Europeans to ask Trump how far he will back Ukraine security guarantees
European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on a Monday visit to Washington to see President Donald Trump in a collective bid to find a way to end Moscow's invasion, with the US offering security guarantees for Kyiv.
The meeting follows a summit in Alaska between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that failed to yield any breakthrough on an immediate ceasefire that the US leader had been pushing for.
The leaders heading to Washington on Monday to appear alongside Zelensky call themselves the 'coalition of the willing'.
They include British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
Also heading to Washington will be Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who get on well with Trump.
Macron said on Sunday that the European leaders would ask Trump how far he would back security guarantees for Ukraine, adding he did not think Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted peace. The French leader emphasised Europe's will to present a united front with Ukrainians and ask the Americans 'to what extent' they are ready to contribute to the security guarantees that would be offered to Ukraine in a peace agreement.
'No country can accept the loss of territories unless it has security guarantees for its remaining territory,' Macron said, adding that if Europe appears weak today 'we will pay a heavy price tomorrow."
Macron was speaking from his summer residence after joining a video conference with other European leaders to coordinate their joint position before the meeting with Trump in Washington on Monday.
On Moscow's position, he commented: 'There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia.'
Peace deal without a ceasefire?
After the Alaska meeting, Trump pivoted to say that he was now seeking a peace deal, even without a ceasefire. On Sunday, he posted 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. Stay tuned!' on his Truth Social platform but did not elaborate.
Trump's Russia envoy Steve Witkoff said on Sunday on CNN that Trump and Putin had agreed in their summit on 'robust security guarantees' for Ukraine.
But Zelenskyy, on a Brussels visit on Sunday hosted by European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, rejected the idea of Russia offering his country security guarantees.
'What President Trump said about security guarantees is much more important to me than Putin's thoughts, because Putin will not give any security guarantees,' he said.
Von der Leyen hailed the US offer to provide security guarantees modelled on - but separate from - NATO's collective security arrangement, known as Article 5.
'We welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine, and the coalition of the willing, including the European Union, is ready to do its share,' von der Leyen said.
Territorial concessions?
Trump's pivot to looking for a peace deal, not a ceasefire, aligns with the stance long taken by Putin, and which Ukraine and its European allies have criticised as Putin's way to buy time with the intent of making battlefield gains.
Witkoff, in his CNN interview, elaborated that the United States was prepared to provide their 'game-changing' security guarantees as part of a process that would involve territorial "concessions".
Zelenskyy reiterated that the Ukrainian constitution makes it impossible to cede any territory.
'We need real negotiations, which means they can start where the front line is now [...] Russia is still unsuccessful in the Donetsk region. Putin has been unable to take it for twelve years,' the Ukrainian leader said.
However, he added that since the territorial issue is so important, 'it should be discussed only by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia at the trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the United States, and Russia.'
'So far, Russia has given no sign that such a trilateral meeting will happen', he said.
According to an official briefed on a call Trump held with Zelenskyy and European leaders as he flew back from Alaska, the US leader supported a Putin proposal that Russia take full control of two eastern Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others.
Putin 'de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas,' an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, which Russia currently only partly controls, the source said.
In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control.
Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them.
'The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas,' the source said.
What sort of consequences?
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to NBC on Sunday, warned of 'consequences' - including the potential imposition of new sanctions on Russia - if no peace deal is reached on Ukraine.
Von der Leyen also emphasised that 'this peace must be achieved through strength' and Europe was preparing one more sanction package: 'We have adopted 18 packages so far, and we are advancing preparation for the nineteenth. This package will be forthcoming in early September'.
(bms, sm)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
4 hours ago
- Euractiv
Poland plans 3% tax on tech giants
Poland is planning to levy a 3% tax on large tech companies which it wants to support its own technology and media sectors. As negotiations to adapt the global tax system to modern digital realities continue at the OECD level, many European countries are working on their own taxes targeting large, predominantly US tech companies. These efforts have caught the attention and ire of US President Donald Trump. But despite noisy pushback from his administration – including threats of retaliation via trade tariffs – a number of countries are pressing on. In Poland, Donald Tusk's government signalled its intent to tax Big Tech back in March. Further details of the plan are now starting to emerge. Work on Poland's draft bill will 'continue through the end of the year', the digital ministry told Euractiv. Once ready, it said the bill will undergo public consultation. Depending on the legislative process, the tax could take effect as soon as 2027. The ministry said the tax will apply to companies whose global revenue exceeds €750 million. It will be aimed at platforms including marketplaces, social media and ride-sharing apps, as well as companies carrying personalised advertisements or selling user data. Services that only provide users with access to content (such as games) or interfaces (such as payment or comms platforms) are set to be exempt, as are financial services and direct web sales – such as via a retail company's own website. Companies would have to report revenues generated in Poland or in relation to Poland, based on whether they can 'reasonably assume' users are residents of the country – for example through their IP addresses, per the ministry. It added that a 'modest' 3% tax on tech giants' revenues could generate up to €470 million in the first year. The ministry expects the tax take to continue to grow after that. The proposal appears quite similar to the Commission's draft for an EU-wide digital tax from 2018 – which would have paid into national treasuries – but got abandoned after member states were unable to reach agreement. The Commission also publicly mulled introducing an EU digital tax to pay back the Union's Covid recovery debts. However, instead, it recently proposed an EU-wide tax on large companies in general. (nl)
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
Europeans brace for fraught White House talks on Ukraine
Security guarantees, not concessions, top Ukraine allies' agenda Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Alexandra Brzozowski Euractiv Aug 18, 2025 16:35 4 min. read Analysis Based on factual reporting, although it Incorporates the expertise of the author/producer and may offer interpretations and conclusions. European leaders head into a Trump-Zelenskyy Oval Office stand-off on Monday fearing pressure on Kyiv, and scrambling to shield Kyiv from a Trump-Putin deal. The burst of White House diplomacy comes just days after the US-hosted Alaska talks with Russia on ending the war in Ukraine, where Vladimir Putin was welcomed with a red-carpet ceremony, but no signs of an imminent ceasefire emerged. As Trump and Zelenskyy will meet at 7 pm European time for a heavily choreographed encounter, EU diplomats have expressed concerns that Trump might try to pressure Zelenskyy into concessions favourable to Russia. The Ukrainian leader is widely expected to reject the Alaska talking points and provide a European-backed counteroffer to Trump. He will huddle first with a group of European leaders invited by Kyiv as a supporting cast. This includes British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Those leaders will later join Trump and Zelenskyy to convince the US president that Moscow's maximalist demands are schemes to continue the war. After the huddle, they will join Zelenskyy and Trump in a trilateral session. Confrontation concerns European officials can't shake memories of Zelenskyy's last Oval Office exchange, when Trump and his administration officials berated their Ukrainian guest for his lack of gratitude and, bizarrely, his choice of attire. And this time, officials are determined to avoid a repeat. Their primary objective, they say, is to shield Zelenskyy from pressure to make concessions to Russia, though what European leaders can actually deliver remains uncertain. With meetings capped at around an hour apiece, there's only so much damage control they can do. The bigger unknown is Washington itself. What, exactly, is Trump prepared to offer Kyiv and what terms, if any, would Moscow be willing to stomach? Like before, Putin, standing alongside Trump in Alaska, reprised his talking points about the so-called 'root causes' of the war to justify the violation of international law while pressing for maximalist demands. The summit only left European officials fretting that Trump might seek a deal with Putin, potentially involving territorial concessions. Those worries intensified over the weekend when Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy and chief go-between with the Kremlin, hinted that Russia was ready to enshrine its pledge not to invade other countries or breach their sovereignty. But as often before, what a pledge from Putin is worth is anyone's guess. Europe's leaders are expected to focus on one thing: what security guarantees they, alongside America, can extend to Kyiv to make any agreement with Moscow stick. A 'Coalition of the Willing' met on Sunday after Trump reportedly told European leaders a day earlier that America could support such guarantees, so long as NATO stays out of it – a long-standing Russian demand. 'Europe might not be able to offer Ukraine airtight security guarantees without the US,' Lithuania's former Foreign Minister, Gabrielius Landsbergis, noted before the talks. 'But we can take frozen assets, close the skies and bring Ukraine into the EU, if we want. That's what 'standing with Ukraine' means – and I think Putin would start thinking twice.' Before the White House talks, leaders of the Nordic-Baltic Eight - Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, and Sweden - said in a joint statement that 'achieving a just and lasting peace requires a ceasefire and credible security guarantees for Ukraine." Still, the European delegation arriving in Washington on Monday is thin on eastern representation. Solely Finland's Stubb will speak for the Nordic-Baltic-Eastern camp, amid the gaping absence of Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk. While Warsaw has been part of the coalition, it seemed to have been largely sidelined from the Washington talks, yet it remains one of the largest political and financial supporters of Ukraine. Polish officials across the country's political spectrum have been adamant that their country would not be willing to send troops to Ukraine, despite its active political involvement in the coalition. Germany, too, has indicated it might likely be too stretched to provide troops to secure a potential future ceasefire. Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on the podcast rejected the idea, pointing towards a country's brigade stationed in Lithuania as Berlin's key contribution. 'Doing that [maintaining the brigade] and additionally stationing troops in Ukraine would probably overwhelm us,' he said. Charles Szumski and Nick Alipour contributed reporting. (mm)
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
A security guarantee fit for Ukraine is still out of reach
Tonight European leaders are accompanying Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Washington to feel out Donald Trump's commitment to Ukraine security guarantees, but his aren't the only cold feet at the table. Clearly words alone have not worked for Ukraine. In 1994 Kyiv signed the Budapest Memorandum, in which Russia, the US, and UK agreed to 'respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine'. In exchange, Ukraine surrendered the world's third-largest arsenal of nuclear weapons. Russia broke that agreement when it annexed Crimea, reminding us that security guarantees must be more than warm words. So what about something with some legal heft? Kyiv first applied for NATO membership in 2008 and even wrote this aim into its constitution in 2019 (along with eventual EU membership). The reason: to benefit from the alliance's critical Article 5, which rules that an attack against one is an attack against all. However, Trump has repeatedly made clear that NATO membership for Ukraine is not an option. Which brings us to the current situation, where leaders outline an abstract agreement that would make Ukraine a NATO member in all but name. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen welcomed 'President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine', adding that the EU 'is ready to do its share'. US offers NATO-like security assurances to Ukraine The starting point for the proposal was defining a collective security clause 'that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the US', Italian president Meloni said in a statement But is the EU ready? Do we welcome it? And more importantly, does Ukraine? On the face of it, Article 5 sounds like a strong commitment. But Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni told senators that the response to Article 5 activation doesn't have to be immediate use of force. This isn't mere assertion. NATO's official understanding of Article 5 is exactly that: 'each Ally [is] responsible for determining what it deems necessary in the particular circumstances'. It is not inconceivable that with an ersatz Article 5 in place, NATO countries could simply commit to providing the kinds of supports they currently give rather than risk the lives of their own. Skin in the game The only way to deter Russia from attacking Ukraine again is to create a credible threat of a military response that Moscow cannot beat, with much less wriggle room for would-be protectors to get out of. This can only mean troops on the ground from Europe It was the prospect of killing American soldiers in any potential Cold War invasion of West Germany that gave the Soviet Union pause for thought. Moscow could defeat Bonn in a war, but not Washington. The 20th century's brutal logic continues to apply, but only if we're up for it. Paris floated sending troops last year and London has expressed its willingness to do the same. But French President Emmanuel Macron's proposal was resisted by Madrid and Warsaw, and dodged by Mark Rutte – just before he started as NATO Secretary-General. This morning, Germany's foreign minister pooh-poohed sending troops to Ukraine. A brigade in Lithuania 'and additionally stationing troops in Ukraine would probably overwhelm us' Wadephul said, echoing Bundeswehr concerns on the podcast. And while Trump may be consistent in his inconsistency, the last official position of his defense secretary was that the US will not send troops either. We can hope that under the table tonight Macron, Starmer, and von der Leyen will warm the feet of Meloni, Merz, and Trump, but I wouldn't bet the house on it. (ow)
