
Paedophile sports coach (91) becomes one of the oldest people ever jailed in Ireland
A newspaper article published in February 2007 was the trigger that resulted in former sports coach James O'Reilly, last week becoming one of the oldest individuals ever sent to prison in Ireland at the age of 91 for sexually assaulting four young gymnasts under his care.
In the interview, the well-known figure in sporting circles in Arklow, Co Wicklow, through his role as a Community Games organiser and coach of gymnasts and soccer teams, remarked that: 'It my firm belief that they (kids) will not come to any wrong if they are involved in sport.'
Advertisement
Reading those words proved the incentive for one of O'Reilly's victims to report the abuse she suffered from him to gardaí, whose subsequent investigation established that her experience was far from being unique.
At a sitting of Wicklow Circuit Criminal Court last week, the elderly grandfather, who is blind, partially deaf and confined to a wheelchair, was sentenced to 12 months in prison with Judge Terence O'Sullivan branding the nonagenarian as a 'sexual predator.'
Last February, O'Reilly – a widower with two adult children from Fernhill, Arklow, Co Wicklow – pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting four young girls in the south Wicklow town over 30 years ago.
The admissions by the Mullingar native and retired painter and decorator – one in relation to each of his four victims – were made in front of a jury of seven women and five men who had been sworn in to hear his trial at Bray Courthouse.
Advertisement
Just 24 hours earlier, O'Reilly had pleaded not guilty before the same jury to a total of eight charges of indecent or sexual assault and one charge of attempted sexual assault at St Mary's College Sports Hall in Arklow in relation to the same four young females whom he trained.
The offences occurred on dates unknown between January 1st, 1990 and December 31st, 1994, when the accused ran a club for training gymnasts with his late wife, Sadie, who died in December 2021.
Although he became fully blind in 1996, O'Reilly continued to participate in training and organising competitions for the Community Games – a role he began in 1978 – until he stood down just three years ago.
In a victim impact statement, the woman who reported O'Reilly after seeing his interview in the Irish Independent said reading it 18 years ago had given her the drive to pursue getting justice.
Advertisement
She described the article as one which 'glorified' O'Reilly and was all about 'your great deeds which you have done for the children of Arklow.'
'Every cell in my body was repulsed by this interview,' she told the court.
Addressing O'Reilly, she stated: 'You were trusted to provide a safe space for me and the other children. You took this power and used it for your own gratification.'
She added: 'There are no words to describe the level of fear, embarrassment and shame that I experienced that day.'
Advertisement
'The level of fear when you would enter the girls' changing rooms – no child should ever have to experience,' she observed.
The woman said that 30 years later, she still has the same fear of being seen and has to hide away in social situations.
She outlined how she still instinctively folds her arms and covers her chest 'to this very day,' which she said was the same device she would use to protect herself from O'Reilly as a child.
The court heard that the thought of having to stand up as a witness and give evidence in front of a jury had made her physically ill, and she attributed his guilty pleas to 'a stroke of divine intervention.'
Advertisement
As a mother now of three young girls, the woman explained how she had repeatedly refused requests from one of her daughters to join her friends in gymnastics.
'In my eyes, once you put on a leotard, you became a target,' she commented.
The woman, who is now in her 40s, said it was only when her own daughter turned nine that she realised the true extent of what O'Reilly had inflicted on her.
She also accused the former coach of robbing her of the joyful experience of parenting because she sensed danger for her own children when there was none, because of the sexual abuse she suffered.
'Due to your actions, my thoughts were that people in authority did not have good intentions,' she remarked.
In a separate victim impact statement, another woman (42) said the trauma of what happened never goes away.
'I learned to deal with it as a child, but I never thought I would carry it through to my adult life,' she remarked.
She added: 'No person should ever have to go through that sort of trauma or carry that shame through their life because of the actions of another person.'
Although the woman welcomed the fact that she had got justice for herself and others, she acknowledged that O'Reilly's age and illnesses would be taken into account in sentencing him.
She continued: 'I want to state that my age wasn't taken into account when he chose to lay his hands on me many years ago.'
Another of O'Reilly's victims, who was abused when she was about eight, told the court that she had been left 'extremely confused, frightened and ashamed' by what he did to her.
The woman said she did not tell any adult about what happened as she did not have the words or understanding at such a young age.
'I knew what O'Reilly had done to me was wrong. I carried the weight of that secret for years,' she added.
The court heard that discovering at 16 that she was not O'Reilly's only victim caused her both relief and anger.
She continued: 'Relief that I wasn't alone but deep sadness and anger that this had happened to more children; that other adults were aware at the time and that he had been allowed to continue holding positions or respect and influence in our community.'
The woman said she found it 'devastating' when O'Reilly was given a 'People of the Millennium' award for his work with children in Arklow.
She told the court that she could still describe to this day what the accused's hands look like.
'The experience changed the course of my life. It stole a sense of safety, trust and joy that every child deserves,' she added.
She expressed hope that with the court case that O'Reilly's name could be recorded for what he is – 'a prolific abuser of children.'
Speaking after O'Reilly was sentenced to 12 months in prison, one of his victims who had told the court she expected he would not be jailed because of his age said it was hard to see an elderly man being wheeled out of court by prison guards.
However, she added, 'That same man was not sorry for what he had done to us. He showed absolutely no remorse.'
The four victims also said they had been let down by others in Arklow who knew what O'Reilly was doing but who chose to protect him rather than vulnerable young children.
Ireland
Former gymnastics coach (91) pleads guilty to sexu...
Read More
'It's bittersweet. I do feel down, as it was widely known within the community. We were just little girls, and people chose to turn a blind eye,' said one woman.
'I don't feel like this is a celebration, but we finally got our justice,' she observed.
O'Reilly, who was born on New Year's Day in 1934, is likely to mark his 92nd birthday in prison.
If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can call the national 24-hour Rape C
ri
sis Helpline at 1800-77 8888, access text service and webchat options at drcc.ie/services/helpline/ or visit Rape C
ri
sis Help
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
43 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Court throws out damages case brought over wheelbarrow injury
A High Court judge has thrown out a case brought by a former stablehand who wanted damages for hurting his back while emptying a wheelbarrow. Mark Lawless brought proceedings over a March 9th, 2016 incident at Rossmore Cottage Stables in The Curragh, Co Kildare, where he was employed by racehorse trainer Adrian Keatley. Advertisement Mr Lawless, who now works as an auctioneer, sought compensation from Mr Keatley for injury he allegedly sustained to his back when he emptied soiled hay from a wheelbarrow. In a judgment, Mr Justice Michael Twomey said this incident was an 'everyday misfortunate mishap' for which Mr Keatley was not liable, and dismissed Mr Lawless' case. Mr Lawless left his job as a stable hand after about 6 to 8 weeks of work at Mr Keatley's stables, and currently works as an auctioneer. The judge noted that the Supreme Court previously ruled that courts should approach personal injury claims with 'common sense' and 'some degree of scepticism'. Advertisement In this vein, the judge said it was his view that if the wheelbarrow incident occurred in Mr Lawless' own garden, it would be regarded as an 'accident', with no one to blame. This approach is also relevant in considering the evidence of expert witnesses called during the hearing. 'A court does not require an engineer to tell it that one should empty a wheelbarrow on the flat, and not try to empty a wheelbarrow on an upward incline, since this is basic common sense,' the judge said. The judge also said it was his view that Mr Lawless was mistaken in the recollection of the incident: on the balance of probabilities, he emptied the wheelbarrow on a flat surface, rather than – as Mr Lawless said during the hearing of the case – an incline. Ireland Boy who claimed he broke his arm on astro turf pit... Read More Emptying the wheelbarrow on an incline is 'unorthodox', the judge said. 'If he had done so, in this court's view, he would have made that claim in his pleadings.' Advertisement Even if Mr Lawless' recollection was correct, the judge said, he was not entitled to make that claim at the hearing. He also said Mr Lawless had a responsibility to ensure the surface he was emptying the wheelbarrow on was flat. 'If he failed to do so and then decided to roll a wheelbarrow up an incline and seek to empty it on that incline, any injury to his back is not the responsibility of his employer,' the judge said. The judge said it was his preliminary view that the costs of the proceedings at both the High Court and the Circuit Court should be awarded against Mr Lawless. The case had been before the court as an appeal from the Circuit Court.


BreakingNews.ie
43 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man who was banned from Ireland for 20 years to face fitness to plead hearing
A man charged with breaching a court order which banned him from visiting Ireland for 20 years is to face a fitness to plead hearing next week. Matthew Notman of Laburnam House, Laburnam Avenue, Kirkby in Nottingham in the UK, appeared before a sitting of Skibbereen District Court in west Cork in January of this year. Advertisement His appearance in court followed an alleged breach of an order made at Cork Circuit Criminal Court on June 30th, 2022. The order was that Mr Notman was prohibited from communicating directly, or indirectly with a woman living in West Cork. He was also ordered to stay out of Ireland for two decades. Sgt Tom Mulcahy previously told Skibbereen District Court that the accusation was that Mr Notman communicated with the woman on Facebook Messenger on November 13th and 14th, 2024. It was also alleged that Mr Notman entered Ireland by ferry from the UK on November 10th, 2024. The case was sent forward to Cork Circuit Criminal Court. Advertisement World Champion Irish jockey (29) charged with drink driv... Read More Thursday a sitting of Cork Circuit Criminal Court heard from defence barrister, Paula McCarthy, BL. Ms McCarthy said that a report from the Central Mental Hospital found that Mr Notman is not fit to enter a plea. A fitness to plead hearing will take place on July 3rd next at Cork Circuit Criminal Court. Judge Helen Boyle was told that the State accepted the findings of the report from the Central Mental Hospital. Judge Boyle said that she was willing to hear evidence from witnesses via video link next week if such a need arises. Free legal aid was previously granted to the accused.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Dad who killed baby in Ramsgate 'wanted her to stop crying'
A dad who shook his five-week-old baby daughter to death "just wanted her to stop crying" and should not be found guilty of murder, his defence lawyer told a prosecutors said Thomas Holford, who "lost his temper" and "became unstable" from smoking multiple cannabis joints, would have been aware that his actions would have seriously injured Everleigh Holford, 24, admits manslaughter but denies murder and assault causing actual bodily died when her life support was turned off a year after the attack in April 2021 which left her with severe injuries to her brain, ribs and legs. During closing speeches, defence barrister Jo Martin KC told Canterbury Crown Court her client showed no planning, premeditation or motive before killing his said: "This cack-handed, cannabis-fuelled young man would try everything he would normally do to work out why she was crying and then he would move on to stopping that crying."If you agree that it is possible that in Tom Holford's head, in that moment when he was shaking Everleigh for a matter of seconds, there was simply and only a wish for her to stop crying, then it follows that a correct verdict would be not guilty to murder." 'Really serious harm' However, prosecution barrister Eloise Marshall KC told the court that Mr Holford "would have known he would have caused that child really serious harm" by shaking her with "extreme force"."He is causing her ribs to break. Even that act on its own is enough to show that he intended really serious harm."The trial continues.