Sutton cafes and takeaways with the lowest food hygiene scores
Environmental health officers visited premises across the borough between February and July 2025, handing out ratings based on food handling, cleanliness, and safety standards.
Three places were given a hygiene score of 1, meaning major improvement is necessary.
Seven others were rated 2, indicating some improvement is needed.
The ratings follow inspections by Sutton Council under the Food Standards Agency's national scheme. The scores range from 0 (urgent improvement required) to 5 (very good hygiene standards).
While businesses in England are not legally required to display their rating, all results are published online.
The rating does not reflect food quality, customer service or presentation, but focuses purely on hygiene, cleanliness and food safety management.
Low hygiene ratings in Sutton (Feb–Jul 2025)
Rated 1 – Major improvement necessary
Galaxy Cafe, 80 High Street, Carshalton — inspected June 3
Indiya Indiya, 354 High Street, Sutton — inspected June 18
Sureyan Express, 20 The Market, Wrythe Lane, Carshalton — inspected April 16
Rated 2 – Some improvement necessary
Chicken World, 28 High Street, Cheam — inspected March 5
Chopstick House, 64 Banstead Road, Carshalton — inspected April 23
COB / Authentic Biryani / Sensei Burger / Maki Kazzo / Nzalad, 1–3 Marshall's Road, Sutton — inspected April 15
Dosa Bhavan, 364 High Street, Sutton — inspected June 3
Ellachi Belmont, 13 Station Road, Belmont — inspected April 1
Esquires Coffee House, Unit 1 Level 1, St Nicholas Centre, Sutton — inspected March 8
Serans, 147 Stafford Road, Wallington — inspected June 19
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes
The Conservatives are demanding Chancellor Rachel Reeves 'urgently rule out' raising shares taxes in the autumn budget, claiming that leaving investors 'in limbo' will damage the economy. The Tories claim scrapping the £500 dividend allowance will drag an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying investment levies. The party is seeking to pile pressure on ministers after a memo sent by Angela Rayner to Ms Reeves, in which the Deputy Prime Minister suggested a series of tax hikes, was leaked to the press. In the document, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to raise around £325 million a year in revenue, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, the Telegraph reported. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm. 'Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.' The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes. The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'. This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends. Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request. The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so. A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country. 'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could. 'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Man City Reach Agreement with Team Defender for New Long Term Deal
Defender set to extend stay beyond 2027 as club moves to secure key asset Manchester City've reportedly reached full agreement with Portuguese defender Ruben Dias to extend his contract despite his current deal running until Jun 2027. Club Committed to Stability According to The Athletic, City want to secure the 28 year old's services for even longer reflecting his crucial role in Pep Guardiola's plans. New Deal Incoming While the exact length of the extension remains under wraps, the club's expected to announce the renewal and details of the new contract in the coming days. Dias joined Man City from Benfica in 2020 and has since become one of the most reliable centre backs in world football. Under Guardiola he's lifted multiple titles including Premier League, FA Cup and the Champions League.


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
RB Leipzig receive improved offer from Newcastle United for Benjamin Sesko
Red Bull Leipzig have received an improved offer from Newcastle United to sign Benjamin Sesko. An opening bid worth €75million plus €5million in add-ons was deemed insufficient by Leipzig, leading Newcastle to raise that to at least €80m. Sesko is also wanted by Manchester United, but a proposal has yet to arrive from Old Trafford and the figures they have indicated a willingness to pay are lower than those of Newcastle at present. Advertisement That leaves the St James's Park side in a strong position as things stand, after a day of positive talks held by their co-owner Jamie Reuben with Leipzig and the 22-year-old striker. Nothing is agreed yet and there is currently no guarantee of the outcome, which could still be Sesko staying if Leipzig do not accept a deal. The Slovenia international's preference will be crucial — however Leipzig have no intention of settling for a fee below their expectations to grant that, meaning both suitors must reach the required level in order to close the transfer. Newcastle have a long-standing interest in the 22-year-old forward and The Athletic reported on July 24 that the Premier League club were considering a move for him in the event that Alexander Isak leaves the club. The Sweden international wants to leave St James' Park this summer and has been training at his former club, Real Sociedad, while Eddie Howe's squad are on a pre-season tour of Asia. Liverpool had a formal £110m bid for Isak rejected on Friday, as revealed by The Athletic, but the Premier League champions retain a strong interest in the forward, having initially expressed an interest in doing a deal in the region of £120m last month. Sesko has been the subject of interest from several clubs this summer after scoring 21 goals in all competitions for Leipzig last season. Manchester United are also interested in signing the Slovenian and are prioritising him if they are to sign another striker this summer. Arsenal had been monitoring Sesko before they completed the €63.5million (plus €10m) signing of Viktor Gyokeres. Chelsea had admired Sesko for several years but opted to sign Liam Delap and Joao Pedro this summer. Sesko signed a new contract with Leipzig last year which runs through to 2029, with his deal expected to include a gentleman's agreement allowing him to leave for the right project. He has recorded 39 goals and eight assists in 87 appearances for the German club since signing of RB Salzburg in 2023, with both clubs owned by the Red Bull GmbH conglomerate. The striker has also scored 16 goals in 41 appearances for Slovenia, and represented his country at last year's European Championships. Analysis by German football writer Seb Stafford-Bloor Reasonably well, but it was not the season he needed to produce to assuage the doubts. While his overall level of performance improved in the broader sense, with Sesko becoming more connected with the rest of the Leipzig side, his goalscoring numbers were down. He scored one fewer Bundesliga goal (13) in 2024-25 than he did the year before, despite playing almost an extra 900 minutes. He was never able to replicate that seven-game streak from the previous year, either, meaning that it felt underwhelming as a result, despite some eye-catching goals (particularly against Bayern Munich at the Red Bull Arena). Advertisement But Leipzig had a bad season. They sacked Marco Rose in March, limped to their lowest finish since being promoted to the Bundesliga in 2016 and only won one game of their eight Champions League games. That's valuable context. Nevertheless, consistency was still an issue for Sesko and the gap between his best performances and his worst, which is a historic criticism, remains too wide.