Medical pros beg social media users to avoid viral ‘Innotox' trend — which can cause muscle paralysis and even death
Experts are sounding the alarm about a growing number of Americans injecting themselves at home with so-called 'Korean Botox,' drawn in by promises of smooth skin at a fraction of the cost.
Those jumping on the viral Innotox trend, they warn, are playing a game of cosmetic roulette that comes with risks far more serious than a few forehead wrinkles and crow's feet.
Advertisement
4 Self-injecting Innotox is the latest DIY beauty trend going viral.
Eva March – stock.adobe.com
What is Innotox ?
Innotox is a South Korean treatment that contains botulinum toxin type A, the same active ingredient found in Botox, according to Korean Beauty Tech.
It works by temporarily relaxing facial muscles to reduce contractions, which softens the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles, resulting in smoother, more youthful-looking skin.
But unlike Botox, which arrives freeze-dried and must be reconstituted with a sterile solution, Innotox comes as a ready-to-use liquid — making the injection process simpler and more tempting for those looking for a DIY option.
Advertisement
Why are people choosing Innotox?
Aside from the convenience, Innotox fans point to two big draws: faster, longer lasting results and a lower price tag.
While Botox typically takes 4 to 7 days to show effects, some Innotox users report visible changes within 2 to 3 days. Its results can last up to six months — outpacing the usual three-to-four-month lifespan of Botox.
'It works amazing, almost three months and I'm not moving my forehead,' Karen Freeman, a content creator on TikTok, said in a recent video.
Advertisement
4 Innotox is approved for use in other countries, like South Korea, but not in the US.
Derma Solution
'Normally it would be time for me to do this again, but no, good ol' Innotox is still working and ain't mad about it,' she added.
Then there's the cost. A vial of Innotox can be found on third-party sites for as little as $60 to $100, depending on the number of units and the supplier.
By comparison, the average Botox treatment cost was $528 in 2022, according to GoodRx.
What are the risks of self-administering Innotox?
Advertisement
First and foremost, Innotox is not FDA-approved.
4 Karen Freeman is among the Innotox users pleased with her results.
TikTok / @karen74_
That means it's not subject to the same strict safety and efficacy standards as Botox or other botulinum toxin products legally available in the US.
It also raises questions about quality control — especially when it's purchased from unverified sellers online.
'Don't inject yourself with fake Botox products from the internet, I beg of you,' warned Molly O'Rourke, a clinical nurse injector, in a recent Instagram video.
'This is coming from a safety standpoint because these medications are not regulated,' she continued. 'It already comes pre-diluted, which should frighten you because what is that?'
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has echoed similar warnings, noting that counterfeit or improperly sourced botulinum toxin has been linked to serious medical complications.
Advertisement
Even if the product is genuine, the DIY approach carries major risks.
4 Medical experts are warning against self-injecting Innotox at home.
Instagram / @nurseinjectormolly_
Online videos often show people injecting Innotox with minimal training or understanding of facial anatomy — something medical professionals say is highly dangerous.
Advertisement
'If you have real neurotoxin there and you're just injecting it into the wrong places, you could have facial muscle weakness or facial muscle paralysis,' Dr. Evan Rieder, who is board-certified in dermatology and psychiatry, told Today.com.
But the potential dangers aren't limited to your face.
Dr. Michelle Henry, a board-certified dermatologist, told the outlet that the trend is 'dangerous' and 'terrifying.'
'If you have too much botulinum toxin in your body, you get flaccid paralysis, meaning all of your muscles stop working and contracting, including the muscles you need to breathe,' she said. 'That's how patients die.'
Advertisement
While Henry added that there are 'ways that I won't even inject myself,' both Rieder and O'Rourke said they won't inject themselves at all.
While not everyone will experience complications, experts warn that those self-injecting at home may lack the knowledge to properly treat issues or recognize when urgent medical care is needed.
'Just leave it to the professionals,' O'Rourke said. 'I'm all for wanting to learn to do something yourself, but this isn't one of those things.'
Advertisement
Medytox, the company that makes Innotox, told Today.com that it 'only sells prescription products to authorized medical providers and medical distribution companies' and it is 'unaware that some of the product is being offered online in unapproved countries or available to consumers.'
'Medytox certainly does not endorse the self-injection of botulinum toxins by consumers,' they said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
a minute ago
- Gizmodo
Missouri Man Dies After Water Skiing Leads to Brain-Eating Amoeba Infection
A Missouri man's lake outing has ended in tragedy. Local health officials announced this week that a resident died from a rare but nearly always fatal brain amoeba infection likely caught while water skiing. The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services disclosed the resident's death Wednesday, following its initial report of the case last week (though few details about the case were released, several outlets reported the resident was a man). Officials are still investigating the source of the resident's exposure, but it's known he had been water skiing at the Lake of the Ozarks days before becoming sick. 'DHSS regrets to confirm that the patient's death occurred on Aug. 19 in a St. Louis area hospital. We extend our deepest condolences to the loved ones of the patient,' the agency stated. The man contracted an infection of Naegleria fowleri, a single-celled, shape-shifting amoeba that's normally harmless. The freshwater and soil-loving protist typically only feeds on bacteria. And even when people ingest it accidentally by swallowing water, the amoeba doesn't cause illness. But when it enters the body through the nose, it can cause a severe brain infection called primary amebic meningoencephalitis, or PAM. Once inside the brain, the amoeba will replicate and literally feast on our cells. Both the infection itself and the intense immune response it triggers cause widespread damage. People may first experience symptoms like fever and nausea, followed quickly by complications like seizures, hallucinations, and coma. PAM has a mortality rate of 98%, and death usually occurs less than two weeks after the initial exposure. Texas Woman Dies From Brain-Eating Amoeba After Using Tainted RV Water As in this current case, most N. fowleri infections happen when people get water up their nose while swimming in natural warm freshwater environments like lakes. The amoeba is especially abundant in warmer temperatures during the summer. But people can also be infected by using tainted water for nasal irrigation (the amoeba can survive in drinking water systems). Scary as these infections are, they remain incredibly rare. Between 1962 and 2024, there have only been 167 reported cases of PAM in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Of these, only four people survived. Still, given the ubiquitous presence of these amoeba in the environment, it's more than reasonable to take some proactive steps to prevent infection. The CDC recommends holding your nose or wearing a nose clip while diving into a body of freshwater, always keeping your head above when inside a hot spring, and only using boiled or distilled water for your nasal irrigations.
New York Post
31 minutes ago
- New York Post
Piercing your kids' ears puts them at risk for this allergy — the EU even has laws for it
Tiny studs, big trouble? Parents itching to pierce their kids' ears might want to put down the needle — a growing body of research suggests the popular practice could cost more than just a few tears. 'Delay ear piercings in young girls,' Dr. Niha Qamar (@doctor._.q), a board-certified allergist and immunologist, said in a recent TikTok, warning it could increase the risk of a serious, lifelong allergy. Dr. Niha Qamar is a board-certified allergist based in New York. TikTok/@doctor._.q Nationwide, nickel is the leading cause of allergic contact dermatitis — a red, itchy rash that flares up when the skin touches a normally harmless material. Roughly 1.1 million American children are affected by a nickel sensitivity, and studies show that number has quadrupled over the past 30 years. Researchers say early ear piercings are a major factor. In a Swedish study of 960 schoolgirls aged 8 to 15, researchers found that 'the ones who had ear piercings had 13% nickel allergy, versus 1% of the girls who didn't have ear piercings,' Qamar said. Another study out of Finland showed that 31% of pierced kids had a reaction to nickel — compared to just 2% of those without. And in the US, a study found that just 4% of men with no piercings were sensitive to nickel, while 11.1% and 14% of those with one or multiple piercings, respectively, were affected. 'Europe actually passed legislation to decrease the amount of nickel in jewelry (for this reason),' Qamar said. Many Americans get their ears pieced as infants or young children. deltahman – That regulation, the Nickel Directive, was introduced by the European Union in 1994 to limit how much nickel can leach from items like earrings. In the years since, countries like Denmark have reported major drops in sensitization, along with an estimated $2 billion in related health care savings. Nickel allergy isn't deadly, but it can make life miserable. Reactions may include hives, cracked skin, burning, itching and discoloration. More severe symptoms can strike when someone eats nickel-rich foods or has a metal device implanted. Blisters, diarrhea, fatigue, headaches and full-body swelling are all on the table. With no cure, managing symptoms becomes a lifelong battle — and avoiding nickel isn't easy, since it lurks in everything from jewelry and belt buckles to bra hooks and braces. Some people require treatment, which can include medication and even light therapy. With nickel sensitization on the rise in the US, major medical groups are calling for tighter regulations like those already in place in Europe. In 2020, the American Academy of Pediatrics urged the federal government to crack down on nickel in clothing and jewelry. 'The burden of symptoms and cost is high,' the policy statement notes. 'The United States can act on EU data revealing that legislation to limit exposures in childhood, especially with earrings, can impact the prevalence and potentially the severity of disease.' Until then, Qamar says parents should play it safe and hold off on piercing their kids' ears. 'If your child is getting pieced ears, get jewelry that is nickel free,' she recommended. 'That will reduce the risk of nickel sensitization.'
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Millions More Americans Are Being Exposed to Contaminated Water
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New data released by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has shown that millions more Americans are drinking water that is contaminated with carcinogenic chemicals, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) reported. The findings come as part of the EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, known as UCMR 5, requiring U.S. water utilities to test drinking water for 29 individual PFAS compounds. PFAS chemicals, a group of thousands of different substances, are classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and have previously been found in U.S. drinking water systems. Newsweek has contacted the EPA via email for comment. Why It Matters PFAS chemicals, also known as "forever chemicals," are used across various industries, featuring in consumer products and even smartwatch wristbands. While these chemicals are favored for their long-lasting nature, research highlighting their potential health risks has been accumulating in recent years. Other than PFAS chemicals, arsenic contamination in U.S. drinking water systems has also become a growing concern across the country. File photo: a person fills a glass of water from the tap. File photo: a person fills a glass of water from the tap. Hendrik Schmidt/dpa via AP What To Know Jared Hayes, a senior policy analyst at EWG, told Newsweek the EPA's latest release of data confirmed the presence of at least one type of PFAS compound in an additional 200 locations—which in total serve 7 million people. He added that, based on previously collected UCMR and state data, it is now clear that more than 172 million Americans are being exposed to PFAS-contaminated drinking water. The EPA previously wrote in a fact sheet that long-term PFAS exposure "can cause cancer and other serious illnesses that decrease quality of life or result in death." Studies have also found that even low levels of exposure to the chemicals can have wide-reaching impacts on multiple systems in the body. While these numbers "are not entirely surprising given what we know about the persistence and mobility of PFAS in the environment," Vasilis Vasiliou, chair and professor of environmental health sciences at Yale School of Public Health, told Newsweek, it "underscores the magnitude of the problem." He added the findings showed "PFAS contamination is both widespread and underreported." However, Marc Edwards, a professor in civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech, told Newsweek, on the flipside, "We already knew that PFAS chemicals are very widespread—the new data just confirms that expectation." He added the EPA is taking steps to reduce PFAS exposure, and "as our understanding improves and new treatments become available, we'll get a better understanding of what to do about it," he said. Additionally, it is not clear to what degree these additional water utilities were contaminated with PFAS chemicals, Natalie Exum, a professor of environmental health and engineering at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Newsweek. "These chemicals are designed to never breakdown so we should expect that over time every water system in the U.S. will ultimately be contaminated," she said. "I will be more concerned when we can understand at what amounts they are occurring in drinking water and what health effects we are finding at those levels," she added. What People Are Saying Susan Richardson, a professor of chemistry at the University of South Carolina, told Newsweek: "There is the possibility for adverse health outcomes, but I personally would not be concerned at low parts-per-trillion levels. The good news is that drinking water plants will have to meet the new EPA regulation by 2031, and many plants will use granular activated carbon (GAC) to remove it. GAC can also remove natural organic matter precursors to disinfection by-products that are generally present in our drinking water at a thousand times higher levels than PFAS. So, there should be a great co-benefit of using GAC." Jennifer Freeman, a professor of toxicology at Purdue University, Indiana, told Newsweek: "It is very important PFAS drinking water testing continues so we can attain a fuller understanding of where the contamination is occurring and where treatment methods may be needed to reduce exposures." She said: "It is likely already impacting health outcomes across the country with these exposures likely occurring over the past several decades. On the positive side, as drinking water testing continues we now have a better understanding of the PFAS presence in our drinking water supplies and are identifying the regions where contamination is higher and action is needed." Vasiliou told Newsweek: "Chronic exposure to PFAS, even at low levels, has been linked in multiple studies to serious health outcomes, including certain cancers, immune dysfunction, thyroid disease, liver toxicity, and developmental effects. The sheer scale of potential exposure means this could become a major public health challenge in the years ahead. Addressing PFAS contamination is not just an environmental issue, it is a public health imperative." He said: "As monitoring expands, I expect even more communities will be identified, since PFAS are extremely persistent and widespread. What we need now is stronger regulation, expanded monitoring, investment in water treatment, and a rapid phase-out of non-essential PFAS uses." Exum told Newsweek: "PFAS gets into drinking water in so many different ways and over time as they are spread in sewage sludge, sprayed in pesticides, and even travel in rainwater, we should expect that their presence will only increase over time. But their presence may be in low levels depending on the source of contamination, and that is the important question to answer. And it gets answered by the EPA taking action to both regulate these chemicals for their known harms and for the agency to fund the science to understand the public health implications for exposures to these chemicals." She added: "Overall, with more PFAS exposure we should expect to see more cancer, harm to fetal development and reduced vaccine effectiveness, among others. The public needs to be aware and concerned and advocating to their elected officials for the EPA not to weaken the landmark PFAS protections in drinking water." What Happens Next The EPA is expected to release more UCMR 5 results in the coming months. For those who are concerned, Richardson said "activated carbon filters that are certified to remove PFAS" can be used to filter drinking water to reduce exposure.
