logo
Sahara desert, once lush and green, was home to mysterious human lineage

Sahara desert, once lush and green, was home to mysterious human lineage

Reuters04-04-2025
April 4 (Reuters) - The Sahara Desert is one of Earth's most arid and desolate places, stretching across a swathe of North Africa that spans parts of 11 countries and covers an area comparable to China or the United States. But it has not always been so inhospitable.
During a period from about 14,500 to 5,000 years ago, it was a lush green savannah rich in bodies of water and teeming with life. And, according to DNA obtained from the remains of two individuals who lived about 7,000 years ago in what is now Libya, it was home to a mysterious lineage of people isolated from the outside world.
Researchers analyzed the first genomes from people who lived in what is called the "Green Sahara." They obtained DNA from the bones of two females buried at a rock shelter called Takarkori in remote southwestern Libya. They were naturally mummified, representing the oldest-known mummified human remains.
"At the time, Takarkori was a lush savannah with a nearby lake, unlike today's arid desert landscape," said archaeogeneticist Johannes Krause of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, one of the authors of the study published this week in the journal Nature, opens new tab.
The genomes reveal that the Takarkori individuals were part of a distinct and previously unidentified human lineage that lived separated from sub-Saharan and Eurasian populations for thousands of years.
"Intriguingly, the Takarkori people show no significant genetic influence from sub-Saharan populations to the south or Near Eastern and prehistoric European groups to the north. This suggests they remained genetically isolated despite practicing animal husbandry - a cultural innovation that originated outside Africa," Krause said.
Archeological evidence indicates that these people were pastoralists, herding domesticated animals. Artifacts found at the site include tools made of stone, wood and animal bones, pottery, woven baskets and carved figurines.
The ancestry of the two Takarkori individuals was found to have derived from a North African lineage that separated from sub-Saharan populations around 50,000 years ago. That roughly coincides with when other human lineages spread beyond the continent and into the Middle East, Europe and Asia - becoming the ancestors of all people outside Africa.
"The Takarkori lineage likely represents a remnant of the genetic diversity present in northern Africa between 50,000 and 20,000 years ago," Krause said.
"From 20,000 years ago onward, genetic evidence shows an influx of groups from the Eastern Mediterranean, followed by migrations from Iberia and Sicily around 8,000 years ago. However, for reasons still unknown, the Takarkori lineage persisted in isolation for much longer than expected. Since the Sahara only became habitable about 15,000 years ago, their original homeland remains uncertain," Krause said.
Their lineage remained isolated throughout most of its existence before the Sahara again became uninhabitable. At the end of a warmer and wetter climate stage called the African Humid Period, the Sahara transformed into the world's largest hot desert roughly around 3,000 BC.
Members of our species Homo sapiens who spread beyond Africa encountered and interbred with Neanderthal populations already present in parts of Eurasia, leaving a lasting genetic legacy in non-African populations today. But the Green Sahara people carried only trace amounts of Neanderthal DNA, illustrating that they had scant contact with outside populations.
Although the Takarkori population itself disappeared around 5,000 years ago when the African Humid Period ended and the desert returned, traces of their ancestry persist among various North African groups today, Krause said.
"Their genetic legacy offers a new perspective on the region's deep history," Krause said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hollywood's biggest AI debut? Las Vegas Sphere's 'Wizard of Oz'
Hollywood's biggest AI debut? Las Vegas Sphere's 'Wizard of Oz'

Reuters

time9 hours ago

  • Reuters

Hollywood's biggest AI debut? Las Vegas Sphere's 'Wizard of Oz'

LAS VEGAS, Aug 21 (Reuters) - When "The Wizard of Oz at Sphere" opens off the Las Vegas Strip on Aug. 28, audiences will experience the 1939 film classic in a way its creators probably never thought possible. Nearly 18,000 people will find themselves in the eye of the swirling tornado that rips Dorothy's Kansas farmhouse off its moorings and hurtles it onto Munchkinland. The film has been enhanced to fill a 160,000-square-foot wall of LED panels that spans three football fields, encircling the audience and reaching 22 stories high, as 750-horsepower fans kick up wind and debris to simulate the twister. The $104 or more per seat spectacle is more than meets the eye. "The Wizard of Oz" marks one of the most significant partnerships between a studio and technology company to use artificial intelligence to forge a new media experience. Reuters spoke with nine people, including principals directly involved in the project and senior entertainment industry experts, who told the story behind a project that some industry veterans see as a potential watershed moment in Hollywood's use of AI tools. "It definitely represents a really meaningful milestone in AI-human creative collaboration," said Thao Nguyen, immersive arts and emerging technologies agent at CAA. "I think it will set a precedent on how we reimagine culturally significant media." Bringing Dorothy and the Wicked Witch to the massive Sphere, a globe-shaped entertainment venue featuring advanced technology, took two years and brought together its creative team, Warner Bros Discovery executives, Google's DeepMind researchers, academics, visual effects artists -- more than 2,000 people, in all. The development occurred during intense apprehension over AI's impact on jobs in Hollywood and the desire to preserve human creativity. Some visual effects companies initially contacted to work on the project declined because they were not permitted to work with AI at the time. Getting here took the blessing of Warner Bros Discovery CEO David Zaslav, his studio chiefs and lawyers who established guidelines for using AI. "Wizard of Oz at Sphere" drew upon archival materials from the film -- including set blueprints, shot lists, publicity stills and film artifacts -- as well as some 60 research papers to help deliver the movie in resolution representing a ten-fold improvement over previous work. "We had to reimagine the cinematography, we had to reimagine the editing, and we had to do all of this without changing the experience," said Oscar-winner Ben Grossmann, who oversaw the project's visual effects. "Because if you touch anything about this sacred piece of cinema, you're toast!" Rather than exploiting AI to cut jobs, they sought to use it to breathe fresh life into a classic story and create new experiences with existing intellectual property. "Hollywood embraces new technology, and everyone can't wait to be the second one to use it," said Buzz Hays, a veteran film producer who leads Google Cloud's entertainment industry solutions group. "What 'The Wizard of Oz' is doing for us is giving that first opportunity where people go, 'Oh my god, this is not at all what I thought AI was going to be.'" The project began in 2023 with Sphere executives discussing which project would push the technological boundaries of the venue that had already hosted U2 and Darren Aronofsky's "Postcard from Earth." "The Wizard of Oz" quickly topped the list as a familiar, beloved film well-suited for the Sphere's enormous canvas, said Carolyn Blackwood, head of Sphere Studios. It presented an opportunity to re-introduce the classic to a new generation in a way that would place them inside L. Frank Baum's world. Symbolically, the team chose a classic film that was a technical marvel of its time. While not the first movie to use Technicolor, "The Wizard of Oz's" dramatic transition from sepia tones to hyper-saturated color marked a cinematic milestone. Sphere Entertainment's CEO James Dolan and creative collaborator Jane Rosenthal, Tribeca Film Festival co-founder and noted film producer, envisioned a more ambitious project than a mere digital remastering of a classic. Rosenthal tapped Hays to bring in Google as a technical partner. Dolan approached Warner Bros Discovery CEO Zaslav, a friend and business partner from the early days of cable TV, to propose bringing "Oz" to the Sphere. "I had just been to the Sphere with a friend and was really blown away," said Zaslav, adding that Dolan and Rosenthal also won over his studio chiefs, "who loved the idea. It's an example of the great IP we own at Warner Bros." Before turning over one of the world's most important entertainment properties, Warner Bros set strict ground rules. Google could train its generative AI models on each major actor to reproduce their performances, but the data would remain the studio's property. None of the "Oz" training data would be incorporated into Google's public AI models. "One of the things critical to getting this project started was creating a safe place for experimentation," said Grossmann. "Warner Brothers and Google and the Sphere created an environment where they said, 'We don't necessarily know how it's going to end, but we're going to create a little quarantine zone here.'" The visual effects team initially tried enlarging images using CGI, which would have created photorealistic animated versions of the characters. That approach was rejected because it would violate the integrity of the original performances. "AI was effectively a last resort, because we couldn't really do it any other way," said Grossmann, whose Los Angeles studio, Magnopus, worked on such photo-realistic computer animated films as Disney's 'The Lion King.' AI enhanced the resolution of tiny celluloid frames from 1939 to ultra-high-definition images. It restored details -- like freckles on Dorothy's face or burlap texture on Scarecrow's face -- obscured by Technicolor's process. AI also helped "outpaint" on-screen images to fill gaps created by camera cuts or framing, as when it took a close-up of the Tin Man chopping a door of the Witch's castle with an axe to free Dorothy and completed the image of the woodman. It took months of repeated fine-tuning and Google's DeepMind braintrust to elevate consumer-grade AI tools to deliver crisp images with the Sphere's 16K "super" resolution. Musicians re-recorded the entire film score on the original sound stage to take advantage of the venue's 167,000 speakers. The vocal performances of Judy Garland and other actors remain unaltered. Despite attention to authenticity, the project has attracted criticism from some cinephiles who object to altering the cherished film. Entertainment writer Joshua Rivera called it "an affront to art and nature." "None of these people criticizing this have seen the film or understand what we are doing," said Rosenthal. In a private midnight screening for Reuters, Grossmann offered a glimpse of what's to come. Some changes are subtle, as when Uncle Henry stands by the front door while neighbor Almira Gulch demands Toto. AI places the performer, who spends much of his time out of view, back into frame, stitching together a wider view to fill the Sphere's expansive viewing plane. Other changes aim to realize the filmmakers' vision in ways that weren't technically feasible 86 years ago. As Dorothy and friends encounter the Wizard in the Emerald Throne Room, a 200-foot-high green head looms over the audience, eyes bulging and voice booming, creating a more imposing depiction than the original image of an actor in green makeup projected on smoke. "Whenever we made a change, it was because we wanted the audience to experience what Dorothy was experiencing directly," said Grossmann. "We completed something filmmakers were intending to do but were limited by 1939's tools . Coordinated physical effects add another dimension. Flying monkeys will swoop into the Sphere as 16-foot-long helium-filled simians steered by drone operators, one of many Four-D effects. The result is an amalgam of cinema, live production and experiential VR. "I think that's going to change the way people think about entertainment and experience," Grossmann said.

‘Landmines have become the greatest protectors': how wildlife is thriving in the Korean DMZ
‘Landmines have become the greatest protectors': how wildlife is thriving in the Korean DMZ

The Guardian

time10 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘Landmines have become the greatest protectors': how wildlife is thriving in the Korean DMZ

Standing on top of a small mountain, Kim Seung-ho gazes out over an expanse of paddy fields glowing in their autumn gold, the ripening grains swaying gently in the wind. In the distance, North Korea stretches beyond the horizon. 'It's so peaceful,' says the director of the DMZ Ecology Research Institute. 'Over there, it used to be an artillery range, but since they stopped firing, the nature has become so beautiful.' The land before him is the demilitarised zone, or DMZ, a strip of land that runs across the Korean peninsula, dividing North and South Korea roughly along the 38th parallel north. This heavily fortified border was created after the devastating Korean war, which lasted from 1950 to 1953. The conflict ended in an armistice rather than a peace treaty, establishing a buffer zone between the two countries that remain in a technical state of war. Stretching 155 miles (250km) across the peninsula and 2.4 miles wide, the DMZ is anything but demilitarised. It remains one of the world's most heavily fortified borders, strewn with landmines and flanked by military installations on both sides. Yet, in the 72 years since the war ended, this forbidden strip has become an accidental ecological paradise. South Korea's National Institute of Ecology has documented nearly 6,000 species here, including more than 100 endangered species – representing more than a third of South Korea's threatened wildlife. The zone's varied terrain creates distinct habitats: the wetlands of the western sector shelter migrating cranes, while the rugged eastern mountains provide sanctuary for some of the country's most threatened mammals, including Siberian musk deer and Asiatic black bears. Kim and his small team of volunteers, working from their research institute in Paju, near the North Korean border, have spent two decades documenting this unexpected sanctuary. Each week, come rain or shine, they survey the Civilian Control Zone (CCZ), the restricted buffer area bordering the DMZ. 'In temperate climates worldwide, big cities have developed,' he says. 'There's nowhere else where nature has been left alone like this.' The DMZ and its surrounding areas, while covering less than 10% of South Korea's total land area, harbour 38% of the country's endangered species and more than 30% of its flora and fauna. This ecological miracle, however, comes with a dark twist. 'I used to think I was the best environmentalist,' Kim says, 'but I realised the landmines are doing more for conservation than anyone. It's ironic, no? Weapons meant for killing have become the greatest protectors of life.' Kim's team has meticulously documented every important species they encounter, building a detailed database of the region's wildlife. They map each sighting's location, tracking how species move and habitats change over time. Their meticulous documentation has become invaluable. 'At government meetings, researchers sometimes hesitate to speak when we're present,' Kim says. 'They know our data is more comprehensive and accurate than official records.' Despite its ecological richness, researching the DMZ is fraught with challenges. The zone itself remains off-limits to most civilians, heavily guarded and lined with military installations. On its southern side lies the CCZ, where access is tightly restricted. Civilians must pass through military checkpoints, requiring special clearance from the defence ministry and, in certain areas, military escorts. During our drive towards one of the few crossing points leading to the DMZ, Kim remarks that we are fortunate to have been granted access. 'Usually, when relations are this strained, civilian access is the first thing to be restricted,' he says. Moments later, a phone call from the defence ministry informs us that our clearance has been revoked due to sudden military activity at the border. 'This is the reality we work in,' Kim sighs as we turn back and go to survey a nearby non-militarised spot. 'One moment we're planning research; the next, the military situation changes, and everything is put on hold.' It is a frustrating setback, but one Kim's team has grown used to. Later, it emerged that North Korean military personnel had approached the demarcation line to plant explosives, before blowing up the last remaining roads connecting the two countries. It is a stark reminder that while hostilities officially ended in 1953, the tensions remain very real. These setbacks underscore a more profound concern: both war and peace pose a threat to the delicate haven that has emerged in the DMZ. Kim fears that any peace agreement could bring development, threatening the fragile ecosystem. 'The current generation shouldn't decide the DMZ's fate,' he argues. 'We should leave that to a generation that values biodiversity. They should choose its future.' When tensions rise, Kim takes solace in watching the rare cranes that migrate across north-east Asia, resting in the strip for a time before flying on to Siberia for the summer. He hopes that conserving these shared natural treasures could help bring the two countries together. Looking across the restricted zone, Kim reflects on its meaning. 'What's special about the DMZ isn't just its remarkable ecology,' he says, watching the magnificent birds circle overhead. 'Here, war and peace, life and death coexist. The soil contains the remains of soldiers from many nations, yet nature doesn't discriminate by nationality or ideology. It creates a sense of harmony from these tragic elements.' Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield in the Guardian app for more nature coverage

New review finds there are four different species of giraffe
New review finds there are four different species of giraffe

BBC News

time13 hours ago

  • BBC News

New review finds there are four different species of giraffe

A study of giraffes has changed how we understand our long-necked animal friends for out there isn't one species of giraffe as we thought, but there are four different species that have evolved over are the northern giraffe, the reticulated giraffe, the Masai giraffe, and the southern giraffe - which were all thought to be type of the same species at finding has now been officially recognised by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), one of the world's largest environmental groups, who say that this could help efforts to protect giraffes. It was originally thought that there was just one species of the animal - the giraffe - and nine subspecies, which are each different, but not different enough to be labelled as a separate after experts studied giraffe skulls and bones, the IUCN decided that differences were in fact big enough to officially recognise them as different are the world's tallest land mammal, known for their long necks, and are from Africa. The IUCN think that Africa's rivers, valleys and desert areas could have separated different groups of giraffes from each other, meaning that they evolved in different parts of the continent into four giraffe is listed as vulnerable to extinction on IUCN's red list of threatened species, and they say the new understanding can help them conserve the creatures. What is evolution? Evolution is the theory that explains how living things, including humans, developed from simple to complex life forms over millions of of the first people to make the idea popular was a scientist called Charles Darwin, who dedicated his life to writing about theory describes how no animal is the same and all have different features, some of which might help them survive better in their environment. Those that have these features are more likely to thrive and pass on their features on to their a long, long period of time, these small changes become bigger and bigger until the species slowly changes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store