Stoke Lodge field campaigner told to pay £85,000 in legal costs
Ms Welham said her costs would be paid by herself and members of the community.But she and the council are now braced for further costs as the combined payments cover only 40% of the school's total legal bill.
Cotham School was granted a 125-year lease on the land in 2011 due to lack of space on its inner city site three miles away.But the school became involved in a dispute with residents after it put up a 6ft-high (2m) fence around the field in 2019.It said it was forced to fence the site for safeguarding purposes for PE lessons, and due to out-of-control dogs and dog fouling.In 2023, Bristol City Council voted to give the site "town green" status, and told the school it must share the playing field with the community.Last month, however, the move was revoked by a High Court judge.Judge Paul Matthews also ruled Bristol City Council and Ms Welham were liable to pay Cotham School's court costs.Ms Welham was denied permission to appeal.
In a statement following the decision on legal bills, Cotham School said: "We welcome the recovery of public funds that were necessarily expended in protecting the school's playing field, which are required for our delivery of PE lessons."Ms Welham said the Stoke Lodge community was in "pure shock" at the division of the legal bills.In a statement, she said: "We are standing by our commitment and obligations, and I would like to emphasise that we hope that the money that is (unjustly, in my personal view) being required of me and my supporters, will be used to help mitigate any detriment to Cotham School pupils flowing from the effects of the school's repeated legal actions on its financial reserves."Finally, we as a community remain incandescently angry that our last accessible neighbourhood green space, that we love deeply, and which has been relied upon for many decades by the thousands of Bristol citizens who share it with Cotham School, is again in danger of not being protected as it should be."Our commitment to protect the land for future generations is undiminished."
'Chilling impact'
A spokesperson for We Love Stoke Lodge residents' group, which campaigned alongside Ms Welham, told the BBC they were worried the judgement could have negative consequences.The spokesperson said: "Despite the fact that the council was the first defendant in the litigation and was robustly defending a decision that the council itself had made, the court has ordered significant costs against the community."We believe this allocation could have a chilling impact on other community groups seeking to defend important matters of principle."The group said it would be seeking permission to appeal directly from the Court of Appeal, and said it has been given until mid-September to make an application.Bristol City Council declined to comment but said it would be complying with the court order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘One-in-one-out' migrant returns deal with France set to ‘begin next month'
The UK's one-in-one out returns deal with France is reportedly set to begin in a matter of weeks, as pressure piles on the government to take further action to stop people from making the dangerous journey across the Channel. The agreement, announced by the prime minister in a joint press conference with Emmanuel Macron last month, means that for each small boat migrant sent back across the English Channel, an asylum seeker will be allowed to enter the UK from France under a legal route. Sir Keir Starmer said it was a 'breakthrough moment' which would 'turn the tables' on the people smugglers who bring them here. Sources told The Times that home secretary Yvette Cooper, will sign a deal on Wednesday meaning that about 50 people a week who enter the UK on small boats can be sent back to France, starting from next month. Government sources told the newspaper that the signing ceremony was an indication of the endorsement of the deal by the European Union - amid concern that the bloc could oppose the agreement. Labour has put a pledge to crack down on the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government. But with boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action - pressure which is exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls. Last week figures showed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 – the earliest point in a calendar year at which the 25,000 mark has been passed since data on Channel crossings was first reported in 2018 It comes amid escalating protests across the UK opposing the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, with a number of people arrested after a protest outside a hotel in Canary Wharf in London on Sunday. Protesters jeered at people going in and out of the hotel, and officers were forced to step in after flares were let off in the crowd, the Metropolitan Police said. A group of people outside the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf were 'harassing occupants and staff', trying to prevent people make deliveries, as well as trying to 'breach the fencing and access the hotel', a statement said. In recent days, the government has announced further measures to support their crack down on illegal migration, including pouring an extra £100m into their efforts. The money will support the pilot of the new returns agreement with France, paying for up to 300 more National Crime Agency (NCA) officers and new technology and equipment to step up intelligence-gathering on smuggling gangs. Meanwhile, anyone who advertises small boat crossings or fake passports on social media could be face up to five years in prison under a new offence to be introduced under the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill. Speaking on Monday, Dame Angela Eagle told Sky News ministers are 'doing the detailed work' to bring down the asylum backlog, adding: 'We've taken 35,000 people off our streets who have no right to be in our country and sent them back to their countries of origin within a year.' 'We are doing all we can to deal with the challenges that the police are facing on the streets to make sure that women and girls are safe, and in fact, that everybody is safe on our streets.' But as tensions continue to flare over the issue, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said he thinks the 'public's patience has snapped'. 'This is issue is beyond party politics - it is causing immense harm to communities, people's lives are being wrecked as a result of it, and we simply have to fix it. 'I respect people who are peacefully protesting outside hotels this weekend. I understand why they feel so concerned. They're seeing their communities damaged', he added.
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK and France to ratify 'one in, one out' migrant returns deal
LONDON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Britain said it would begin implementing a deal to return migrants who arrive on small boats to France within days after a treaty on the arrangement - a key part of British plans to cut illegal migration - is ratified on Tuesday. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron announced the "one in, one out" pilot scheme on migrant returns last month. Under the new deal, France has agreed to accept the return of undocumented people arriving in Britain by small boats, in exchange for Britain agreeing to accept an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers with British family connections. A treaty on the scheme was signed last week but not previously announced ahead of Tuesday's ratification. Britain said the European Commission and EU member states had given the green light to the plan. Starmer, whose popularity has fallen since winning an election landslide last year, is facing pressure to stop small boat arrivals from the populist Reform UK party, led by Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage. Britain's interior ministry said it expected detentions to begin within days. "This is an important step towards undermining the business model of the organised crime gangs that are behind these crossings," British interior minister Yvette Cooper said. Under the agreement with France, government sources previously said they were looking at about 50 returns a week, or 2,600 a year, a fraction of the more than 35,000 arrivals reported last year, though the scheme could be scaled up. More than 25,000 people have arrived on small boats so far in 2025, and the government has targeted people smugglers with sanctions, clamped down on social media adverts and is working with delivery firms to tackle the illegal work that is often promised to migrants.
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Iran 'asks Taliban for spy kill list' to exploit Britain's lost database exposing MI6 spies and special forces
Iran is plotting with the Taliban to exploit a lost database that exposed details of MI6 spies and UK Special Forces, it was claimed last night. Leaders of Iran's Revolutionary Guards are said to have asked Afghanistan 's warlords for 'access' to the bombshell list at the centre of a two-year super-injunction drama in the UK. The spectre of Iran's extremists and the brutal Taliban regime co-ordinating efforts to hunt down British agents is causing 'concern' in Whitehall, it is understood. The UK lost a vital database of Afghans and UK officials putting 100,000 people 'at risk of death'. When the Daily Mail discovered this data breach disaster in 2023, the Government secured a draconian court order to hush it up, triggering a 23-month battle in secret courts for open justice. Last month the Government finally abandoned its super-injunction and the public discovered ministers had secretly agreed a £7billion scheme, including a mass evacuation programme to rescue thousands of Afghans who had worked for British forces. But then ministers ordered lawyers to gag the Daily Mail and others with a second High Court injunction, to prevent us revealing how the lost list had included details of more than a hundred MI6 spies, Special Forces and other UK officials. Now details have emerged of Iran's efforts to get their hands on the highly sensitive list, 'so they can hunt down MI6 spies', according to reports. Iran and its fundamentalist leaders are desperately seeking leverage with the West ahead of nuclear negotiations this autumn. The so-called 'kill list' contains the names of 25,000 Afghans who were applying to a UK scheme to give sanctuary to those who had worked on the frontlines with British forces. The Daily Mail has seen a copy of the full dataset lost by the British government, and it is understood it also includes details of more than 100 British officials including MI6, Special Forces and senior military commanders, as well as MPs. Many of these were included to help officials verify legitimate claims. Although codes are used, and the list does not specifically identify any spies or special forces, it could be a valuable dataset for an enemy. A senior Iranian official in Tehran said the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had 'formally requested that the Taliban government share the leaked list', according to the Telegraph which added it is understood 'that MI6 intelligence assets will take priority' in the search. It quoted the official as saying the Iranian government has assigned a committee to the issue. The official added: 'There have been discussions on co-operation between Tehran and Kabul on this issue as it can help both countries for negotiations with the West.' For two years, the British government convinced the Royal Courts of Justice to suppress the Daily Mail's story of the data leak, in order to save lives. The Daily Mail's fight for open justice meant we took part in court hearings shown secret Whitehall briefing papers A bombshell document - never seen before - revealing how Labour ministers met in October 2024 and agreed a scheme to relocate about 25,000 Afghans to the UK at a cost of £7billion Daily Mail journalists faced jail by order of a Penal Notice if they revealed the Government's secret - or even breathed a word about the existence of the draconian court order The MoD argued that, if the Taliban learnt of the breach, it would try to get hold of a copy. The MoD believed the Taliban had never obtained the data. It is unclear if the Taliban has it today. The Taliban claimed last month it had obtained it in 2022, but experts pointed out that this is exactly what it would say, for propaganda purposes. It was accidentally leaked in February 2022 when a British soldier emailed the complete file to Afghan contacts instead of sending a small extract. The Daily Mail revealed last week how Afghan heroes who saved British lives are now in hiding in Iran with their families, yet face being deported back to neighbouring Afghanistan and 'certain death' by the vengeful Taliban. The Revolutionary Guard's demand comes after Britain, France and Germany threatened Tehran with a so-called snapback mechanism, which would restore UN Security Council resolutions against it, if no progress is made on negotiations over its nuclear programme by August 30.
