logo
Mamdani stuns Cuomo: 5 takeaways from the NYC mayoral primary

Mamdani stuns Cuomo: 5 takeaways from the NYC mayoral primary

The Hill5 hours ago

Zohran Mamdani stunned political observers across the country on Tuesday as he looks set to win the Democratic nomination for mayor of New York City over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
While a winner hasn't been officially declared, Cuomo didn't wait for the entire vote to be tabulated to concede. Less than two hours after the polls closed, he told his supporters that 'tonight was Assemblyman Mamdani's night,' underscoring a seismic shift in American politics.
Mamdani made gains on Cuomo in recent weeks but still trailed in most polling against the former New York governor, who entered the race in March as the clear favorite. But Mamdani rose rapidly as the primary approached.
Here are five takeaways from the night's results:
Mamdani's rise is one of the most stunning in recent memory.
He entered the Democratic race to replace embattled Mayor Eric Adams in the general election as a little-known state legislator who had only served in office since 2021. He started out in single digits in polling, well behind Cuomo, and found himself in the middle of a pack of other candidates trying to break through.
His momentum was apparent in recent weeks as he closed the gap behind Cuomo in the polls and gained several high-profile endorsements from top progressives like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). The progressive Working Families Party also called on voters to rank Mamdani first on their ballots.
How much he closed the gap seemed up in the air as polls varied significantly. While one independent poll showed Mamdani within range of Cuomo and prevailing in the final round, most of the polls consistently showed Cuomo ahead.
But that polling lead didn't materialize as voters headed to the polls. Mamdani is currently on track to be ahead in the first round and won't need as much support from other candidates' voters to reach a majority.
With 92 percent of the estimated vote in as of Tuesday night, Decision Desk HQ found the New York State Assembly member leading the pack at close to 44 percent, while Cuomo had 36 percent of the vote and New York City Comptroller Brad Lander sat at 11 percent.
Ultimately, Mamdani's victory is likely to go down as one of the most stunning upsets in recent political memory.
Cuomo's concession of the Democratic primary on Tuesday may have added to the stunning effect of the night's results, but New York City voters might not have seen the last of him.
Cuomo announced in May that he would also run in the general election under the banner of the Fight and Deliver Party, saying at the time that he wanted to secure the largest coalition possible and appeal to those disillusioned with the Democratic Party.
As long as he receives enough signatures to appear on the ballot, and assuming he decides to go forward, this would likely ensure him a spot facing off against Mamdani again.
But Cuomo seemed uncertain about whether he would go through with this general election campaign, saying he'll take time to decide how to go forward.
'I want to look at all the numbers as they come in and analyze the rank choice voting,' he said in a statement. 'I will then consult with my colleagues on what is the best path for me to help the City of New York, as I have already qualified to run for mayor on an independent line in November.'
After a few notable defeats or close calls in recent months, Tuesday night offered a much-needed shot in the arm for progressives.
Mamdani, a democratic socialist, had the backing of Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez, the de facto leaders of the progressive movement, and observers were watching closely to see if the two members of Congress scored an important symbolic victory in the New York City primary.
Notably, Mamdani made no effort to distance himself from the left wing of his party, which has struggled to repair its image in the wake of former Vice President Harris's loss in November.
Cuomo, meanwhile, had received the backing of more establishment Democrats in addition to a handful of members of Congress, including New York Reps. Adriano Espaillat, George Latimer, Tom Suozzi and Ritchie Torres. Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) also offered an endorsement in the race.
Mamdani's strong performance so far in the race is notable given progressives have suffered some losses over the last year, including both Bowman and former Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) — some of the most high-profile progressive members of Congress who lost their primaries last cycle.
His victory comes amid an intraparty battle between the progressive and establishment wings of the party. Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders have sought to harness grassroots progressive energy around the country through appearances focused on ending American 'oligarchy.'
This year's New York City mayoral race is also a far cry from 2021, which catapulted Eric Adams, who was campaigning then as a centrist Democrat with a background as a former police officer, to mayor's office. Voters have since soured on Adams, who was embroiled in a corruption case that was ultimately dropped earlier this year.
In other races in the city, progressive Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg coasted to easy primary wins against more moderate challengers.
Key to Mamdani's victory was his strong performance not just with groups with which he had been polling well, but also with groups that polls suggested weren't as favorable to him.
Polling had regularly shown Mamdani's strengths to be with young voters, in particular millennials and those from Gen Z, while Cuomo relied on an aging population. The results come as many Democrats have expressed frustration with the party's old guard and called for generational change.
Mamdani was also seen to be stronger with white voters and those with college degrees, the latter of whom increasingly are part of the Democratic base and are regular voters. But Mamdani also performed decently with groups that Cuomo had leaned on, winning in some mixed Black-Hispanic areas and keeping his losses in Black areas to smaller amounts than expected.
He also won in some wealthy older white areas. Mamdani was expected to perform well among wealthier voters, but older voters were key to Cuomo's path to victory.
One question looming over the party after Tuesday night will be whether Democrats use Mamdani's campaign as a guide moving forward in their own elections, particularly as he sought to create a diverse coalition of key voting blocs and energized young voters – some of the same ones the party struggled with last cycle.
The mayoral election may also prompt some members of the party to reconsider voters' appetites toward voting for new and diverse candidates. Many establishment and centrist Democrats aligned themselves with Cuomo despite his controversies as Mamdani was viewed as politically too far left by some. But if Tuesday night demonstrated anything, it's that Democrats aren't shy about disrupting the status quo and rejecting powerful Democratic brands.
Political observers, of course, can only extrapolate so much from one singular election. Yet the election comes against the backdrop of a party that is struggling with how to counter President Trump in his second term and giving its base reasons to be excited about voting for Democrats.
While the mayoral race could easily be seen as a moderate-progressive David vs. Goliath story, it's also a part of a larger dynamic of younger candidates challenging older politicians. The primary results may add winds in younger Democrats' sails, particularly those challenging older incumbents in Congress.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK says it will buy F-35 jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs
UK says it will buy F-35 jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs

San Francisco Chronicle​

time44 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

UK says it will buy F-35 jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — The United Kingdom will buy 12 U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs and will join NATO's shared airborne nuclear mission, in a major expansion of its nuclear deterrent, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Wednesday. The government called it 'the biggest strengthening of the U.K.'s nuclear posture in a generation.' Starmer made the announcement while attending a NATO summit in the Netherlands. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte welcomed the decision, calling it 'yet another robust British contribution to NATO.' The U.K. phased out air-dropped atomic weapons in the 1990s after the end of the Cold War. Its nuclear arsenal now consists of submarine-based missiles. Only three NATO members – the U.S., Britain and France – are nuclear powers, while seven nations contribute to the alliance's nuclear mission by contributing jets that can carry either conventional or weapons or American B61 bombs stockpiled in Europe. The use of nuclear weapons by the U.K. as part of the mission would require the authorization of the alliance's nuclear planning group as well as the U.S. president and British prime minister. Starmer also announced that the U.K. will provide 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds ($95 million) raised from interest on seized Russian assets. The announcements come as the U.K. and other NATO members pledge to increase spending on security to 5% of gross domestic product by 2035. The total includes 3.5% on defense and another 1.5% on broader security and resilience efforts.

China Responds to Trump's Cryptic Post About Iran Oil
China Responds to Trump's Cryptic Post About Iran Oil

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

China Responds to Trump's Cryptic Post About Iran Oil

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China has responded to U.S. President Donald Trump's post about its purchases of Iranian oil, saying it would prioritize its national interests. Trump, having brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, posted to Truth Social that China could continue purchasing Iranian oil and may also buy it from the U.S. It cut across a long-running American policy of deterring Iranian oil exports through sanctions to weaken the Tehran regime's most important source of revenue. "China will take legitimate measures to safeguard its energy security based on its own national interests," Guo Jiakun, spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, said at a press briefing on Wednesday, June 25, in response to a question about the post. Trump had posted on Tuesday that "China can now continue to purchase Oil from Iran. Hopefully, they will be purchasing plenty from the U.S., also. It was my Great Honor to make this happen!" This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Trump delaying the TikTok ban is the most lawless thing he's done yet
Trump delaying the TikTok ban is the most lawless thing he's done yet

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump delaying the TikTok ban is the most lawless thing he's done yet

The president does not have discretion over which laws he would like to enforce and which he would like to ignore. Trump's decision to arbitrarily extend TikTok's lifespan does exactly that. The first several months of Donald Trump's second presidential term have been marked by controversy and charges that he's a lawless president. However, the most brazen example of Trump's lawlessness is his refusal to enforce the TikTok ban, which has been passed by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court. On June 19, Trump extended the deadline for TikTok to shut down by another 90 days, marking the third time he has done so. The TikTok ban is the law of the land, and Trump's refusal to enforce it is a dereliction of his duties as president. Those who are silent on it should put aside their own personal motives and bring more attention to this fact. TikTok ban is the law of the land Many forget that a TikTok ban was originally Trump's idea, and that many Democrats wrote the idea off as just another piece of his anti-China agenda. However, things have changed. Trump seemingly developed a soft spot for TikTok because he believes it helped him win reelection. Still, in the time between Trump's original stance and his change of heart on the issue, a law banning TikTok passed the House and Senate and was signed in 2024 by then-President Joe Biden. The Supreme Court even upheld the ban, against the arguments of TikTok's lawyers. Trump saved TikTok – for now. Guess it's not a national security threat anymore? | Opinion The law banning TikTok does have a provision that allows for the president to delay the deadline for TikTok to cease operations or agree to a sale. Still, the criteria allowing for such an extension are nowhere close to being fulfilled. The text of the ban allows for the president to extend the deadline a single time for 90 days, so long as TikTok is close to reaching a deal with an American company to sell. There is no indication that's the case, and Trump's arbitrary executive orders are flagrantly illegal. Even Trump's guise in refusing to enforce the law – the idea that he is attempting to give TikTok time to broker a deal − doesn't make sense. Nothing would be more compelling for TikTok to sell the app to an American company than the ban going into effect. An app that cannot run is useless to its owners, and their best course of action would be to sell. Trump has no authority to refuse to enforce the law The president does not have discretion over which laws he would like to enforce and which he would like to ignore. Trump's decision to arbitrarily extend TikTok's lifespan does exactly that. The president, along with the rest of the executive branch, has an obligation to enforce the laws of the nation that have been passed by Congress and signed into law. A president's job is to enforce the law, whereas Congress' job is to decide what the law is. When a president can choose which laws he is to enforce, he is deciding what the law is, in a sense. Opinion: AOC howls about impeaching Trump. But president had the authority to bomb Iran. That's why Trump's refusal to enforce the ban is his most lawless action as president. Sure, there's the constitutionality of his deportation schemes and his reinterpretation of birthright citizenship, but those instances had judicial checks. In no other area is Trump as actively derelict in his duties as president without repercussions as he is in relation to the TikTok ban. For all the talk about Trump being a lawless president, Democrats and Republicans have both been relatively quiet about this single worst example of Trump acting as such. Republicans should be wary about the next administration of Democrats that comes along refusing to enforce a certain law because they disagree with it, or they simply don't feel like it. If Democrats were the ones refusing to enforce the ban on TikTok, it would be the only thing Republicans talked about. I'm sure that the outrage would be far louder if Trump were refusing to enforce other statutes, such as parts of the National Firearms Act, the tax code, or any other number of statutes that Democrats are sympathetic to. However, because it concerns a popular social media platform remaining in service, the complaints are rather quiet. Refusal to enforce laws is not a path Americans want our presidents to travel. That slippery slope can take us to some very dangerous places. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store