State Senate passes bill to prohibit ranked choice voting
The House has its own, slightly different version that will be on second reading — the amendment stage — on Wednesday.
The Senate bill is SB 490. It defines ranked choice voting — generally abbreviated as RCV — as occurring in rounds where losers are eliminated until one candidate scores a clear majority.
As previously reported, RCV is used statewide in Alaska, Hawaii and Maine. RCV is prohibited in Idaho, Montana, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida.
It was noted on the Senate floor that eight other states are considering banning RCV.
Sen. Mike Oliverio, R-Monongalia, a bill co-sponsor, stood in support of it. He cited the hypothetical example of WVU meeting Pitt in the Backyard Brawl, where Pitt outscores WVU in the first three quarters, but WVU makes a fourth-quarter comeback and seemingly wins by a point.
But, Oliverio said, the referee decides that Pitt won three quarters compared to WVU's one, and gives the game to Pitt.
"We live in a society where we have winners and losers and this bill just restates that, " he said.
"We have in West Virginia an incredible electoral system. We get it right in West Virginia, " he said. "I think it's important that we pass this bill ; we get rid of this silliness that has taken place in other states, and we continue to have the finest elections in the country."
His 13th District colleague, Sen. Joey Garcia, D-Marion, rose in good-natured opposition to the bill, noting that the Brawl features just two opponents, while RCV typically applies to elections with multiple candidates, especially primaries.
Primary winners often score only 30 % of the vote, he said. RCV can lend some moderation and if a city or county wanted to try it, he'd be interested in seeing what happens. "I do think we're rushing in the other direction a little too quickly."
Tuesday was Marshall University Day at the Capitol, and Judiciary chair Mike Stuart, R-Kanawha, prompted chuckles across the room by saying, "Other than a bad analogy using a non-football school like Pitt, rather than Marshall University to play WVU, I've got nothing."
The vote was 31-2, with the only other Democrat, Majority Leader Mike Woelfel, D-Cabell, joining Garcia.
The House bill is HB 2683. It contains a shorter definition of RCV and different phrasing of the prohibition. The most significant difference is a sentence saying the prohibition doesn't apply to internal political party processes.
Municipal elections bill On Monday, the Senate unanimously passed SB 50, to align municipal election dates with statewide primary and general elections. It sets a compliance date of July 1, 2032, for municipalities with charters that have to be amended by the voters, and for municipalities without charters that can do it simply by ordinance.
SB 50 also heads to the House.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Sherrod Brown raises $3.6M in 24 hours since launching Senate bid
Former Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) raised more than $3.6 million in the first 24 hours after he launched his comeback campaign for Senate Monday. Brown's campaign said in a release on Tuesday that the donations came from all 88 of Ohio's counties and 95 percent of them were less than $100, averaging $53 per donation. The release states that $3 million went to Brown's campaign itself, while the other $600,000 went to affiliated joint fundraising committees that can support his campaign. 'Ohioans are fired up to send Sherrod Brown to fight for them in the Senate,' said Brown campaign manager Patrick Eisenhauer in a statement. 'Sherrod has lived his life by three principles: standing up for workers, treating everyone with dignity and respect, and working as hard as possible for the people of Ohio. He's running to be a voice for Ohioans and fight back against politicians doing the bidding of corporations and billionaires.' Brown's entrance into the Senate race against Sen. Jon Husted (R) is a win for Democrats who are hoping to make the contest competitive as they face a tough map toward trying to win back control of the Senate next year. Ohio has increasingly voted for President Trump through each of his three presidential campaigns, but Brown was the last Democrat elected statewide and has consistently outperformed the top of the ticket. He only lost reelection last year by about 3.5 points to Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio). Husted was appointed to fill the Senate seat vacated by Vice President Vance and is running in a special election to serve the remainder of the term. Whoever wins the election would have to run again in 2028 if they wish to serve a full term. Brown has sought to develop a reputation for himself as a champion of the working class and Ohioans. Still, he will face an uphill battle in a state that has increasingly elected Republicans statewide in recent years.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Texas Democrats poised to end standoff: 5 things to know
Texas House Democrats who fled the state to stall a Republican redistricting plan have signaled they're ready to return to the Lone Star State in the coming days. The Texas state legislature wrapped up its first special session on Friday, one of the conditions the Democrats gave for ending their quorum break. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) quickly called a second special session, with Democrats' anticipated return set to clear the way for the Texas House to move forward with an aggressive gerrymander that could net five more House seats for the GOP in the midterms. But the quorum-breaking Texas Democrats are touting the national attention they've brought to the redistricting fight and looking for hope from California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has vowed to move forward with his own new map. Here's what to know as Democrats plan to end the standoff: Why now? It was always highly unlikely that Texas Democrats would be able to permanently thwart the GOP's redistricting effort. But by fleeing the state, they hoped to raise national attention over the issue and inspire Democrat-led states to move forward with their own new maps. In both cases, they succeeded. The Texas Democrats' decision to leave made the redistricting battle a national story. And now California is moving forward with its own effort to rewrite its congressional lines in the hopes of counteracting the Texas GOP. Other blue states may soon follow. The Texas Democrats also wanted to hold out until the first special session came to an end, which it did on Friday. They cited both that and California's decision to move forward with redistricting as its preconditions for coming home. The developments allow Democrats to frame the outcome as a victory, even if Republicans will also tout their return as a win. There were also other financial and political risks for the Democrats. They've been forced to parry Republican criticism that they're holding up other legislative business — including disaster relief for Texas affected by recent floods — by staying out-of-state. And each quorum breaker has been racking up $500-a-day fines for their absence, on top of threats of removal and arrest, as well as the logistical cost of living away from their homes. What does it mean for the new Texas maps? The new GOP-friendly maps are almost certain to pass once the Democrats return to the state. Even as they remained out of state, a set of new congressional lines passed in the state Senate, while an identical set of lines were also approved by a state House committee. House Republicans couldn't bring the new map to a floor vote in the lower chamber, however, until the Democrats returned. With the Democrats expected to return to the state, Republicans will have the quorum needed to hold a vote on and pass their map. The map would go next to Abbott for his signature before the new congressional lines are enacted. Texas Democrats knew they would inevitably return to the state since Abbott had threatened to call special session after special session until they returned. Democrats had no options available for blocking the new map from passing, since Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of the state legislature and the GOP also has a Republican governor. How are both sides spinning it? Republicans are touting their return as a win, since it means they will be able to move forward with passing new congressional lines. But Democrats are celebrating the outcome as a political victory too. 'Abbott thought he could silence Black and Latino Texans with his redistricting scheme. He was wrong. We fought back — now other states, starting with California, will neutralize their power grab,' the Texas House Democrats said in a statement posted on X. National Democrats also hailed it as a win that Republicans were unable to pass their new House map during the first special session. 'Under threats to their safety and livelihood, Texas Democrats have continued to deny Republicans a quorum to enact their rigged maps and ignited a national Democratic movement,' Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin said in a statement. 'From California to Washington, D.C, Democrats will continue to stand with the American people and the people of Texas as we battle against Trump and Republicans' anti-democratic attacks,' he added. But the White House is also pushing other states like Indiana and Missouri to redraw their maps as well – raising questions over how many states will ultimately get involved in the fight and have the upper hand. What does it mean for the wider redistricting battle? The redistricting battle in Texas has turned into a nationwide war, and that's unlikely to change anytime soon. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) wants to hold a special election in November to ask voters to weigh in on a ballot measure allowing the state legislature to redraw the state's congressional maps for the rest of the decade. 'I hope we are waking up to this reality. Wake up, America. Wake up to what Donald Trump is doing,' Newsom said at a Thursday event on the effort. 'Wake up to his assault, wake up to the assault on institutions and knowledge and history. Wake up to his war on science, public health and his war on the American people.' California Democrats released their proposed new map, which targets five Republican incumbents, on Friday night. Other states are also considering jumping into the fray. Ohio is already set to redistrict due to state requirements, and Republicans in Florida and Missouri have suggested they'll be revisiting their maps, too. Other blue states like New York and Illinois are also weighing redistricting now. Is it really the end of the fight in Texas? The next front in the Texas redistricting battle is likely to play out in the courts. As the Democrats' statement noted on Thursday, their legal counsel has advised them to 'return to Texas to build a strong public legislative record for the upcoming legal battle against a map that violates both the current Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.' 'We will return to the House floor and to the courthouse with a clear message: the fight to protect voting rights has only just begun,' it added. Democratic groups are likely to file a lawsuit once Texas passes its new map. If that battle plays out in state courts, it will almost certainly fail since the Texas Supreme Court has a conservative majority. If it were to somehow play out in federal court, it's not as clear-cut, given the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled favorably for Democrats in the past over the Voting Rights Act. At the same time, the U.S. Supreme Court still enjoys a conservative majority. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Texas House signals it will ‘move quickly' on redistricting with Democrats back
The Texas House signaled it would move quickly on redistricting and other legislative matters after reaching a quorum Monday afternoon following the return of Democrats who had fled the state in protest against GOP efforts to push through a new congressional map. 'No one here needs a reminder that the last few weeks have been contentious, but from this point forward, the rules of engagement are clear: Debate is welcome, but personal attacks and name calling will not be tolerated,' Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) told his colleagues. 'Let me also be clear about where we go from here,' he added. 'We are done waiting. We have a quorum. Now is the time for action. We'll move quickly, and the schedule [will] be demanding until our work is complete.' Texas House Democrats returned to the state after boycotting an initial special session called by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R). Republicans had moved to quickly pass a new GOP-friendly House map that aims to give Republicans five pickup opportunities ahead of 2026. Democrats had signaled they would return to the state after two conditions were met: Texas lawmakers adjourning their first special session Friday and California Democrats introducing their own House map that looks to offset expected gains from Texas's new House map. Both of those happened last week. 'When Republicans tried to silence minority voters through racist gerrymandering, Texas House Democrats answered the call,' the Texas House Democrats said in a post on social platform X ahead of the Monday session. 'After rallying Americans to join this existential battle for democracy, we're returning to Texas on our terms — ready to build the legal record needed to defeat these unconstitutional maps in court. The fight continues,' they added. Monday's session lasted just under half an hour, with a number of bills being read and referred to different committees, including legislation around the proposed GOP House map. The congressional lines need to passed by each chamber's respective redistricting committee before the map can be teed up for floor votes in the House and Senate. Once passed in the state Legislature, they will head to Abbott's desk for his signature. Burrows said the House would next meet on Wednesday, with lawmakers who did not thwart the chamber's quorum being allowed to freely leave. Burrows said House Democrats would only be allowed to leave 'after agreeing to be released into the custody of a designated DPS [Department of Public Safety] officer appointment under the rules of the House' who would ensure their return on Wednesday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
