logo
Should babies get a ‘bonus dose' of the measles vaccine? Doctors say it depends

Should babies get a ‘bonus dose' of the measles vaccine? Doctors say it depends

Like many anxious parents, Beth Spektor spent the last few weeks fretting over how to protect her infant daughter from the first deadly measles outbreak to hit the U.S. in a decade.
Her 9-month-old was too young for the first dose of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, typically given to American toddlers shortly after their first birthday.
But when her New Jersey mommy WhatsApp group started buzzing about an early bonus dose of MMR for babies, Spektor decided to ask her pediatrician for one anyway.
'I was assuming she would say, 'It's up to you,' or 'It's not a bad idea,' something a little less definitive,' the mother said.
Instead, the doctor urged her to take the extra jab, a move they recommended to all infant patients after three linked cases were reported in their region.
'[The doctor] said she was hoping that [U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr.] would change the schedule to recommend that all babies over 6 months get the bonus dose,' Spektor said.
That's unlikely, experts say. Despite the current outbreak, measles is still rare in the U.S., and while MMR is safe for babies as young as 6 months, it's more effective in toddlers. Most pediatricians still recommend holding off until a child's first birthday, with few narrow exceptions.
Meanwhile, Kennedy has spent this week touting codliver oil and steriods, alongside a tepid endorsement of vaccines.
Yet even as record numbers of parents now delay or decline inoculation, pediatricians and public health experts said they've seen a surge in requests for bonus doses following the death of an unvaccinated six-year-old in West Texas last week.
When reports of an infected Orange County infant carrying measles through Los Angeles International Airport began to circulate Friday, that curiosity turn to panic in some households.
'There has been a noticeable increase in parental concern about measles, particularly among those who plan to travel with young children or who have infants in daycare,' said Dr. Priya R. Soni of Cedars Sinai Medical Center, an assistant professor of pediatric infectious diseases. 'Some parents are requesting early MMR vaccination, which is an appropriate strategy in certain high-risk situations.'
So-called 'zero' or 'supplemental' doses of MMR have long been recommended to jet-setting infants who will travel to countries such as Ireland, Sri Lanka or the Philippines before their first birthday.
While most people survive a measles infection, the disease kills more than 100,000 children every year worldwide, leaves an additional 60,000 children blind and thousands more with permanent brain damage.
The grave risks are why early shots are also given to babies living near domestic outbreaks. The Texas Department of Public Health is currently recommending bonus doses for infants in six counties, including Gaines, where the largest outbreak emerged.
'It's one of the most contagious illnesses that we know about,' said Dr. Meghan Martin, a pediatric emergency medicine doctor at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital in St. Petersburg, Fla., who helps explain infectious disease to her 2.3 million followers on TikTok.
Martin got her own daughter a bonus dose before a visit to New York during a measles outbreak there in 2018. But she said most parents should forego it unless their babies are headed to a high-risk country or live in an outbreak region.
Dr. Eric Ball, a pediatrician in Orange County and chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics' California chapter, said he recommended bonus doses to his patients in 2014, during the height of the Disneyland outbreak. But with no active outbreak in the area, he is advising patients to wait.
But some doctors said they were open to early vaccinations even for infants whose daycare classmates travel abroad, as well as families in communities where many parents avoid or space out vaccines.
'I actually recently had a conversation with a parent [who said], 'We're moving our almost one-year-old to a place with a lot of vaccine hesitancy, so we'd like to do an early MMR,'' said Dr. Nelson Branco, an assistant clinical professor of pediatrics at UCSF, who sees patients in Marin County. After searching the local kindergarten vaccination rate, 'I said, 'It's not strictly recommended, but I would give it if you'd like.''
Doctors agree early jabs aren't as effective as later ones, which is why they don't count toward the two-dose series all children need for kindergarten.
That hasn't deterred some pro-inoculation parents on TikTok and Reddit from trading tips on how to snag extra shots for trips to Disney World, even as anti-vax parents smear them as toxic and deadly on the same comment threads.
'Looking through posts [on Reddit], I kept seeing it,' said Angela Owens, a first-time mom in Maryland who underwent a stem cell transplant in 2022 and had not yet gotten a replacement MMR when she got pregnant. 'Continually seeing those posts, it's like, 'Am I worried enough? Am I worried too much?''
Doctors said their experience was the same in clinic.
'I'll be in one room, and I'll talk to a patient for 30 minutes to convince him to get one vaccine, and I'll go to the next room and have someone who is eager to give their kids an extra bonus vaccine,' said Ball, the Orange County pediatrician.
The practice of handing out bonus doses gave some experts pause.
Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said it reminded him of the early days of the COVID vaccine, with part of country refusing vaccination and part of the country collecting so many shots they 'should have had a Pfizer loyalty card.'
'The benefits of waiting until 12 months of age is greater than the largely theoretical risk that you're going to be exposed to someone with measles,' even in a daycare setting where a baby might be exposed to other children who are traveling internationally, he said.
Babies get their earliest 'vaccines' from their mothers, in the form of blood proteins that pass through the placenta in the third trimester. Those maternal antibodies protect infants while their immune system matures. But they can also blunt the affect of the measles vaccine, neutralizing the weakened virus before the baby's body mounts a response.
'There's not a simple formula,' said Dr. William Moss, executive director of the International Vaccine Access Center at Johns Hopkins. 'If you wait longer, a higher proportion of children will develop a protective response. We're weighing that with the child's risk of getting measles.'
In places where measles is common, the World Health Organization recommends the first vaccine at 9 months, when the vast majority of infants will develop immunity. Where it is rare, the recommendation is between 12 and 15 months when nearly all children will.
'There were some very early studies ... that did suggest children who got an early first dose of the measles vaccine had less of a response to a later dose,' Moss said. 'My take on that literature is it was flawed and there were a number of subsequent studies that did not demonstrate that.'
But newer studies have complicated the picture in another way, he said.
The current guidelines were developed at a time when many mothers had immunity from measles infections. Now, most have immunity from the vaccines themselves. Though babies still inherit these maternal measles antibodies, they're weaker and wane sooner than those from wild-type measles, studies show.
The World Health Organization has supported earlier inoculations in some cases, noting in 2020 that babies in countries such as the U.S. 'may become susceptible to measles well before the age of vaccination, but they may also be more likely to develop protective immune responses when vaccinated.'
Babies often get measles from school-age siblings, meaning as vaccine hesitancy spreads — including the practice of spacing or delaying vaccines — so does danger.
'We're seeing a lot more kids in practice that are not being vaccinated,' said Martin, the Florida doctor. 'Maybe only 85% of [2-year-olds] I see in practice are vaccinated, which is concerning.'
She and other experts agreed, the best defense for babies is for everyone else to get their shots on time.
'The bottom line message is people should be vaccinated,' Moss said. 'If enough of the general population is vaccinated, we will protect infants from getting measles through herd immunity. That's what's worked.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm in Addiction Recovery and I Still Drink Wine
I'm in Addiction Recovery and I Still Drink Wine

New York Times

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Times

I'm in Addiction Recovery and I Still Drink Wine

Not long ago, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s history of heroin addiction alone would likely have disqualified him from being considered for a role like secretary of Health and Human Services. Now, however, numerous successful authors, politicians, executives and celebrities talk openly about past substance use disorders. 'Lived experience' even confers additional authority. But there's a caveat to this acceptance. Recovery is still largely viewed as lifelong abstinence — not just forever avoiding the specific substances someone once relied on, but also typically steering clear of all nonmedical drug use besides caffeine and nicotine. Most public recovery stories — like Mr. Kennedy's — are tales of total abstinence, often propelled by participation in 12-step programs like Alcoholics Anonymous. In reality, most people who resolve addictions — including me — do not reject all substance use forever. For example, though I am in recovery from heroin and cocaine addiction, I still occasionally drink alcohol and use marijuana without issue. Though definitions vary, many experts now agree: If substance use no longer interferes with your ability to live a productive and loving life, then recovery has been achieved, with or without abstinence. Still, few people are open about their 'non-abstinent' recovery. Many of us fear that if we disclose the occasional weed gummy or sauvignon blanc with friends, we will be viewed as still in active addiction, and face the stigma that comes with that. The scarcity of recovery stories like mine distorts drug policy. It bolsters the continued dominance of abstinence-only rehabs and recovery housing, which deters many people who could benefit from seeking help. It enables most residential treatment and recovery homes to reject long-term use of the addiction medications like buprenorphine and methadone — the only treatments proven to cut opioid overdose deaths in half — based on the mistaken idea that taking them means a person isn't really sober or in recovery. A recent executive order from the Trump administration makes recognizing non-abstinent recovery more urgent than ever. It proposes defunding a wide range of harm reduction programs that help people use drugs more safely without requiring abstinence, including efforts that provide clean needles or supervised places to use drugs. It also promotes compulsory rehab, which overwhelmingly demands total abstinence. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Not All Ultra-Processed Foods Are Bad for You—These 8 Are Actually Healthy
Not All Ultra-Processed Foods Are Bad for You—These 8 Are Actually Healthy

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Not All Ultra-Processed Foods Are Bad for You—These 8 Are Actually Healthy

New research from the American Heart Association suggests these foods have some benefits. Key Takeaways Ultra-processed foods dominate the U.S. diet and raise heart disease risk, but some—like whole-grain cereals or plain yogurt—can still be healthy. Good picks include frozen produce, low-sodium beans, nuts, and high-fiber cereals, while processed meats, sugary drinks, and refined breads are best limited. Swaps like plain yogurt with fruit or sparkling water, plus smart use of frozen or canned basics, can cut harmful UPFs without losing convenience. If you've noticed a lot of headlines around ultra-processed foods lately, you're not imagining it. There have been several recent studies linking ultra-processed foods (UPFs)—which contain ingredients and chemicals that aren't generally available to a home cook—to a variety of health issues, from cardiovascular disease to risk of premature death. "High UPF intake is widespread and detrimental," says Grace Derocha, RDN, CDCES,spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. "Nearly 60% of U.S. calories come from UPFs—and adolescents fare worst, correlating with poorer heart health scores." But before you clean out your pantry, there is some nuance when it comes to processed foods, according to new research from the American Heart Association. And in fact, some can actually be beneficial to your health. Meet Our Expert Grace Derocha, RDN, CDCES,spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics What the Research Shows Regarding Ultra-Processed Foods The American Health Association found that processed foods that contain additives and chemicals often have other not-so-great ingredients that put you at risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic diseases, and death, including unhealthy fats and added sugars and salts. And processed food takes up more than 70% of what's available at your local grocery store, so it can be harder than you'd expect to avoid them. The American Heart Association recommends limiting your UPF intake and focusing your diet on vegetables, fruits, whole grains, beans, nuts, seeds, healthy oils, and lean proteins. But in this new research, they've taken a stab at defining which UPFs are the most dangerous to your health—and which ones aren't. "Not all UPFs are equally harmful: Items like whole-grain cereals or yogurt may carry lower or even inverse cardiovascular disease risk compared with sugary beverages or processed meats," Derocha says. "The science recognizes the complexity—UPF is a broad category, and context matters. We should differentiate between 'unhealthy UPFs' and more wholesome packaged items." Related: The Difference Between Processed Food and Ultra-Processed Food—and Why It Matters for Health How to Choose Healthier Processed Foods You don't have to give up the convenience of processed foods entirely in order to reduce your risk of negative health effects. Just follow these tips—based on the new research—to help you create a shopping list that'll focus on your health. Opt for "Green-Flag" Processed Foods One of the reasons that ultra-processed foods have proliferated? They make it much simpler to get dinner on the table—just heat and eat. But you don't have to rely on heavily processed foods to simplify your food prep. "Convenience doesn't equal compromise," Derocha says. "Smart choices like frozen produce, canned staples, and wisely selected UPFs can make healthy eating accessible." Among the "green-flagged" processed foods that are considered healthier: Lightly salted and flavored nuts, seeds, and legumes Low-sodium canned beans and legumes Low-sodium canned tuna, salmon, or chicken, packed in water Unsweetened dried fruit Low-sodium whole grain breads and crackers High fiber cereal with minimal sweeteners Plant-based meat and dairy alternatives like soy milk and tofu Frozen produce There are also a few "caution" items that are considered moderately healthy, such as canned fruit in light syrup or juice, hard cheeses, and low-sodium and/or low-fat canned soups or canned beans that contain salt. Minimize "Red-Flag" Foods The American Heart Association chart reviews both processed and unprocessed foods for their potential impacts on cardiovascular health—which includes a list of red-flagged foods that could put your health at risk. "Identifying high-risk UPF subgroups is essential to balancing nutritional goals with the need for accessible and appealing food options," according to the study. "Most UPFs overlap with foods high in saturated fat, added sugars, and sodium, which are already targets for cardiometabolic risk reduction." Processed meats like bacon, chicken nuggets, sausage, and hot dogs, and sugar-sweetened beverages are high on the list of red-flag foods, but you probably won't be surprised by what is on the list: Processed meats, like chicken nuggets, sausage, hot dogs Sugar-sweetened beverages Sweets like cookies, candies, and fruit snacks Cheese products White bread, tortillas, and rolls Ice cream and other dairy-based desserts Frozen meals that contain things on this list (like pizza or instant noodles) Canned fruit in syrup Tortilla or potato-based chips But the paper also called out some minimally processed foods that could be harmful to your health. That list includes: Meat and dairy products, including red meat, pork, butter, beef tallow, and sour cream Natural sweeteners, like sugar, honey, and maple syrup Sweetened dried or canned fruit and brined vegetables French fries Crackers 100% fruit juice Tropical oils, like palm and coconut oil Some of these foods are often on lists of healthier options, and Derocha notes that they may be more of a "sometimes" food, rather than a wholesale ban. "While honey is minimally processed, it's still a concentrated source of sugar—making it less heart-friendly than, say, whole-grain bread or canned beans that offer fiber and nutrients. It's less about processing level and more about overall contributions to cardiovascular health." Make Healthier Swaps If you're looking to reduce your ultra-processed food intake, there are some easy swaps that are just as delicious—and won't raise your health risks. "Try sparkling water flavored with fruit instead of soda; make yogurt parfaits with plain yogurt and fruit instead of pre-sweetened cartons," Derocha suggests. And check the ingredient list. "Look for UPFs that include whole grains, legumes, yogurt, or nuts—not just isolated additives," Derocha says. "Cereals, yogurts, and whole-grain products are among UPFs associated with lower cardiovascular risk." You'll also want to limit or avoid foods that have a huge list of chemicals among their ingredients. "Favor foods with fewer, recognizable ingredients—avoid long lists of additives, emulsifiers, sweeteners," Derocha says. Find Other Ways to Speed Up Meal Prep Choosing minimally processed building blocks like frozen fruits and veggies, canned beans, and frozen whole grains can help you get your meal on the plate faster, Derocha says. "You can also meal prep simple components," she suggests. "Roast a batch of chicken or bake vegetables ahead, then mix and match throughout the week." You can also consider batch cooking, in which you make a larger batch of a favorite dish and freeze the leftovers for a busy weeknight. "Cook once, and eat twice," Derocha says. "Allowing the freezer to be your friend is a great way to be in the driver's seat of what you are consuming." Related: 9 Superfoods That Will Help You Live Longer, According to Dietitians Read the original article on Real Simple

NIH director offers reason for cutting vaccine contracts
NIH director offers reason for cutting vaccine contracts

The Hill

time10 hours ago

  • The Hill

NIH director offers reason for cutting vaccine contracts

Bhattacharya said in a recent episode of the podcast 'War Room' and then again in an opinion piece in The Washington Post, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) chose to cancel millions of dollars in mRNA contracts because the American public does not trust the technology. His reasoning differs from the explanation HHS Secretary Kennedy gave for canceling $500 million worth of mRNA contracts last week. Kennedy justified the move by claiming the technology does not meet 'current scientific standards.' Bhattacharya called mRNA a promising technology that could lead to better treatments for diseases like cancer. But he expressed concern over just how much antigen mRNA vaccines produce and leave in the body, even though other types of vaccines share the same issue and are considered safe and effective. Bhattacharya blamed public distrust in mRNA on vaccine mandates and other public health safety measures issued under the Biden administration, arguing that his administration did not properly address concerns about the vaccine's safety and efficacy. 'As a vaccine intended for broad public use, especially during a public health emergency, the platform has failed a crucial test: earning public trust,' he wrote. 'No matter how elegant the science, a platform that lacks credibility among the people it seeks to protect cannot fulfill its public health mission.' outspoken critic of lockdown measures and vaccine mandates.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store