
$10,000 fine for predatory tow truck drivers considered in Calgary
Councillors are responding to situations where motorists involved in a collision are pressured by quickly arriving tow truck drivers to accept their service and clear the road, without getting a quote upfront.
Drivers are then hit with sticker shock when they're charged $1,000 or more for a tow, and are sometimes barred from even accessing personal items in their vehicles.
Calgary's community development committee met on Thursday and councillors voted 6-0 in favour of bringing recommendations for new bylaw amendments to the next regular council meeting for approval.
The recommendations include barring tow truck drivers from coming within 200 metres of a collision on the road, unless requested by a driver involved in the crash, a police officer or a member of the Calgary Fire Department. The tow truck driver will have to demonstrate they were invited to the scene or face a $10,000 fine.
Jeff Kasbrick, Alberta Motor Association vice-president of advocacy and operations, welcomes the proposed amendments, arguing predatory towing has been a growing practice within the past year in Calgary and Edmonton.
"We think that not only is it important to be creating that buffer, but it's even more important to be making sure there's enough of a disincentive for operators to be breaching that buffer," Kasbrick said.
"They are, in these moments of great stress and moments of great uncertainty, preying on [drivers] and creating this great sense of urgency."
The problem can even lead to predatory tow trucks impeding the actions of first responders trying to assist drivers involved in the collision.
Kasbrick would like to see the measures enforced more broadly, with similar penalties applied to predatory tow truck drivers across Alberta.
Last year, the AMA launched the "Know Before The Tow" awareness campaign to remind drivers of their rights to request a quote upfront, choose who tows their vehicle, refuse service unless otherwise directed by police, and access personal items from their car after it's been towed.
"It's not just what it is that we do through bylaw or through legislative means, but it's also about making sure that Albertans are aware that this is happening in the province and that they're empowered to stop it in its tracks," Kasbrick said.
Coun. Courtney Walcott, who chairs the community development committee, said he was surprised to learn just how much the practice has taken advantage of some drivers, not just in Calgary but on a national level.
"A 200-metre buffer might be enough to satisfy what's happening now, but I think it might raise some questions about what are the fines, will they be enough and will they prevent this predatory practice," said Walcott, who represents Ward 8.
Jackie Richards, the Calgary director for the Towing and Recovery Association of Alberta, told council on Thursday her association supports any measure to curb "malicious practices" by rogue operators.
"This conduct has created unnecessary anxiety for individuals, and it undermines the public trust in the towing industry," said Richards, who is a third-generation owner of a towing company in Calgary.
To go even further, Richards suggested the city should consider seizing and impounding the offending tow truck when it arrives at the scene of a crash it shouldn't be at, to prevent the drivers from finding a way to avoid the fine and continue the practice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edmonton Journal
3 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Opinion: Alberta's no-fault auto insurance is already failing
Last fall, the Alberta government promised drivers an enticing bargain: give up your right to sue reckless drivers and challenge insurance companies in court, and you'd save $400 a year on premiums. The no-fault model branded as Care First was pitched as a win-win. Article content But here's the truth: those savings will never come. Even the government and insurance industry lobbyists now admit it. If rolled out in 2027, Care First will not lower your insurance bill. It will, however, strip away your legal rights and shrink your coverage. Article content Article content Article content Now, as policy details emerge, those same lobbyists are scrambling. They're pushing for even more extreme measures: scrap remaining legal rights, cut benefits further and lift the premium cap. Their argument? The system won't save drivers a dime unless Albertans give up even more. Article content Albertans are facing a bait-and-switch. We're being asked to surrender our legal protections, yet we'll still face rising premiums. Insurers take control of the system away from the courts. Accountability disappears. Costs stay the same. Article content Here's the choice the insurance lobby is presenting: Article content Option A: Go forward with Care First as designed. Premiums stay high (they're already set to rise 15 per cent over the next two years), but Albertans lose their right to sue in most cases. Article content Article content Option B: Do what the insurers want — strip away every remaining right and remove all caps on premiums. Article content In both scenarios, Albertans lose. Article content Who wins? Insurance companies, reckless drivers and fraudsters. Article content Care First gives insurers sweeping power over injury claims while silencing victims. Even if you're seriously injured, you'll only be able to sue if the at-fault driver is criminally convicted. This threshold has no connection to how badly you're hurt. If you're paralyzed by a distracted driver who wasn't charged, you're out of luck. But if you suffer minor injuries in a DUI crash, you might retain some rights. Victims are compensated not based on their injuries, but on whether the offender faced charges. Article content Meanwhile, bad drivers face fewer consequences. Under the current system, an at-fault driver can be sued, see their premiums skyrocket and is barred from claiming their own losses. Under Care First, they'll receive full benefits — even if they caused the crash. Their only penalty? A future rate hike spread across every driver's policy — good drivers end up subsidizing the bad.


Calgary Herald
5 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Alberta's new auto insurance system lacks clarity on whether or not there will be cost savings: experts
Article content Fred Litwiniuk, chief growth officer at Litco Legal Support Organization, said the numbers can be misleading since they mainly say the maximum amount those in vehicle accidents could receive, but might not. Article content 'They also reference the province of Manitoba in there. I would want to know how much Manitobans actually get paid, versus what the benefits are on paper,' Litwiniuk said. Article content 'People get lured in by the big numbers, because the care-first system numbers that they've outlined, some of the numbers look pretty big. The question is, where's that money going to come from if the insurers are already pleading poverty,' he said. Article content Injury lawyers bracing for impact Article content Officials at a Wednesday technical briefing said the new system reduces the need for litigation because of how high the benefits are. Article content Under the new model, Albertans injured in collisions will only be able to pursue litigation in select cases such as for pain-and-suffering damages if the driver was convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code or Traffic Safety Act, or those who have to pay out of pocket beyond the benefits provided by the policy will also be able to sue the at-fault driver for those expenses. Article content Article content According to the report, by reducing the cost of litigation, Albertans can 'expect to see a stabilization of rates and a reduction in the premiums they pay for third-party liability coverage under their auto insurance policy.' Article content Personal injury lawyer Mark McCourt, who has been advocating against the reforms, said in his 30 years practising at McCourt Law Offices, there has been one person who has received the current maximum $50,000 payment in medical expense benefits. Article content 'There's there's a reason there are lawyers in the system. Lawyers are there to keep wrongdoers honest and with the lawyers out of the picture, the wrongdoers and the representatives of those wrongdoers, in this case insurance companies, are going to be able to act with impunity,' McCourt said. Article content McCourt said once the new system is implemented on Jan. 1, 2027, it could mean the end of the line for his business. Article content Article content 'I don't think my business is going to be able to survive with a 99 per cent decrease in revenues, and that would go for every other injury law firm in the in the province,' McCourt said. Article content Alberta NDP affordability critic Sharif Haji criticized the province's lack of clarity on how the reforms will reduce premiums, despite the government's claims about affordability. Article content Article content


Edmonton Journal
5 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Alberta's new auto insurance system lacks clarity on whether or not there will be cost savings: experts
Fred Litwiniuk, chief growth officer at Litco Legal Support Organization, said the numbers can be misleading since they mainly say the maximum amount those in vehicle accidents could receive, but might not. 'They also reference the province of Manitoba in there. I would want to know how much Manitobans actually get paid, versus what the benefits are on paper,' Litwiniuk said. 'People get lured in by the big numbers, because the care-first system numbers that they've outlined, some of the numbers look pretty big. The question is, where's that money going to come from if the insurers are already pleading poverty,' he said. Officials at a Wednesday technical briefing said the new system reduces the need for litigation because of how high the benefits are. Under the new model, Albertans injured in collisions will only be able to pursue litigation in select cases such as for pain-and-suffering damages if the driver was convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code or Traffic Safety Act, or those who have to pay out of pocket beyond the benefits provided by the policy will also be able to sue the at-fault driver for those expenses. According to the report, by reducing the cost of litigation, Albertans can 'expect to see a stabilization of rates and a reduction in the premiums they pay for third-party liability coverage under their auto insurance policy.' Personal injury lawyer Mark McCourt, who has been advocating against the reforms, said in his 30 years practising at McCourt Law Offices, there has been one person who has received the current maximum $50,000 payment in medical expense benefits. 'There's there's a reason there are lawyers in the system. Lawyers are there to keep wrongdoers honest and with the lawyers out of the picture, the wrongdoers and the representatives of those wrongdoers, in this case insurance companies, are going to be able to act with impunity,' McCourt said. McCourt said once the new system is implemented on Jan. 1, 2027, it could mean the end of the line for his business. 'I don't think my business is going to be able to survive with a 99 per cent decrease in revenues, and that would go for every other injury law firm in the in the province,' McCourt said. Alberta NDP affordability critic Sharif Haji criticized the province's lack of clarity on how the reforms will reduce premiums, despite the government's claims about affordability. 'I think taking away the right to sue is problematic … but other than that, it doesn't provide any substantive way to see that how much premiums will go down,' Haji said. Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the news you need to know — add and to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters . You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. The Edmonton Journal | The Edmonton Sun