Kremlin says Trump-Putin meeting agreed for 'coming days'
The Russian president named the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as a potential location for the summit with Trump, but essentially ruled out a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The Trump-Putin summit would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. It comes as the Republican seeks an end to Russia's military assault on Ukraine.
Three rounds of direct talks between Moscow and Kyiv have failed to yield any progress towards a ceasefire. The two sides appear as far apart as ever in the conditions they have set for an end to the more than three-year-long conflict.
Trump said on Wednesday that he was likely to meet Putin face-to-face "very soon".
They last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Trump's first term as US president, but have spoken by telephone several times since the former reality TV star returned to the White House earlier this year.
"Both sides showed interest" in the Russia-US leaders meeting, Putin told reporters on Thursday.
"We have many friends who are willing to help us organise such events. One of our friends is the president of the United Arab Emirates," he said, standing next to UAE leader Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
Earlier on Thursday, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said that the plan to hold a bilateral summit was "at the suggestion of the American side".
"Next week has been set as a target date," said Ushakov, adding that both sides have already agreed the venue "in principle", without mentioning it.
- Putin-Zelensky meeting? -
Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its military offensive on Ukraine in February 2022.
Russian bombardments have forced millions of people to flee their homes and have destroyed swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine.
Putin has resisted multiple calls from the United States, Europe and Kyiv for a ceasefire.
At talks in Istanbul, Russian negotiators outlined hardline territorial demands if Ukraine wants Russia to halt its advance -- calling for Kyiv to withdraw from some territory it still controls and to renounce Western military support.
Reports of the upcoming summit came after US envoy Steve Witkoff met Putin in Moscow.
Witkoff proposed a trilateral meeting with Zelensky, but Putin appeared to rule out direct talks with the Ukrainian leader.
"I have nothing against it in general, it is possible, but certain conditions must be created for this," he told reporters, adding: "Unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions."
Putin said in June that he was ready to meet Zelensky, but only during a "final phase" of negotiations on ending the conflict.
Zelensky earlier on Thursday had refreshed his call for a meeting with Putin -- which he says is the only way to make progress towards peace.
"It is necessary to determine the timing for such a format and the range of issues to be addressed," he wrote on social media.
The Ukrainian leader later spoke with his European allies, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, as he called for the continent to be included in any potential peace talks.
"The war is happening in Europe, and Ukraine is an integral part of Europe -- we are already in negotiations on EU accession. Therefore, Europe must be a participant in the relevant processes," Zelensky said on social media after the call with Merz.
He also said that he would hold several other conversations throughout the course of the day, including with Italian officials.
"Today, security advisors will hold an online meeting to align our joint views -- Ukraine and the whole of Europe, the United States," Zelensky said.
"Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same brave approach from the Russian side. It is time we ended the war," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
13 minutes ago
- IOL News
Trump announces 100% chip tariff, pressuring Asian producers
Donald Trump has announced a 100% tariff on semiconductors from firms that do not invest in the United States. Image: Pete Linforth/Pixabay Donald Trump has announced a 100% tariff on semiconductors from firms that do not invest in the United States - sparking volatility in Asian chipmaker shares Thursday. The US president unveiled the levy at the White House on Wednesday ahead of the imposition of sweeping tariffs on goods from dozens of countries, with chips so far exempt. It comes with the United States and China locked in a high-stakes race to develop the high-end semiconductors used to power artificial intelligence systems. "We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100 percent on chips and semiconductors, but if you're building in the United States... there's no charge," Trump said. He did not give a timetable for the new levy, which he has repeatedly threatened in the past, to be enacted. Arisa Liu, senior semiconductor researcher at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research, said it would impact the "strategic direction of global semiconductor companies". "Since the United States is the world's largest player in AI and related high-performance computing, this will have a relatively greater impact on companies involved in advanced processes," she said. "The highest-end semiconductors will be excluded," Alicia Garcia-Herrero, the chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis, told AFP. But "this kills producers of low-end chips", including those based in Malaysia or China, she warned. On Thursday, shares in Taiwan's TSMC - world's largest contract maker of chips, which counts Nvidia and Apple among its clients - soared nearly 5% after the government said the company would not be affected. Taiwan is a global powerhouse in semiconductor manufacturing, with more than half of the world's chips and nearly all of the high-end ones made there. 'Fight for Malaysia' Trump has previously accused Taiwan of having stolen the US chip industry, and earlier this year, TSMC unveiled a plan to invest an extra $100 billion in the United States. Samsung Electronics, which is pumping billions into the United States, rose more than 2% in Seoul, but a range of Japanese chip-making shares sank on the news. Apple is also investing an additional $100 billion in the United States, Trump and the US tech giant's CEO Tim Cook announced Wednesday, with Cook calling it "the largest investment Apple has made in America". Malaysian trade minister Zafrul Abdul Aziz told parliament on Thursday that the country, a key chip manufacturing hub, was seeking an explanation from the US side. "We will continue to fight for Malaysia to ensure that any policy changes or exemption criteria are communicated and negotiated in advance, and that Malaysia's position as a strategic partner is preserved," he said. Chiang Min-yen, a non-resident fellow at the Research Institute for Democracy, Society, and Emerging Technology, said the tariff would hit legacy chipmakers who don't have the deep pockets to invest in the United States. "Most of the legacy chip manufacturers in Taiwan, in the US, even in Japan... all face very serious, unfair market competition from Chinese competitors," he said.
TimesLIVE
13 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Buffeted by Trump and vote-rigging charges, India's Modi starts to push back
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is navigating one of the most challenging stretches of his 11 years in office. A contentious ceasefire with arch-enemy Pakistan, renewed scrutiny over his age and a diplomatic chill with the US despite much-publicised rapport with President Donald Trump have converged to test his leadership like never before. While he needs to deal with these headwinds, Modi also has to answer opposition charges of vote-rigging in the 2024 general election. The challenges are coming to a head just before a difficult electoral battle in Bihar, one of India's most politically significant states. A defeat in the vote to the state assembly would not affect Modi's position in the national parliament, but it would be a hammer blow to the reputation of a leader who has maintained a vice-like grip on power since he was elected prime minister more than a decade ago. This week Trump's administration announced a 50% tariff on imports from India, among the highest of any country in the world, throwing the bilateral relationship into deep disarray. Yet until just six months ago, Trump and Modi were exchanging bear hugs and describing each other as close friends. 'The Indo-US relation revolved around the personalities of Trump and Modi,' New Delhi-based political commentator Arati Jerath said. 'So now when it's souring, Modi has no buffer. There is a fair amount of disappointment that this strong leader has not been able to show the sort of strength and muscularity that he said to have.'
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Litmus Test for SADC Unity in the Wake of US Military Overtures
Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema, Angola President Joao Lourenco, US President Joe Biden, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) President Felix Tshisekedi, and Tanzania Vice-President Philip Isdor Mpango at the Lobito Corridor Trans-Africa Summit December 4, 2024. ( Image: AFP Kim Heller The United States (U.S.) is romancing the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It is no whirlwind courtship. For months now, Washington has been actively engaged in the new peace process in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In July, senior leaders from the U.S. Africa Command visited Angola and Namibia. Last week, AFRICOM Deputy Commander Lieutenant General John W. Brennan and Ambassador Robert Scott held an online press briefing to provide some insight into the U.S. intentions. There is an unmistakable desire to deepen security links and avert the threat of terrorism and insurgency, which poses a risk beyond the Continent. The U.S. also hopes to elevate its economic presence in Africa. The G-7-backed Lobito Corridor, connecting Angola to the DRC and Zambia, is a flagship project. At the recent press conference, Brennan spoke of how the U.S. respects and honours the vision of "African-led, partner-led, and ally-enabled" projects. Brennan cited the Joint Combined Exchange Training (JCET) in Angola as such an example. However, behind the silky talk lies the grim fact that most foreign partner projects are owned and governed by foreign interests rather than driven by local needs or wishes. Despite all the overtures by the United States government, there is no true love affair in the offering. Stripped of all its seductive talk and promises, it is crystal clear that this newfound fondness for Africa is motivated by the United States' lust for mineral wealth, its excitement about the prospect of SADC as a security headquarters, and the thrill of winning strategic advantages over its key rivals, China and Russia. The U.S. does not love Africa. It loves to use Africa. For the U.S., the stability of Southern Africa, its enormous mineral wealth and its vital geo-strategic ports make it a highly attractive partner. Greater control over the Lobito Corridor is a significant win for the U.S., for it provides access to a critical sea route for both economic and military purposes. The charm offensive in the SADC must be viewed in the context of negative sentiments towards the U.S. in parts of Africa. There is little love left for the U.S. in parts of West Africa, the Sahel region, and most notably in Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger. It is not surprising then that the U.S. is desperately seeking a friendly outpost on the Continent, and Southern Africa seems to be a willing partner. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has recently spoken of how the U.S. is moving away from a "charity-based foreign aid model" to partnerships with African countries that "demonstrate the ability and willingness to help themselves." Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The US is a serial opportunist. Its roving eye is easily drawn to speedy, high-dividend transactions rather than long and steady associations. The U.S. expects that SADC will be up for sale, like much of Africa. Too often, the Continent is little more than a passing fancy in the rivalries of great nations. In the swoon of foreign advances, SADC must be cautious, and it is imperative that it resist becoming an easily discarded pawn in U.S. rivalries with China and Russia. The U.S. is unlikely to be a steady partner for SADC, especially under the Trump administration. A short-term fancy by the U.S. whose affections can be withdrawn in a wink, is not a sustainable partnership for SADC unless it is defined and dictated by SADC itself, rather than imposed by the United States. SADC must forget how U.S. Aid was stopped in an inhumanly hurried manner, jeopardising millions of impoverished Africans. What is concerning is that an overwhelming involvement of the U.S. in the Lobita Corridor, its military presence, and hold over mineral resources appears to emulate former exploitative colonial patterns. Equally worrying is the risk of U.S. interference with security priorities and protocols. The securitisation of SADC and the potential disorientation of its security plans, protocols and structures pose a direct threat to its sovereignty. Emotions can change; whims are not long-term commitments. SADC must be careful not to fall for a gambit that does not favour it in the medium to long term. The words of African Union Commission Chairperson Moussa Faki Mahamat must be heeded, "We are not pawns," he declared at the 2024 AU summit. At this juncture, SADC unity cannot be compromised, especially given the ongoing crisis in the DRC. A unified rather than individual country strategy is likely to strengthen the hand of the SADC in dealing with the U.S.'s partnership invitation. The Trump administration holds no affection for Africa. It is about narcissistic intent and interest. A penchant for power, not peace, is its motivational force. The intent is simple. For now, the U.S. is salivating about minerals, strategic ports, valuable shipping corridors and military presence. In West Africa, AFRICOM has been marched out. Now, the U.S. is hoping to be welcomed in Southern Africa. With the relative stability SADC offers, it could be a real win for the U.S. Unless SADC ensures that the relationship is one of mutual collaboration, support, and development rather than dependency and control, it will be but a pawn in the play of foreign players. In the Washington Qatar brokered peace deal for the DRC, SADC and the African Union were sidelined. This should make SADC proceed with caution. SADC risks getting caught up in an exploitative relationship – where its strategic assets and infrastructure are used for U.S security benefits and where extraction rather than development ensues. SADC must act in a unified manner, especially given that member countries have different historical relationships with and attitudes towards the U.S. SADC will need to be highly vigilant to ensure that military training exercises are not more sinister military plans by the U.S. to fight the growing influence of China and Russia. If SADC acts submissively and with naivety, smiles will turn to tears in a classic betrayal by imperial agendas. Africa must protect its heart and its sovereignty. Southern Africa cannot be turned into the U.S.'s new battlefield. What is certain is that Africa will continue to be a playground for foreign wars. With this understanding, SADC must not lose its sovereignty in the easy frolic and charm of foreign suitors. * Kim Heller is a political analyst and author of No White Lies: Black Politics and White Power in South Africa. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
