
Who Needs Hollywood? Chinese Animated Film Shatters Box Office Records.
The new king of the Chinese box office is an adorably ugly, demonic child fighting off monsters.
In less than two weeks since its release, 'Ne Zha 2,' an animated film based loosely on Chinese mythology and a famous 16th century novel, has become the highest-grossing movie ever in China, with more than $1 billion in ticket sales. It is also the first film not made by a Hollywood studio to cross that mark.
The blockbuster delivered a rare dose of good news for the Chinese film industry, which is struggling with anemic ticket sales and a slumping economy. The few films that break through the malaise are no longer Hollywood titles, but domestic features teeming with patriotic messaging or rooted in traditional Chinese culture or folklore.
'Ne Zha 2' is a sequel to what had been the highest-grossing animated film in China. In the 2019 original, Nezha is born as the reincarnation of a demon with supernatural powers, but destined to live only three years. He fights back against his fate and saves his village.
In the sequel, Nezha revisits a similar theme. He challenges the political order and authority governing gods and demons, fighting the Dragon King of the Four Seas and other creatures.
' 'Ne Zha 2' is the rare movie that hits all the marks,' said Raymond Zhou, an independent Chinese film critic. 'It targets all demographics, and has successfully won over all of them.'
The movie has pulled in $1.2 billion in ticket sales since its release on Jan. 29, at the start of the Chinese Lunar New Year holiday, according to Maoyan, a Chinese entertainment data provider. Its haul is already more than double the highest-grossing movie of 2024. The film, distributed by CMC Pictures, will be released in North America on Friday.
Chinese state media and Communist Party officials celebrated the movie's success, portraying it as a recognition of China's cultural influence.
'Chinese culture is constantly moving forward in inheritance and innovation and showing its unique charm,' wrote the Global Times, a Communist Party tabloid.
China Daily, a state-run newspaper, said in an opinion essay that 'Ne Zha 2' symbolizes the country's 'growing cultural confidence.' It called it evidence that China's entertainment industry is telling its own stories instead of relying on Western studios to make movies based on Chinese folklore, citing 'Mulan' from Walt Disney Studios as an example.
' 'Ne Zha 2' reclaims the storytelling mantle, proving that no one can narrate China's myths better than China itself,' the essay stated.
Traditional Chinese culture has also inspired breakthroughs in other forms of entertainment. In video games, Black Myth: Wukong, based on a classic 16th century Chinese novel called 'Journey to the West,' was an instant hit when it came out last year.
Until 'Ne Zha 2,' the top-grossing Chinese films tapped into the country's deepening nationalistic fervor. The previous No. 1, 'The Battle at Lake Changjin,' is a 2021 film about a group of Chinese volunteers who defeated American soldiers during the Korean War. Close behind was 'Wolf Warrior 2,' a 2017 action film in which a Chinese former special forces soldier takes on an American villain.
It's been a tough stretch overall for Chinese films, however. Box office sales fell 23 percent last year, according to the China Film Administration, a government regulator.
The industry has gotten a boost from China's broader efforts to stimulate consumer spending and reinvigorate a sluggish economy. The government added an extra day to the more than weeklong New Year holiday, giving moviegoers more time to go to the theater. In addition, there were discounts, subsidies and other incentives for movie tickets.
But Mr. Zhou, the film critic, said the incentives did not explain the success of 'Ne Zha 2.' He credited the franchise's popularity to its spin on classic tales and characters, resonating with younger audiences.
As the world's second-largest movie market, after the United States, Chinese audiences were once a dependable source of ticket sales for Hollywood blockbusters.
That is no longer the case. Last year, 'Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire' was the only U.S. movie in the top 10 of China's box office, ranking ninth. In 2023, no American film cracked the top 10.
Hu Xijin, a former editor in chief of the Global Times, said China's decision to open up to Hollywood films in the 1990s helped advance the country's movie industry, but China can now stand on its own.
'This is the best Chinese animation I have ever seen,' Mr. Hu wrote on Weibo, a social media platform. 'The era when Chinese people looked up to Hollywood cartoons like 'Kung Fu Panda' and marveled at them is over.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why the Warner Bros. Discovery merger was doomed from the start
Warner Bros. Discovery's split is the latest proof that conglomerates are deeply out of fashion. Glomming diverse operations together smooths out profits through business cycles. It mutualizes economic risk. But it also mutualizes scandal, tainting a corporate empire with the real or perceived sins of one subsidiary. And with President Donald Trump looking for points of leverage, corporate sprawl is a real liability. ABC, CBS, CNN, and MSNBC are blips on the bottom lines of Warner Bros., Disney, Paramount, and Comcast. But they're lightning rods for controversy — Trump has sued two of those channels and complains constantly about the other two — and suck up executives' time and attention. News channels were never cash cows, but at least they were trophy assets that were fun to own. Not so much these days. It's not just the president: These companies' broad footprints leave no easy choices in the culture wars. Hollywood talent, middle-America cruise passengers, coders building streaming apps, and the guy installing your cable all get mad about different things. Conglomerates have lots of ways to get in trouble. This isn't entirely a new problem. In 1996, Martin Scorsese was shopping a movie about the Dalai Lama. Universal Studios, which was owned by Seagram at the time, passed. 'I don't need to have my spirits and wine business thrown out of China,' then-CEO Edgar Bronfman said. His fears were well-founded, and a preview of what we're seeing now: Disney made the movie, and landed on a Chinese blacklist that threatened the opening of its Shanghai theme park. Breakups like those announced by Warner Bros. Discovery and Comcast might be freeing for both sides. The next time Trump criticizes MSNBC, he can't threaten Comcast with (hypothetically) OSHA agents descending on Universal Orlando. Mark Lazarus, who will run Comcast's new cable spinoff, will be more exposed to political pressure without a corporate parent. But he can decide what to put on MSNBC without wondering what it will do to Harry Potter theme parks. For the second time in seven years and the third time this century, a company that bought the Warner Bros. entertainment empire wishes it had not. Failures to foresee tectonic changes — and the lure of media moguldom — has turned one of the most storied names in Hollywood into a dealmaking albatross. The split unwinds the 2022 merger of CNN and HBO owner WarnerMedia with Discovery, a jumble of cable channels offering humbler fare. It was a bet that content companies needed to be bigger to compete with Netflix, and that consumers would want to watch , Anderson Cooper's war zone dispatches, and in the same place. Its previous owner, AT&T, bought what was then called Time Warner in 2018 for about $100 billion, including debt, and almost immediately regretted it. In 2021, it struck a deal to sell it to Discovery for a package of cash and stock worth about $43 billion — a roughly $40 billion writedown (AT&T has disputed the latter number.) Go back further, and its predecessor was party to what is widely considered the worst corporate merger in history, the union of AOL and Time Warner in 2001. The M&A math is a bit hard to decipher, but a business worth around $100 billion to AT&T seven years ago is now roughly half of Warner Bros. Discovery, which trades at $24 billion today. It's not even the good half: Cable is in long-term decline, and CEO David Zaslav's parting gift to SpinCo is a 20% stake in the more valuable studio and streaming businesses that will stay behind. Why do companies keep getting this so wrong? After all, Netflix launched its streaming service in 2007, and Bob Iger first sounded the alarm about cord-cutting in 2015. AOL presaged the confluence of tech and media, but broadband killed dial-up and the dot-com bubble burst. AT&T, too, was onto something when it aimed to deliver shows directly to people's phones. But it was outmaneuvered by nimbler streamers, slowed down by a creaking debt load, culture clashes, and the Justice Department. Tech giants like Amazon have paid up for sports rights, a key part of the cable bundle. The result is a cable business melting faster than bosses expected. The winner in all this? Rupert Murdoch, who agreed to sell 21st Century Fox — a collection of cable channels plus a movie studio, more or less identical to Warner Bros. — to Disney for $71 billion in 2017, at what would prove to be the top. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dan David Prize names 9 historians as winners of 2025 award
JERUSALEM (AP) — The Dan David Prize will award nine historians, archaeologists and filmmakers from around the world with $300,000 for their research, the foundation announced Tuesday. The award winners are researching a vast array of topics, from the notebook of Isaac Newton's roommate to the history and culture of Ethiopian Jews. The academics recently received the prize during a ceremony in Italy. The prize, based at Tel Aviv University, is awarded each year to academics in the early and middle stages of their careers who are conducting 'innovative research on the human past.' 'By making groundbreaking discoveries or applying new methods to historical research, our winners constantly challenge us to think about the past while rethinking how we shed light on it,' said Ariel David, whose father, Dan David, founded the prize in 2001. One of the winners is Beth Lew-Williams of Princeton University, a historian whose work has focused on how legal discrimination impacted Chinese immigration to the US and the experience of Chinese immigrants. Another is Fred Kudjo Kuwornu of Do The Right Films, a filmmaker whose work focuses on Black representation and identity. His recent film, We Were Here: The Untold History of Black Africans in Renaissance Europe, was presented at the 2024 Biennale in Venice. Another awardee is Dmitri Levitin of the University of Utrecht and All Souls College, Oxford, a history of scholarship who is collaborating on research into the newly discovered notebook of Isaac Newton's university roommate. Other winners are Abidemi Babatunde Babalola of the British Museum, Mackenzie Cooley of Hamilton College, Bar Kribus of Tel Aviv University, Hannah Marcus, Harvard University, Alina Șerban, Founder of Untold Stories, and Caroline Sturdy Colls, University of Huddersfield. Among the ranks of past winners are Canadian author Margaret Atwood, the cellist Yo-Yo Ma and Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. infectious disease expert. The award was originally launched to focus on academic work that rewarded humanity. It has since shifted to focus specifically on those who study the past, with the idea that the prize will greatly enhance their research abilities.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eddington Trailer Previews Ari Aster's Polarizing Western Movie With Pedro Pascal
A new trailer for has been released. Eddington is the forthcoming A24 movie that is written and directed by Ari Aster. A contemporary Western starring Pedro Pascal and Joaquin Phoenix, the movie will be released in United States theaters next month. Check out the new Eddington trailer and poster below (watch more trailers and clips): The Eddington trailer previews tension between Phoenix and Pascal's characters, as both of them live in a small town in which everyone is angry at their neighbors, largely because of the COVID-19 pandemic. 'In May of 2020, a standoff between a small-town sheriff (Joaquin Phoenix) and mayor (Pedro Pascal) sparks a powder keg as neighbor is pitted against neighbor in Eddington, New Mexico,' the official synopsis reads. The cast of the movie also includes Austin Butler, Emma Stone, Luke Grimes, Deirdre O'Connell, Michael Ward, Clifton Collins Jr., Amélie Hoeferle, and William Belleau. Eddington had its world premiere at the Cannes Film Festival last month. The movie received polarizing reviews from critics; some, like Indiewire's David Ehrlich, praised its satirical take on COVID and modern times, while others, such The Times' Kevin Maher, felt that Eddington feels 'unsure of what it wants to say.' The film currently has a 65 percent score on Rotten Tomatoes with 49 reviews. Aster found himself in a similar position when Beau Is Afraid was released in 2023, as that movie also received mixed reviews. Prior to that, Aster directed Hereditary in 2018 and Midsommar in 2019. 'I felt like [Aster] wrote something that was all our worst fears as that lockdown experience was already a fracturing society,' Pascal said of the movie, via IndieWire, at Cannes. This was building toward an untethered sense of reality. There is a point of not going back. I was overwhelmed by that fear, and it's wonderful that it was confirmed by Ari.' Eddington will be released in United States theaters on July 18, 2025, from A24. The post Eddington Trailer Previews Ari Aster's Polarizing Western Movie With Pedro Pascal appeared first on - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.