logo
Cars aren't tested properly for women's safety. Congress is trying to fix that.

Cars aren't tested properly for women's safety. Congress is trying to fix that.

Yahoo02-04-2025

WASHINGTON — Maria Weston Kuhn was on vacation with her family when a head-on car crash changed her life. Kuhn and her mother, both in the back seat, were rushed to the hospital with serious injuries.
The seatbelt Kuhn wore pinned her intestines to her spine. After emergency surgery and a hospital stay, Kuhn, then 19, had to take a semester off from school to recover. Yet even though her father and brother were closer to the site of impact, they walked away with only scratches.
After Kuhn, who is now 24, returned home from the hospital, she noticed a clipping from Consumer Reports on her bed: Her grandmother had cut out an article about gender disparities in car safety testing. Kuhn learned that her injuries were exactly the kind of injuries women are most likely to suffer in car crashes.
'It's just like reading your life in a story. It's crazy,' she told NBC News in an interview last month.
As Kuhn then discovered, women are 73% more likely to be seriously injured in a head-on car crash compared with men in the same crash. Female drivers and front-seat passengers are 17% more likely to be killed in a car crash than a male occupant of the same age, according to multiple studies conducted over the last five years.
Chris O'Conner, president and CEO of Humanetics, one of the world's leading producers of crash test dummies, said that's for a relatively simple and chilling reason: Cars are not designed to be safe for women.
'If you look back in history, the crash test dummy was designed around a male, and that male became the baseline,' O'Conner said, adding that vehicles are being designed 'around a male.'
Safety standards today look much like they did in the 1980s, when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) first mandated the use of dummies in car safety testing, though there were moves to do more testing with female dummies during the Obama administration. But NHTSA regulations still allow car companies in the U.S. to test for safety using 40- to 50-year-old dummies that are not anatomically representative of the average female, in terms of height, weight and body type — despite newer, more high-tech testing dummies being available.
Today, more women have driver's licenses than men, and O'Conner argues NHTSA must bolster testing requirements to force American car companies to prioritize safety.
'The car companies aren't required to test with the new dummy, because the regulation says you only have to use the old standard, which is from 40-50 years ago. So why are the car companies still using this? Because it's available and it's easy,' O'Connor said.
The standard 'female' car-test dummy in use today weighs 108 pounds and is 4 feet, 11 inches tall. The Hybrid III dummy, created in the 1970s, is based on the smallest 5% of American women and, according to O'Conner, is really just a smaller version of a male-representative dummy with 'a chest strapped on to it.'
Humanetics' newer model, called the THOR-5F, has 150 sensors, including in the legs, where female drivers are at a nearly 80% higher risk for injury than male drivers are in the same accident. The model has also been designed to better mimic an actual female body, according to O'Conner.
'This enables us to be able to design cars that are safer for women as well as safer for men,' O'Conner said.
A Department of Transportation spokesperson said Secretary Sean Duffy's 'top priority' is safety.
'He agrees that new crash test dummies that better cover the only two genders — male or female — have taken too long to develop,' the spokesperson said.
Five and a half years after her accident, Kuhn and her organization, Drive US Forward, are driving forces behind the 'She Develops Regulations in Vehicle Equality and Safety (She DRIVES) Act' — a bipartisan bill requiring that NHTSA uses 'the most advanced testing devices available' and directing the agency to update federal motor vehicle safety standards.
Duffy's spokesperson said he 'appreciates Congress's interest in resolving this issue and is committed to accelerating the process to improve safety for all Americans.'
The Senate Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over NHTSA, voted unanimously to advance the bill to the full Senate earlier this year.
'This legislation deals with passenger safety and specifically for women to be safer when they're traveling in vehicles,' Sen. Deb Fischer, who leads the bill, told NBC News in an interview last month.
'This is truly a safety issue for women. It needs to be addressed,' added Fischer, a Nebraska Republican. 'There's a simple fix, and that fix is to be able to have crash test dummies that reflect a woman's lighter frame, lesser weight than an average man, and to gather the data from that in order to make these vehicles safer for women to travel in.'
Asked why Congress needs to act to force NHTSA to update safety regulations, she replied: 'Sometimes manufacturers need to be pushed a little bit, but I think it always needs to be based on science and facts, and that's what we have here. We have facts out there that show that there is a problem. It's a big safety problem, and there's a simple fix. So let's do it.'
Since her accident, Kuhn has shared her story with several lawmakers, many of whom support a legislative solution. The She DRIVES Act is 'unifying' and 'nonpartisan,' Kuhn said.
'With enough determination and commitment, we can come together as Americans to make our country a better place for everyone,' she added.
'It is difficult when you entrust your government to protect you and take care of you, and when they fail to do that, it costs lives,' Kuhn said, adding, 'Everybody deserves to feel safe in a car.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Americans Call Distracted Driving Dangerous, But Few Admit to Doing It
Americans Call Distracted Driving Dangerous, But Few Admit to Doing It

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Americans Call Distracted Driving Dangerous, But Few Admit to Doing It

According to a new Verra Mobility study released for Distracted Driving Awareness Month, 85% of Americans believe distracted driving is just as dangerous as drunk driving. That stat alone should give anyone pause. But here's the kicker: while most drivers say they see reckless behavior on the road all the time, far fewer are willing to admit they've done it themselves. So what did the numbers really show, and what should they mean for everyday drivers like us? Verra Mobility surveyed 2,000 frequent drivers across the U.S. The vast majority say they're noticing bad behavior regularly: 89% say they see speeding at least a few times per week 67% report seeing someone run a red light at least once a month 65% have spotted drivers using their phones while behind the wheel 60% have witnessed someone speeding in a school zone And overall, 63% of respondents believe the average driver has gotten worse in recent years. These observations line up with national data. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, distracted driving led to more than 3,000 deaths in 2024. That's not just a statistic—it's thousands of families impacted by something as preventable as checking a text message. Here's where things get interesting. When asked about their own driving, people painted a much rosier picture. 65% say they've never driven distracted in the past year 74% claim they haven't used their phone behind the wheel 85% say they've never sped in a school zone It's a bit of a reality check. We may see ourselves as safe and alert, but the numbers suggest we're often not as careful as we think. But here's the disconnect: AAA has found that 87% of U.S. drivers engage in unsafe behaviors behind the wheel. And according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, distracted driving was responsible for more than 3,000 deaths and over 400,000 injuries in 2022 alone. So, while we're pretty quick to notice risky behavior in others (like speeding or phone use), we're not always as honest about our own habits. Despite the disconnect between what people see and what they report doing, one thing is clear: most Americans want safer streets, especially when kids are involved. 59% support automated enforcement to curb dangerous driving 77% support it for school zones A whopping 96% support it for school buses These tech-enabled tools, like speed cameras and red-light enforcement, aren't just about catching bad behavior — they're designed to reduce it. And they're shown to work, especially in school zones and high-risk areas. Jon Baldwin, EVP of Government Solutions at Verra Mobility, summed it up this way: "I believe that the average American is a good driver and cares about safety... being self-aware is key to making our roads safer so that everyone takes responsibility for their own driving behavior." If you're reading this and thinking, 'Yeah, I've seen bad drivers,' maybe it's also a good moment to ask: How often am I fully focused when I'm behind the wheel? The next time your phone buzzes, or a shortcut tempts you to speed through a yellow light, take a beat. Our streets — and the lives on them — deserve your full attention.

American presidents have long used autopens. Just ask Trump.
American presidents have long used autopens. Just ask Trump.

Politico

time38 minutes ago

  • Politico

American presidents have long used autopens. Just ask Trump.

Donald Trump has repeatedly slammed Joe Biden's use of an autopen during his presidency, going so far as to center its usage in a broad investigation Trump announced Wednesday into his predecessor. But politicians on both sides of the aisle are deeply familiar with the tool. The autopen — also referred to as the robot pen — replicates an individual's signature using a writing utensil, rather than a scanned and printed version of it. The tool, which resembles a small printer with a long arm that allows users to attach a pen to the center, has a long history of use in American politics. The device was first patented in 1803, according to the Shapell Manuscript Foundation, an independent research organization that collects original manuscripts and historical documents. Iterations of the autopen have been used by presidents as far back as Thomas Jefferson, who wrote that 'I could not, now therefore, live without' the device he used to duplicate letters. 'The Autopen has long been a tool for the world's most influential leaders, allowing them to more effectively apply their time and attention to important issues without compromising the impact of personalized correspondence,' according to The Autopen Co., which sells the machines. U.S. leaders on both sides of the aisle have used the autopen for decades — and have faced criticism for their use of the tool. During Lyndon Johnson's administration, the autopen was featured in The National Enquirer for an article headlined 'One of the Best Kept Secrets in Washington: The Robot That Sits In For The President.' Even Trump himself has said he used autopens, but 'only for very unimportant papers.' 'We may use it, as an example, to send some young person a letter because it's nice,' Trump said in March, according to The Associated Press. 'You know, we get thousands and thousands of letters, letters of support for young people, from people that aren't feeling well, etcetera. But to sign pardons and all of the things that he signed with an autopen is disgraceful.' In 2004, George W. Bush's secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, faced criticism from some veterans for using an autopen to sign condolence letters to families of troops killed in the Iraq War. In 2011, Barack Obama used an autopen to sign a Patriot Act extension — becoming the first known, apparent use of the tool by a president for legislation — and used it subsequently in his administration. The move resulted in Republicans questioning the constitutionality of Obama's decision, though Bush's Office of Legal Counsel, which is part of the Department of Justice, had already concluded the use of autopens was constitutional. 'The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law,' the office's 2005 ruling stated. 'Rather, the President may sign a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President's signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.' There is no specific law governing a president's use of an autopen. But the ruling from the Department of Justice hasn't stopped Trump from accusing Biden and his team of illegally using the tool, alleging that Biden's team used an autopen to sign documents without Biden's permission or knowledge. Trump has also claimed that Biden's round of pardons — including 'preemptive pardons' of Jan. 6 investigators, his son Hunter Biden and Anthony Fauci — were illegal and are 'void' and 'vacant.' However, most legal scholars are in agreement that pardons cannot be overturned once granted. In 1869, a federal court ruled, 'The law undoubtedly is, that when a pardon is complete, there is no power to revoke it, any more than there is power to revoke any other completed act.' Biden has denied the claims that any decision was ever made or issued in his name without his approval or knowledge. Trump and other Republican accusers have provided no evidence that aides used an autopen without the former president's approval. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency,' Biden told POLITICO in a statement. 'I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false. This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations.'

Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk
Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk

President Trump said he assumes his relationship with Elon Musk has ended and that he has no desire to repair it after the pair publicly fell out last week. "I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken," Trump said of the billionaire in a phone call with NBC News' Kristen Welker. The big picture: Trump's comments also came with a warning to Musk when the president said the Tesla CEO could face "serious consequences" should he fund Democratic candidates in the next election running against Republicans who vote for Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The billionaire, who contributed more than $290 million to Republicans in the 2024 election but has since said he'd cut back on political spending, posted last week that politicians "who betrayed the American people" should be fired in November. Trump declined to elaborate on what the consequences would be for Musk. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a Sunday interview on ABC's "This Week" that it would be a "big mistake" for Musk to go after Republicans who vote for the bill. Driving the news: Trump said he has no plans to speak to the Tesla CEO during the Saturday phone interview with Welker. Asked if he thought his relationship with Musk was over, Trump said he "would assume so." He accused the once-close administration ally of being "disrespectful to the office of the President." Catch up quick: The alliance between Trump and the former chainsaw-wielding face of DOGE exploded last week as Musk continuously campaigned against the massive tax-and-spending package, blasting it as a "disgusting abomination." Speaking to reporters during an Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Thursday, Trump said he was "very disappointed" in Musk, who he claimed was very familiar with the inner workings of the legislation. While Trump talked, Musk fired back in real-time on X, claiming in one post that Trump would have lost the election without him. Zoom in: In one post that appears to have been deleted, Musk accused the president of being "in the Epstein files." Trump told NBC that it's "old news."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store