Middle East Tensions Stir Markets, Ringgit Holds Firm
Despite a firm US Dollar Index (DXY), the ringgit opened stronger on Monday against the greenback and a slew of major and regional currencies, with geopolitical anxieties dominating sentiment.
At 8am, the local unit stood at 4.2420/2655 against the US dollar, up from Friday's close of 4.2505/2565. This came as the US launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, raising fears of a broader conflict involving Israel and Iran.
'The focus is clearly on how it might impact crude oil prices and risk sentiment,' said Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid. He noted Brent crude had jumped 2.49% to US$78.93 a barrel — its highest level since January 2025 — amid concerns that Iran could respond by leveraging control of the Straits of Hormuz.
Afzanizam added that while the ringgit firmed initially, the currency market remains cautious, with potential downside risks as traders shift into risk-off mode. The US Dollar Index has reached 98.937 points, while spot gold rose 0.27% to US$3,377.42 per ounce.
Against other major currencies, the ringgit rose to 2.9023/9186 against the Japanese yen from 2.9245/9289, strengthened to 5.7000/7316 versus the British pound from 5.7356/7437, and edged up to 4.8800/9070 against the euro from 4.9000/9069.
The ringgit also posted gains against regional peers — improving to 3.2948/3133 against the Singapore dollar, 12.9243/13.0042 versus the Thai baht, 258.6/260.2 vis-a-vis the Indonesian rupiah, and 7.42/7.46 against the Philippine peso. Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Analysis: NATO summit highlights internal tensions amid Trump's defense spending push, says experts
By Zhao Xiaona, Larry Neild LONDON, June 23 (Xinhua) -- As NATO leaders gather this week in The Hague for the alliance's first-ever summit hosted by the Netherlands, attention is shifting toward the alliance's cohesion and internal dynamics, rather than facing external policy challenges. According to the agenda, although the summit officially runs for two days, from June 24 to 25, the key discussions are expected to take place over the course of a single day. The agenda is narrowly focused on U.S. President Donald Trump's proposal to raise defense spending targets to 5 percent of GDP - a plan that has received a mixed response from European capitals, highlighting deeper concerns about NATO's unity, military capabilities, and long-term strategic direction. "This summit is highly Trump-centric," said Stefan Wolff, professor of international security at the University of Birmingham. "It's been compressed to a single day, with a single agenda item, designed to limit unpredictability. That reflects NATO's institutional anxiety - a defensive effort to retain the U.S. as a participant, even at the cost of long-term planning." Wolff added that the summit's tightly controlled structure underscores fears that Trump might exit prematurely or withdraw support if discussions stray beyond his specified terms. "The structure of this meeting is intentionally risk-averse," he said. "It's not about building consensus - it's about avoiding disruption." Although Trump's demand for higher defense spending dominates the agenda, recent unilateral U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have further diverted NATO's focus from its foundational mission - strengthening Europe's defense architecture. "The U.S. acted alone, and Europe simply wasn't part of that conversation," Wolff said. "Europe still lacks strategic enablers - intelligence, long-range transport, rapid deployment, and command systems. These aren't just budget issues - they are structural gaps." Wolff warned that even if NATO members meet the proposed 5 percent target, without prioritization and coordinated defense-industrial development, such spending risks becoming "financial inflation without strategic output." Internal divisions further complicate the alliance's ability to act cohesively. While some member states push for a more proactive collective defense role, others remain reluctant to commit to common strategies or timelines. "If NATO cannot agree on its main purpose, then even well-funded forces will lack shared direction," Wolff said. "Without unity, the 5 percent target becomes just another political gesture to buy time." John Bryson, chair of Enterprise and Economic Geography at Birmingham Business School, the University of Birmingham, described the summit as a crucial test for Europe's defense ambitions. "This is a test of whether Europe can grow beyond its dependency on the United States and shape a credible defense model of its own," he said. Bryson noted that raising defense spending is not a panacea for NATO. "This is the paradox of deterrence - you spend vast sums on weapons that may never be used, and that doesn't automatically translate into security. " He emphasized that NATO should be a stabilizing force. "It is not a war-fighting alliance, but a war-prevention structure. The moment it loses its cohesion, it loses its meaning." Both Bryson and Wolff agreed that the alliance faces fragile internal conditions. Trump's influence, they said, has driven NATO toward short-term reassurance at the expense of long-term strategic development. Bryson also noted that Washington's growing involvement in Middle East conflicts risks further distracting NATO from its core European focus. "Venturing beyond its geographic scope could dilute NATO's identity as a defensive pact - and that, above all, must be safeguarded," Bryson said.
Malaysia Sun
6 hours ago
- Malaysia Sun
Oil flip-flops, dollar firms after US hits Iran nuclear facilities
The dollar strengthened and oil prices pulled back from their early gains on Monday after the US struck Irans nuclear facilities at the weekend. Asian markets, however, retreated while European stocks were slightly higher as traders nervously awaited Irans response. Oil pricesgave up most of their early gains on Monday and the dollar strengthenedafter the United States struck Iran's nuclear facilities at the weekend. Asian marketsmostly retreated while European bourses were marginally higher as traders wait to see how Tehran could respond. Read moreIran vows US will 'receive a response' after strikes on nuclear sites "Everything hinges onIran's response and whether it's a symbolic jab or a haymaker that knocks theStrait of Hormuzoffline," said Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management. One option on the table would be to potentially create economic havoc by seeking to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz -- which carries one-fifth of global oil output. Iran is the world's ninth-biggest oil-producing country, with output of about 3.3 million barrels per day. Itexportsjust under half of that amount and consumes the rest. Read more'Dangerous escalation': World leaders call for return to diplomacy after US strikes on Iran When trading opened on Monday, Brent and the main US crude contract WTI both jumped more than four percent to hit their highest price since January. They pared these gains however and briefly dipped into the red before recovering totradeslightly higher. "So far, satellite images reportedly suggest that oil continues to flow through the Strait, which may explain the muted market reaction to the news," said Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote Bank. "Many remain optimistic that Iran will avoid a full-blown retaliation and regional chaos, to prevent its own oil facilities from becoming targets and to avoid a widening conflict that could hurtChinaits biggest oil customer." But "if things get uglier" the price of US crude could even spike beyond $100 per barrel, she said. WTI was trading around $74 per barrel on Monday. 'Extreme route' "An oil price shock would create a real negative impact on most Asian economies" as many are big net energy importers, economists at MUFG warned. Tokyo,Seoul, Sydney,Singapore, Taipei, Manila, Bangkok and Jakarta were all lower. Hong Kong, Shanghai and Kuala Lumpur were the only gainers in Asia. InEuropean marketsLondonand Frankfurt ticked marginally higher whilePariswas flat. Read moreRussia and China push for a ceasefire as UN Security Council meets on Iran The dollar rose against other currencies but analysts questioned to what extent this would hold out. "If the increase proves to be just a knee-jerk reaction to what is perceived as short-lived US involvement in the Middle-East conflict, the dollar's downward path is likely to resume," said Sebastian Boyd, markets live blog strategist at Bloomberg. Chris Weston at Pepperstone said Iran would be able to inflict economic damage on the world without taking the "extreme route" of trying to close the Strait of Hormuz. "By planting enough belief that they could disrupt this key logistical channel, maritime costs could rise to the point that it would have a significant impact on the supply of crude and gas," he wrote. At the same time, "while Trump's primary focus will be on theMiddle East, headlines on trade negotiations could soon start to roll in and market anxieties could feasibly build". Key figures at around 0900 GMT Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.2 percent at $77.14 per barrel WestTexasIntermediate: UP 0.1 percent at $73.94 per barrel Tokyo -Nikkei225: DOWN 0.1 percent at 38,354.09 (close) Hong Kong- Hang Seng Index: UP 0.7 percent at 23,689.13 (close) Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.7 percent at 3,381.58 (close) London - FTSE 100: UP 0.1 percent at 8,800.5 Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1458 from $1.1516 on Friday Pound/dollar: UP at $1.3445 from $1.3444 Dollar/yen: UP at 147.94 yen from 146.13 yen Euro/pound: DOWN at 85.65 pence from 85.66 pence New York- Dow: UP 0.1 percent at 42,206.82 (close) (FRANCE 24 with AFP) Originally published on France24
Malaysia Sun
6 hours ago
- Malaysia Sun
Oil dips, dollar firms after US strikes in Iran
Oil prices gave up most of their early gains on Monday and the dollar strengthened after the United States struck Iran's nuclear facilities at the weekend. Asian markets mostly retreated while European bourses were marginally higher as traders wait to see how Tehran could respond. "Everything hinges on Iran's response -- and whether it's a symbolic jab or a haymaker that knocks the Strait of Hormuz offline," said Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management. One option on the table would be to potentially create economic havoc by seeking to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz -- which carries one-fifth of global oil output. Iran is the world's ninth-biggest oil-producing country, with output of about 3.3 million barrels per day. It exports just under half of that amount and consumes the rest. When trading opened on Monday, Brent and the main US crude contract WTI both jumped more than four percent to hit their highest price since January. They pared these gains however and briefly dipped into the red before recovering to trade slightly higher. "So far, satellite images reportedly suggest that oil continues to flow through the Strait, which may explain the muted market reaction to the news," said Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote Bank. "Many remain optimistic that Iran will avoid a full-blown retaliation and regional chaos, to prevent its own oil facilities from becoming targets and to avoid a widening conflict that could hurt China -- its biggest oil customer." But "if things get uglier" the price of US crude could even spike beyond $100 per barrel, she said. WTI was trading around $74 per barrel on Monday. 'Extreme route' "An oil price shock would create a real negative impact on most Asian economies" as many are big net energy importers, economists at MUFG warned. Tokyo, Seoul, Sydney, Singapore, Taipei, Manila, Bangkok and Jakarta were all lower. Hong Kong, Shanghai and Kuala Lumpur were the only gainers in Asia. In European markets London and Frankfurt ticked marginally higher while Paris was flat. The dollar rose against other currencies but analysts questioned to what extent this would hold out. "If the increase proves to be just a knee-jerk reaction to what is perceived as short-lived US involvement in the Middle-East conflict, the dollar's downward path is likely to resume," said Sebastian Boyd, markets live blog strategist at Bloomberg. Chris Weston at Pepperstone said Iran would be able to inflict economic damage on the world without taking the "extreme route" of trying to close the Strait of Hormuz. "By planting enough belief that they could disrupt this key logistical channel, maritime costs could rise to the point that it would have a significant impact on the supply of crude and gas," he wrote. At the same time, "while Trump's primary focus will be on the Middle East, headlines on trade negotiations could soon start to roll in and market anxieties could feasibly build". Key figures at around 0900 GMT Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.2 percent at $77.14 per barrel West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.1 percent at $73.94 per barrel Tokyo - Nikkei 225: DOWN 0.1 percent at 38,354.09 (close) Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: UP 0.7 percent at 23,689.13 (close) Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.7 percent at 3,381.58 (close) London - FTSE 100: UP 0.1 percent at 8,800.5 Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1458 from $1.1516 on Friday Pound/dollar: UP at $1.3445 from $1.3444 Dollar/yen: UP at 147.94 yen from 146.13 yen Euro/pound: DOWN at 85.65 pence from 85.66 pence New York - Dow: UP 0.1 percent at 42,206.82 (close) Originally published on France24
