Mayor Bass says she'll take a pay cut as city's budget concerns continue
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass says that she will take a pay cut and hold off on scheduled raises for her staff members as the city continues to address the nearly $1 billion shortfall in the budget for the 2025-26 fiscal year.
"The mayor is taking a pay cut and Mayor's Office staff are not taking their regularly scheduled cost of living adjustments office-wide in June 2025 (4%), December 2025 (2%) and June 2026 (4%)," said Zach Sedil, a spokesman for Bass' office.
They didn't say exactly how much of a pay cut the mayor would take, nor when it would go into effect, but her annual salary is approximately $301,000.
In April, Bass delivered her State of the City Address, laying out a $13.9 billion budget that included the elimination of thousands of city positions and more than 1,600 layoffs. While the budget is technically on par with the 2024-25 budget, Bass said that they would close the gap through layoffs and department consolidations as costs increase and revenues decrease.
At the time, she told the city's workforce, "You are the city's greatest asset … but I want to be straight with you. My proposed budget, unfortunately, includes layoffs, which is a decision of absolute last resort."
With the personnel cuts, the proposed budget would be an increase of 8.2% over the adopted spending plan for last year's budget.
The proposal is still being reviewed by the City Council's Budget and Finance Committee for approval. Since announcing her proposal, Bass has also visited the state capitol to lobby for a relief package of $2 billion.
Deliberations on the proposal continue on Monday and the new fiscal year begins in July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cuomo, Adams battle for Orthodox Jewish support in mayor's race
NEW YORK — New York City Mayor Eric Adams suggested Tuesday that Orthodox Jewish support flocking to mayoral front-runner Andrew Cuomo is lighter than it seems. He may have a point. Cuomo has been racking up endorsements from influential leaders in a community long considered a potent electoral force as he leads the Democratic mayoral primary field. On Tuesday, he scored the top ranking from a major Hasidic sect in Brooklyn. But one of the former governor's most prominent backers suggested days earlier his brethren would be supporting Adams in the general election — and would do so with a similar fervor to 2024, when they came out en masse for President Donald Trump. 'In November you'll see the same thing with God's help,' Rabbi Moishe Indig, a top leader in Brooklyn's Satmar community, said during an event focused on combating antisemitism. 'We will come out to show our great support for our great mayor and brother, Eric Adams.' Indig was speaking at an event headlined by Adams and conservative television personality Dr. Phil on Sunday, the day before he publicly endorsed Cuomo. In addition to pledging fealty to the incumbent in the November general election, the Brooklyn religious and political fixture estimated 75,000 people in his community voted in the presidential race, mostly breaking for Trump. That number explains the nascent battle between Cuomo and Adams, who are both preparing for a potential general election showdown after Adams dropped out of the primary. 'We are talking about relationships of over 30 years — 30 years,' Adams, a Brooklyn borough president and state senator before becoming mayor, said of his ties to the borough's Orthodox communities during an unrelated press conference. As he spoke, he again excoriated Cuomo and accused him of overstating his support in Jewish and Black communities, both central to Adams' winning 2021 coalition. 'So let the primary run its course,' he said. 'We are going to see what's going to happen in the general.' Adams, a registered Democrat, opted out of the Democratic primary in April, recognizing he was too damaged by a federal indictment, and his related choice to cozy up to President Donald Trump, who pushed for a judge to drop the charges. As The New York Times reported Tuesday, Adams' team has been working behind the scenes to dissuade rabbis from endorsing Cuomo as the mayor publicly pursues policies sought by the community. A mayoral aide, for instance, was successful in persuading 25 Hasidic groups and institutions to endorse City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams over Cuomo in the primary, according to the Times. And another prominent Jewish leader in Brooklyn who endorsed Cuomo later clarified in a social media post that his backing was only for the primary and that he has a close relationship with the mayor. But despite animus between many religious communities and Cuomo over his Covid-era prohibitions on large gatherings, the front-runner has already landed crucial backing from some of the most important Jewish leaders in Brooklyn and Queens. And even Indig walked back his stated support for Eric Adams when asked by POLITICO, noting he hasn't made a general election endorsement yet. 'I don't know what's going to happen in November,' he added. With that in mind, Cuomo's team dismissed the mayor's assertions. 'Governor Cuomo's relationship with the Jewish community is deep, strong and stretches back decades and we're proud to have assembled one of the largest Orthodox coalitions in history in support of our campaign to get New York City back on the right track,' Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in a statement. 'We're not surprised the mayor is trying to play games behind the scenes.' Jeff Colin contributed to this report.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kristi Noem Ripped For Latest 'Dehumanizing' Dig About People In Los Angeles ... And It's Bad
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was slammed online for recent comments she made about the Los Angeles community amid ongoing tensions surrounding protests in the city against mass raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. During a Monday night appearance on Fox News show 'Hannity,' both host Sean Hannity and Noem criticized California's so-called 'sanctuary' policies which, in general, limits cooperation with federal immigration officials. Noem charged that ICE agents have been targeting criminals in Los Angeles who are the 'worst of the worst' — despite data and reporting showing that the mass arreststhat have taken place under President Donald Trump's administration have included people with no criminal records. Noem went on to charge that Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) have done 'absolutely nothing' about crime in the city. 'Now she's holding press conferences talking about the fact that people have the right to peacefully protest, and that they're a city of immigrants,' Noem said about Bass on 'Hannity' before she leveled a disparaging dig about Angelenos. 'Well, they're not a city of immigrants; they're a city of criminals,' she continued. 'Because she has protected them for so many years.' People in Los Angeles have taken to the streets to protest the Trump administration's ICE raids in their neighborhoods. Newsom has accused Trump of escalating the situation after he deployed Marines and National Guard troops in California to counter the protests. The president justified his decision to do so — despite objections from Newsom — telling reporters from the Oval Office on Tuesday that he was done playing by the rules. Newsom has accused the president of wanting to fuel chaos in Los Angeles. The last time a president deployed the National Guard without cooperation from a governor was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights protesters. People on X, formerly Twitter, slammed Noem's comments about Los Angeles, the second largest city in the country, which has rich cultural diversity. Many called her comments 'dehumanizing.' Speaking about Noem's comments on 'Hannity,' Collin Anderson, a clinical assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo College of Arts and Sciences, said that it's 'always concerning to hear a high-ranking federal employee paint entire swathes of the country with a broad brush.' He emphasized that it's important to remember that 'federal employees are public servants who are supposed to serve the people.' Anderson said that Noem's comments that Los Angeles is 'a city of criminals' is an attempt to 'paint the situation in LA as quite dire.' He said that if news reports suggest that 'all of LA is burning,' and the city is 'brimming with criminals,' then people 'will be more likely to support harsher measures to bring what they perceive to be as out of control violence' — even though, he said, people participating in the protests 'represent only a fraction of a percentage of the population' of the city, and that the demonstrations are confined to 'a geographic area of a few square miles.' And Anderson said that baselessly describing people as criminals — people who 'for the most part have not gone through due process to determine their criminality or not' is meant to cast them as being in an 'out-group' — a 'group that isn't part of 'proper' society.' 'Dehumanizing language is dangerous, and society must always be vigilant about it, lest we repeat the horrors of the past,' he said. 'The last thing to remember in all of this [is] rights are either for everyone, or they are for no one.' 'If someone else's rights are being violated, your rights can be too,' he continued. Jaime Dominguez, a political scientist and associate professor of Instruction at Northwestern University Weinberg College of Arts & Sciences, said that Noem's comments about Los Angeles reflect an 'overarching theme' within the Trump administration, which is to criminalize immigrants and 'seeing immigrants through just this linear lens.' 'And the lens is, of course, that they're not a citizen, they don't care about the country, they're not invested in the country,' he said. Dominguez said that viewing immigrants this way gives Noem and other members of the Trump administration the 'leverage to basically target immigrants' and to push a narrative that they're 'not invested in our country.' He emphasized that this strategy from the current administration is dangerous. 'Once you dehumanize the immigrant in the eyes of the public, then the public will become immune and desensitized to what we see happening on the street,' he said, before later adding: 'It's out of the playbook of authoritarian figures.' Dominguez also stressed that Trump's decision to send troops to Los Angeles is part of his tactic to create 'chaos' and 'disorder' — and to make it seem as though he's the one fixing it. It's part of Trump's 'DNA,' he said. Kristi Noem Tries To Tell Californians How To Vote BUSTED: Critics Rip 'Hypocrite' Kristi Noem By Using Her Own Words Against Her Kristi Noem Said An Immigrant Threatened To Kill Trump. The Story Quickly Fell Apart.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NYC mayoral candidates answer questions on taxes, affordability, spending
The Brief The Citizens Budget Commission sent out a questionnaire to the New York City mayoral candidates. Nine of the candidates responded, answering questions regarding government efficiency, taxes and other topics. NEW YORK CITY - The Citizens Budget Commission's (CBC) new questionnaire sheds some light on the potential future spending habits of New York City's mayoral candidates. All answers provided by the candidates were taken from their responses to the CBC's 2025 New York City Mayoral Candidate Questionnaire. What we know SKIP TO: Services and operations | Education | Attracting residents and businesses | Taxes Twelve candidates were sent the questionnaire – only New York City Mayor Eric Adams, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and Senator Zellnor Myrie did not submit responses. The other candidates are as follows: Former Assemblymember Michael Blake Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo New York City Comptroller Brad Lander Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani Senator Jessica Ramos (who just recently endorsed Cuomo) Curtis Sliwa Former New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer Whitney Tilson Jim Walden A more comprehensive look at each candidate can be found here. What they're saying Here are some of the subjects broached by the questionnaire. A majority of the candidates rated the efficiency of NYC's services and operations from fair to poor, with only Jim Walden rating the efficiency as "good" – Mamdani, Sliwa and Tilson were the three to rate the services and operations as "poor." In comparison, none of the candidates rates the quality of these services as "poor," with Stringer and Blake going so far as to label them "good" (the other candidates all settled on "fair"). "If you can't afford rent, find a good school or feel safe walking home, you're not staying in New York City." Senator Jessica Ramos The variation of answers was far greater when the candidates were asked which two major agencies offer significant opportunity to improve said efficiency. Blake and Ramos highlighted NYCHA (NYC Housing Authority) as one of their two chosen agencies; Blake, Mamdani and Sliwa pointed to education. While on the subject of education, only one candidate argued against the concept that increasing public school per-student spending would increase achievement: Curtis Sliwa. "Results come from better leadership, not blank checks." Tilson did not commit to a yes or no answer: "Higher per-pupil spending generally does not increase achievement, but I want to invest in certain areas, such as expanding 3-K and reading tutors in elementary schools, for struggling children." All seven other candidates agreed with the idea that an increase in per-student spending would lead to higher achievement rates. Every candidate who participated in the questionnaire agreed that public safety and housing affordability were the two most pressing issues regarding attracting new residents and businesses. "New Yorkers with children under the age of six are leaving the city at more than twice the rate of those without young children." Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani When asked to choose a third factor, the candidates began to diverge in perspective. Lander, Ramos, Stringer, Tilson and Walden concurred that the city's quality of education offered is an obstacle to attracting newcomers. Sliwa cited high taxes as his suspected issue, while Mamdani zeroed in on childcare, or more accurately, a lack of affordable childcare options. Cuomo and Blake settled on similar matters, with Blake attributing the issue to the cost of living overall, while Cuomo pointed to "quality of life write large" as the issue. All candidates involved said they would keep the city's sales tax as it is currently – answers diverged in regard to personal income taxes and property taxes. Ramos and Mamdani would increase the personal income tax of New Yorkers, while Cuomo and Sliwa would decrease them, with the other candidates saying they would keep them the same. Walden, Cuomo and Sliwa would decrease the property tax rate, while Blake would increase it – most other candidates would keep the rate as it is now, except for Ramos, who did not provide an answer. The Source This article includes information from a Citizens Budget Commission questionnaire.
