
'Paedo' billionaire close to Putin 'trafficked schoolgirls' to rich pals
A "paedophile scandal" dubbed Russia's " Epstein affair" allegedly involving one of Vladimir Putin's billionaire buddies in Moscow has been exposed.
Underage "virgin" girls, aged 15 to 17, were reportedly recruited and lured by a network of pimps using the schoolgirls for rich clients, according to an independent Russian media outlet. These young girls were reportedly enticed by promises of money to have sex with rich clients and oligarchs. These vile groups used regional beauty contests, modelling agencies, castings for non-existent shoots, dating sites and even online messenger groups to find their young victims. A Russian billionaire was named as part of a court case into the scandal.
The organisers of one group of child sex pimps, and the well-known Russian billionaire were recorded in the investigative materials, but the identity was later expunged, according to media outlets Verstka and Important Stories. The billionaire and other clients suspected of using these young girls for horror sex crimes were not prosecuted - allegedly in a likely cover-up by Putin's authorities.
This billionaire was seen rubbing shoulders with Putin earlier this year at a major state occasion at the Kremlin. Another suspected client was connected to a former Putin defence minister, alleged the outlets.
One client reportedly ordered a new schoolgirl almost every day on a trip. An investigator on the case reportedly said they were told not to pursue the clients. They said: "Our bosses, on orders from the prosecutors, told us not to touch it. All [of us] are grown-ups, [we] can take a hint."
A victim, named Liza, told the outlet she had her first sex session with a billionaire when she was 15. She and other victims were allegedly ordered to hospital to "check for virginity" and sexually transmitted diseases. The report said: "She had no phone - it had been taken away the day before."
Liza described the mansion she was allegedly taken to and said: "A big bed, expensive furniture, a large, expensive chandelier". She claimed a driver in a grey Audi had brought her and a housekeeper served her dinner and put her to bed.
The report added: "Then a man entered the bedroom. He did not introduce himself but had sex with [the schoolgirl]. Twenty minutes later, the man left, Liza took a shower, and fell asleep again. The next morning….the visit was repeated."
The report also said the young girl was then paid after she was taken advantage of, adding: "Before leaving, the man handed the schoolgirl a book, which contained 150,000 rubles [£1,700 / $2,300]."
Liza told investigators she "got scared" before the encounter and said: "I suddenly realised that I was too far from home and not in control of the situation." She then told authorities the scouts would threaten her "with problems" if she disobeyed. Another girl, Irina, 17, from a provincial city, also testified that she was paid for sexual services with the same oligarch.
One pimp Maksim 'Mad Max' Nekozyrev - jailed for six years for organising prostitution with minors - was recorded under interrogation saying: "We call them [virgins] 5.1 or 6.1. These are high value goods. A clean, unexposed girl is sought out, naturally she must be a virgin. Next, this girl gets acquainted with a VIP client. VIP clients are, by the rule, billionaires."
A woman Anastasia Yakusheva was sentenced to six years in a penal colony, and another female pimp Olga Goncharova was jailed for five years and six months. Another woman, Svetlana Titova, was sought in Austria, but her extradition was refused. She was jailed for seven years in absentia.
Titova denied these claims and said: "I never organised any prostitution, I helped girls from poor families. I introduced them to wealthy men, if they asked. Believe me, they all ask themselves."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
7 minutes ago
- Metro
Trump should give Putin a gift in Alaska
Donald Trump calls himself the world's greatest deal-maker. From real estate to reality TV and now the White House, he has built his brand on the idea that he can walk into any room, size up the other guy, and walk out with the better end of the bargain. This week in Alaska, home of the shortest border between the US and Russia, when Trump meets with Vladimir Putin to discuss the future of Ukraine, he will have the chance of a lifetime to prove it. And there should be no sweetheart deal. No favourable terms. Just one order: get the hell out of Ukraine. You'd be forgiven for expecting something more diplomatic, more nuanced, from me, a senior political advisor of over a decade, perhaps a smarter idea, a more strategic approach. But here's the truth: There isn't one. There is no give-and-take. And anyone who tries to tell you there is, isn't being truthful about what it takes to end this war. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Winning – or even negotiating – can only come from a place of strength. It's that simple, and there is no mistake here. Putin's war in Ukraine is not a misunderstanding or a border dispute. No, it is a deliberate, aggressive, and illegal bombing of civilian homes, abducting children to 're-educate' them and flattening entire cities. It is what happens when a dictator in the Kremlin believes the rules do not apply to him. So let's keep it simple this time – tell this despot, in front of the world's cameras: get out of Ukraine, now. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Okay, let's be strategic about how this happens. Yes, I appreciate that Putin will need to leave the room feeling like he's won something – autocrats always do. He can't be seen to have been humiliated, even as it's made clear he cannot hope to triumph against Ukraine and its allies. So, let him 'sell' his victory to Russia – that's fine, even wise – but what he gets must be symbolic, meaningless, and worth less than the paper it's printed on. If there's one thing no one can deny, it's Trump's knack for exactly that. His career has been built on grand symbolic gestures that mean less than they appear – from gold-plated hotel lobbies to a golden statue signed by Apple CEO Tim Cook to staged ribbon-cuttings for projects that never materialised. The man knows how to package theatre as substance, so handing Putin a hollow 'victory' should be easy. Let him save face, but not gains. Work up a joint statement about 'future cooperation' or 'peaceful dialogue'. Offer him a ceremonial title – 'co-guarantor of peace in Eastern Europe.' Stage a public signing where Trump and Putin pledge to 'explore mutual economic opportunities'. Promise to buy Russian oil at some arbitrary future date. Maybe even revive plans for that Trump Tower in Moscow. Lift some sanctions of no real consequence. Let him keep a meaningless seat at a future summit on global security. Slag off those European leaders together if it makes him feel better. Frankly, I don't care. It's all fine as long as the only thing he takes home in reality is total withdrawal. But here's the red line: not a single inch of Ukrainian land goes with him. Not Donetsk, not Luhansk, not any of it. These are not 'Russian' territories – they are illegally occupied Ukrainian regions whose people have lived under siege, violence, and fear for years. Giving them away, as Trump has appeared to suggest, would not just be betrayal, it would reward the very aggression we must oppose. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Anything else isn't peace, it's surrender; betrayal in historic slow motion. History is littered with examples of attempted appeasement failing. Germany and Poland in 1939. Russia and Crimea in 2014. Seventy-five years apart, but the lesson is the same: Give aggressors an inch and they come for a mile. You stop occupiers by starving them of every gain, not feeding them. If Trump wants to walk away with a real win – for himself, for the free world, and most importantly for Ukraine – he will let Putin tell his people whatever he wants. Give him the photo-op and sign the statement. That 'victory' can all be Putin's. But not the land. Not Ukraine. Not her people. Not now, not ever. And if he refuses? Escalation. Sure, increase sanctions, ramp up aid and deepen isolation. But then, we must do what should have been done on Day One: Strip the Kremlin of its ability to command this war. That means direct intervention – British boots on the ground in Ukraine, American jets overhead and coordinated European military action to finish the job of defending our ally. . That's it. No lectures. No meandering. No more 'strongly worded statements.' Dictators don't stop because they're persuaded; they stop because they're defeated – diplomatically or militarily. Ukrainians know all too well the consequences of brutal aggression. Over 100,000 of them dead. 20,000 of their children abducted. On support for President Zelenskyy and his people, the UK can hold its head high. From the first second of Putin's invasion to this very moment, we have stood unflinchingly at Ukraine's side, and we will not step away. But it is past time for the UK, Europe, and the US to help our neighbours strike the final blow. First, through one final diplomatic push, but if that fails, then Trump, Starmer and Europe must draw a direct line from demand to consequence – and it must be swift, calculated, and utterly terminal to Putin's imperialist ambitions. A Ukraine forced into concessions – especially territorial concessions – makes us all infinitely less safe. More Trending It tells strongmen across the world that rules are optional if you have enough tanks and guarantees another war – in Ukraine or elsewhere – within a decade, perhaps even sooner and even closer than we think right now. This is the greatest test of Donald Trump's lifetime. The President's supporters brag about his toughness. His opponents accuse him of fawning over dictators. Now he must prove which is true. If we are to believe it's the former, there is only one deal he will propose and only one deal he will close. The stakes have quite literally never been higher. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Trump 'only wants to secure Nobel Peace Prize with Russia-Ukraine negotiations' MORE: Donald Trump says he's 'going to Russia' to meet Putin – when it's actually in Alaska MORE: Donald Trump sends in National Guard to evict 'bloodthirsty criminals' from US capital


Metro
38 minutes ago
- Metro
Trump 'only wants to secure Nobel Peace Prize with Russia-Ukraine negotiations'
Forget geopolitics or alliances. In the looming negotiations between the US and Russia on Alaskan soil, Donald Trump appears to be backing only one side – his own. There are a 48 hours left to Friday's summit, which will be attended by the US president and Vladimir Putin. Meanwhile, Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky has not made the guest list. Trump has already said this would be a 'feel-out meeting' aimed at urging the Russian leader to end the war, but that 'some swapping and changes in land' between Russia and Ukraine would happen. Jason Pack, host of The Disorder Podcast, told Metro that the Republican is not working to protect Russian or Ukrainian interests, or even American, and that his endgame is a personal victory. He said: 'Trump is not protecting US interests. He doesn't have a coherent view of what US interests are. 'He has engaged in this diplomacy not because he believes it is in the US interest, but to get the Nobel Peace Prize or to aggrandize himself… or to distract from [his connection to] the Jeffrey Epstein case. 'This is the way in which he disorderly makes foreign policy.' Calls for transparency have been mounting after it was reported that the president is mentioned in the sealed Epstein case documents. Pack previously told Metro that Trump has been 'freaking out' over the sex trafficking investigation and all the ripple effects it could have on him. Separately, the politician has been formally nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Cambodian prime minister Hun Manet for his role in halting the the country's recent border conflict with Thailand. Nobel Prizes are set to be unveiled in October, but Trump has had his eyes on one since at least the beginning of his second term in the White House. Pack stressed that the Alaskan summit is about 'the showmanship and his own psychological needs' rather than a coherent through-line of strategic interests. He added: 'When Trump came into office and promised to make peace in 24 hours, he proposed a series of very pro-Russian deals and even the Russians did not accept them; they wanted more. 'He then got upset with the fact that Putin was continuing to bomb Ukraine. 'And even though he had humiliated Zelensky in the Oval Office meeting, he did a few more pro-Ukrainian moves, like letting arms being sold to Europe to pass onto Ukraine, restarting the intelligence sharing. More Trending 'It is because he has definitely got frustrated with Putin – not because his actions are against US strategic interests – they always have been – but because Putin is denying him the psychological and media win that he wants.' Today, there was a report from the intelligence and military command on what Putin is counting on and what he is actually preparing for, including military preparations. He is definitely not preparing for a ceasefire or an end to the war. Putin is determined only to present a… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 11, 2025 Whatever comes out of the negotiations, Pack said he does not believe it will be 'viable'. Unconfirmed media reports say Putin has told Trump he wants Ukraine to hand over the part of the Donetsk region that Russia does not control. But Zelensky has publicly pushed back against the idea of ceding territory to Russia, saying any peace deal must be a just one. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Putin red-faced after new Russian navy boat sinks during final building work MORE: Three tourists killed by 'sea mines' washing up on packed Ukrainian beach MORE: From spooning Satan to ruling Canada – every time South Park mocked Trump


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Russia makes sudden advance in Ukraine before Trump-Putin summit, maps show
MOSCOW, Aug 12 (Reuters) - Russian forces have made a sudden thrust into eastern Ukraine near the coal mining town of Dobropillia, a move that may be designed to increase the pressure on Kyiv to cede land as the U.S. and Russian presidents prepare to meet. Ukraine's authoritative DeepState war map showed on Tuesday that Russian forces had advanced by at least 10 km (six miles) north in two prongs in recent days, part of their drive to take full control of Ukraine's Donetsk region. The advance is one of the most dramatic in the last year. DeepState said the Russians had surged forward near three villages on a section of the frontline associated with the Ukrainian towns of Kostyantynivka and Pokrovsk, which Moscow is trying to encircle, exploiting Kyiv's lack of manpower. "The situation is quite chaotic, as the enemy, having found gaps in the defence, is infiltrating deeper, trying to quickly consolidate and accumulate forces for further advancement," DeepState said on its Telegram channel. U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are expected to discuss a possible deal to end the war in Ukraine when they meet in Alaska on Friday. Unconfirmed media reports say Putin has told Trump he wants Ukraine to hand over the part of the Donetsk region that Russia does not control. There was no immediate comment on the advance from Moscow. Ukrainian military spokesperson Viktor Trehubov said only small groups were penetrating defensive lines, and that this did not amount to a breakthrough. Pasi Paroinen, a military analyst with the Finland-based Black Bird Group, said the situation had escalated rapidly, with Russian forces infiltrating past Ukrainian lines to a depth of roughly 17 km (10 miles) during the past three days. "Forwardmost Russian units have reportedly reached the Dobropillia – Kramatorsk road T0514 and Russian infiltration groups have also been reported near Dobropillia proper," he wrote on X. Tatarigami_UA, a former Ukrainian army officer whose Frontelligence Insight analysis tracks the conflict, posted: "In both 2014 and 2015, Russia launched major offensives ahead of negotiations to gain leverage. The current situation is serious, but far from the collapse some suggest." Sergei Markov, a former Kremlin adviser, said the Russians had been able to advance due to "a partial collapse in the front" due to Ukraine's shortage of soldiers. Ukraine has redeployed elite forces to try to thwart the advance, Russia's Interfax news agency and Ukrainian war bloggers reported. "This breakthrough is like a gift to Putin and Trump during the negotiations," Markov said, suggesting it could increase pressure on Kyiv to cede some land to prevent the Russian army eventually taking the rest of Donetsk by force. To do that, though, Russian forces would first need to take control of Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka and Kostiantynivka - four places Russian military analysts call "fortress cities". Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has publicly pushed back against the idea of ceding territory to Russia, saying any peace deal must be a just one. Bohdan Krotevych, former chief of staff of Ukraine's Azov brigade and a National Guard lieutenant colonel, took to X late on Monday to warn Zelenskiy of the threat, saying the frontline in the area was "a complete mess". "The line of combat engagement as a fixed line does not actually exist," he said.