logo
Security experts say large businesses may look to fortify their offices after shooting rampage

Security experts say large businesses may look to fortify their offices after shooting rampage

NZ Herald30-07-2025
Companies such as Intel and Lockheed Martin are earmarking hundreds of thousands of dollars for executive security, and firms are tracking social media for 'aggressive rhetoric' that could lead to violence.
There's been a 'sea change' since Thompson was killed while making his way to an investor conference at a Midtown Manhattan hotel, said John Torres of the global consultancy Guidepost Solutions. 'We've been getting calls non-stop.'
Kucera said Allied received more requests for risk assessments in the six months after Thompson's slaying than in the preceding five years combined. The assessments examine social media, office buildings and other factors to gauge the likelihood of violence against employees.
About half of Fortune 500 companies provided security details for C-suite executives in May, compared with roughly 20% last year, Kucera said.
A separate analysis of 208 companies in the S&P 500 found that 31.3% of them provided security benefits as part of executive compensation packages, up from 24.5% in 2023 and 23.1% in 2022, according to the research firm Equilar.
Some industry observers said there's more that corporations can do to protect their workforces from unexpected and seemingly random attacks, such as installing panic buttons or weapons-detection technology.
'We're badging people in - we're not searching their bags, they're not going through metal detectors,' said Amanda DeAlmeida with Building Security Services, a firm that provides guards for more than 100 properties across New York and New Jersey.
They mostly act as concierges in the office buildings they serve, she said.
'Unfortunately, if we're not armed, there's only so much that the guards can do,' DeAlmeida added.
In the event of an attack, they will follow active-shooter protocols, she said, but without access to panic buttons, loudspeakers or other tools, it's 'a lot more difficult' to alert tenants to danger.
Tuesday's attack follows a spate of violent or politically motivated incidents involving major corporate brands.
A Tesla Cybertruck explosion in front of the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas, reports of molotov cocktails and gunfire at Tesla lots across the US, and a stabbing attack that injured 11 people at a Michigan Walmart.
About 28% of public mass shootings - those that weren't at private residences - took place in a workplace, according to a 2023 National Institute of Justice report that synthesised findings from dozens of publications and research projects. An additional 13% occurred in retail establishments.
The gunman the latest shooting, whom police identified as 27-year-old Shane Tamura of Las Vegas, double parked and entered the lobby of 345 Park Avenue with an AR-style rifle just before 6.30pm local time, according to New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch.
He opened fire, killing off-duty police officer Didarul Islam, who was providing security for the building, and proceeded to spray the lobby with bullets, Tisch said.
Also killed were Blackstone executive Wesley LePatner as she tried to find cover behind a pillar, and guard Aland Etienne, who was shot behind his security desk.
Tamura then boarded a lift - allowing a woman to get off unharmed - and rode it to the 33rd floor, where he killed Rudin Management employee Julia Hyman before shooting himself, authorities said.
Some tenants had time to barricade themselves inside their offices during the attack.
UnitedHealthcare chief executive Brian Thompson was gunned down late last year.
Employees at private-equity firm Blackstone stacked grey sofas against a door, according to an image circulating on social media and confirmed by the firm.
New York Mayor Eric Adams said in television interviews that Tamura appeared to be targeting offices of the National Football League but took the wrong lift, arriving at a floor where Rudin Management, a real estate firm and the building manager, has an office.
A note found in Tamura's wallet, Adams said, mentioned chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, a degenerative brain disease that the football league has been grappling with for years.
The NFL did not respond to a request for comment. In a memo to staff, Commissioner Roger Goodell wrote that an NFL employee was seriously injured in the attack and was in a hospital in stable condition.
Executives at Rudin Management could not be reached by phone or email.
While most large companies and office towers have some form of security in place, the level varies based on factors including how high-profile or controversial the firm is, said Fred Burton, executive director of protective intelligence for Ontic, a security technology company.
Companies weigh considerations such as how many people 'harbour some degree of hate and discontent against your CEO or the industry that you're with', he said. 'Are you doing work for the - air quote - the 'industrial war machine?''
An increasingly polarised political climate has only heightened those concerns, as protests over the Gaza war, immigration policies, and other matters have spilled onto streets and university campuses and led to company boycotts, some industry observers said.
'It only takes one person to turn around and say, oh, this company is led by someone whose politics they don't like. And they're going to try to get in there and make a statement,' said Torres, Guidepost Solutions' president of security and technology consulting.
New York police have said Luigi Mangione was motivated by animus towards America's healthcare system when he allegedly shot and killed Thompson on December 4. Before his death, the UnitedHealthcare executive voiced concerns that the company had an image problem.
Some corporations are being more proactive about security, recognising the risk of not taking safety seriously, other industry observers said.
'Litigation is, unfortunately, the fallout of poor security or at least perceived poor security,' said Ken Wheatley, a former chief security officer for Sony Electronics' global operations who has testified as an expert witness in premise liability and negligent security lawsuits.
Corporate security spending has jumped precipitously, business filings show.
The technology giant Intel spent US$248,900 on the 'incremental cost of residential security' for former chief executive Patrick Gelsinger in 2024, compared with US$1500 spent on his residential security in 2023, and US$1700 in 2022, company records show. Gelsinger, who stepped down on December 1, 2024, also had a car and security-trained driver.
Lockheed Martin said it 'enhanced' security measures for its senior executives in 2024 to ensure their safety, though there had been risks 'for well over a decade', according to a May report. The aerospace and defence company spent US$1,194,805 on security for chief executive James Taiclet alone that year.
Several healthcare companies made significant investments in security last year.
Pharmaceutical giant Merck spent US$81,242 installing and maintaining residential, travel and home security for chief executive Robert Davis in 2024, compared with US$11,824 in 2023, and US$6689 in 2022, filings show.
And Centene Corporation said it spent US$69,133 on personal security for chief executive Sarah London last year, records show.
The company, which offers managed healthcare products and services primarily for Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries, began to pay personal security costs for some executive officers in December.
UnitedHealth, where Thompson worked, spent US$253,827 on executive security for chief financial officer John Rex in 2024, and US$926,989 for Heather Cianfrocco, another executive, filings show. Records did not include a breakdown for executive security in 2023.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NZ sharemarket flat amid US slump, eyes on Trump's tariffs
NZ sharemarket flat amid US slump, eyes on Trump's tariffs

NZ Herald

time17 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

NZ sharemarket flat amid US slump, eyes on Trump's tariffs

'I think people are still holding their breath for the reporting season, which begins next week, and then it really gets going the following week,' Lister said. 'We're just in a bit of a holding pattern in terms of the stock-specific news. We don't really want to hear from any of these businesses because when you hear from a business this close to reporting season, it can often mean that it's going to be a profit downgrade they're obliged to tell us about. 'No news is probably good news at this point on the corporate front.' On the NZX, Lister pointed to Chorus and Gentrack Group, which had positive days. Chorus lifted 29c to $9.09 on turnover of $5.4m, while Gentrack rallied by 3.78% or 37c to $10.15. Infratil also continued its positive run, with Lister noting its share price had gained just over 4% during the week. Infratil lifted 1.26% or 15c to $12.05, on turnover worth $24.6m. As for the decliners, SkyCity was down 2.04% to $0.96, Restaurant Brands fell 1.72% to $2.85 on turnover of $3.57m, and Auckland Airport fell 1.18% to $7.55 on turnover of $7.6m. Elsewhere, Stats NZ released unemployment data for the June quarter, with the headline figure rising to 5.2%, slightly below economists' predictions of 5.3%. Lister said while it hadn't gone up as much as people were expecting, it was still at its highest levels since the pandemic. 'That's the last really important data point ahead of the Reserve Bank meeting in a fortnight's time. The balance of risks definitely suggests that another cut is required this month. 'You've got to remember that unemployment tends to be a lagging indicator, so it doesn't tell you a lot about what's coming.' Overnight, the Global Dairy Auction took place, with the second increase in a row following four consecutive declines. International news Wall Street stocks retreated on Tuesday local time as markets monitored ongoing trade talks ahead of new tariff increases set to take effect later this week. US stocks initially looked poised to extend Monday's rally but soon tumbled into negative territory. 'We're struggling for direction right now,' said Adam Sarhan of 50 Park Investments. 'After a big move up over the last few weeks, it's perfectly normal and healthy to see the market consolidate or go sideways a little bit.' The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished down 0.1% at 44,111.74. The broad-based S&P 500 dropped 0.5% to 6299.19, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index shed 0.7% to 20,916.55. US President Donald Trump told CNBC he plans fresh tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. The statement comes before a separate set of tariff increases goes into force on dozens of economies later this week. Swiss officials travelled to Washington on Tuesday to try to strike a last-minute deal. – Additional reporting AFP Tom Raynel is a multimedia business journalist for the Herald, covering small business, retail and tourism.

On New Zealand's Role In The New ANZUS Remake
On New Zealand's Role In The New ANZUS Remake

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

On New Zealand's Role In The New ANZUS Remake

Want Donald Trump to lower the tariffs on your exports to US markets? Easy. Offer him money. Lots of it. As the New York Times explained yesterday (in a story headlined 'Trump's Demand to Trading Partners: Pledge Money or Get Higher Tariffs) South Korea bought its way to a 10% reduction in its tariff rate by offering to spend $350 billion on US investments, and to purchase $100 billion of liquified natural gas. South Korea is not the only country to make such pledges. Japan said it would establish a $550 billion fund for investments in the United States. The European Union indicated that its companies were poised to invest at least $600 billion. To trade experts, the commitments raise the question of whether Mr. Trump is negotiating with trading partners or trade hostages. One can only hope that the New Zealand diplomats and corporate leaders heading to Washington to beg for leniency on our 15% tariff rate do realise that paying Trump off with large amounts of protection money is the only way to grease the tariff wheel. Think of those billions we recently set aside for new defence spending. Perhaps a few billions committed to Lockheed Martin or Raytheon or General Dynamics might knock a few points off the tariff rate? Keep this scam in mind if, by some miracle, our tariff rate does get reduced. It won't be because of Winston Peters' diplomatic wizardry, or Christopher Luxon's innate will be because we succumbed to a shakedown by the Mafioso-in-Chief, and paid him off. Makes one high would be we willing to bid for a tariff cut? New Movie, Same Actors Previously on AUKUS, Death From Below... back in 2021, Joe Biden, Boris Johnson and Scott Morrison hatched a secret defence pact. The core narrative involved the deployment of a fleet of nuclear submarines to negate the threat he inscrutable Chinese allegedly pose to everything that Australia holds dear: everything from shrimps on the barbie to the rightful dominance of Euro-American civilisation over the heathen hordes of Asia, a threat that's as old as Fu Manchu himself. In this week's episode... in a surprising story twist, it looks as if the fabled Second Pillar of AUKUS (consisting of quantum technology, hypersonics, underwater drones and other James Bond stuff) might have more chance of becoming a reality than the Pillar One that begat it. Basically, AUKUS is/was a reward to the nation of little Aussie battlers for faithful services rendered to Washington. In return, the US agreed to equip Australia with a fleet of super silent Virginia-class nuclear subs to update Canberra's ageing submarine fleet. Keen as mustard, Scott Morrison cancelled an existing submarine contract with France, at great expense. Alas, the story hasn't worked out the way the US had promised in the trailer. Due to the low annual rates of productivity in American shipyards, the US Navy and Australia can't both get these new submarines in a timely fashion. The key risk to AUKUS is that the Americans fail to manufacture enough new Virginia-class boats to enable them to transfer up to five vessels to Australia. The required production rate for that to happen is 2.3 Virginia-class subs per year. Last year, the production rate was below 1.2, and it has never exceeded 2 at any stage in the life of the programme. How come? There are many things to blame: Admiral Jonathan Rucker, the programme executive for the Virginia-class boats, [has] told Congress that workforce was the main issue. 'Our 2024 annual production rate of Virginia-class submarines per year was 1.13 compared to our need of 2.0. The main causes for this are workforce challenges, material and supplier delays, and shipbuilder facilities and infrastructure issues, all of which are driving cost increases and schedule delays.' Under Donald Trump, America's needs always come first. Therefore, it will now be many years (at best) beyond the initial 2034 delivery dates before Australia finally gets its hot new mega-expensive submarine deterrent, long after any Chinese threat to Taiwan has been done and dusted. Oh, and Taiwan is a key reason why Elbridge Colby, Trump's defence policy mastermind has been stalling on AUKUS: After taking the post [at the Pentagon] Colby told his British counterparts that the Royal Navy should focus on threats from Russia and leave the U.S. Navy to lead in the western also helped trigger a review of former President Joe Biden's multibillion-dollar U.S.-U.K.-Australia submarine pact, out of concern that the Australians might not deploy U.S.-provided submarines during a U.S.-led campaign on Chinese forces in the event of an assault on Taiwan. In effect, Colby was saying that Australia (with New Zealand tagging along behind) can't be relied on to go to war with China over Taiwan when expected to do so by Washington. Plainly, if New Zealand is to be allowed into AUKUS, we will similarly need to demonstrate our willingness to take orders from further up the operational chain of command.. and ultimately, that means from Generalissimo Donald Trump, the AUKUS commander in chief. Are we really going to spend billions of taxpayer dollars on defence, in order to be marched into WW3 by Donald Trump? Looks that way. Footnote: Reportedly, we are still very, very annoyed at the Cook Islands for not telling us about the deals with China they announced in February. So much so that we skipped attending their 60th birthday celebrations this week. Talk about a double standard. AUKUS is/was a secret deal struck with the US ,whereby nuclear submarines would pass through Pacific waters en route to intimidating China – but we never told Pacific leaders beforehand, let alone sought their feedback. They only found out about AUKUS on the news. You get the picture. The Cook Islands and Vanuatu are supposed to notify us ahead of time and get our stamp of approval before signing up to any deals with China. Yet at the same time, the neo-colonial powers can do whatever secret military deals they like with the US that affect the region, and tell Pacific nations about it only after the fact. Footnote Two: There is a further story twist in the AUKUS saga. The original band of brothers (Biden, Johnson, Morrison) have all left the political scene. Vladimir Putin though, has changed things for Britain. In the UK's Integrated Defence Review back in 2021, Boris Johnson had happily embraced Biden's 'Indo-Pacific tilt' as being the UK's strategic priority as well. Not any more. As Keir Starmer recently stressed, the UK's defence spending priority is now a 'NATO first' strategy aimed at countering the threat posed by Russia to Ukraine, and to the rest of Europe. Meaning: the 'UK' part of AUKUS has virtually left the building. What is left behind? An old story line is being revived. The former team of the US, Australia and New Zealand are back in combat fatigues, and preparing to kick China's ass. To all intents, AUKUS is an ANZUS reboot, but one that's been shorn of New Zealand's old anti-nuclear misgivings. Luxon, Peters, and Defence Minister Judith Collins now seem more than happy for New Zealand to be actively engaged with a nuclear deterrent that projects its force far beyond our shores. Oh, we'll say we're in it only for the high-tech spin-offs. But you can bet that our access to those good things will be conditional on us agreeing to the rest of it. No doubt, some woke generals will want Japan on board for diversity reasons, to give the pact more credibility in the capitals of Asia. But to repeat: there should be no doubt about would be the boss. In the new JANZUS War Room, there will be no room for 'independent' foreign policy. All of the key operational decisions will be made in Washington. USA, USA! We've all seen that movie. Luther Reborn ( again and again) Talking of the early to mid 1970s, the sweet and soulful lover man Luther Vandross (1951-2005) was an inescapable presence. The recent mega-hit 'Luther' tribute track by Kendrick Lamar and SZA drew creatively on the classic 1973'If This World Were Mine' duet by Vandross and Cheryl Lynn, a song that Marvin Gaye had originally written for the doomed love of his life, Tammi Terrell. OK. So we have the Gaye/Terrell duet as radically re-interpreted by Lynn and Vandross, a version that in turn was sampled and lovingly re-imagined by Kendrick Lamar and SZA. Here's the Vandross/Lynn version : And here's the long version of the Kendrick Lamar/SZA revamp, which ends with a lengthy Vandross/Lynn sample : It doesn't end there. Last week, the alt-folk musicians Sam Beam (aka Iron & Wine) and Ben Bidwell of Band of Horses released an Americana version of 'Luther.' At the very least, they deserve some points for trying:

The NZ economy is still sick, doubts are growing about the Govt prescription
The NZ economy is still sick, doubts are growing about the Govt prescription

NZ Herald

time4 days ago

  • NZ Herald

The NZ economy is still sick, doubts are growing about the Govt prescription

Are these the right antibiotics? Are the antibiotics making me feel sick? I do feel a little better I think. But it's taking longer than I expected. Maybe I should see the doctor again. Or am I just being impatient? Ugh, so much uncertainty. Hopefully, those who've tuned in for a fresh read on the state of the economy can see where this is going. Never let a metaphor go by, I say! Anyway, here's me and the New Zealand economy, both sick in the midst of a miserable wet winter and worrying about whether our recoveries have stalled. A run of negative data has knocked the wind out of the nation's sails. The bad vibes are being pushed along by a strong political current. Both the left and right are telling us that the Government has prescribed the wrong medicine. The left blames the Government for cutting spending into a downturn. The logic is pretty simple. Any good Keynesian will tell you, when demand in the private sector falls, that's the time for the Government to come to the party. Borrow a bit more, don't slash and burn civil service, hire more teachers and nurses, build more stuff ... it won't be inflationary because it won't be crowding out private sector competition, which is in recession. The trouble is, we're still in the aftermath of the last big spend-up, which went on too long. Labour's stimulus, once we got through the initial Covid shock, did clash with a private sector boom and exacerbated inflation. That muddied the political narrative. It made it inevitable that the incoming centre-right coalition would cut back despite the extra damage that would do to economic growth. In the context of using fiscal policy to drive economic prosperity, you can make a good case that successive governments have got things completely arse about face. You'd expect this argument from the left. But Christopher Luxon and Nicola Willis are being savaged even more aggressively from their right flank. The monetarists, the supply-side guys, the neo-liberals, (whatever you want to call them) are berating the Government for not dealing with the national debt and Crown deficit by administering a Rogernomics-style reboot of the whole economy. I doubt that would make the current downturn any more pleasant, but they argue it couldn't be much worse. And the payoff would be longer-term gains as the economy found a more productive and financially secure baseline. Both arguments can be compelling and, if nothing else, add to the concern that the current strategy of subtle market-oriented tweaks risks underdelivering on all sides. But through all of this gloom, one thing we need to remember is that most economists still believe the foundations of recovery are in place. Step back a bit from the mess of ugly recent economic data – the second quarter sucked, we get it! What are we actually experiencing? The labour market is tough. Unemployment is rising, and new job creation is almost non-existent. But this is not a surprise. In fact, while economists do get things wrong, they've been forecasting unemployment to be about where it is now for more than a year. We know it's one of the last pieces of data to turn in any recovery. Unfortunately, it is now overlapping with an unwanted and unexpected spike in inflation. Like a jump scare in the final scene of a horror movie, food prices (with rates and power, and insurance) have conspired to pause Reserve Bank rate cuts and rattled our faith in the recovery. Then there are tariffs and global unrest and all of that. It's not really surprising that it all feels bleak. So it's a bit ironic to be writing an optimistic take on the economy, especially given the rough week stuck at home that I've just had. My view wouldn't have been so upbeat if I hadn't been woken from my sick bed on Friday morning by a text from investment bank HSBC's Australian head of communications. He was asking how far away I was from my scheduled meeting with their global chief economist, Janet Henry and and Australia-New Zealand chief economist Paul Bloxham. Oops ... I was a long way away. But they kindly let me Zoom in later, and I'm very glad I did. As anyone with Australian cousins will know, sometimes it's healthy to be slapped in the face with a slightly condescending, external view of the New Zealand condition. Bloxham told me his forecasts currently make him one of the gloomiest economists on Australian growth. However, he's one of the most positive on New Zealand growth. Last year, New Zealand had the single largest contraction of any economy in the developed world, Bloxham points out. That inevitably comes with a hangover. But if you believe in the fundamentals of the New Zealand economy, which he does, there is no reason to assume the cycle won't turn. 'I suspect why I'm a little bit more upbeat than others is I sit in Sydney and watch it from the outside and go: hey, you've got two big forces at work that are set to continue to lift growth and give you a recovery.' No prizes for guessing those two forces – falling interest rates and booming agricultural commodity prices. The money flowing into the rural economy must eventually flow through to the cities and lift growth, Bloxham says. It won't happen overnight, but it will happen (my words, not his). We've had a big downswing, which means we're due a pretty big upswing to get back to trend, he says. And we've got monetary policy and the terms of trade in place to drive that cyclical upswing. 'All cycles look different. We always ask the same question going through: oh, it's not quite happening as quickly as we thought. 'The question you ask yourself is: is that because it's not working? Is it that interest rates aren't going to have the same effect? That a positive-terms-of-trade shock won't have the same effect? Or are things just a bit different this time around?' Great question. And look, the sun's finally out and I think my head's clearing. Time to go for a walk and ponder it all. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store