logo
Why newly-independent India barred an official from accepting a Cuban honour

Why newly-independent India barred an official from accepting a Cuban honour

Scroll.in6 days ago
In June 1948, Ashfaque Husain, a senior bureaucrat in India's Ministry of Education, received an unexpected letter from Havana: he was being awarded a state honour by the Cuban government.
'I have the honour to inform you that the National Council of the Order of Merit 'Carlos Manuel de Céspedes' has, by a decree dated 18th April, been pleased to confer on you...,' Cuban Under Secretary of State Augel Solanos wrote in the letter.
The Cuban official asked Husain to accept the honour by filling out a printed form sent with the letter. 'In congratulating you on the well earned distinction conferred on you, I avail myself of the opportunity to offer you the assurances of my high consideration,' he wrote in bureaucratese.
For Havana, the award carried immense importance. It was named after Cuba's most revered figure, Carlos Manuel de Céspedes del Castillo – the revolutionary who, in 1868, made the first declaration of Cuban independence from Spain.
At the time Husain received the letter, India – freed from British rule just months earlier – did not even have formal diplomatic relations with Cuba. But what it did have was Cuba's gratitude.
At a session of the UNESCO General Conference in Mexico City in November 1947, India had supported establishing the organisation's regional office in Havana. And leading the Indian delegation at the session was none other than the director of education, Husain.
Translation time
The letter to Husain was written in Spanish, a language he did not understand, but he managed to get its gist. Unsure of how to react, he forwarded it to the Ministries of Home and External Affairs and Commonwealth Relations for advice.
'I may, perhaps, explain that this is not a personal honour for me but as a token of friendliness which the Government of Cuba apparently desires to extend towards the Government of India in recognition of the help which they received at the last General Conference of UNESCO in securing the establishment of the regional centre of UNESCO in Havana,' Husain wrote.
He added, 'It is as such that I welcome the distinction.'
Since almost no Indian government official at the time knew even basic Spanish, the Cuban missive got stuck in the Indian bureaucratic labyrinth.
The External Affairs and Commonwealth Relations Ministry first asked the Defence Ministry's General Staff Branch to translate the letter. In reply, Lt Col KR Menon wrote: 'There are no facilities for translation of documents for this section. Our translation section translates English pamphlets into Roman Hindustani and the limited staff is working overtime on the translation of the much-needed pamphlets.'
Menon suggested the letter be sent to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting for translation, but its officials were not even sure if the Cuban communication was in Spanish or Portuguese. They recommended a Mr Banerjee, who worked as the Russian Production Officer at the ministry and knew Spanish.
'Incidentally, we suggested several months ago the setting up of a translation bureau as part of our Russian section,' wrote S Sinha, director of the Information and Broadcasting Ministry's Publications Division. 'We do not know if that proposal was ever pursued and, if so, with what results.'
He added, 'It is a pity that urgent government documents have to be sent from door to door in the hope of finding someone to translate them instead of having a full-fledged section for this purpose.'
As it happened, the in-demand Mr Banerjee was on leave. A few more weeks passed before he returned to New Delhi and translated the three pages that included the letter and the form of acceptance. In all, it took the Indian government six months to fully understand the contents of the letter.
Rigid policy
Not that the effort helped.
Recently freed from foreign domination, India was not keen on accepting awards from other nations, even those that had nothing to do with the colonisation of the subcontinent.
Around the time Husain was offered an honour by Cuba, a private citizen named AF Mody, who was secretary at the Danish Consulate in Bombay, received a similar offer from Denmark. Mody too approached the Ministry of External Affairs and Commonwealth Relations for advice. His case appears in the ministry's internal communication.
'The bestowal of honours and awards in India, save in the case of recognition of gallantry, having been discontinued, it would seem doubtful whether in the case under consideration it would be in order to agree to Mr. Mody receiving a foreign medal, that is to say, the Danish Liberty Medal, even though it is for services rendered during the war,' T J Natarajan, a senior official at the ministry, said in a note to Foreign Secretary KPS Menon. 'Such awards, in the absence of any comparable awards in India would, it is feared, create a craving for foreign insignia.'
A note signed by Menon and two other senior officials agreed with Natarajan's comments: the government was 'averse to the grant of a medal to an Indian national by a foreign state'. Nevertheless, it was 'deeply appreciative of the sentiments' behind the Danish offer.
With such a rigid policy around foreign honours, even for private citizens, there was little chance Husain would be allowed to receive the Cuban award.
'The assistance given by Mr. Ashfaque Husain to the Cuban Government was just a performance of his official duties and as such no award or distinction from the Cuban Government is necessary in lieu in discharge of such duties,' Natarajan said in a note. 'There have been instances in the past when the Foreign Government's requests to confer on officials of the Govt of India distinctions or awards for the meritorious services rendered by them in the capacity of their official duties were refused as our regulations on the acceptance of such awards are very rigid.'
Husain was asked to turn down the award and 'explain his inability...in suitable terms'.
It is possible that the Cuban authorities were displeased by India's refusal, but if it caused any damage to the bilateral relations, there is no public record to suggest it. After the Cuban Revolution in January 1959 and Ernesto Guevara's visit to India, each country opened an embassy in the other's capital. Their relations have remained warm ever since.
It is unclear when India changed its policy towards government officials and private citizens accepting foreign awards, but the fears of independent India's first bureaucrats about a 'craving for foreign insignia' resonate more clearly nearly eight decades later.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

To further tech manufacturing, India rethinks China blockade
To further tech manufacturing, India rethinks China blockade

Indian Express

time16 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

To further tech manufacturing, India rethinks China blockade

Nearly half a decade ago, India adopted a 'China-out' strategy of sorts, in response to the border clashes in 2020, introduced an anti-Beijing foreign investment policy, and kept Chinese firms out of critical sectors like telecommunications. Now, however, necessitated by changing geopolitical dynamics, following US President Donald Trump's unprecedented onslaught on global trade, and India's own manufacturing ambitions, New Delhi is undertaking a serious rethink on the existing strategy, and is strongly considering particularly easing China-based entities' entry into the country, with some riders. The most recent sign of the thaw came in the form of a recommendation made by the government think tank Niti Aayog, earlier this month, to ease India's foreign direct investment (FDI) rules, which involves government scrutiny into investments made by Chinese firms. Earlier, the Economic Survey 2023-24 had sprung a surprise by advocating attracting investments from Chinese companies to boost exports. India had earlier put restrictions on investments from China through Press Note 3 in April 2020 to curb potential opportunistic takeovers of Indian companies during the Covid-19 pandemic by making a government approval mandatory for all investments from countries sharing a land border with India, including China. It continued to be in force in the wake of national security concerns due to border tensions after the Galwan clash. Early signs of a thaw There have been some signs that India is slowly, but surely, allowing Chinese companies to partner with Indian entities. Dixon Technologies, which is a major Indian electronics assembly company, received approval from the IT Ministry to set up a joint venture with China-based Longcheer. The new company will focus on manufacturing and supplying a wide range of electronics, including smartphones, tablets, true wireless stereo (TWS) devices, smartwatches, AI-powered PCs, automotive electronics, and healthcare devices. Dixon will hold 74 per cent in the JV, and the remaining 26 per cent will be with Longcheer. 'We can not continue to avoid China. The truth is, they make things which we need for our assembly operations, and if we want to go deeper into the supply chain, our companies have to work with Chinese companies,' a senior government official said. The IT Ministry, earlier this year, notified a Rs 23,000 crore policy for electronic components manufacturing, and it is widely anticipated that Indian firms would partner with Chinese entities to participate in the scheme, given the expertise they have. Recently, India also resumed issuance of tourist visas to Chinese nationals as part of a broader effort to repair bilateral ties. Earlier this month, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar travelled to China where he had underlined that 'differences should not become disputes' nor should 'competition ever become conflict' and that while India and China have made good progress in the past nine months towards the normalisation of bilateral relations, they should work to address de-escalation on the border. China out in letter, not in spirit, and some repercussions Of course, while the government managed to keep China out in some sectors like finished smartphones, imports from the country continued, particularly for a number of electronic components, which are crucial for the final assembly process in India, but for which New Delhi has little to no production base. The Indian Express had earlier reported that the financial year 2023-24, India imported electronic components worth over $12 billion from China and $6 billion from Hong Kong, with the two accounting for more than half of total such imports to India – suggesting that the country's growing footprint in electronics manufacturing was not necessarily into reduced reliance on Beijing. In the last five years, electronics imports from China and Hong Kong have far outnumbered imports from other major manufacturing hubs like South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and all ASEAN countries, combined. China, for its own part, and seeing India's growing manufacturing footprint, also imposed restrictions on its companies, making it harder for them to do business with Indian firms. For instance, India's share in US smartphone imports surged to nearly 36 per cent in the first five months of 2025, from about 11 per cent in 2024. China, which continues to dominate the product category, saw its share drop from 82 per cent to 49 per cent over the same period, this paper had reported earlier. China's actions include pulling workers out of India, and making it more difficult for India-based manufacturing companies to obtain capital goods, which are needed for the assembly process. China has also imposed a blockade on several rare earth metals and magnets, and while the prime target of that restriction is the United States, India has found itself caught in the crosshairs. Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More

Watch: Starmer looking on, Trump calls London mayor Sadiq Khan ‘nasty'; UK leader defends him as...
Watch: Starmer looking on, Trump calls London mayor Sadiq Khan ‘nasty'; UK leader defends him as...

First Post

time18 minutes ago

  • First Post

Watch: Starmer looking on, Trump calls London mayor Sadiq Khan ‘nasty'; UK leader defends him as...

Trump took a fresh swipe at London Mayor Sadiq Khan during a press conference in Scotland, calling him 'a nasty person' and criticising his leadership. British PM Keir Starmer, standing beside Trump, quickly defended Khan, calling him 'a friend of mine.' read more US President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer attend a family photo during the Group of Seven (G7) Summit at the Kananaskis Country Golf Course in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada. AFP US President Donald Trump reignited his feud with London Mayor Sadiq Khan during a press conference in Scotland alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who stepped in and defended Khan as 'a friend of mine.' When asked if he planned to visit London during his upcoming state visit in September, Trump replied, 'I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job.' He went on to call Khan 'a nasty person,' prompting Starmer's brief response: 'He's a friend of mine, actually.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Unfazed, Trump further went back and forth saying, 'I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London.' 'I am not a fan of the London mayor. I think he has done a terrible job. He's a nasty person.' US President Donald Trump launches into attack on Sadiq Khan during his UK visit Follow our live blog for more🔗 📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602 and YouTube — Sky News (@SkyNews) July 28, 2025 The animosity between Trump and Khan—both of whom have clashed repeatedly since 2016—is long-standing. Khan, a Labour politician like Starmer, has often criticised Trump, particularly over his stance on immigration and his travel ban targeting several Muslim-majority nations. In return, Trump has lashed out at Khan on multiple occasions, calling him a 'stone cold loser,' 'very dumb,' and accusing him of doing a 'very bad job on terrorism.' Khan, who is the first Muslim to lead a Western capital, has said Trump's attacks are rooted in bias. 'He's come for me because of, let's be frank, my ethnicity and my religion,' Khan said in a podcast prior to Trump's 2024 re-election. However, following Trump's win, Khan told AFP that 'the American people have spoken loudly and clearly' and that the election result must be respected. Responding to Trump's latest remarks, a spokesperson for Khan issued a statement Monday saying the mayor was 'delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world,' adding: 'He'd see how our diversity makes us stronger not weaker; richer, not poorer.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

BCCI's call on India vs Pakistan awaited amid outrage; Asia Cup snub may hurt Suryakumar Yadav's team: Report
BCCI's call on India vs Pakistan awaited amid outrage; Asia Cup snub may hurt Suryakumar Yadav's team: Report

Hindustan Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

BCCI's call on India vs Pakistan awaited amid outrage; Asia Cup snub may hurt Suryakumar Yadav's team: Report

The cricketing rivalry between India and Pakistan is set to resume later this year in September after the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) confirmed the schedule for the 2025 Asia Cup last week. The two teams will face each other on September 14 in the Group A encounter, and if they progress to the final, the tournament could likely witness two more encounters. However, the announcement triggered an avalanche of criticism on social media as the Indian sports ministry threw the ball into the BCCI's court to take the final call. India could likely face Pakistan thrice in Asia Cup 2025 The public outrage stemmed from the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, where 26 civilians lost their lives. The incident was followed by a military showdown between the nations, during which India conducted Operation Sindoor. In the wake of the Pahalgam attack, the BCCI had stalled the confirmation of their participation in the Asia Cup, leaving the tournament on the verge of being cancelled as the Indian cricket board awaited the government's approval. The anticipation ended last week when the ACC head and chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), Mohsin Naqvi, announced the schedule for the Asia Cup. "As of now, the BCCI does not come under the purview of the sports ministry as the National Sports Governance Bill is still to be passed. So, the ministry doesn't have a say, but we will wait and see how the BCCI responds to public sentiment," a sports ministry source told PTI. What happens if India refuse to play against Pakistan in Asia Cup? According to a report in NDTV, India do have the right to forfeit the game against Pakistan, but it will be a loss for the Suryakumar Yadav-led side as the organisers, based on the rules, will consider it as a walkover and hence hand Pakistan the designated points. "This is not a bilateral contest but a match in a multi-nation tournament. If India does not play or forfeit the match, it will give Pakistan a huge advantage. This will be like giving them a walkover, which is not desirable," sources told the channel, confirming that the match is unlikely to be cancelled. Earlier this month, the Yuvraj Singh-led India Champions side refused to play against Pakistan in the second season of the World Championship of Legends in Birmingham for the same reason, following a backlash from fans. The decision forced WCL organisers to call off the game, and they later apologised to the Indian players for "unintentionally causing discomfort."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store