logo
What's next - Xia Baolong speaks on national security law's fifth anniversary

What's next - Xia Baolong speaks on national security law's fifth anniversary

This story has been made freely available as a public service to our readers. Please consider supporting SCMP's journalism by
subscribing . New users who
download our updated app get a seven-day free trial.
Beijing's point man on Hong Kong affairs is addressing a national security law forum on Saturday as part of his third inspection visit to the city to assess its progress on multiple fronts.
Xia Baolong's attendance at the forum, which is being held to mark the fifth anniversary of the Beijing-imposed legislation, is a focus of the official's five-day visit.
Commentators have suggested that the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office (HKMAO) director may use the event to share his latest assessment of national security threats in the city and lay down the direction for the next phase of the law's implementation.
More from our coverage:
Reporting by Jeffie Lam, Jess Ma and Willa Wu.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US names five more Chinese industries for enforcement under Uygur labour law
US names five more Chinese industries for enforcement under Uygur labour law

South China Morning Post

time2 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

US names five more Chinese industries for enforcement under Uygur labour law

The US Department of Homeland Security announced on Tuesday it is designating five new Chinese industry sectors, including copper, lithium and steel, for 'high priority' enforcement under a human rights law restricting imports from China's Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region. Advertisement Tuesday's updated list also names caustic soda – a chemical used in textiles and detergents – and red dates, bringing the total number of high-priority sectors targeted under the law to 12. 'America has a moral, economic and national security duty to eradicate threats that endanger our nation's prosperity, including unfair trade practices that disadvantage the American people and stifle our economic growth,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. 'The use of slave labour is repulsive and we will hold Chinese companies accountable for abuses and eliminate threats its forced labour practices pose to our prosperity,' she added. Advertisement Beijing has repeatedly denied all allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang, lumping them together with US accusations of 'genocide' in the region as 'lies of the century'.

US soybean farmers urge Trump to make purchase deal with China
US soybean farmers urge Trump to make purchase deal with China

South China Morning Post

time2 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

US soybean farmers urge Trump to make purchase deal with China

American soybean farmers urged US President Donald Trump in a Tuesday letter to reach a trade deal with China that secures significant soybean purchase agreements, warning of dire long-term economic outcomes if the country continues to shun the US crop. China , the world's largest soybean buyer, is turning to Brazilian cargoes amid trade tensions with the US and continuing negotiations. The country has not pre-purchased soybeans from the coming US harvest, an unusual delay that has worried traders and farmers. 'Soybean farmers are under extreme financial stress. Prices continue to drop and at the same time our farmers are paying significantly more for inputs and equipment. 'US soybean farmers cannot survive a prolonged trade dispute with our largest customer,' said the letter sent from the American Soybean Association (ASA) to Trump on Tuesday. China's turn to Brazilian soybeans could cost US farmers billions. China bought 54 per cent of US soybean exports in the 2023-2024 marketing year, worth US$13.2 billion, according to the ASA. The country's soybean imports hit a record July high this year.

Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'
Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'

HKFP

time4 hours ago

  • HKFP

Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'

Handpicked judges presiding over jailed media tycoon Jimmy Lai's national security trial have questioned whether content in his pro-democracy paper amounted to 'seditious publications,' as stipulated by the prosecution. The court continued hearing closing arguments on Tuesday after proceedings were twice delayed last week, first owing to bad weather and then to health concerns relating to the 77-year-old tycoon's heart. Delivering arguments for the seditious publications charge, lead prosecutor Anthony Chau referenced articles published in Lai's Apple Daily including an editorial calling for sanctions against Beijing and Hong Kong authorities. He said that those articles did not include 'rational criticism,' and that none of them provided recommendations or ventured 'to suggest any solutions.' But High Court judge Esther Toh, one of the three judges chosen to preside over the security trial, cast doubt on the prosecution's argument that critical articles must propose solutions to be considered not seditious. 'Did they actually have to venture that? You can write a critical article about the water problem, but do you have to venture to offer solutions?' Toh asked, appearing to reference a recent contract fraud case involving the drinking water supply at government offices. Judge Alex Lee pointed to Apple Daily articles calling for the now-shelved extradition bill which sparked widespread protests and unrest in 2019 to be withdrawn, saying: 'They were opposing the very introduction of the extradition bill… was that not a suggested solution?' The 2019 protests escalated into sometimes violent displays of dissent against police behaviour, amid calls for democracy and anger over Beijing's encroachment. Demonstrators demanded an independent probe into police conduct, amnesty for those arrested and a halt to the characterisation of protests as 'riots.' Lee on Tuesday added that an article could not be considered seditious if its purpose was to highlight pitfalls in governance, 'but if it was to defame the government causing the people to lose confidence or to turn hostile against the government, that would be a case of sedition.' Chau also referenced Lai's text messages directing the paper's English news division, which the court had earlier heard was set up to appeal for international support. Lai had told senior management that the paper was not supposed to have a 'balanced view' and only needed a view of the 'yellow' side — the colour associated with the city's pro-democracy movement, Chau added. Calls for sanctions 'in disguise' Besides the charge of conspiracy to publish seditious materials under colonial-era legislation, the tycoon also stands accused of two charges of conspiracy to commit foreign collusion under the Beijing-imposed national security law. He faces life behind bars if convicted. Based on Lai's prior exchanges with US politicians and diplomats, one could infer that the pro-democracy paper's criticism of the Chinese authorities were an 'indirect' means of calling on foreign governments to interfere, Chau told the court on Tuesday. That was after judge Toh asked whether the prosecution meant that the paper's articles were calls for sanctions 'in disguise.' The prosecution has alleged that Lai used his ties with foreign officials and politicians to impose sanctions against authorities in mainland China and Hong Kong. Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest, criminalising subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. Chau also maintained that the media baron had called for what the prosecution labelled 'Sanctions, Blockades, or Hostile activity' (SBHA) against the central Chinese authorities, despite not having made any open or direct requests for such actions after the enactment of Beijing's national security law in Hong Kong. The prosecution submitted that Lai had adopted a 'calculated and strategic approach' for foreign sanctions to be imposed on China and Hong Kong by deliberately and 'falsely' picturing the Chinese Communist Party in a negative light. Prosecutors named retired US army general Jack Keane, ex-US deputy secretary of defence Paul Wolfowitz, ex-US state department advisor Christian Whiton, and Mary Kissel, an advisor to then US secretary of state Mike Pompeo, as Lai's foreign connections, among others. Chau also told the court that Lai had admitted, during his testimony, that he continued international lobbying efforts even after the enactment of the national security law to inform foreign governments of what was happening in Hong Kong and to appeal for condemnation of the Hong Kong and Beijing authorities. However, he denied lobbying overseas governments to influence foreign policy. Chau is expected to conclude oral submissions of the prosecution's closing arguments on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store