Compared to Trump, ‘mad' King George looks decidedly sane
'George III is Abraham Lincoln compared to Trump,' said Rick Atkinson, who is vivifying the Revolutionary War in his mesmerising histories The British Are Coming and The Fate of the Day. The latter, the second book in a planned trilogy, has been on the New York Times bestseller list for six weeks and is being devoured by lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
As the 'No Kings' resistance among Democrats bristles, and as President Donald Trump continues to defy limits on executive power, it is instructive to examine comparisons of Trump to George.
'George isn't the 'royal brute' that Thomas Paine calls him in Common Sense,' Atkinson said. 'He's not the 'tyrant' that Jefferson calls him in the Declaration of Independence, and he's not the sinister idiot who runs across the stage in Hamilton every night singing You'll Be Back.' (And when push comes to shove, I will send a fully armed battalion to remind you of my love).
Yes, George had manic episodes that scared people — depicted in Alan Bennett's The Madness of George III, a play made into a movie with Nigel Hawthorne and Helen Mirren. Palace aides are unnerved when the king's urine turns blue.
'He was in a straitjacket for a while, that's how deranged he was,' Atkinson said. 'His last 10 years were spent at Windsor, basically in a cell. He went blind and deaf. He had long white hair, white beard.'
George was relentless about his runaway child, America.
'He's ruthless,' Atkinson explained, 'because he believes that if the American colonies are permitted to slip away, it will encourage insurrections in Ireland, in Canada, the British Sugar Islands, the West Indies, in India, and it'll be the beginning of the end of the first British Empire, which has just been created. And it's not going to happen on his watch.'
Unlike Trump, who loves to wallow in gilt, repost king memes and rhapsodise about God's divine plan for him, George did not flout the rule of law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
11 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
You can't quit America: It's too big to fail as the global leviathan
This week, the European Union agreed to a trade deal with the United States that amounts to a capitulation to President Donald Trump. Yes, Trump had already made concessions in advance by pre-emptively walking back his outrageous opening gambit in the tariff war when markets rebelled. But the US president has since enjoyed a run of victories, establishing a new baseline for US tariff revenue with minimal retaliation from its trading partners. The deal that European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen sealed with Trump is part of this new normal, in which most countries appear willing to pay extra for access to American markets. It's not America but the rest of the world that seems to be chickening out. There is a hard lesson here for anyone who imagines that a populist-governed US might somehow end up isolated on the world stage. This fantasy has been a source of both comfort and schadenfreude for anti-Trump liberals, since it offers a vision of potential political escape from populism, with liberal culture reconstituted in Toronto or Oxford or Scandinavia, and a vision of a Trumpian America suffering economic punishment as its walls rise higher and the rest of the world prospers through mutual exchange – without the US. Both conceits are fundamental misreadings of the global situation, which the foreign leaders who have bowed to Trump's demands seem to understand clearly. The first thing they understand is that American economic power is just too big to escape or isolate or ignore. Before Trump's 2024 victory, the economic story was one in which American growth was clearly pulling away from our peer economies in Europe and East Asia. Since Trump's return to power, even protectionist policy that almost every economist deplores hasn't prevented the American sharemarket from rising and the American growth machine from churning onwards. Loading Even if Trump reverts to deeper folly and causes a recession, the forces favouring the US over Germany or Britain or South Korea or Japan will still be present in the next administration and beyond. Almost all of America's liberal-democratic peers are poorer than it is and too sclerotic to suddenly surge past it. There is just no booming, youthful, dynamic, entrepreneurial zone capable of taking the place of America in a network of free economies, and therefore no substitute for trade with its companies and access to its markets, even at a Trumpian price. There is, of course, China, which is strong enough to stand up to Trump's bullying and dynamic enough to stand as a counterweight to American economic might. But unless your country is already authoritarian – and not necessarily even then – the risks of throwing yourself fully into China's orbit are still much more extreme than the costs of managing a populist administration in Washington. This doesn't mean other countries won't end up trading more with China because of American protectionism. But there is no plausible world where China simply replaces the US as a trusted partner and pillar of globalisation. Here the economic story links up with the political one. If it's implausible to imagine a network of European and Asian economies prospering without the American leviathan, it's even less plausible to imagine some kind of liberal world order reconstituting itself separately from the US.
The Age
11 minutes ago
- The Age
You can't quit America: It's too big to fail as the global leviathan
This week, the European Union agreed to a trade deal with the United States that amounts to a capitulation to President Donald Trump. Yes, Trump had already made concessions in advance by pre-emptively walking back his outrageous opening gambit in the tariff war when markets rebelled. But the US president has since enjoyed a run of victories, establishing a new baseline for US tariff revenue with minimal retaliation from its trading partners. The deal that European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen sealed with Trump is part of this new normal, in which most countries appear willing to pay extra for access to American markets. It's not America but the rest of the world that seems to be chickening out. There is a hard lesson here for anyone who imagines that a populist-governed US might somehow end up isolated on the world stage. This fantasy has been a source of both comfort and schadenfreude for anti-Trump liberals, since it offers a vision of potential political escape from populism, with liberal culture reconstituted in Toronto or Oxford or Scandinavia, and a vision of a Trumpian America suffering economic punishment as its walls rise higher and the rest of the world prospers through mutual exchange – without the US. Both conceits are fundamental misreadings of the global situation, which the foreign leaders who have bowed to Trump's demands seem to understand clearly. The first thing they understand is that American economic power is just too big to escape or isolate or ignore. Before Trump's 2024 victory, the economic story was one in which American growth was clearly pulling away from our peer economies in Europe and East Asia. Since Trump's return to power, even protectionist policy that almost every economist deplores hasn't prevented the American sharemarket from rising and the American growth machine from churning onwards. Loading Even if Trump reverts to deeper folly and causes a recession, the forces favouring the US over Germany or Britain or South Korea or Japan will still be present in the next administration and beyond. Almost all of America's liberal-democratic peers are poorer than it is and too sclerotic to suddenly surge past it. There is just no booming, youthful, dynamic, entrepreneurial zone capable of taking the place of America in a network of free economies, and therefore no substitute for trade with its companies and access to its markets, even at a Trumpian price. There is, of course, China, which is strong enough to stand up to Trump's bullying and dynamic enough to stand as a counterweight to American economic might. But unless your country is already authoritarian – and not necessarily even then – the risks of throwing yourself fully into China's orbit are still much more extreme than the costs of managing a populist administration in Washington. This doesn't mean other countries won't end up trading more with China because of American protectionism. But there is no plausible world where China simply replaces the US as a trusted partner and pillar of globalisation. Here the economic story links up with the political one. If it's implausible to imagine a network of European and Asian economies prospering without the American leviathan, it's even less plausible to imagine some kind of liberal world order reconstituting itself separately from the US.
AU Financial Review
41 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Australia dodges bullet as Trump keeps base tariff at 10pc
Australia has dodged a bullet for now with US president Donald Trump deciding leaving unchanged the basic 10 per cent import tariff he has applied to Australian goods. To the relief of the Albanese government, there was no specific mention of Australia on Friday morning AEST when Trump issued an executive order updating the reciprocal tariffs on more than 40 countries which he announced on 'liberation day' in early April.
