Iran-Israel Conflict Spills to Digital World, Inflaming Rivalry
On Tuesday, a pro-Israel hacking group claimed responsibility for a disruptive cyberattack against a major Iranian bank, and Iran's state-run IRIB News reported that Israel had launched a full-scale cyberattack on the country's critical infrastructure.
Iran's Fars News Agency, affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, reported that the country has endured more than 6,700 distributed denial-of-service attacks over the past three days. It said temporary internet restrictions were implemented as a measure to blunt the impact of large-scale cyberattacks. DDoS attacks overwhelm servers with artificial traffic, disrupting access to websites and online services.
Iranians were reporting widespread issues accessing the internet on Tuesday night, with many virtual private networks, or VPNs, rendered unusable. Customers also reported problems with banking services, including banking machines and online systems. It's not clear if the problems were the result of cyberattacks or efforts by the government to minimize their impact.
The attacks tied to Israel herald a new front in the escalating Middle East conflict — but the countries' cyber rivalry spans two decades.
Iran and its regional proxies, such as Hamas, have attempted a wide variety of cyberattacks against Israel in recent years — including information operations, data destruction attacks and phishing campaigns — with mixed results, according to Google.
Israel is widely considered one of the world's most advanced and capable countries in launching cyberattacks. An operation called Stuxnet, uncovered in 2010 and tied to the US and Israel, sabotaged hardware believed to be responsible for Iran's nuclear weapons development. One of the most advanced and impactful hacking operations in history, Stuxnet demonstrates the longstanding centrality of cyber to the Israel-Iran conflict.
The claims of Predatory Sparrow, which took credit for hacking Iran's Bank Sepah, are the latest manifestation of that digital tit-for-tat.
The group is known for launching significant cyberattacks against Iran over the last five years while maintaining the image of a 'hacktivist' organization. Many cybersecurity experts within private industry have suggested Private Sparrow is linked to the Israeli government.
Israel's Ministry for Foreign Affairs didn't respond to a request for comment. Predatory Sparrow couldn't be reached for comment.
'Most disruptive and destructive cyberattacks are about influence and psychological impact rather than practical impact,' said John Hultquist, chief analyst at Google's Threat Intelligence Group. 'That's why a lot of them involve an effort to publicize the incidents which oftentimes includes a fictitious hacktivist front.'
Predatory Sparrow posted on both Telegram and X at 4 a.m. Tuesday New York time that it had successfully 'destroyed the data' of Bank Sepah, claiming that the institution was used to circumvent international sanctions.
Bank Sepah couldn't be reached for comment.
Predatory Sparrow has been active since 2021. The group appeared in public when they took credit for destroying data in Iran's national railway system resulting in delays around the country. Iran's Ministry of Roads and Urban Development were hit by hackers around the same time with the same tool designed to destroy computer files.
In other attacks, Predatory Sparrow was blamed for targeting point-of-sale systems at Iranian gas stations, causing a malfunction at Iran's Khouzestan steel mill that caused molten steel to spill onto the steel plant's floor and publicizing the alleged phone number of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
The attackers are unique in that there is relatively little technical information about the hacks compared to similar campaigns, according to security experts. The kind of destructive efforts for which Predatory Sparrow is known tend to destroy the technical forensic evidence that analysts need to understand it.
Often, the group has used social media to promote its activity, a tactic that experts say is proof that Predatory Sparrow aims to have a psychological impact. The hack against Bank Sepah came with its own publicity push, with Predatory Sparrow warning that 'this is what happens to institutions dedicated to maintaining the dictator's terrorist fantasies.'
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Judge orders Trump administration to restore part of UCLA's suspended funding
A U.S. judge on Tuesday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to restore a part of the federal grant funding that it recently suspended for the University of California, Los Angeles. US District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco ruled that the grant funding suspensions violated an earlier June preliminary injunction where she ordered the National Science Foundation to restore dozens of grants that it had terminated at the University of California. That order had blocked the agency from cancelling other grants at the University of California system, of which UCLA is a part. 'NSF's actions violate the Preliminary Injunction,' Lin, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden, wrote. The White House and the university had no immediate comment on the ruling. UCLA said last week the government froze $584 million in funding. Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian student protests against U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. The Los Angeles Times newspaper reported that the judge's order asked for the restoration of more than a third of the suspended $584 million funding. The University of California said last week it was reviewing a settlement offer by the Trump administration for UCLA in which the university will pay $1 billion. It said such a large payment would 'devastate' the institution. The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's war in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. Experts have raised free speech and academic freedom concerns over the Republican president's threats. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom called the Trump administration's settlement offer a form of extortion. Large demonstrations took place at UCLA last year. Last month, UCLA agreed to pay over $6 million to settle a lawsuit alleging antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters. Rights advocates note a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to conflict in the Middle East. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. The government has settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both accepted certain government demands. Settlement talks with Harvard University are ongoing.
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
China's lead in open-source AI jolts Washington and Silicon Valley
China's ambition to turn its open-source artificial-intelligence models into a global standard has jolted American companies and policymakers, who fear U.S. models could be eclipsed and are mobilizing their responses to the threat. Chinese advances in AI have come one after another this year, starting with the widely heralded DeepSeek and its R1 reasoning model in January. This was followed by Alibaba's Qwen and a flurry of others since July, with names such as Moonshot, and MiniMax. The models all have versions that are free for users to download and modify. This approach, commonly referred to as open source or open weight, is driving global adoption of Chinese AI technology. American companies that have kept their models proprietary are feeling the pressure. In early August, ChatGPT maker OpenAI released its first open-source model, called gpt-oss. The history of technology offers many examples where a welter of competitors in an industry's infancy eventually evolved into a monopoly or oligopoly of a few players. Microsoft's Windows operating system for desktops, Google's search engine, and the iOS and Android operating systems for smartphones are just a few of the examples. History also teaches that the battle to become an industry standard isn't necessarily won by the most technologically advanced player. Easy availability and flexibility play a role, which is why China's advances in open-source AI worry many in Washington and Silicon Valley. In an AI action plan released in July, the Trump administration said open-source models 'could become global standards in some areas of business and in academic research." The report called on the U.S. to build 'leading open models founded on American values." President Trump displayed a signed executive order related to his Artificial Intelligence Action Plan last month. For now, the rewards to the winners in open-source AI are slim, since they spend hundreds of millions of dollars developing models and get paid nothing directly in return. But those who lock in users may be able to sell other services piggybacking on the free part, just as Google offers search, YouTube and other revenue-generating products bundled with its Android operating system. Android is itself open source and built on Linux, an open-source operating system still widely used in the industry. Researchers have long embraced open source as a way of accelerating the development of emerging technology, since it allows every user to see the code and suggest improvements. Chinese officials have encouraged open-source research and development not only in AI but also in operating systems, semiconductor architecture and engineering software. 'Fearing being cut off from American technologies, China is fostering open-source projects as a strategic fallback and emergency resource," said Lian Jye Su, an analyst at research firm Omdia focusing on AI. This year's U.S.-China trade war has shown how each side can leverage its industrial advantages—such as Nvidia chips for the U.S. and rare-earth minerals for China—to extract concessions from the other side. U.S. officials worry that if Chinese AI models dominate the globe, Beijing will figure out a way to exploit it for geopolitical advantage. Away from politics, open-source AI models are vying for adoption by businesses. Many customers like open-source AI because they can freely adapt it and put it on their computer systems, keeping sensitive information in-house. Singapore-based Oversea-Chinese Banking, one of Southeast Asia's biggest banks, has developed around 30 internal tools using open-source models, including Google's Gemma to summarize documents, Qwen to help write computer code and DeepSeek to analyze market trends. The bank said it avoided being locked into any one model. It monitors new releases and can switch if it likes a new model. It also prefers models that many developers are familiar with, so it can get technical support. 'At any point in time, we probably have a stable of about 10 open-source models that we're using," said Donald MacDonald, an executive at OCBC. The overall performance of China's best open-weight model has surpassed the American open-source champion since November, according to research firm Artificial Analysis. The firm, which rates the ability of models in math, coding and other areas, found a version of Alibaba's Qwen3 beat OpenAI's gpt-oss. However, the Chinese model is almost twice as big as OpenAI's, suggesting that for simpler tasks, Qwen might consume more computing power to do the same job. OpenAI said its open-source model outperformed rivals of similar size on reasoning tasks and delivered strong performance at low cost. Major U.S. cloud-service providers have started offering gpt-oss to their users. Amazon Web Services said the OpenAI model was more cost-effective than DeepSeek's R1 running on its infrastructure. Engineers, especially those in Asia, said they found Chinese models were often more sophisticated in understanding their local languages and catching cultural nuances. Models from China are trained with more data in Chinese, which shares similarities with some other Asian languages. Shinichi Usami, an engineer in Yokohama, Japan, recently developed a customer-service chatbot for a retail client. He chose Alibaba's Qwen. With a leading U.S. model, he said, 'we've observed instances where the chatbot struggles to grasp the implicit intent from users' words and the responses can occasionally be not polite enough," said Usami. 'Qwen appears to handle these nuances better." Companies in China's hypercompetitive AI industry at first focused on undercutting each other's prices for closed-source models. That competition has extended in recent months to open-source models as everyone fights for adoption and public recognition. 'Chinese companies often prioritize user stickiness over immediate revenue," said Charlie Chai, a Shanghai-based tech analyst at 86Research. While startups have a window to attract users, it won't last long, analysts said, and larger tech companies are often best-positioned to cash in on a big user base by offering related services such as specialized apps or cloud services. 'This Darwinian life-or-death struggle will lead to the demise of many of the existing players, but the intense competition breeds strong companies," wrote Andrew Ng, head of Silicon Valley startup in a recent blog. Write to Raffaele Huang at
India.com
33 minutes ago
- India.com
Who is Aravind Srinivas? AI genius who has given Rs 2880000000000 offer to buy Google Chrome
The world's most popular web browser, Google Chrome, might soon have a new owner. Aravind Srinivas-led AI company Perplexity has made a surprise offer of USD 34.5 billion (around Rs. 2.88 lakh crore) to buy Chrome. The offer was sent directly to Alphabet, Google's parent company, without any prior talks. The three-year-old startup confirmed it sent the formal bid to Google, despite being valued at just USD 18 billion itself. According to reports from The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg , Perplexity made this move at a time when Google is under pressure in the US to break its monopoly. Last year, a federal judge ruled that Google holds an illegal monopoly in internet search. The US government is now considering forcing Google to sell the Chrome browser and license its search data to competitors. Judge Amit Mehta is expected to announce a final decision on these measures soon. Who is Aravind Srinivas? Aravind Srinivas is the co-founder and CEO of Perplexity AI. He is of Indian origin and studied at IIT Madras, where he completed a dual degree in electrical engineering in 2017. Later, he earned a PhD in computer science from the University of California, Berkeley. He started Perplexity AI in 2022 along with Andy Konwinski, Denis Yarats, and Johnny Ho. The company has raised about USD 1 billion so far from big investors like Nvidia and Japan's SoftBank, and its latest valuation was USD 14 billion. Srinivas began his career in 2018 as a research intern at OpenAI. After that, he worked in similar roles at Google (2020–2021) and DeepMind. Before founding Perplexity, he returned to OpenAI as a research scientist. What is Perplexity's plan? Perplexity, valued at USD 18 billion, says it has secured full financial backing from several major investment funds for this deal. The company's Chief Business Officer, Dmitry Shevelenko, confirmed that multiple large funds have agreed to finance the entire transaction. This isn't Perplexity's first bold mov, earlier, it had even proposed merging TikTok's US operations with its own. How Perplexity plans to change Chrome Perplexity is preparing to launch its own AI-powered browser called Comet . The company claims that if it buys Chrome, it won't make any 'hidden changes,' ensuring user trust and stability. It has also promised to invest USD 3 billion in Chrome and its open-source version, Chromium, over the next two years, while retaining most of the current Chrome team. Will Google agree with Perplexity plan? It's still unclear whether Google will accept the offer. For Google, Chrome is not just a browser, it's a crucial pillar of its search and advertising business. However, if pressure from US courts increases, the situation could change, turning this into one of the biggest surprises in tech industry history.
