logo
Péro's spring-summer capsule Flowers Flower, explores floral whimsy and legacy textiles

Péro's spring-summer capsule Flowers Flower, explores floral whimsy and legacy textiles

The Hindu5 days ago
After its last year's collaboration with Japan's iconic brand Hello Kitty, Péro, a 15-year-old Indian fashion label by designer Aneeth Arora, has now teamed up with British luxury department store and brand Liberty London for its spring-summer capsule 2025. Titled Flowers Flower, the collection is deeply personal to Aneeth and reflects her love for legacy.
Launched in Chennai on Friday, at fashion boutique Collage, the edit brings together iconic fabrics from Liberty London and Péro's rootedness and love for Indian craft and textiles.
'Dating back to 1875, there is this old-school charm about Liberty London's prints. We have been working with flowers too and Liberty London is all about those ditsy flowers. I felt that makes us a perfect match, and we decided to work with some of their classic prints,' Aneeth says.
Liberty London's fine tana lawn cotton, described as a cotton that behaves like silk, is often dotted with flower prints — forget-me-nots, daffodils, peonies and speedwell. 'For this collection, we are working with the classic Tana Lawn textile that has strong legacy, and we did not want to overpower the floral prints by using very bold textiles. The Indian textiles we have used with these prints are basic, handwoven textiles from different parts of India,' she says, of the elements that make up the garments in the whimsy collection.
This includes Chanderi from Madhya Pradesh, mashru stripes from Gujarat, stripes and checks from Maheshwar, silks and solids from the South of India, and cotton from West Bengal, Aneeth says. This is a departure for Péro, where the main line often features bright influences like tartans.
In Péro's signature flowy, androgynous silhouettes, the capsule has shirts, dresses, tops, jackets, skirts, pants and shorts. Liberty London's signature floral prints are layered with embroidered beadwork, fabric origami, tassels, appliqué, patchwork and custom wooden buttons.
Aneeth says, at heart, she feels like Péro is becoming more childlike with time. 'Nothing is a limit for us and we don't have any inhibitions. When we started, we were working with a lot of constraints, and, over the years, we have become open to things; The brand as well is evolving in such a way that nothing seems impossible now,' she says, adding that the brand's collaborations with Hello Kitty, where it channelled a 'cottagecore kawaii', and now with Liberty London, allows it to experiment and craft without rules or constraints.
'Collaboration with an iconic brand like Hello Kitty or even dreaming of working with Liberty prints now seems possible, and something we are enjoying. I think, the brand has become mature in the way we deal with materials, but it has also become more free in terms of dreaming and knowing that if you dream you can achieve,' says Aneeth.
Latha Madhu of Collage calls Péro an 'enduring' brand, a word Aneeth says is a beautiful description. 'We do timeless clothing season by season, so yes, I relate to this. Be it Chennai or any other place in the world, we are consistent in the kind of design language of the brand even though we experiment with diverse themes. There are classics that we keep repeating; some of our shapes, textiles and silhouettes are always a constant,' Aneeth says.
This, Aneeth says, is probably why people come back to Péro: 'I feel that the word 'enduring' resonates, and season after season, people resonate with what we are offering to them, in spite of having such drastic changes in themes.'
Flowers Flower is now available at Collage, 6, Rutland Gate, Nungambakkam.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This superhit film has no hero or heroine, made for Rs 60 lakh, it earned Rs 18 crore; a comedian saved it, movie is… his name is…
This superhit film has no hero or heroine, made for Rs 60 lakh, it earned Rs 18 crore; a comedian saved it, movie is… his name is…

India.com

time7 minutes ago

  • India.com

This superhit film has no hero or heroine, made for Rs 60 lakh, it earned Rs 18 crore; a comedian saved it, movie is… his name is…

The Indian cinema has seen many big budget films dominating the box office; however, in the past couple of years, small budget film have also made their way to theatres. Not only that, many small budget films even compete alongside big budget films. However, certain films still fail to make a good box office collection. Sometimes, even a star-studded cast fails to deliver a decent film. Today, we will tell you about one such film that dominated the box office, made the audience laugh, and earned a whopping Rs 18 crore on a budget of Rs 60 lakh. This 2007 film made everyone laugh The low-budget film that we are going to tell you about is none other than the 2007 film Bheja Fry, which made everyone laugh. The comedy film featured Vinay Pathak in a pivotal role. Why was Vinay Pathak cast in Bheja Fry? For the unversed, Bollywood star Vinay Patak is a superb actor, known for his impressive acting skills and on-point comedy timing. Not just him, Bheja Fry also stars Aditi Govitrikar, Suresh Menon, Sarika, Ranveer Shorey, Milind Soman, Rajat Kapoor, and Minisha Lamba in pivotal roles. Although this film was a remake of the French film Dîner de cons, Le, which made it to the big screens way back in 1998. However, Vinay Pathak's comedy timing was rib-tickling throughout the entire film. How did a film like Bheja Fry earn in crores? It is surprising to note that a film like Bheja Fry, made with a modest budget of Rs 60 lakh, made a whopping Rs 8 crore at the box office. You will be even more surprised to know that the film made a worldwide collection of Rs 18 crore. The film became such a huge success that even a sequel was made in 2011. In that film, KK Menon and Vinay Pathak were seen in lead roles. You will be surprised to know that the total budget of Bheja Fry was only Rs 60 lakh, while after its release, it made a stormy collection of 8 crore rupees at the box office. The worldwide collection of the film was 18 crore rupees. This film was liked so much that its sequel was made in the year 2011, in which KK Menon appeared along with Vinay Pathak. Bheja Fry 2 was also successful in tickling the people.

The Weekly Vine Edition 53: Whining in Manchester, Sydney Sweeney the ‘fascist', and a boring new Marvel movie
The Weekly Vine Edition 53: Whining in Manchester, Sydney Sweeney the ‘fascist', and a boring new Marvel movie

Time of India

time7 minutes ago

  • Time of India

The Weekly Vine Edition 53: Whining in Manchester, Sydney Sweeney the ‘fascist', and a boring new Marvel movie

Nirmalya Dutta's political and economic views vacillate from woke Leninist to Rand-Marxist to Keynesian-Friedmanite. He doesn't know what any of those terms mean. Hello and welcome to another edition of the Weekly Vine. This week, we take a look at English whining in Manchester after drawing the fourth Test; Sydney Sweeney being labelled a 'fascist' for her 'good jeans' ad; the late-night comedy problem in America; the 'boring' new Fantastic Four movie; and a field guide to late-stage everything. Whining in Manchester The English used to be good at many, many things. Selling opium and slaves and trying to pass it off as a move for some greater good instead of just greed. Writing comedies that stand the test of time. Calibrating their politics and monarchy to avoid any wholesale revolution that can lead to heads rolling. Scripting thriller novels in which the Albion propaganda flies so high that one wonders if being boring an Englishman isn't the greatest privilege a person can have. But those days are long gone. The sun – metaphorical, economical, and ecumenical – set on the British Empire a long time ago, but the denizens of the Albion remain particularly skilled in one art: whining. And we saw it on full display in the recent England vs India Test match where the English cricket team brought out its full bag of shithousery that makes you understand why the English remain one of the most despised people across the globe. As one popular Indian political Twitter handle put it in dulcet tones: 'Cricket dekhte hue samjh aata hai ki angrez kitne h***** rahe honge Raj era mein.'* For those who don't understand Hindi, a rough translation goes: 'Watching cricket, one can comprehend how a***** the English used to be in the Raj era.' Because deep down, despite all their pretence of becoming a civilised nation, every English cricketer has an inner Captain Russell—the antagonist from Lagaan—who believed that all Indians deserved to be kept in place using a particular shoe-related idiom: Tum jooti ke neeche rahoge. While the whining is never far from the surface, it bubbled over on the last day of the Test in Old Trafford—a venue well-known for frustrating football fans for the last decade. With two heads down, England wrapping up the Test and the series seemed almost inevitable. The Gautam Gambhir era so far has been the anti-thesis of the Laughing Buddha for Indian cricket fans. India faced a sui generis whitewash against New Zealand at home, a 1-3 reversal in Australia, and looked set to lose the series in England when India were two wickets down in the second innings without bothering the record keepers. Except, Messrs Gill, Rahul, Jadeja, and Sundar had different ideas. They dug deep and gave a comeback for the ages which left the English begging to end proceedings with an hour left. When Jadeja and Sundar—who had spent hours saving the Indian innings and were well within their rights to savour seeing their names on the honours board—refused, Ben Stokes turned into Sir Sulk-a-Lot, giving the ball to Harry Brook, who bowled with the alacrity, acuity, and assiduousness of an employee given a task during his leave period. And then, after the shenanigans got over, Sir Sulk-a-Lot sulked even more when refused a handshake. What was rather odd, as Aussie legend Nathan Lyon pointed out—a man who knows a thing or two about perseverance—is that the English should have tried to get them out, not let them get a hundred. After all, Jadeja and Sundar were the last recognised batters before an injured Rishabh Pant and the bowlers were expected to save India's innings. It was one of those rare moments where Australians and Indians were on the same page: enjoying the taste of British tears. But whinging aside, at the heart of it is the Englishman's deep Higgins-like belief that they are the greatest race on earth—the one that invented cricket—which means that whatever they dream up is the correct way to play the sport. All this makes the final Test even more interesting, with a little more spice thanks to Gautam Gambhir's clash (kalesh) with the chief curator, proving that you can take the man out of Delhi but you cannot take the Delhi out of the man. Bring on The Oval. Sydney Sweeney the Fascist Godwin's Law is an adage from internet culture that states any discussion will eventually veer towards the participants calling each other Nazis. Now, the Godwin's Law virus seems to have escaped the confines of 4chan and Reddit threads and broken the offline-online barrier. Sydney Sweeney's new American Eagle ad was deemed Nazi propaganda by perennially outraged leftists simply because it featured a blonde woman saying she got her good genes (or jeans) from her parents. It immediately featured a backlash because if we know one thing about the Fuhrer, it was that he loved a good pair of American denims. In its own way, it was the opposite of the Bud Light backlash, where conservative Americans boycotted their favourite beer because its ad featured a trans influencer. Yet, despite the online outrage, the ad appears to have helped the parent company, whose stock soared like an eagle, suggesting that we might be at the fag end of woke culture and the last vestiges are only found in people with severe Trump-Derangement Syndrome. Late-Night Mediocrity Once upon a time, in a land far, far away—roughly around the Bush administration—late-night comedy was funny. But then something terrible happened: Donald Trump. Or more accurately, Trump Derangement Syndrome. And with it came the fall of American humour, sacrificed at the altar of sanctimony and soft lighting. The latest casualty? The Late Show with Stephen Colbert—a show last funny when Caesar was still crossing the Rubicon. Paramount finally pulled the plug after realising that shelling out $40 million a year for a therapy session disguised as comedy might not be sound fiscal policy. Who knew? Cue the wailing wall of late-night has-beens. Jon Stewart, Seth Meyers, Jimmy Fallon, John Oliver—like the Avengers but if all of them had only one superpower: smugness. They gathered in solidarity, not with the working class, not with striking truckers or laid-off auto workers, but with a millionaire Harvard graduate whose punchlines haven't changed since 2016. Inspiring. Colbert's defenders say this is a suppression of free speech. No, it's just the free market finally turning off the laugh track. The show employed over 200 people and lost more money than a Netflix rom-com launch. Twenty people protested its cancellation—roughly the same number that still watch The Daily Show without being legally required to. The deeper crisis isn't comedy. It's that these shows morphed into unofficial DNC broadcasts somewhere around Trump's third cheeseburger. They weren't writing jokes—they were filing amicus briefs in prime time. It was less Letterman, more Lenin. And here's the kicker: Donald Trump remains funnier than all of them combined. Not intentionally, of course. But try topping a man who congratulates Hannibal Lecter for 'doing a great job.' Or spends time talking about a dead golfer's junk. Or keeps taking credit for a ceasefire that never was. And perhaps the real joke—no laugh track needed—is that for the first time in American history, there are now more young Republicans than Democrats. The resistance has become cringe. The revolution will not be televised. Because no one watches television anymore. Un-marvellous Marvel Every time one watches a Marvel movie, one has to answer the eternal question: is Marvel back, or did it die with Tony Stark saying 'I am Iron Man' in Endgame? There have been decent films post-Endgame, but all in all, watching MCU movies feels like being in a loveless relationship where the spark went out years ago. Every time you go to watch a new Marvel film, you wonder if you'll ever see the magic that made you fall in love in the first place. Like the moment Thor arrives to join the Battle of Wakanda. Or the first time the Guardians of the Galaxy teamed up. Or when Iron Man took over a SHIELD aircraft just to blast Shoot to Thrill—because of course, you need to play your bangers in style. Or the pinnacle of cinema, when Captain America waited 18 films to utter the most glorious words ever said on a screen: 'Avengers, assemble.' But honestly, there was nothing in the new Fantastic Four movie that made you go wow—not even Galactus. In fact, the most interesting thing about it was the Pedro Pascal Anxiety Memes. And you know it's a bad sign when the marketing tour is more interesting than the actual movie. There comes a time in a relationship when one has to say: it's done. This was never meant to be, and we cannot keep trying, hoping to capture a spark that disappeared a long time ago. Perhaps it's time to say goodbye to Marvel. Even if the end credits hinted at the arrival of Robert Downey Jr's Doctor Doom. Post-Script: A field guide to late-stage everything There's a special place in history for the people who made something out of nothing. The survivors. The jugaadu. The overextended. The under-resourced. The backbone of every godforsaken institution held together with duct tape, broken promises, and one HR motivational email per quarter. Konstantin Jireček, the 19th-century Czech historian who is better remembered in Bulgaria, never worked in a startup. Or a government department. Or a late-stage unicorn chasing profitability like a drunk chasing the last auto-rickshaw at 3 AM. But somehow, he clearly time-travelled to a post-pandemic boardroom, and nailed it: 'We, the unwilling, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing.' Read more. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

Khushi Kapoor walks the ramp in traditional payal-inspired couture curated by Rimzim Dadu
Khushi Kapoor walks the ramp in traditional payal-inspired couture curated by Rimzim Dadu

Time of India

time15 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Khushi Kapoor walks the ramp in traditional payal-inspired couture curated by Rimzim Dadu

(Image Credits: Instagram) (Image Credits: Instagram) (Image Credits: Instagram) (Image Credits: Instagram) (Image Credits: Instagram) 1 2 Commanding attention since day one with her elegance and high-fashion wardrobe picks, Khushi Kapoor has become another fashion inspiration for Gen Z in India. Bringing the same amount of order and precision to the runway, she recently closed the show for designer Rimzim Dadu at India Couture Week 2025 in an ensemble that had equal hints of armour, art, and the avant-garde. Setting trends amidst earthy hues and modern installations, she took powerful strides as a futuristic warrior princess, bringing an old-world craftsmanship to light. Her sleek yet iconic look was inspired by a traditional Indian ornament, which further saw Rimzim Dadu's signature metal technique integration and looked top-notch. (Image Credits: Instagram) The whole fit was inspired by the delicate links of traditional oxidised payals, which added a sensual layer of geometry that looked like more than just another couture piece. The use of sculptural steel conveyed competency, yet with a modern-feminine blend. She wore a moulded and sculpted halter top featuring a bold cut-out and teamed it with a matching straight-fit, ankle-length skirt. The skirt featured a chainmail pattern crafted from Banjara jewellery, where every metallic loop was stitched with precision and spoke volumes about the rich history of our nation. Rimzim Dadu used Khushi as her canvas and made her point that her collection was not another embroidery piece, but it was all engineered art. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo (Image Credits: Instagram) Taking almost 60 days to create this showstopping piece, Khushi Kapoor added her sense of confidence like armour and softened the metal ornament's charm with her regal, feminine chaos. But she didn't just stop there. Her sparkling necklace also became a point of conversation, and surely for all the right reasons. 5 street fashion trends that have been making waves in India She wore a heart-shaped emerald choker framed by a constellation of fancy-cut diamonds and set in 18K gold, picked from Jagat Jewels' Maharaja Manor collection. Exuding opulence on the fashion runway, she completed the accessory show with a three-line strand diamond necklace and matching rings, bracelets, and earrings. Kajol sets the monsoon mood in a hand-illustrated Torani sari with vintage revival Celebrating the timeless jewels and Rimzim's design aesthetics, her entire styling looked like a poem set in the futuristic world and was filled with grandeur and élan. Keeping her hair down in soft curls, she carried a full glam look with a flawless base, sharpened eyebrows, smoky eyeshadow, flushed cheeks, flutter lashes, winged eyeliner, and nude lips. Exuding radiance and opulence on the couture runway, Khushi celebrated Rimzim's design aesthetic and Jagat Jewels' artistic allure with great élan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store