logo
Court ruling a wake-up call for Quebec to work with English universities, not against them, Concordia says

Court ruling a wake-up call for Quebec to work with English universities, not against them, Concordia says

By
Buoyed by a partial court victory, Concordia president Graham Carr says the time has come for Quebec's anglophone universities and the Legault government to turn the page and begin working together.
'The decision to seek legal action came after months and months of trying to have data-driven conversations with the government and frustration at the lack of genuine dialogue and collaboration,' Carr told The Gazette.
'My hope is the government will look at this judgment and the larger context and (decide) we can hit reset and take a genuinely collaborative approach to supporting a higher education system that is world-class.'
Last year, Concordia and McGill sued the Coalition Avenir Québec government over its university funding overhaul, which specifically targeted English-language institutions. The institutions said the changes hurt their finances, forcing them to make deep budget cuts.
On Thursday, Quebec Superior Court Justice Éric Dufour ruled that parts of the funding revamp were 'unreasonable.'
The affected measures are the 33-per-cent tuition hike for out-of-province students that took effect in 2024, as well as French proficiency targets for non-Quebec students at English universities, set to begin in the fall of 2025.
Dufour gave the provincial government nine months to revise its tuition policy in line with the judgment. He ordered an immediate end to the French-language requirements.
However, the judge rejected the anglophone universities' argument that another aspect of the overhaul — concerning the portion of international student fees retained by Quebec — was unlawful.
Higher Education Minister Pascale Déry has not commented on the decision. Parties involved in the case have 30 days to appeal.
'I am relieved and reassured that on some very critical matters, the judge found in our favour,' Carr said.
He said on francization, Quebec's English universities — Concordia, McGill and Bishop's — have long been committed to helping non-Quebec students learn French. Carr said that 'commitment remains.'
Concordia is struggling financially. The university has cut millions in spending as it tries to restore a balanced budget by 2028-29, as set out in a recovery plan approved by Quebec's Higher Education Ministry.
In February, the university said it still needed 'to realize $21.8 million in additional savings and increased revenue — the equivalent of (three to four per cent) of the university's overall operating budget of $665 million.'
Carr said the court judgment will not solve Concordia's money problems.
He noted that a drop in applications from out-of-province and international students has hurt his university's finances. More recently, the provincial and federal governments have cut the number of international students that universities can accept.
In March, McGill announced it would lay off about 100 employees as it worked to eliminate a projected $45-million deficit for next year.
The university said several factors led to the possible shortfall, including the out-of-province tuition increase and a provincial clawback of a portion of tuition revenues. It also pointed to caps on international student admissions at the provincial and federal levels and lower capital grants from Quebec.
In a statement sent to students and staff late Thursday, McGill president Deep Saini said his university is reviewing the court decision
'McGill remains firmly committed to playing an essential role in Quebec's economy, talent pipeline, research ecosystem and to contributing to the promotion and vitality of the French language,' Saini said.
He thanked the university community for its 'dedication to McGill as we work to protect its mission and place as one of the world's top institutions of higher education.'
The Quebec Community Groups Network, which has described the university reform as an 'attack on Quebec's English-speaking community,' welcomed the court decision.
'This is an important ruling on a crucial issue,' Eva Ludvig, president of the umbrella group of anglophone associations, said in a statement to The Gazette.
'It confirms our belief that the government acted rashly last fall in first blaming out-of-province students for the decline in French it perceives, and in imposing a discriminatory tuition burden on these students who contribute mightily to Montreal and Quebec, as well as the English language-institutions that are at the heart of our English-speaking community.'
Ludvig said it's telling that the judge was 'so critical of the lack of evidence and data to back up the tuition policy. The government blew it on this one, and the universities' partial victory is well deserved.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pool fence installers slammed as deadline for Quebec safety changes approaches
Pool fence installers slammed as deadline for Quebec safety changes approaches

CTV News

time4 hours ago

  • CTV News

Pool fence installers slammed as deadline for Quebec safety changes approaches

Ian Simard installs pool fences and says he's booked and busy as Quebecers scramble to conform to new rules. (Olivia O'Malley/CTV) Quebec's Residential Swimming Pool Safety Act — which aims to prevent children from drowning — now applies to all pools, regardless of when they were installed. Owners have until Sept. 30 to make necessary adjustments, which vary depending on the pool type, or face fines. Ian Simard has been installing pool fences for 18 years. He says demand ahead of the deadline is so high he might have to work seven days a week. 'This is really the first time that this business has doubled and tripled this year,' he told CTV News. In-ground pools must be surrounded by a fence at least 1.2 metres in height. It can't have parts that allow it to be climbed, and gates must be self-closing and self-locking. Clôture Enfant Sécure president Mathieu Lalonde says he gets around 100 calls from panicked pool owners every day. 'They are a bit nervous about the deadline, but we assure them that we have enough material and we're going to work hard to serve them,' said Lalonde. He says the longest wait time for his company is around a month and a half, so people have time to make the necessary changes. That's good news for pool owners like Lori-Ann Legault. Legault and her husband have a tough decision ahead of them. They have enjoyed the above ground pool in their Chateauguay backyard for the last 28 years. 'It's our oasis,' she said. Now the couple must decide whether they will get rid of it or make costly changes to conform to provincial rules. 'To put out thousands of dollars … wasn't at the top of our wish list of things to do. We would prefer to keep that money in the bank,' said Legault. Legault, her husband and daughter just remodeled the back deck by themselves three years ago. Provincial rules would force the family to completely fence off her deck, as to not allow easy entrance to the pool. They would also have to move electrical equipment that children could climb at least one meter away from the pool. 'Honestly, I'm discouraged I wouldn't really know where to start,' Legault said. When the regulations come into effect this fall, anyone who doesn't abide by the rules is subject to a fine of upwards of $700 for the first offence.

Apple, Amazon and Spotify challenging CRTC's Canadian content rules in court this week
Apple, Amazon and Spotify challenging CRTC's Canadian content rules in court this week

Vancouver Sun

time5 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Apple, Amazon and Spotify challenging CRTC's Canadian content rules in court this week

Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be 'equitable.' It said the contribution requirement is 'inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues.' Apple also said the regulator 'acted prematurely' and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was 'equitable.' It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association-Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. It said in court documents that none of the streamers 'has any connection to news production' and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. 'What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money,' it said. 'That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production.' In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. 'While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services,' the broadcasters said. 'For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade.' A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. 'The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants,' the office of the attorney general said. 'Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters.' The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve 'an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden.' 'This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament' and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store