rupert Grint has tried to strike a more personal chord. In interviews, he referred to Rowling as an "auntie"—someone he disagrees with, but still holds a complex relationship with. In an interview with The Times, he said, "I liken JK Rowling to an auntie. I don't necessarily agree with everything my auntie says, but she's still my auntie. It's a tricky one."His stance reflects the internal conflict many feel: can you love the art while questioning the artist?Tom Felton, who played the antagonistic Draco Malfoy, was more muted in his response, saying he's not deeply affected by the controversy and choosing to focus on the unifying power of Potter. But Ralph Fiennes, who portrayed Lord Voldemort, came to Rowling's defense with characteristic intensity. According to New York Times, he called the abuse Rowling faced 'disgusting' and insisted that her perspective was not extreme but Bonham Carter, the formidable Bellatrix Lestrange, echoed similar sentiments. As per a report from The Times, she condemned the backlash as 'a load of b***ocks,' suggesting Rowling was a victim of overzealous cancel culture and hinting that envy might be fueling the vitriol. 'She's allowed her opinion,' Bonham Carter said, urging respect for trauma-informed Isaacs (Lucius Malfoy) offered a cautious but thoughtful take—acknowledging differences in views but emphasizing Rowling's extensive charitable work. While talking with Telegraph, he refused to 'stab her in the front or the back' without a personal conversation. Evanna Lynch (Luna Lovegood), who once stood against Rowling, has since revisited her opinion. She now urges compassion on all sides, admitting she was 'naive' in earlier responses and praising Rowling's support for detransitioners—a controversial but honest Harry Melling, who played the unlikable cousin Dudley Dursley, offered a clear and succinct opinion while talking to the Independent: "Transgender women are women and transgender men are men." A simple statement, delivered without fanfare, but loaded with Harry Potter franchise , once a global beacon of fantasy, is now entangled in a very real-world dilemma—can the creation be separated from the creator? Can childhood heroes still stand tall if they clash with the values of their literary parent?What is unmistakably clear is that movies are not books, and actors are not authors. Each individual carries their own worldview, their own politics, their own truth. And just as Rowling once taught the world to question what lies beneath a surface, this controversy now compels fans and stars alike to reckon with the complex, often uncomfortable intersection of art, identity, and belief.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Diet Cherry Coke likely to make comeback in US market after 4 years: Report
After a gap of four years, international beverage firm Cola Cola is most likely to bring back its classic Diet Cherry Coke in the US market, reported Economic Times. Diet Cherry Coke was launched in 1985 but discontinued in 2020. Citing a January report by the digital media outlet Parade, ET mentioned that the Diet Cherry Coke may make a comeback to the shelves with retro packaging during the summer season. Claiming a comeback of the classic drink, popular social media creator Snack-O-Lator later shared the news on its Instagram channel. It added that Diet Cherry Coke is making a comeback better than ever. 'Diet Cherry Coke is returning for a limited time with retro packaging!,' the post read. 'It's been years since the OG Diet Cherry Coke has been out, so I'm really looking forward to getting it again,' the post further stated, adding, 'This does not appear to be an exclusive release, but I'll update as it arrives on store shelves. Are you excited for some Diet Cherry Coca-Cola goodness?' Diet Coke is reportedly popular among consumers as it is a classic soda fountain beverage with flavours, including Diet Cherry Coke. Meanwhile, there are also calls for the return of Diet Coke with Lime. The popular beverage-making firm's website has mentioned that Diet Coke Cherry targeted adult consumers, and it contained no sugar and no calories. Also, the Diet Coke Cherry does not have any bubbles or effervescence, but the drink has an adult cola taste with a hint of cherry. Following the news was spread, netizens were quick to react. one wrote, 'Where can I find! This is an emergency! 😂' Another said, "Bring back the Diet Coke with lime and the one with Splenda" A third wrote, "Did Cherry Cole Zero go away? I haven't got any in a while but I thought it was still around. Huh." 'Oh yay! Im super picky about my diet soda and the Splenda Sweetened stuff just didn't hit right, I need the old school carcinogenic aspartame to get my fix 😂,' commented a fourth.
