
Parents really do have a favourite child, new study suggests. And it's probably who you think it is
This may not feel like news if you have siblings and a long-standing hunch that one of you could rob a bank and still be the golden child.
But a new study suggests parents really do have a favourite kid based on birth order, gender and personality. Although the reasons may be more complex.
Younger siblings generally receive slightly more favourable treatment from their parents, according to a meta-analysis of nearly 19,500 people in 30 different studies published in the U.S., Canada and Western Europe between 2015 and 2022, plus an additional 14 unpublished databases.
However, this favouritism for the baby of the family was no longer true when the authors looked specifically at control and autonomy as predictors, and then, parents preferred the eldest. In other words, parents were less controlling of older siblings.
Parents also reported slightly favouring daughters over sons. But personality played a role, too, with the authors noting that parents tended to favour children who were "agreeable" and "conscientious," regardless of birth order and gender.
"Our findings specifically suggest that within families, some children may be easier to parent than others," the authors wrote in the study, which was was published in the American Psychological Association's Psychological Bulletin earlier this month.
The researchers from Brigham Young University (BYU) in Provo, Utah, and Western University in London, Ont., looked at birth order, gender, temperament and personality and whether these predicted parental differential treatment. The authors analyzed responses from parents and siblings.
The study has been making headlines around the world. But Lisa Strohschein, a sociology professor at the University of Alberta and the editor-in-chief of the journal Canadian Studies in Population, suggests this may be because the story simply fits narratives people already have about parental preferential treatment.
The study itself had very small effect sizes, she cautioned, to the point that they're nearly "trivial." Even the authors acknowledge their small effect sizes in their limitations, Strohschein added, where they write that "the reasons why parents treat their children differently are likely more complex and extend beyond the factors explored in this study."
"If parents are preferring one child over another, that can have really toxic effects," Strohschein, who was not involved with the new study, told CBC News.
"It's very common, but I don't think it depends on age or gender or birth order as much as we think."
WATCH | Is parenting harder today?
Is parenting harder today than it used to be?
4 months ago
Duration 4:06
Favouritism is common
The prodigal son. The golden child. The rebel. As much as parents may deny it, the belief that parents prefer one sibling over another is entrenched throughout our culture.
For good reason. A swath of research suggests parental favouritism is quite common, occurring in as many as 65 per cent of U.S. families. In studies, it's called "parental differential treatment," or PDT for short. It's been reported across other countries, like China and Mexico, and has been associated with children's psychosocial well-being.
2020 study in Hong Kong.
And other studies that examine the predictors of PDT, like birth order and gender, have shown similar results. For instance, a 2003 study suggested parents often favour the youngest child. A 2006 study said mothers often favour daughters over their sons.
"Most parents probably connect more easily with one child over another, whether that be due to personality, birth order, gender or other things like shared interests," BYU School of Family Life professor Alex Jensen said in a news release.
"Watch for those patterns within yourself. Pay attention to how your children react to things that could be perceived as favouritism."
But Strohschein stresses that parenting isn't fixed; it's dynamic, changing over time as children get older and parents get more experienced. So she says that asking flat questions in studies like these, like "did your parents favour girls over boys," doesn't necessarily reflect the reality of who parents are and how they treat their children.
"You're learning as you're going," Strohschein said.
Good news for middle kids?
But as for the current study's finding that parents tended to favour the more agreeable and conscientious child? That may be good news for middle children, according to new Canadian-led research published at the end of December in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
That study of more than 700,000 online participants from Canada, the U.S., Australia and the United Kingdom found that middle children were more co-operative.
That's in contrast to most previous research, which had found that adults' personality trait levels were unrelated to their birth order, Michael Ashton, a psychology professor at Brock University, and lead author of the Canadian study, told CBC News. But his research found that middle-borns scored highest on two personality dimensions involving co-operativeness —specifically, honesty/humility and agreeableness.
That said, he noted that the findings may relate more to family size than birth order, since middle children tend to be from larger families. And on average, people from larger families tended to be higher in these co-operative traits.
"We suspect that when one grows up around siblings, even during one's first few years, there's a greater need to co-operate, which leads one to develop a slightly more co-operative personality," Ashton said.
WATCH | Why people aren't having as many kids:
Why aren't people having as many kids? It's complicated
3 months ago
Duration 3:43
Canada's birth rate is among the lowest low. Why aren't people having as many children? CBC sat down with three women to talk about their decision.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dodgers second baseman Tommy Edman is day-to-day after tweaking right ankle
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Los Angeles Dodgers second baseman Tommy Edman tweaked his right ankle this week and is day-to-day. It's the same ankle that landed Edman on the injured list a month ago after he hurt it in a game against Miami. Advertisement Edman wasn't in the starting lineup for the second straight day Wednesday against the New York Mets. He entered as a pinch hitter in the seventh inning Tuesday night. 'The ankle got a little sore,' manager Dave Roberts said. 'We want to make sure that we're doing everything we can so it doesn't get worse.' Roberts said Edman's sore ankle is affecting his lateral movement and it could be a few days before the team makes any decision about a possible move to the injured list. Edman was chosen MVP of the 2024 National League Championship Series, when he had 11 hits and drove in 11 runs as the Dodgers beat the Mets in six games to reach the World Series. ___ AP MLB: The Associated Press
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Phil Gould calls out dressing room claims at the Broncos after players hit back
NRL supremo Phil Gould has rubbished suggestions the Broncos players look like they are lacking effort having backed Michael Maguire to make the 'mental' adjustments to turn things around. Gould watched Daly Cherry-Evans and the Manly Sea Eagles destroy the Broncos last Saturday as they put 34 on Brisbane in a dismal display. Despite boasting representative players such as Payne Haas, Patrick Carrigan, Reece Walsh and Adam Reynolds in their squad, the Broncos sit in 12th on the ladder. The defeat to the Sea Eagles also marked their sixth in seven games as the playing group look bereft of ideas out on the field when things are going against them. While Maguire has moved to make selection changes this week with Carrigan moving back to lock, the coach is facing scrutiny after a strong start to the season. Both Ben Ikin and Darren Lockyer made telling comments about Maguire's position at the club after his latest loss piled on the pressure. Although Gould has slammed suggestions the players are not on board with Maguire's style. Speaking on his Wide World of Sports podcast Six Tackles with Gus, the Bulldogs general manager feels the players are trying too hard during their form slump and overplaying their hand. "When you see a side like that, all of sudden it's the players are off with the coach, the coach has lost the dressing room... that's rubbish, I don't see that at all," he said. "That's what people saw about any club struggling when they expected better. I think people get influenced by the scoreboard a lot when they critique these performances. "I'm watching the game and I'm not seeing a lack of effort, I'm not seeing a lack of care. I certainly can't label them with that. In fact, I think sometimes they are their own worst enemy because they are over trying." Gould feels the players are trying hard, but lack cohesion and a clear plan when they find themselves down on the scoreboard. Although the former NSW coach believes if Maguire can find the switch, it could see a massive change in the powerful Broncos side stacked with talent. Gould feels it isn't due to a lack of physicality or skill that has seen the Broncos lose six of their last seven games. But rather the change in momentum will come internally with Maguire needing to reframe the mindset of the playing group that he has inherited. And he also feels the players need to change their view on how the season will turn around. "I think the problems with them mainly are mental...I think these are things they just need to settle down, it is not going to be solved overnight," he added. "They just need to take a breath of fresh air, sit and relax, and get into that room full of mirrors where they can all take accountability for what's going wrong and sort it out." RELATED: Family detail as Craig Bellamy tipped to make shock switch to coach side Cameron Smith's truth bomb after Queensland coach accused of 'weak' act Both Kotoni Staggs and captain Adam Reynolds have slapped down the suggestion there is player unrest at the club after the weekend's loss. Speculation was mounting Maguire's rigged training regime had taken its toll on some of the players. This prompted Penrith legend Greg Alexander to rip into the reports. "Don't let me think that Brisbane players are whingeing because Michael Maguire is too hard on them. Cry me a river, you little wusses," Alexander said on SEN Radio this week. "If that is true, none of them deserve to be playing NRL. "I can't believe it's true because I can't believe that experienced NRL players would be bitching and whingeing because Michael Maguire keeps them there too long." However, Reynolds led the charge and dismissed such claims heading into round 15. "It's easy for the outside noise to obviously try and tear the team apart and the coaching staff," Reynolds said on Channel Nine. "Look, we're working hard, we're just like any other team who train hard. Everyone can write what they want to write, but internally we know we're capable of doing some great things here, and Madge is the right man leading us forward."


Roya News
13 minutes ago
- Roya News
US vetoes UN Security Council call for Gaza ceasefire
The United States vetoed Wednesday a UN Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza, which Washington claimed undermined ongoing diplomacy to resolve the conflict. It was the 15-member body's first vote on the situation since November, when the United States -- a key 'Israeli' ally -- also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting. "This resolution would undermine diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire that reflects the realities on the ground and emboldens Hamas," Washington's United Nations envoy Dorothy Shea said ahead of the vote. "This resolution also draws false equivalence between Israel and Hamas," she said. The draft resolution had demanded "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties." It also called for the "immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups." Underlining a "catastrophic humanitarian situation" in the Palestinian territory, the resolution, had it passed, would have demanded the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. The veto was the first wielded by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. 'Israel' has faced growing international pressure to end its war on Gaza. That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which 'Israel' blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May. The United Nations said that was not enough to meet the humanitarian needs. 'Judged by history' A US-backed relief effort called the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has also faced criticism for going against long-standing humanitarian principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military belligerent. 'Israeli' bombardment on Wednesday killed at least 16 people in the Gaza Strip, including 12 in a single strike on a tent housing displaced people, the Palestinian territory's civil defense agency said. On Tuesday, 27 people were killed in southern Gaza when 'Israeli' troops opened fire near a GHF aid site, with the military saying the incident was under investigation. Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, on Tuesday urged the Council to act. "All of us will be judged by history as to how much have we done in order to stop this crime against the Palestinian people," he said. 'Israel's' ambassador to the UN Danny Danon attacked the text ahead of the vote. "This resolution doesn't advance humanitarian relief. It undermines it. It ignores a working system in favor of political agendas," he was to tell the council, according to remarks released by his office.